When Does Voice Have to be More Than Only Listening? Procedural Justice Effects as a Function of Confident Leadership

2010 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 69-78 ◽  
Author(s):  
David De Cremer ◽  
Maarten Wubben
Keyword(s):  
Procedural Justice ◽  
Interaction Effect ◽  
Laboratory Experiments ◽  
Negative Emotions

The present research examined how voice procedures and leader confidence affect participants’ negative emotions and willingness to withdraw. It was predicted that receiving voice would be valued out of instrumental concerns, but only when the enacting leader was high in confidence. Two laboratory experiments indeed showed an interaction between type of voice (pre-decisional vs. post-decisional) and leader’s confidence (low vs. high) on participants’ negative emotions and willingness to withdraw. In particular, post-decision voice only led to more negative responses than did pre-decision voice when the enacting leader was high in confidence. Negative emotions mediated this interaction effect of type of voice on willingness to withdraw. Implications for integrating the leadership and procedural justice literatures are discussed.

Do the Compensatory Effects of Outcome and Procedure on Policy Acceptance Depend on Trust in Authority?

2015 ◽  
Vol 43 (9) ◽  
pp. 1429-1440 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xuan-Na Wu ◽  
Xue Wu
Keyword(s):  
Public Policy ◽  
Procedural Justice ◽  
Public Administration ◽  
Interaction Effect ◽  
Chinese University ◽  
Outcome Favorability ◽  
Negative Effect ◽  
Fair Procedure ◽  
Practical Implications ◽  
Policy Setting

Previous researchers have shown that procedural justice and outcome favorability interact to influence people's beliefs and behaviors. When an outcome is unfavorable, people tend to respond more positively to policies with fair procedures. We conducted 2 studies to explore the influence of trust in authority on process-by-outcome interaction in public administration in China. In each study, there was a different public policy setting, and different designs and participants (i.e., a scenario tested with Chinese university students in Study 1 and a survey conducted with residents of a city in China in Study 2). The convergent results showed that the interaction between procedural justice and outcome favorability was moderated by trust in authority. When the level of trust was high, the interaction effect was significant, and a fair procedure attenuated the negative effect of an unfavorable outcome. However, when there was little trust, the interaction was absent. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.

Influence of Emotions on the Acceptance of an Oil Drilling Project

2017 ◽  
Vol 50 (3) ◽  
pp. 324-349 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cristina Ruiz ◽  
Rosario Marrero ◽  
Bernardo Hernández
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Procedural Justice ◽  
Perceived Risk ◽  
Structural Equation ◽  
Local Community ◽  
Negative Emotions ◽  
Final Decision ◽  
Perceived Benefits ◽  
Oil Drilling ◽  
Drilling Project

In 2014, the Canary Islands were exposed to a decision-making process for an oil drilling project 80 kilometers offshore. Whereas the national government was in favor of oil drilling, the local government was against it because of the environmental impact, and the effect on tourism and the coastal ecosystem. In this study, we analyze the reactions of the local community to this project by connecting beliefs, perceived benefits, perceived risk, procedural justice, negative emotions, and acceptance through a tested structural equation model. The results showed that acceptance was essentially explained by perceived benefits and negative emotions, whereas perceived benefits and procedural justice predicted negative emotions. Several differences between males and females were found. These results are discussed in relation to the importance of understanding the effects and emotional reactions of this type of project on the population before the final decision making.

Effects of Modulated Emotion and Facial Masking Encounter on Personal Distance

2020 ◽  
pp. 003151252097351
Author(s):  
Natsuo Sakuma ◽  
Kazunari Ikeda
Keyword(s):  
Interaction Effect ◽  
Positive Emotion ◽  
Negative Emotion ◽  
Negative Emotions ◽  
Personal Space ◽  
Interpersonal Behavior ◽  
Emotional States ◽  
Interpersonal Distance ◽  
Insight Into ◽  
Positive And Negative Emotions

In this study, we examined the effects of participants’ emotional states on personal space when an approaching person’s face was either masked or unmasked. We used the participants’ uncomfortable stop-distance as our method of measuring personal space. Inducing a positive emotion narrowed perceived personal space, whereas inducing a negative emotion widened personal space. For both positive and negative emotions, the perceived interpersonal distance was shorter when the approaching face was unmasked than masked. There was no interaction effect on personal space between induced affect and masking or unmasking the approaching face. This study might provide insight into interpersonal behavior during a pandemic juncture.

scholarly journals Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on sustainable consumption

2021 ◽  
Vol 49 (6) ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Myoung-Jin Chae
Keyword(s):  
Infectious Disease ◽  
Laboratory Experiments ◽  
Negative Emotions ◽  
Sustainable Consumption ◽  
Laundry Detergent ◽  
Health And Safety ◽  
Perceived Threat ◽  
Socially Responsible ◽  
Consumption Behavior

Recent findings on COVID-19 indicate that during a pandemic consumers focus on themselves and protection of their health and safety as an immediate major concern. However, there is little understanding of how the perceived threat of an infectious disease influences sustainable consumption behavior. Through a series of laboratory experiments on chocolate bar and laundry detergent choices, I found that the COVID-19 pandemic increased consumers' perceived threat, leading to a decrease in sustainable (vs. nonsustainable) products. Further, the results of a survey comprising 402 U.S. consumers show that perceived threat from the pandemic increased their self-centeredness, the effects of which were driven by a series of consequence-related negative emotions. My findings provide insights for firms promoting socially responsible products and citizens who consider sustainability a major long-term concern.

