scholarly journals Association between apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease 1 rs1760944 T>G polymorphism and susceptibility of cancer: a meta-analysis involving 21764 subjects

2019 ◽  
Vol 39 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
Guowen Ding ◽  
Yu Chen ◽  
Huiwen Pan ◽  
Hao Qiu ◽  
Weifeng Tang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Risk ◽  
Publication Bias ◽  
Protective Factor ◽  
Cancer Susceptibility ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Pooled Analysis ◽  
Case Control ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Case Control Studies ◽  
Risk Of Cancer

Abstract Background: Previous case–control studies have suggested that apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease 1 (APE1) rs1760944 T>G polymorphism may be associated with cancer risk. Here, we carried out an updated meta-analysis to focus on the correlation between APE1 rs1760944 T>G locus and the risk of cancer. Methods: We used the crude odds ratios (ORs) with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to evaluate the possible relationship between the APE1 rs1760944 T>G polymorphism and cancer risk. Heterogeneity, publication bias and sensitivity analysis were also harnessed to check the potential bias of the present study. Results: Twenty-three independent studies involving 10166 cancer cases and 11598 controls were eligible for this pooled analysis. We found that APE1 rs1760944 T>G polymorphism decreased the risk of cancer in four genetic models (G vs. T: OR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.83–0.92; P<0.001; GG vs. TT: OR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.69–0.86; P<0.001; GG/TG vs. TT: OR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.77–0.89, P<0.001 and GG vs. TT/TG: OR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.80–0.92, P<0.001). Results of subgroup analyses also demonstrated that this single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) modified the risk among lung cancer, breast cancer, osteosarcoma, and Asians. Evidence of publication bias was found in the present study. When we treated the publication bias with ‘trim-and-fill’ method, the adjusted ORs and CIs were not significantly changed. Conclusion: In conclusion, current evidence highlights that the APE1 rs1760944 T>G polymorphism is a protective factor for cancer susceptibility. In the future, case–control studies with detailed risk factors are needed to confirm or refute our findings.

scholarly journals Association between PD-1 and PD-L1 Polymorphisms and the Risk of Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Case-Control Studies

Cancers ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (8) ◽  
pp. 1150 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Hashemi ◽  
Shima Karami ◽  
Sahel Sarabandi ◽  
Abdolkarim Moazeni-Roodi ◽  
Andrzej Małecki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Death ◽  
Cancer Risk ◽  
Programmed Cell Death ◽  
Cancer Susceptibility ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Case Control ◽  
Case Control Studies ◽  
Programmed Cell Death 1 ◽  
Risk Of Cancer ◽  
The Impact

A number of case-control studies regarding the association of the polymorphisms in the programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) and programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) genes with the risk of cancer have yielded inconsistent findings. Therefore, we have conducted a comprehensive, updated meta-analysis study to identify the impact of PD-1 and PD-L1 polymorphisms on overall cancer susceptibility. The findings revealed that PD-1 rs2227981 and rs11568821 polymorphisms significantly decreased the overall cancer risk (Odds Ratio (OR) = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.68–0.99, p = 0.04, TT vs. CT+CC; OR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.67–0.94, p = 0.006, AG vs. GG, and OR = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.70–0.96, p = 0.020, AG+AA vs. GG, respectively), while PD-1 rs7421861 polymorphism significantly increased the risk of developing cancer (OR = 1.16, 95% CI = 1.02–1.33, p = 0.03, CT vs. TT). The PD-L1 rs4143815 variant significantly decreased the risk of cancer in homozygous (OR = 0.62, 95% CI = 0.41–0.94, p = 0.02), dominant (OR = 0.70, 95% CI = 0.50–0.97, p = 0.03), recessive (OR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.60–0.96, p = 0.02), and allele (OR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.63–0.96, p = 0.02) genetic models. No significant association between rs2227982, rs36084323, rs10204525, and rs2890658 polymorphisms and overall cancer risk has been found. In conclusions, the results of this meta-analysis have revealed an association between PD-1 rs2227981, rs11568821, rs7421861, as well as PD-L1 rs4143815 polymorphisms and overall cancer susceptibility.

scholarly journals Apple intake and cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

2016 ◽  
Vol 19 (14) ◽  
pp. 2603-2617 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roberto Fabiani ◽  
Liliana Minelli ◽  
Patrizia Rosignoli
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Risk ◽  
Oral Cavity ◽  
Publication Bias ◽  
Observational Studies ◽  
Statistical Tests ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Random Effect ◽  
Random Effect Model ◽  
Case Control ◽  
Risk Of Cancer

