scholarly journals The feasibility of pancreatic duct stenting using a novel 4-Fr plastic stent with a 0.025-in. guidewire

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazumasa Nagai ◽  
Atsushi Sofuni ◽  
Takayoshi Tsuchiya ◽  
Kentaro Ishii ◽  
Reina Tanaka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Propensity Score ◽  
Pancreatic Duct ◽  
Propensity Score Matching ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Amylase Level ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Plastic Stent ◽  
Technical Success Rate ◽  
Pancreatic Duct Stenting

AbstractPancreatic duct stenting is a well-established method for reducing post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis. However, there is no consensus on the optimal type of plastic stent. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of a new 4-Fr plastic stent for pancreatic duct stenting. Forty-nine consecutive patients who placed the 4-Fr stent into the pancreatic duct (4Fr group) were compared with 187 consecutive patients who placed a conventional 5-Fr stent (control group). The primary outcome was technical success. Complications rate, including post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) were the secondary outcomes. Propensity score matching was introduced to reduce selection bias. The technical success rate was 100% in the 4Fr group and 97.9% in the control group (p = 0.315). Post-ERCP amylase level was significantly lower in the 4-Fr group than the control group before propensity score matching (p = 0.006), though without statistical significance after propensity score matching (p = 0.298). The rate of PEP in the 4Fr group (6.1%) was lower than the control group (15.5%), though without statistical significance before (p = 0.088) and after (p = 1.00) propensity score matching. Pancreatic duct stenting using a novel 4-Fr plastic stent would be at least similar or more feasible and safe compared to the conventional plastic stent.

scholarly journals Bicyclol for the treatment of drug-induced liver injury: a propensity score matching analysis using a nationwide inpatient database

2021 ◽  
Vol 49 (4) ◽  
pp. 030006052110059
Author(s):  
Yongfeng Wang ◽  
Rongtao Lai ◽  
Peilan Zong ◽  
Qingling Xu ◽  
Jia Shang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Liver Injury ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Propensity Score Matching ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Time Interval ◽  
Potential Candidate ◽  
Drug Induced ◽  
Drug Induced Liver Injury ◽  
Propensity Score Matching Analysis

ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of bicyclol in patients with drug-induced liver injury (DILI) using a nationwide database.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of DILI patients in the DILI-R database. Propensity score matching was performed to balance the bicyclol and control groups, and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) recovery was compared between the two groups. Factors associated with ALT recovery and safety were identified.ResultsThe analysis included the data of 25,927 patients. Eighty-seven cases were included in the bicyclol group, with 932 cases in the control group. One-to-one propensity score matching created 86 matched pairs. The ALT normalization rate in the bicyclol group was significantly higher than that in the control group (50.00% vs. 24.42%), and statistical significance was found in the superiority test. After adjustment of baseline ALT levels, baseline total bilirubin levels, sex, age, acute or chronic liver diseases, and suspected drugs in the multivariate logic regression analysis, the major influencing factors for ALT recovery included the time interval between ALT tests (days) and the group factor (bicyclol treatment). There were no differences in the proportion of renal function impairment or blood abnormalities between the two groups.ConclusionsBicyclol is a potential candidate for DILI.

scholarly journals Effects of Polymyxin B Hemoperfusion on Septic Shock Patients Requiring Noradrenaline: Analysis of a Nationwide Administrative Database in Japan

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Kenji Fujimori ◽  
Kunio Tarasawa ◽  
Kiyohide Fushimi
Keyword(s):  
Septic Shock ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Propensity Score Matching ◽  
Polymyxin B ◽  
Administrative Database ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Continuous Hemodiafiltration ◽  
Significant Survival ◽  
Maximum Daily Dose ◽  
Polymyxin B Hemoperfusion

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Polymyxin B hemoperfusion (PMX) reduces endotoxin in septic shock patients’ blood and can improve hemodynamics and organ functions. However, its effects on the reduction of septic shock mortality are controversial. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Using the Japanese diagnosis procedure combination database from April 2016 to March 2019, we identified adult septic shock patients treated with noradrenaline. This study used propensity score matching to compare the outcome between PMX-treated and non-treated patients. The primary endpoint was 28-day mortality, counting from the day of noradrenaline initiation. The secondary endpoints were noradrenaline-, ventilator-, and continuous hemodiafiltration (CHDF)-free days at day 28. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Of 30,731 eligible patients, 4,766 received PMX. Propensity score matching produced a matched cohort of 4,141 pairs with well-balanced patient backgrounds. The 28-day survival rate was 77.9% in the PMX group and 71.1% in the control group (<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.0001). Median days of noradrenalin-, CHDF-, and ventilator-free days were 2 days (<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.0001), 2 days (<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.0001), and 6 days (<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.0001) longer in the PMX group than in the control group, respectively. When stratified with the maximum daily dose of noradrenaline, the PMX group showed a statistically significant survival benefit in the groups with noradrenaline dose &#x3c;20 mg/day but not in the noradrenaline group dose ≥20 mg/day. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Analysis of large Japanese databases showed that septic shock patients who received noradrenaline might benefit from PMX treatment.

