Systems-level feedback in cell-cycle control

2010 ◽  
Vol 38 (5) ◽  
pp. 1242-1246 ◽  
Author(s):  
Béla Novák ◽  
P.K. Vinod ◽  
Paula Freire ◽  
Orsolya Kapuy
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Feedback Loop ◽  
Cell Cycle Control ◽  
Double Negative ◽  
Cyclin Dependent Kinase ◽  
Successful Completion ◽  
Cell Cycles ◽  
Underlying Network ◽  
Oscillatory Mechanism ◽  
Negative Feedbacks

Alternation of chromosome replication and segregation is essential for successful completion of the cell cycle and it requires an oscillation of Cdk1 (cyclin-dependent kinase 1)–CycB (cyclin B) activity. In the present review, we illustrate the essential features of checkpoint controlled and uncontrolled cell-cycle oscillations by using mechanical metaphors. Despite variations in the molecular details of the oscillatory mechanism, the underlying network motifs responsible for the oscillations are always well-conserved. The checkpoint-controlled cell cycles are always driven by a negative-feedback loop amplified by double-negative feedbacks (antagonism).

Expression of the cell cycle control gene, cdc25, is constitutive in the segmental founder cells but is cell-cycle-regulated in the micromeres of leech embryos

Development ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 121 (9) ◽  
pp. 3035-3043 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.T. Bissen
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Cell Cycle Control ◽  
Control Gene ◽  
Cdc25 Phosphatase ◽  
Cell Cycles ◽  
Cell Divisions ◽  
Zygotic Transcription ◽  
Founder Cells ◽  
Drosophila Embryos

The identifiable cells of leech embryos exhibit characteristic differences in the timing of cell division. To elucidate the mechanisms underlying these cell-specific differences in cell cycle timing, the leech cdc25 gene was isolated because Cdc25 phosphatase regulates the asynchronous cell divisions of postblastoderm Drosophila embryos. Examination of the distribution of cdc25 RNA and the zygotic expression of cdc25 in identified cells of leech embryos revealed lineage-dependent mechanisms of regulation. The early blastomeres, macromeres and teloblasts have steady levels of maternal cdc25 RNA throughout their cell cycles. The levels of cdc25 RNA remain constant throughout the cell cycles of the segmental founder cells, but the majority of these transcripts are zygotically produced. Cdc25 RNA levels fluctuate during the cell cycles of the micromeres. The levels peak during early G2, due to a burst of zygotic transcription, and then decline as the cell cycles progress. These data suggest that cells of different lineages employ different strategies of cell cycle control.

scholarly journals The proteasome controls ESCRT-III–mediated cell division in an archaeon

Science ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 369 (6504) ◽  
pp. eaaz2532 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriel Tarrason Risa ◽  
Fredrik Hurtig ◽  
Sian Bray ◽  
Anne E. Hafner ◽  
Lena Harker-Kirschneck ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Division Ring ◽  
Cell Cycle Control ◽  
Sulfolobus Acidocaldarius ◽  
Cyclin Dependent Kinase ◽  
Membrane Remodeling

Sulfolobus acidocaldarius is the closest experimentally tractable archaeal relative of eukaryotes and, despite lacking obvious cyclin-dependent kinase and cyclin homologs, has an ordered eukaryote-like cell cycle with distinct phases of DNA replication and division. Here, in exploring the mechanism of cell division in S. acidocaldarius, we identify a role for the archaeal proteasome in regulating the transition from the end of one cell cycle to the beginning of the next. Further, we identify the archaeal ESCRT-III homolog, CdvB, as a key target of the proteasome and show that its degradation triggers division by allowing constriction of the CdvB1:CdvB2 ESCRT-III division ring. These findings offer a minimal mechanism for ESCRT-III–mediated membrane remodeling and point to a conserved role for the proteasome in eukaryotic and archaeal cell cycle control.

scholarly journals Cell Cycle Control of Schwann Cell Proliferation: Role of Cyclin-Dependent Kinase-2

2000 ◽  
Vol 20 (12) ◽  
pp. 4627-4634 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ravi Tikoo ◽  
George Zanazzi ◽  
Dov Shiffman ◽  
James Salzer ◽  
Moses V. Chao
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Proliferation ◽  
Schwann Cell ◽  
Cell Cycle Control ◽  
Cyclin Dependent Kinase

scholarly journals Two distinct ubiquitin-proteolysis pathways in the fission yeast cell cycle

1999 ◽  
Vol 354 (1389) ◽  
pp. 1551-1557 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takashi Toda ◽  
Itziar Ochotorena ◽  
Kin-ichiro Kominami
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Fission Yeast ◽  
Cell Cycle Control ◽  
Eukaryotic Cell ◽  
Cdk Inhibitor ◽  
Cyclin Dependent Kinase ◽  
Anaphase Promoting Complex ◽  
Repeat Proteins ◽  
Cycle Dependent ◽  
Universal Mechanism