AbstractObjectiveConflicting results on the association between fruit consumption and cancer risk have been reported. Little is known about the cancer preventive effects of different fruit types. The present meta-analysis investigates whether an association exists between apple intake and cancer risk.DesignRelevant observational studies were identified by literature search (PubMed, Web of Science and Embase). A random-effect model was used to estimate the cancer risk in different anatomical sites. Between-study heterogeneity and publication bias were assessed using adequate statistical tests.ResultsTwenty case–control (three on lung, five on colorectal, five on breast, two on oesophageal, three on oral cavity, two on prostate and one each on pancreas, bladder, larynx, ovary, kidney and brain cancer) and twenty-one cohort (seven on lung, two on colorectal, three on breast and one each on oesophageal, pancreas, bladder, kidney, endometrial, head–neck, urothelial and stomach cancer) studies met the inclusion criteria. Comparing the highest v. lowest level of apple consumption, the reduction of lung cancer risk was statistically highly significant in both case–control (OR=0·75; 95% CI 0·63, 0·88; P=0·001, I2=0 %) and cohort studies (relative risk=0·89; 95% CI 0·84, 0·94; P<0·001, I2=53 %). Instead, in the case of colorectal (OR=0·66; 95% CI 0·54, 0·81; P<0·001, I2=55%), breast (OR=0·79; 95% CI 0·73, 0·87; P<0·001, I2=1 %) and overall digestive tract (OR=0·50; 95% CI 0·36, 0·69; P<0·001, I2=90 %) cancers a significant preventive effect of apples was found only in case–control studies while prospective studies indicated no effect. No evidence of publication bias could be detected for colorectal, oral cavity, oesophageal and breast cancer. However, some confounding effects may be present and related to the consumption of other fruit which have not been considered as adjusting factors.ConclusionsThe present meta-analysis indicates that consumption of apples is associated with a reduced risk of cancer in different anatomical sites.

scholarly journals Impact of XPF rs2276466 polymorphism on cancer susceptibility: a meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 39 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yezhou Liu ◽  
Kun Liu ◽  
Xueru Zhao ◽  
Yidan Sun ◽  
Ning Ma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Risk ◽  
Gastrointestinal Cancer ◽  
Cancer Susceptibility ◽  
Excision Repair ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Complementation Group ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Case Control Studies ◽  
Summary Estimate ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Association between the xeroderma pigmentosum complementation group F (XPF)rs2276466 located in the excision repair cross complementation group 4 (ERCC4) gene and cancer susceptibility has been widely investigated. However, results thus far have remained controversial. A meta-analysis was performed to identify the impact of this polymorphism on cancer susceptibility. PubMed, Embase and Science-Web databases were searched systematically up to May 20, 2018, to obtain all the records evaluating the association between the rs2276466 polymorphism and the risk of all types of cancers. We used the odds ratio (OR) as a measure of effect, and pooled the data in a Mantel-Haenszel weighed random-effects meta-analysis to provide a summary estimate of the impact of this polymorphism on gastrointestinal cancer, neurogenic cancer and other cancers (breast cancer and SCCHN). All the analyses were carried out in STATA 14.1.11 case–control studies that consisted of 5730 cases and 6756 controls, were eventually included in our meta-analysis. The significant association was observed between the XPFrs2276466 polymorphism and neurogenic cancer susceptibility (recessive model: OR = 1.648, 95% CI = 1.294–2.098, P<0.001). Furthermore, no significant impact of this polymorphism was detected on decreased gastrointestinal cancer risk (dominant model: OR = 1.064, 95%CI = 0.961–1.177, P = 0.233). The rs2276466 polymorphism might play different roles in carcinogenesis of various cancer types. Current evidence did not suggest that this polymorphism was directly associated with gastrointestinal susceptibility. However, this polymorphism might contribute to increased neurogenic cancer risk. More preclinical and epidemiological studies are still imperative for further evaluation

scholarly journals The association between dietary zinc intake and risk of pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis

2017 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Li Li ◽  
Xuesong Gai
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Cancer Risk ◽  
Publication Bias ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Case Control ◽  
Significant Heterogeneity ◽  
Case Control Studies ◽  
Dietary Zinc ◽  
Zinc Intake ◽  
Pancreatic Cancer Risk

Previous reports have suggested a potential association on dietary zinc intake with the risk of pancreatic cancer. Since the associations between different studies were controversial, we therefore conducted a meta-analysis to reassess the relationship between dietary zinc intake and pancreatic cancer risk. A comprehensive search from the databases of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Medline was performed until January 31, 2017. Relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) derived by using random effect model was used. Sensitivity analysis and publication bias were conducted. Our meta-analysis was based on seven studies involving 1659 cases, including two prospective cohort studies and five case–control studies. The total RR of pancreatic cancer risk for the highest versus the lowest categories of dietary zinc intake was 0.798 (0.621–0.984), with its significant heterogeneity among studies (I2=58.2%, P=0.026). The average Newcastle–Ottawa scale (NOS) score was 7.29, suggesting a high quality. There was no publication bias in the meta-analysis about dietary zinc intake on the risk of pancreatic cancer. Subgroup analyses showed that dietary zinc intake could reduce the risk of pancreatic cancer in case–control studies and among American populations. In conclusion, we found that highest category of dietary zinc intake can significantly reduce the risk of pancreatic cancer, especially among American populations.