Abstract 205: New Onset Heart Failure and Adverse Ischemic Events Associated with Amiodarone and Dronedarone Use among Atrial Fibrillation Patients

2013 ◽  
Vol 6 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gosia Sylwestrzak ◽  
Jinan Liu ◽  
Alan Rosenberg ◽  
Jeffrey White ◽  
John Barron ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Propensity Score Matching ◽  
Incidence Rate ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Administrative Claims ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Observational Cohort ◽  
New Onset

Background: Dronedarone is a non-iodinated form of amiodarone that may not cause some of serious adverse effects associated with amiodarone. However, it is less effective than amiodarone in maintaining normal sinus rhythm, and it does not improve success of electrical cardioversion. Additionally, dronedarone use has been associated with new onset or worsening of heart failure (HF), including a doubling of the risk of death in patients with symptomatic heart failure. We aimed to compare the incidence of newly diagnosed HF and HF hospitalizations among dronedarone and amiodarone users. Secondary outcomes of interest included rates of acute ischemic stroke (IS) and transient ischemic attack (TIA). Methods: This retrospective study utilized administrative claims data between 1/1/2007-9/30/2011 from the HealthCore Integrated Research Environment (HIRE ® ). Patients were required to have at least one claim for atrial fibrillation. Propensity score matching was employed to adjust for differences between the cohorts. Incidence rate of HF, HF hospitalizations, IS and TIA events were compared between matched cohorts using Poisson time-to-event model. Results: The cohort consisted of 6,013 amiodarone and 1,534 dronedarone patients. Dronedarone patients were younger, healthier per Deyo-Charlson Index (DCI) and CHADS2 score, and less likely to have underlying heart disease (all p-values<0.05). In the propensity score matching process 838 patients with comparable baseline characteristics were selected in each group. Median follow up was 552 days in the amiodarone cohort and 412 days in the dronedarone cohort. Among patients without HF history, new onset HF incidence rate was 34.6 per 100 person-year in amiodarone cohort and 19.1 per 100 person-year in dronedarone cohort (IRR=1.61, 95% CI: 1.30-2.01, p<0.01). The incidence rate for HF hospitalization was also higher in amiodarone patients-- 10.7 per 100 person-year against 7.8 per 100 person-year for dronedarone (IRR=1.39, 95% CI: 1.02-1.85, p=0.03). For IS, the incidence rate was 1.68 per 100 person-year in amiodarone vs. 0.84 in dronedarone but results did not reach statistical significance (IRR=1.91, 95% CI: 0.84-4.30, p=0.12); for TIA, it was 3.67 vs. 2.35 for amiodarone and dronedarone respectively (IRR=2.01, 95% CI: 1.14-3.57, p=0.02). Conclusions: In a propensity score matched observational cohort study, amiodarone use was associated with higher incidence rate of new onset HF, HF hospitalizations, and TIA as identified from claims. This finding differs from other clinical studies. Future observational cohort studies should incorporate medical record review for validation since information from claims might be insufficient to fully account for underlying patient risk status, or accurately determine if HF was new onset. Key words: amiodarone; dronedarone; atrial fibrillation; heart failure.

scholarly journals Comparison of Long-term outcomes between Lynch sydrome and sporadic colorectal cancer: a propensity score matching analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yun Xu ◽  
Cong Li ◽  
Charlie Zhi-Lin Zheng ◽  
Yu-Qin Zhang ◽  
Tian-An Guo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Propensity Score Matching ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Sporadic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Long Term Survival ◽  
Tumor Stages