The SCF complex (Skp1-Cullin-1-F-box) and the APC/cyclosome (anaphase-promoting complex) are two ubiquitin ligases that play a crucial role in eukaryotic cell cycle control. In fission yeast F-box/WD-repeat proteins Pop1 and Pop2, components of SCF are required for cell-cycle-dependent degradation of the cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) inhibitor Rum1 and the S-phase regulator Cdc18. Accumulation of these proteins in pop1 and pop2 mutants leads to re-replication and defects in sexual differentiation. Despite structural and functional similarities, Pop1 and Pop2 are not redundant homologues. Instead, these two proteins form heterodimers as well as homodimers, such that three distinct complexes, namely SCF Pop1/Pop1 , SCF Pop1/Pop2 and SCF Pop2/Pop2 , appear to exist in the cell. The APC/cyclosome is responsible for inactivation of CDK/cyclins through the degradation of B-type cyclins. We have identified two novel components or regulators of this complex, called Apc10 and Ste9, which are evolutionarily highly conserved. Apc10 (and Ste9), together with Rum1, are required for the establishment of and progression through the G1 phase in fission yeast. We propose that dual downregulation of CDK, one via the APC/cyclosome and the other via the CDK inhibitor, is a universal mechanism that is used to arrest the cell cycle at G1.

scholarly journals Visualizing the metazoan proliferation-terminal differentiation decision in vivo

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca C. Adikes ◽  
Abraham Q. Kohrman ◽  
Michael A. Q. Martinez ◽  
Nicholas J. Palmisano ◽  
Jayson J. Smith ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Cycle Control ◽  
Cell Lineage ◽  
Terminal Differentiation ◽  
Cyclin Dependent Kinase ◽  
C Elegans ◽  
Differentiated Cells ◽  
Imaging Tool ◽  
Wide Range

SummaryCell proliferation and terminal differentiation are intimately coordinated during metazoan development. Here, we adapt a cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) sensor to uncouple these cell cycle-associated events live in C. elegans and zebrafish. The CDK sensor consists of a fluorescently tagged CDK substrate that steadily translocates from the nucleus to the cytoplasm in response to increasing CDK activity and consequent sensor phosphorylation. We show that the CDK sensor can distinguish cycling cells in G1 from terminally differentiated cells in G0, revealing a commitment point and a cryptic stochasticity in an otherwise invariant C. elegans cell lineage. We also derive a predictive model of future proliferation behavior in C. elegans and zebrafish based on a snapshot of CDK activity in newly born cells. Thus, we introduce a live-cell imaging tool to facilitate in vivo studies of cell cycle control in a wide-range of developmental contexts.

scholarly journals A Search for Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4/6 Inhibitors by Pharmacophore-Based Virtual Screening, Molecular Docking, and Molecular Dynamic Simulations

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (24) ◽  
pp. 13423
Author(s):  
Ni Made Pitri Susanti ◽  
Sophi Damayanti ◽  
Rahmana Emran Kartasasmita ◽  
Daryono Hadi Tjahjono
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Molecular Docking ◽  
Virtual Screening ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Cell Cycle Control ◽  
Pharmacophore Model ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Cyclin Dependent Kinase ◽  
Dynamic Simulations ◽  
Reference Drug

The G1 phase of cell cycle progression is regulated by Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4 (CDK4) as well as Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 6 (CDK6), and the acivities of these enzymes are regulated by the catalytic subunit, cyclin D. Cell cycle control through selective pharmacological inhibition of CDK4/6 has proven to be beneficial in the treatment of estrogen receptor-positive (ER-positive) breast cancer, particularly improving the progression-free survival of patients. Thus, targeting specific inhibition on CDK4/6 is bound to increase therapeutic efficiency. This study aimed to obtain CDK4/6 inhibitors through a pharmacophore-based virtual screening of the ZINC15 purchasable compound database using the in silico method. The pharmacophore model was designed based on the FDA-approved cdk4/6 inhibitor structures, and molecular docking was performed to further screen the hit compounds obtained. A total of eight compounds were selected based on docking results and interactions with CDK4 and CDK6, using palbociclib as the reference drug. According to the results, the compounds of ZINC585292724 and ZINC585291674 were the best compounds based on free binding energy, as well as hydrogen bond stability, and, therefore, exhibit potential as starting points in the development of CDK4/6 inhibitors.

scholarly journals The Multiple Roles of the Cdc14 Phosphatase in Cell Cycle Control

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 709
Author(s):  
Javier Manzano-López ◽  
Fernando Monje-Casas
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Current Knowledge ◽  
Cell Cycle Control ◽  
Multiple Roles ◽  
Special Focus ◽  
Cyclin Dependent Kinase ◽  
Yeast Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Cycle Progression

The Cdc14 phosphatase is a key regulator of mitosis in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cdc14 was initially described as playing an essential role in the control of cell cycle progression by promoting mitotic exit on the basis of its capacity to counteract the activity of the cyclin-dependent kinase Cdc28/Cdk1. A compiling body of evidence, however, has later demonstrated that this phosphatase plays other multiple roles in the regulation of mitosis at different cell cycle stages. Here, we summarize our current knowledge about the pivotal role of Cdc14 in cell cycle control, with a special focus in the most recently uncovered functions of the phosphatase.