scholarly journals Garlic consumption and colorectal cancer risk in man: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2015 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 308-317 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manuela Chiavarini ◽  
Liliana Minelli ◽  
Roberto Fabiani
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Cancer Risk ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Epidemiological Studies ◽  
Pooled Analysis ◽  
Case Control ◽  
Dietary Factors ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Risk ◽  
Risk Estimate ◽  
Case Control Studies

AbstractObjectiveColorectal cancer shows large incidence variations worldwide that have been attributed to different dietary factors. We conducted a meta-analysis on the relationship between garlic consumption and colorectal cancer risk.DesignWe systematically reviewed publications obtained by searching ISI Web of Knowledge, MEDLINE and EMBASE literature databases. We extracted the risk estimate of the highest and the lowest reported categories of intake from each study and conducted meta-analysis using a random-effects model.ResultsThe pooled analysis of all fourteen studies, seven cohort and seven case–control, indicated that garlic consumption was not associated with colorectal cancer risk (OR=0·93; 95 % CI 0·82, 1·06, P=0·281; I2=83·6 %, P≤0·001). Separate analyses on the basis of cancer sites and sex also revealed no statistically significant effects on cancer risk. However, when separately analysed on the basis of study type, we found that garlic was associated with an approximately 37 % reduction in colorectal cancer risk in the case–control studies (combined risk estimate=0·63, 95 % CI 0·48, 0·82, P=0·001; I2=75·6 %, P≤0·001).ConclusionsOur results suggest that consumption of garlic is not associated with a reduced colorectal cancer risk. Further investigations are necessary to clarify the discrepancy between results obtained from different types of epidemiological studies.

scholarly journals An updated meta-analysis of XRCC4 rs1805377 polymorphism and the risk of cancer based on 23 case-control studies

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xin-yuan Zhang ◽  
Xiao-han Wei ◽  
Bao-jie Wang ◽  
Jun Yao
Keyword(s):  
Subgroup Analysis ◽  
Cancer Susceptibility ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Pooled Analysis ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Case Control Studies ◽  
Cancer Susceptibility Genes ◽  
Cancer Occurrence ◽  
Risk Of Cancer

Abstract Background The growing studies reports that the genes participating in repairing of DNA double-strand breaks may be cancer-susceptibility genes. Rs1805377 (A>G) is a functional single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in the x-ray cross-complementing group 4 (XRCC4) gene that may be involved in the etiology of cancer. However, no conclusive results can be determined from individually published studies. Thus, we performed a meta-analysis to examine the association between XRCC4 rs1805377 polymorphism and cancer risk.Methods The potential literatures were searched using three online electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science). The available studies were included according to the inclusion criteria. The pooled analysis were performed to explore the association between XRCC4 rs1805377 locus and the risk of cancer. Additionally, we also performed subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis.Results Twenty-three studies were included in our meta-analysis. It contained 9,433 cancer patients and 10,337 healthy controls. The pooled results showed that there was no association between rs1805377 and the risk of cancer. Under the dominant model, the final pooled odds ratios (ORs) was 1.115 (95% confidence intervals: 0.956-1.301; P = 0.165) in a random effects model without the statistical significance. The subgroup analysis by ethnicity and source of controls also didn’t find that rs1805377 polymorphism was related to cancer occurrence. In the subgroup by type of cancers, the significant association was only found in gastric antrum adenocarcinoma.Conclusions our meta-analysis suggested that there was no association between rs1805377 polymorphism and cancer occurrence. It may provide useful information for the relevant studies on the etiology of cancer in future.

scholarly journals Association between TP53 codon 72 G>C Polymorphism and Thyroid Carcinoma Risk: An Up-to-Date Meta-Analysis

2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 89-95
Author(s):  
Jamal Jafari Nedooshan ◽  
Mohammad Forat Yazdi ◽  
Hossein Neamatzadeh ◽  
Masoud Zare Shehneh ◽  
Saeed Kargar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Thyroid Cancer ◽  
Cancer Risk ◽  
Cancer Susceptibility ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Case Control ◽  
Case Control Studies ◽  
P53 Codon 72 ◽  
Codon 72 ◽  
Thyroid Cancer Risk ◽  
Carcinoma Risk