Abstract Background Lynch syndrome (LS) is the most common hereditary colorectal cancer (CRC) syndrome. Comparison of prognosis between LS and sporadic CRC (SCRC) were rare,with conflicting results. This study aimed to compare the long-term outcomes between patients with LS and SCRC. Methods Between June 2008 and September 2018, a total of 47 patients were diagnosed with LS by genetic testing at Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center. A 1:2 propensity score matching was performed to obtain homogeneous cohorts from SCRC group. Thereafter, 94 SCRC patients were enrolled as control group. The long-term survival rates between the two groups were compared, and the prognostic factors were also analyzed. Results The 5-year OS rate of LS group was 97.6%, which was significantly higher than of 82.6% for SCRC group (p = 0.029). The 5-year PFS rate showed no significant differences between the two groups (78.0% for LS group vs. 70.6% for SCRC patients; p = 0.262). The 5-year TFS rates in LS group was 62.1% for LS patients, which were significantly lower than of 70.6% for SCRC group (p = 0.039). By multivariate analysis, we found that tumor progression of primary CRC and TNM staging were independent risk factors for OS. Conclusion LS patients have better long-term survival prognosis than SCRC patients. Strict regular follow-up monitoring, detection at earlier tumor stages, and effective treatment are key to ensuring better long-term prognosis.

scholarly journals Impact of Dexmedetomidine On Secondary Hyperparathyroidism Recurrence In Uremic Patients Who Received Parathyroidectomy With Auto-Transplantation: A Retrospective Propensity-Matched Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yun Wu ◽  
Wei Han ◽  
Peikun Li ◽  
Xianwen Hu ◽  
Ye Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Secondary Hyperparathyroidism ◽  
Propensity Score Matching ◽  
Mechanism Of Action ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Total Parathyroidectomy ◽  
Uremic Patients ◽  
The Difference

Abstract Background: Recurrence of secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) remains a big challenge in uremic patients who underwent total parathyroidectomy with auto-transplantation (tPTX-AT). However, the relationship between perioperative intervention and recurrence of SHPT remains unclear. Dexmedetomidine has been used safely and effectively in uremic patients’ anesthesia. The aim of the study was to explore the effect of dexmedetomidine on the recurrence of SHPT and speculate the possible mechanism of action.Methods: Records of patients who underwent tPTX-AT between 2017 and 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. The study consisted of patients who received dexmedetomidine intra-operatively and the controls were patients who did not receive dexmedetomidine. The primary endpoint was the difference in the recurrence of SHPT one year after surgery between the two groups. The secondary endpoint was health-related quality of life scores. Analysis included propensity score matching and multivariable logistic regression. Results: Of 354 patients, 133 patients received dexmedetomidine intraoperatively, and the total recurrence rate of SHPT was 10.2%. After propensity score matching, patients who received dexmedetomidine had a 3.80-fold decreased risk of SHPT recurrence (odds ratio, 0.263; 95% confidence interval, 0.081 to 0.854; P=0.026) and exhibited a better quality of life in terms of physical functioning and general health, and less emotional role limitations compared with those in control group.Conclusion: In uremic patients who received tPTX-AT, there was an association between dexmedetomidine use and decreased risk of SHPT recurrence. Further studies are needed to accurately assess the effects and mechanism of action of dexmedetomidine on the prognosis of this population.

scholarly journals Evaluación de la eficacia de un programa de tutoría formativa

2018 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-56
Author(s):  
Renata Clerici ◽  
Lorenza Da Re
Keyword(s):  
Propensity Score ◽  
Propensity Score Matching ◽  
Statistical Technique ◽  
Drop Out ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Educación Superior ◽  
Central Process ◽  
Educacion Superior ◽  
Ex Post ◽  
Selection Of

La tutoría universitaria es un proceso central en el Espacio Europeo de Educación Superior (EEES), en sus distintas modalidades y con sus distintas estrategias. Actualmente, en la educación superior coexiste una transformación basada en una renovada visión del pasado donde la atención personalizada ocupa un lugar privilegiado, con la finalidad de fomentar el desarrollo integral de los estudiantes, favoreciendo el aprendizaje y atenuando el abandono, y donde la tutoría universitaria tiene un papel decisivo. El presente estudio se centra en la evaluación de un programa de tutoría formativa en tres grados de la Universidad de Padua. Se realiza una verificación de la eficacia a través de la creación de un grupo control ex-post, compuesto por los sujetos no-tratados, cuyas características eran similares a las de los sujetos tratados. Se utiliza un procedimiento de propensity score matching. Los resultados muestran que la verificación contra-factual de las hipótesis de investigación acerca de la eficacia del programa da resultados significativos, en relación al abandono, se redujo a la mitad y el rendimiento académico mejoró, sobre todo en términos de resultados de aprendizaje. University tutoring is a central process in the European Higher Education Area (EHEA), with its different modalities and strategies. Nowadays, in post-secondary education a new attention to customer-tailored educational actions coexists with the goal to promote a wholeperson development of students in order to improve learning and contrast drop-outs: university tutoring plays a crucial role in this new vision. The study is focused on the evaluation of a programme of formative tutoring that involved three first-cycle degree courses at the University of Padova. The hypothesis of effectiveness, in particular, was verified by ex-post selection of a control group, composed of the most similar not treated students to treated ones. The selection of the control group members was carried out by propensity score matching, a statistical technique that predicts the probability to receive the treatment accounting for a set of students observable characteristics. This counter-factual causal analysis gave significant results: the drop-out rate fell by half, and performance increased in terms of learning outcomes.

