scholarly journals HCF-1 promotes cell cycle progression by regulating the expression of CDC42

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Pan Xiang ◽  
Fei Li ◽  
Zhihua Ma ◽  
Jiping Yue ◽  
Cailing Lu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Rho Gtpases ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Eukaryotic Cell ◽  
Transcription Start ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Cellular Processes ◽  
Host Cell Factor 1 ◽  
Regulation Mode

Abstract The eukaryotic cell cycle involves a highly orchestrated series of events in which the cellular genome is replicated during a synthesis (S) phase and each of the two resulting copies are segregated properly during mitosis (M). Host cell factor-1 (HCF-1) is a transcriptional co-regulator that is essential for and has been implicated in basic cellular processes, such as transcriptional regulation and cell cycle progression. Although a series of HCF-1 transcriptional targets have been identified, few functional clues have been provided, especially for chromosome segregation. Our results showed that HCF-1 activated CDC42 expression by binding to the −881 to −575 region upstream of the CDC42 transcription start site, and the regulation of CDC42 expression by HCF-1 was correlated with cell cycle progression. The overexpression of a spontaneously cycling and constitutively active CDC42 mutant (CDC42F28L) rescued G1 phase delay and multinucleate defects in mitosis upon the loss of HCF-1. Therefore, these results establish that HCF-1 ensures proper cell cycle progression by regulating the expression of CDC42, which indicates a possible mechanism of cell cycle coordination and the regulation mode of typical Rho GTPases.

Cyclin specificity: how many wheels do you need on a unicycle?

2001 ◽  
Vol 114 (10) ◽  
pp. 1811-1820 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.E. Miller ◽  
F.R. Cross
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Subcellular Localization ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Eukaryotic Cell ◽  
Cyclin Dependent Kinase ◽  
Temporal Expression ◽  
Cycle Progression

Cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) activity is essential for eukaryotic cell cycle events. Multiple cyclins activate CDKs in all eukaryotes, but it is unclear whether multiple cyclins are really required for cell cycle progression. It has been argued that cyclins may predominantly act as simple enzymatic activators of CDKs; in opposition to this idea, it has been argued that cyclins might target the activated CDK to particular substrates or inhibitors. Such targeting might occur through a combination of factors, including temporal expression, protein associations, and subcellular localization.

scholarly journals Non‐redundant functions of H2A.Z.1 and H2A.Z.2 in chromosome segregation and cell cycle progression

EMBO Reports ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raquel Sales‐Gil ◽  
Dorothee C Kommer ◽  
Ines J Castro ◽  
Hasnat A Amin ◽  
Veronica Vinciotti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Redundant Functions

scholarly journals Regulation of cell cycle drivers by Cullin-RING ubiquitin ligases

2020 ◽  
Vol 52 (10) ◽  
pp. 1637-1651 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sang-Min Jang ◽  
Christophe E. Redon ◽  
Bhushan L. Thakur ◽  
Meriam K. Bahta ◽  
Mirit I. Aladjem
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Ubiquitin Ligases ◽  
Anaphase Promoting Complex ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Cellular Processes ◽  
Cellular Pathways ◽  
Regulation Of Cell Cycle ◽  
F Box Protein

Abstract The last decade has revealed new roles for Cullin-RING ubiquitin ligases (CRLs) in a myriad of cellular processes, including cell cycle progression. In addition to CRL1, also named SCF (SKP1-Cullin 1-F box protein), which has been known for decades as an important factor in the regulation of the cell cycle, it is now evident that all eight CRL family members are involved in the intricate cellular pathways driving cell cycle progression. In this review, we summarize the structure of CRLs and their functions in driving the cell cycle. We focus on how CRLs target key proteins for degradation or otherwise alter their functions to control the progression over the various cell cycle phases leading to cell division. We also summarize how CRLs and the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C) ligase complex closely cooperate to govern efficient cell cycle progression.

scholarly journals Tyr198 is the Essential Autophosphorylation Site for STK16 Localization and Kinase Activity

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (19) ◽  
pp. 4852 ◽  
Author(s):  
Junjun Wang ◽  
Juanjuan Liu ◽  
Xinmiao Ji ◽  
Xin Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Kinase Activity ◽  
Kinase Domain ◽  
Serine Threonine Kinase ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Threonine Kinase ◽  
Cellular Processes ◽  
Activation Segment ◽  
And Function

STK16, reported as a Golgi localized serine/threonine kinase, has been shown to participate in multiple cellular processes, including the TGF-β signaling pathway, TGN protein secretion and sorting, as well as cell cycle and Golgi assembly regulation. However, the mechanisms of the regulation of its kinase activity remain underexplored. It was known that STK16 is autophosphorylated at Thr185, Ser197, and Tyr198 of the activation segment in its kinase domain. We found that STK16 localizes to the cell membrane and the Golgi throughout the cell cycle, but mutations in the auto-phosphorylation sites not only alter its subcellular localization but also affect its kinase activity. In particular, the Tyr198 mutation alone significantly reduced the kinase activity of STK16, abolished its Golgi and membrane localization, and affected the cell cycle progression. This study demonstrates that a single site autophosphorylation of STK16 could affect its localization and function, which provides insights into the molecular regulatory mechanism of STK16’s kinase activity.