Human lactoferrin controls the level of retinoblastoma protein and its activityThis paper is one of a selection of papers published in this Special Issue, entitled 7th International Conference on Lactoferrin: Structure, Function, and Applications, and has undergone the Journal's usual peer review process.

2006 ◽  
Vol 84 (3) ◽  
pp. 345-350 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hee-Joung Son ◽  
Shin-Hee Lee ◽  
Sang-Yun Choi
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Growth ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Peer Review Process ◽  
Cell Cycle Control ◽  
Retinoblastoma Protein ◽  
Cyclin Dependent Kinase ◽  
Antiproliferative Effects ◽  
Cyclin Dependent Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Selection Of

Lactoferrin (Lf) has been implicated in the regulation of cell growth. However, the molecular mechanism underlying this effect remains to be elucidated. In this study, we show that Lf is involved in the cell cycle control system in a variety of cell lines, through retinoblastoma protein (Rb) - mediated growth arrest. We observed that Lf induces the expression of Rb, a signal mediator of cell cycle control, and that a majority of this Lf-induced Rb persists in a hypophosphorylated form. In addition, we determined that Lf specifically augments the level of a cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor, p21, but not p27. Upon treatment with Lf, H1299 cells expressing defective p53 effected an augmentation of endogenous p21 levels, which may contribute to the accumulation of hypophosphorylated Rb. A substantial quantity of active Rb binds more efficiently to E2F1 in cells that express Lf and consequently blocks the expression of an E2F1-responsive gene, thereby suggesting that Lf plays a crucial role in the inhibition of tumor cell growth. Therefore, we conclude that the antiproliferative effects of Lf can likely be attributed to the elevated levels of hypophosphorylated Rb.

scholarly journals Transient primary cilia mediate robust Hedgehog pathway-dependent cell cycle control

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily K. Ho ◽  
Anaïs E. Tsai ◽  
Tim Stearns
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Primary Cilium ◽  
Primary Cilia ◽  
Cell Cycle Control ◽  
Proliferating Cells ◽  
Pathway Activity ◽  
Cell Cycles ◽  
Medulloblastoma Cell Line ◽  
Multiple Cell ◽  
Hh Signaling

SummaryThe regulation of proliferation is one of the primary functions of Hedgehog (Hh) signaling in development. Transduction of Hh signaling requires the primary cilium, a microtubule-based organelle that is necessary for several steps in the pathway (Corbit et al., 2005; Huangfu and Anderson, 2005; Huangfu et al., 2003; Liu et al., 2005; Rohatgi et al., 2007). Many cells only build a primary cilium upon cell cycle arrest in G0. In those proliferating cells that do make a cilium, it is a transient organelle, being assembled in G1 and disassembled sometime after, although exactly when is not well-characterized (Ford et al., 2018; Pugacheva et al., 2007; Wang and Dynlacht, 2018). Thus the requirement for primary cilia presents a conundrum: how are proliferative signals conveyed through an organelle that is present for only part of the cell cycle? Here we investigate this question in a mouse medulloblastoma cell line, SMB55, that requires cilium-mediated Hh pathway activity for proliferation (Zhao et al., 2015). We show that SMB55 cells are often ciliated beyond G1 into S phase, and the presence of the cilium determines the periods of Hh pathway activity. Using live imaging over multiple cell cycles, we define two windows of opportunity for Hh pathway activity, either of which is sufficient to effect cell cycle entry. The first is in the ciliated phase of the previous cell cycle, and the second is in G1 of the cell cycle in which the decision is made. We propose that the ability of cells to integrate Hh pathway activity from more than one cell cycle imparts robustness on Hh pathway control of proliferation and may have implications for other Hh-mediated events in development.

scholarly journals Cell cycle control during early embryogenesis

Development ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 148 (13) ◽  
Author(s):  
Susanna E. Brantley ◽  
Stefano Di Talia
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Quantitative Imaging ◽  
Cell Cycle Control ◽  
Embryonic Cell ◽  
Early Embryogenesis ◽  
Model Systems ◽  
Drosophila Embryo ◽  
Cell Cycles ◽  
Physical Mechanisms ◽  
Species Specific

ABSTRACT Understanding the mechanisms of embryonic cell cycles is a central goal of developmental biology, as the regulation of the cell cycle must be closely coordinated with other events during early embryogenesis. Quantitative imaging approaches have recently begun to reveal how the cell cycle oscillator is controlled in space and time, and how it is integrated with mechanical signals to drive morphogenesis. Here, we discuss how the Drosophila embryo has served as an excellent model for addressing the molecular and physical mechanisms of embryonic cell cycles, with comparisons to other model systems to highlight conserved and species-specific mechanisms. We describe how the rapid cleavage divisions characteristic of most metazoan embryos require chemical waves and cytoplasmic flows to coordinate morphogenesis across the large expanse of the embryo. We also outline how, in the late cleavage divisions, the cell cycle is inter-regulated with the activation of gene expression to ensure a reliable maternal-to-zygotic transition. Finally, we discuss how precise transcriptional regulation of the timing of mitosis ensures that tissue morphogenesis and cell proliferation are tightly controlled during gastrulation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document