scholarly journals Relationship between formulaic breast volume and risk of breast cancer based on linear measurements

BMC Cancer ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoxia Li ◽  
Chunlan Zhou ◽  
Yanni Wu ◽  
Xiaohong Chen
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Propensity Score Matching ◽  
Conditional Logistic Regression ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Case Group ◽  
Breast Volume ◽  
Linear Measurements ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background Whether breast volume is a risk factor for breast cancer is controversial. This study aimed to evaluate whether a significant association between breast volume and risk of breast cancer, based on linear measurements, was present by applying propensity score matching (PSM). Methods The study was designed as a hospital-based case-control study. Between March 2018 and May 2019, 208 cases and 340 controls were retrospectively reviewed. Information on menarche, smoking, feeding mode, oral contraceptives, reproductive history and family history was obtained through a structured questionnaire. Breast volume was calculated using a formula based on linear measurements of breast parameters. Cox regression and PSM were used to estimate odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for breast cancer using risk factors adjusted for potential confounders. Results There was a significant difference in breast volume between the two groups before propensity score matching (P = 0.014). Binary logistic regression showed that the risk of breast cancer was slightly higher in the case group with larger breast volumes than in the control group(P = 0.009, OR = 1.002, 95%CI:1.000 ~ 1.003). However, there was no significant statistical difference between the two groups using an independent sample Mann-Whitney U test (P = 0.438) or conditional logistic regression (P = 0.446). Conclusions After PSM for potential confounding factors, there is no significant difference in breast volume estimated by BREAST-V formula between the case group and the control group. The risk of breast cancer may not be related to breast volume in Chinese women.

Early removal of biflanged metal stents in the management of pancreatic walled-off necrosis: a prospective study

Endoscopy ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 50 (06) ◽  
pp. 597-605 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vinay Dhir ◽  
Douglas Adler ◽  
Ankit Dalal ◽  
Nitin Aherrao ◽  
Rahul Shah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Pancreatic Duct ◽  
Recurrence Rate ◽  
Plastic Stents ◽  
Metal Stents ◽  
Plastic Stent ◽  
Early Removal ◽  
Pancreatic Duct Stenting ◽  
Walled Off Necrosis

Abstract Background and study aims Dedicated stents placed under endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guidance have shown promise for the management of pancreatic walled-off necrosis (WON). A long duration of stent placement may increase the risk of adverse events. We prospectively evaluated the effects of (i) early removal of biflanged metal stents (BFMSs) and (ii) additional stenting of the pancreatic duct with plastic stents in patients with ductal leaks, on the risk of WON recurrence. Patients and methods Symptomatic patients with pancreatic WON underwent EUS-guided BFMS placement, followed by necrosectomy, when required, from Day 3. A 5 Fr plastic stent was placed in patients with ductal leak. BFMS was removed when the WON cavity had collapsed completely. Patients were followed up at 3-month intervals. Results BFMS placement was successful in all 88 patients. A total of 64 patients (72.7 %) underwent necrosectomy (median 3 sessions). All BFMSs were removed at a median of 3.5 weeks (range 3 – 17 weeks). Ductal disconnection and leak occurred in 53/87 (60.9 %) and 61/87 (70.1 %) patients, respectively. A 5 Fr stent was placed in 56/61 patients (91.8 %) with ductal leak. Overall, 22 patients (25.0 %) had adverse events (17 mild, 1 moderate, 3 severe, 1 fatal). Recurrence was noted in 8/88 (9.1 %) at a median follow-up of 22 months. The recurrence rate was higher in patients with ductal disconnection than in those without (13.2 % vs. 2.9 %; P = 0.08), and was similar in patients with vs. without pancreatic duct stenting (7.1 % vs. 12.9 %; P = 0.44). Seven recurrences (87.5 %) partially regressed on follow-up and did not require therapy; in one case, drainage with a plastic stent was performed. Conclusions Short-term BFMS placement is an effective therapy for pancreatic WON. The majority of recurrences developed in patients with ductal disconnection and did not require therapy. Additional pancreatic duct stents probably do not influence the recurrence rate.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document