scholarly journals Escherichia coli Cytotoxic Necrotizing Factor 1 Blocks Cell Cycle G2/M Transition in Uroepithelial Cells

2006 ◽  
Vol 74 (7) ◽  
pp. 3765-3772 ◽  
Author(s):  
Loredana Falzano ◽  
Perla Filippini ◽  
Sara Travaglione ◽  
Alessandro Giamboi Miraglia ◽  
Alessia Fabbri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Rho Gtpases ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Cyclin B1 ◽  
Eukaryotic Cell ◽  
Cytotoxic Necrotizing Factor ◽  
Cytoskeleton Organization ◽  
Protein Toxin ◽  
Cytotoxic Necrotizing Factor 1

ABSTRACT Evidence is accumulating that a growing number of bacterial toxins act by modulating the eukaryotic cell cycle machinery. In this context, we provide evidence that a protein toxin named cytotoxic necrotizing factor 1 (CNF1) from uropathogenic Escherichia coli is able to block cell cycle G2/M transition in the uroepithelial cell line T24. CNF1 permanently activates the small GTP-binding proteins of the Rho family that, beside controlling the actin cytoskeleton organization, also play a pivotal role in a large number of other cellular processes, including cell cycle regulation. The results reported here show that CNF1 is able to induce the accumulation of cells in the G2/M phase by sequestering cyclin B1 in the cytoplasm and down-regulating its expression. The possible role played by the Rho GTPases in the toxin-induced cell cycle deregulation has been investigated and discussed. The activity of CNF1 on cell cycle progression can offer a novel view of E. coli pathogenicity.

Epigenetic dynamics across the cell cycle

2010 ◽  
Vol 48 ◽  
pp. 107-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tony Bou Kheir ◽  
Anders H. Lund
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Current Knowledge ◽  
Chromatin Condensation ◽  
Chromatin Modifications ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Daughter Cells ◽  
Mammalian Cell Cycle ◽  
Regulate Cell Cycle Progression

Progression of the mammalian cell cycle depends on correct timing and co-ordination of a series of events, which are managed by the cellular transcriptional machinery and epigenetic mechanisms governing genome accessibility. Epigenetic chromatin modifications are dynamic across the cell cycle, and are shown to influence and be influenced by cell-cycle progression. Chromatin modifiers regulate cell-cycle progression locally by controlling the expression of individual genes and globally by controlling chromatin condensation and chromosome segregation. The cell cycle, on the other hand, ensures a correct inheritance of epigenetic chromatin modifications to daughter cells. In this chapter, we summarize the current knowledge on the dynamics of epigenetic chromatin modifications during progression of the cell cycle.

scholarly journals A fission yeast homolog of CDC20/p55CDC/Fizzy is required for recovery from DNA damage and genetically interacts with p34cdc2.

1997 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 742-750 ◽  
Author(s):  
T Matsumoto
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Fission Yeast ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Eukaryotic Cell ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Cell Cycle Delay ◽  
Successful Recovery ◽  
Synthetically Lethal

Successful recovery from DNA damage requires coordination of several biological processes. Eukaryotic cell cycle progression is delayed when the cells encounter DNA-damaging agents. This cell cycle delay allows the cells to cope with DNA damage by utilizing DNA repair enzymes. Thus, at least two processes, induction of the cell cycle delay and repair of damaged DNA, are coordinately required for recovery. In this study, a fission yeast rad mutant (slp1-362) was genetically investigated. In response to radiation, slp1 stops cell division; however, it does not restart it. This defect is suppressed when slp1-362 is combined with wee1-50 or cdc2-3w; in these mutants, the onset of mitosis is advanced due to the premature activation of p34cdc2. In contrast, slp1 is synthetically lethal with cdc25, nim1/cdr1, or cdr2, all of which are unable to activate the p34cdc2 kinase correctly. These genetic interactions of slp1 with cdc2 and its modulators imply that slp1 is not defective in either "induction of cell cycle delay" or "DNA repair." slp1+ may be involved in a critical process which restarts cell cycle progression after the completion of DNA repair. Molecular cloning of slp1+ revealed that slp1+ encodes a putative 488-amino-acid polypeptide exhibiting significant homology to WD-domain proteins, namely, CDC20 (budding yeast), p55CDC (human), and Fizzy (fly). A possible role of slp1+ is proposed.

scholarly journals Mechanosensitive Expression of Lamellipodin Governs Cell Cycle Progression and Intracellular Stiffness