Objective: Many published data on the association between p53 codon 72 G>C polymorphism and thyroid carcinoma risk showed inconclusive results. The aim this study was to assess the association between p53 codon 72 G>C polymorphism and thyroid cancer risk. Methods: A literature search of PubMed, EMBASE, Google scholar and Web of Science databases for case–control studies examining the association between p53 codon 72 G>C polymorphism and thyroid cancer susceptibility up October 2016 was performed. Odds ratios (OR) with 95 % confidence intervals (95 % CI) were used to assess the strength of the association. Results: A total of 12 case–control studies involving 2,062 thyroid cancer patients and 3,027 controls were included. There was a significant association between the p53 codon 72 G>C polymorphism and thyroid cancer susceptibility in the overall populations under homozygote (CC vs. GG: OR = 1.18, 95% CI 1.12-3.05, P = 0.01) and recessive model (CC vs. GC+GG: OR = 1.73, 95% CI 1.16-2.59, P = 0.007). Subgroup analysis by ethnicity showed that there was no significant association between p53 codon 72 G>C polymorphism and thyroid cancer risk in Caucasians, Asians and mixed Brazilian. No significant publication bias was observed by using Begg’s funnel plot and Egger’s test. Conclusion: Present meta-analysis indicated that the p53 codon 72 G>C polymorphism may be associated with thyroid cancer risk. However, more studies with large sample size are needed to further assess the associations.

scholarly journals Lack of association between miR-146a rs2910164 C/G locus and colorectal cancer: from a case–control study to a meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiakai Jiang ◽  
Sheng Zhang ◽  
Weifeng Tang ◽  
Zhiyuan Qiu
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Case Control Study ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Pooled Analysis ◽  
Case Control ◽  
Case Control Studies ◽  
Relationship Of ◽  
Risk Of Cancer ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Control Study

Abstract Previous studies suggested that miR-146a rs2910164 (C/G) locus was predicted to influence the risk of cancer. However, the relationship of miR-146a rs2910164 locus with colorectal cancer (CRC) susceptibility was controversial. We recruited 1003 CRC patients and 1303 controls, and performed a case–control study to clarify the correlation of miR-146a rs2910164 locus with CRC risk. Subsequently, a comprehensive meta-analysis was conducted to verify our findings. In the case–control study, we suggested that miR-146a rs2910164 variants did not alter CRC risk (CG vs. CC: adjusted P=0.465; GG vs. CC: adjusted P=0.436, CG/GG vs. CC: adjusted P=0.387 and GG vs. CC/CG: adjusted P=0.589), even in subgroup analysis. Next, we conducted a pooled-analysis to identify the correlation of miR-146a rs2910164 locus with CRC risk. In this pooled-analysis, 7947 CRC cases and 12,168 controls were included. We found that miR-146a rs2910164 polymorphism did not influence the risk of CRC (G vs. C: P=0.537; GG vs. CC: P=0.517, CG/GG vs. CC: P=0.520 and GG vs. CC/CG: P=0.167). Our findings suggest that miR-146a rs2910164 C/G polymorphism is not correlated with the susceptibility of CRC. In the future, more case–control studies are needed to confirm our results.

Analysis of the Association of Matrix Metalloproteinase-1 Gene Promoter (rs1799750) Polymorphism and Risk of Ovarian Cancer

2015 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 961-967 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lijie Wang ◽  
Beihua Kong
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Cancer Risk ◽  
Matrix Metalloproteinase ◽  
Cancer Susceptibility ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Gene Promoter ◽  
Case Control ◽  
Ovarian Cancer Risk ◽  
Case Control Studies ◽  
Matrix Metalloproteinase 1

ObjectiveStudies investigating the association betweenmatrix metalloproteinase-1(MMP1) gene promoter 1607–base pair (bp) polymorphism and ovarian cancer risk have yielded conflicting results.MethodsWe therefore carried out a meta-analysis of 754 ovarian cancer cases and 1184 controls from 5 published case-control studies. The strength of the association betweenMMP11607-bp polymorphism and ovarian cancer susceptibility was calculated using pooled odds ratios (ORs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs).ResultsThe results suggest that no statistically significant associations exist betweenMMP11607-bp polymorphisms and ovarian cancer risk in all 4 genetic models (2G2G vs 1G1G: OR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.81–1.43;P= 0.23; 1G2G vs 1G1G: OR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.82–1.36;P= 0.15; 1G2G + 2G2G vs 1G1G: OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.83–1.34;P= 0.16; 2G2G vs 1G1G + 1G2G: OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.80–1.20;P= 0.84).ConclusionsIn summary, this meta-analysis showed that theMMP11607-bp polymorphism is not associated with ovarian cancer risk.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document