Joking about ourselves: Effects of disparaging humor on ingroup stereotyping

2016 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 568-583 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catalina Argüello Gutiérrez ◽  
Hugo Carretero-Dios ◽  
Guillermo B. Willis ◽  
Miguel Moya
Keyword(s):  
University Students ◽  
Interaction Effect ◽  
Negative Emotions ◽  
Ingroup Identification ◽  
Traditional Pattern ◽  
Text Condition

In three studies, we examined whether ingroup disparaging humor leads to greater stereotyping of the ingroup. First, in Study 1, ( N = 101) university students were exposed to (a) ingroup disparaging humor, (b) neutral humor, or (c) ingroup disparaging nonhumorous text. Participants exposed to disparaging humor reported more stereotypic evaluations than those in the neutral humor or disparaging text condition. Study 2 ( N = 167) replicated these findings with humor conditions (disparaging vs. neutral) and showed that ingroup identification moderated the effects of the type of humor. Low identifiers exposed to ingroup disparaging humor (vs. those in the control condition) reported a greater frequency of stereotypic evaluations, whereas the manipulation did not affect high identifiers. Finally, Study 3 ( N = 153) also manipulated the source of the jokes. As in Study 2, we found an interaction effect showing that high identifiers were not affected by the manipulation, whereas for low identifiers disparaging humor increased stereotyping and led to more negative emotions toward the ingroup. No significant effects were found for source of the jokes. We discuss findings in terms of how the traditional pattern of humor facilitating outgroup stereotyping also seems to apply to ingroup stereotyping.

scholarly journals The Effect of Sanction Severity and Its Interaction With Procedural Justice

2021 ◽  
pp. 009385482110383
Author(s):  
Franziska M. Yasrebi-De Kom ◽  
Anja J. E. Dirkzwager ◽  
Peter H. Van Der Laan ◽  
Paul Nieuwbeerta
Keyword(s):  
Longitudinal Study ◽  
Procedural Justice ◽  
Interaction Effect ◽  
Situational Factors ◽  
Added Value ◽  
Deterrent Effect ◽  
Recent Scholarship ◽  
Situational Characteristics ◽  
Justice Perceptions ◽  
First Time

Recent scholarship suggests that detention may have differential effects depending on situational factors. This longitudinal study tests an integrative theoretical framework with the aim to identify conditions under which detention deters from subsequent rule-violating behavior. We examined whether effects of experienced sanction severity on subsequent misconduct and reoffending behavior are dependent on procedural justice perceptions among Dutch adults in detention ( n = 763 and n = 765, respectively). The deterrent effect of sanction severity on misconduct was dependent on procedural justice. Increased sanction severity only deterred from subsequent misconduct when treatment was perceived as procedurally neutral to just. For individuals who were detained for the first time, a similar interaction effect was observed for reoffending behavior. The results support the added value of integrating deterrence theory with situational characteristics (i.e., procedural justice) to explain sanctioning effects and suggest that correctional staffs’ relationships with individuals in detention can contribute to order in prison and beyond.

Police bias and diminished trust in police: a role for procedural justice?

2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Natasha S. Madon ◽  
Kristina Murphy
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Procedural Justice ◽  
Interaction Effect ◽  
Design Methodology ◽  
Significant Interaction Effect ◽  
Content Type ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Positive Effect ◽  
Sydney Australia ◽  
Trust In Police

PurposeSince 9/11, Muslims have experienced discrimination and scrutiny from authorities. For many, this experience has damaged their trust in law enforcement and left them with the impression that they are viewed as suspect. This study seeks to better understand the relationship between Muslims' perceived police bias and trust, and how procedural justice may shape this relationship.Design/methodology/approachThe authors collected survey data from 398 Muslims in Sydney, Australia, as part of a larger study on immigrants' views of police. Participants were surveyed on a range of topics including contact with police, global assessments of police procedural justice and how they believe police treat their cultural group.FindingsOverall, the authors find that the extent to which people perceive police bias is associated with their level of trust in police. Greater preconceived bias is associated with lower trust in police. The authors also find that perceiving police as procedurally just is positively related to trust. Importantly, this study finds a significant interaction effect between perceptions of police bias and procedural justice on Muslims' trust in police. Specifically, for those who hold the view that police are unbiased, perceiving police as generally procedural just has a strong positive effect on trust. For those who view police as biased against Muslims, procedural justice has a weak but positive effect on trust. This interaction effect suggests that perceived bias may shape how Muslims interpret police treatment of Muslims.Originality/valueThis study is the first to explore how perceived police bias and perceptions of procedural justice predict and interact to shape Muslims' trust in police, advancing existing procedural justice policing scholarship.

scholarly journals The Effect of Sanction Severity and Its Interaction With Procedural Justice

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Franziska Yasrebi ◽  
Anja Dirkzwager ◽  
Peter van der Laan ◽  
Paul Nieuwbeerta
Keyword(s):  
Longitudinal Study ◽  
Procedural Justice ◽  
Interaction Effect ◽  
Situational Factors ◽  
Added Value ◽  
Deterrent Effect ◽  
Recent Scholarship ◽  
Situational Characteristics ◽  
Justice Perceptions ◽  
First Time

Recent scholarship suggests that detention may have differential effects depending on situational factors. This longitudinal study tests an integrative theoretical framework with the aim to identify the conditions under which detention deters from subsequent rule-violating behavior. We examined whether the effects of experienced sanction severity on subsequent misconduct/reoffending behavior are dependent on procedural justice perceptions among Dutch adults in detention (n = 763 and n = 765). The deterrent effect of sanction severity on misconduct was dependent on procedural justice. Increased sanction severity only deterred from subsequent misconduct when treatment was perceived as procedurally neutral to just. For individuals that were detained for the first time, a similar interaction effect was observed for their reoffending behavior. The results support the added value of integrating deterrence theory with situational characteristics (i.e., procedural justice) to explain sanctioning effects and suggest that correctional staffs’ relationships with individuals in detention can contribute to order in prison and beyond.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document