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph A. Brazzo ◽  
Kwonmoo Lee ◽  
Yongho Bae
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Proliferation ◽  
Cell Migration ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Cellular Processes ◽  
M Phase ◽  
And Migration ◽  
In Cells

SUMMARYCells exhibit pathological behaviors in response to increased extracellular matrix (ECM) stiffness, including accelerated cell proliferation and migration [1–9], which are correlated with increased intracellular stiffness and tension [2, 3, 10–12]. The biomechanical signal transduction of ECM stiffness into relevant molecular signals and resultant cellular processes is mediated through multiple proteins associated with the actin cytoskeleton in lamellipodia [2, 3, 10, 11, 13]. However, the molecular mechanisms by which lamellipodial dynamics regulate cellular responses to ECM stiffening remain unclear. Previous work described that lamellipodin, a phosphoinositide- and actin filament-binding protein that is known mostly for controlling cell migration [14–21], promotes ECM stiffness-mediated early cell cycle progression [2], revealing a potential commonality between the mechanisms controlling stiffness-dependent cell migration and those controlling cell proliferation. However, i) whether and how ECM stiffness affects the levels of lamellipodin expression and ii) whether stiffness-mediated lamellipodin expression is required throughout cell cycle progression and for intracellular stiffness have not been explored. Here, we show that the levels of lamellipodin expression in cells are significantly increased by a stiff ECM and that this stiffness-mediated lamellipodin upregulation persistently stimulates cell cycle progression and intracellular stiffness throughout the cell cycle, from the early G1 phase to M phase. Finally, we show that both Rac activation and intracellular stiffening are required for the mechanosensitive induction of lamellipodin. More specifically, inhibiting Rac1 activation in cells on stiff ECM reduces the levels of lamellipodin expression, and this effect is reversed by the overexpression of activated Rac1 in cells on soft ECM. We thus propose that lamellipodin is a critical molecular lynchpin in the control of mechanosensitive cell cycle progression and intracellular stiffness.

scholarly journals Src-transformed cells hijack mitosis to extrude from the epithelium

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katarzyna A. Anton ◽  
Mihoko Kajita ◽  
Rika Narumi ◽  
Yasuyuki Fujita ◽  
Masazumi Tada
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Apical Part ◽  
Transformed Cells ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Cellular Processes ◽  
Initial Stage ◽  
Apical Extrusion

AbstractAt the initial stage of carcinogenesis single mutated cells appear within an epithelium. Mammalian in vitro experiments show that potentially cancerous cells undergo live apical extrusion from normal monolayers. However, the mechanism underlying this process in vivo remains poorly understood. Mosaic expression of the oncogene vSrc in a simple epithelium of the early zebrafish embryo results in apical extrusion of transformed cells. Here we find that during extrusion components of the cytokinetic ring are recruited to adherens junctions of transformed cells, stimulating formation of a misoriented pseudo cytokinetic ring. During extrusion, the ring constricts and separates the basal from the apical part of the cell releasing both from the epithelium. This process requires cell cycle progression and occurs immediately after vSrc-transformed cell enters mitosis. To achieve extrusion, vSrc coordinates cell cycle progression, junctional integrity, cell survival and apicobasal polarity. Without vSrc, modulating these cellular processes reconstitutes vSrc-like extrusion, confirming their sufficiency for this process.

scholarly journals Nek5 promotes centrosome integrity in interphase and loss of centrosome cohesion in mitosis

2015 ◽  
Vol 209 (3) ◽  
pp. 339-348 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suzanna L. Prosser ◽  
Navdeep K. Sahota ◽  
Laurence Pelletier ◽  
Ciaran G. Morrison ◽  
Andrew M. Fry
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Primary Cilia ◽  
Microtubule Nucleation ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Spindle Formation ◽  
Mitotic Entry ◽  
Bipolar Spindle ◽  
Centrosome Separation

Nek5 is a poorly characterized member of the NIMA-related kinase family, other members of which play roles in cell cycle progression and primary cilia function. Here, we show that Nek5, similar to Nek2, localizes to the proximal ends of centrioles. Depletion of Nek5 or overexpression of kinase-inactive Nek5 caused unscheduled separation of centrosomes in interphase, a phenotype also observed upon overexpression of active Nek2. However, separated centrosomes that resulted from Nek5 depletion remained relatively close together, exhibited excess recruitment of the centrosome linker protein rootletin, and had reduced levels of Nek2. In addition, Nek5 depletion led to loss of PCM components, including γ-tubulin, pericentrin, and Cdk5Rap2, with centrosomes exhibiting reduced microtubule nucleation. Upon mitotic entry, Nek5-depleted cells inappropriately retained centrosome linker components and exhibited delayed centrosome separation and defective chromosome segregation. Hence, Nek5 is required for the loss of centrosome linker proteins and enhanced microtubule nucleation that lead to timely centrosome separation and bipolar spindle formation in mitosis.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document