QoS Analysis on OSPFv3 And RIPng Using GRE Tunneling on IPv6 Integrated Ipv4 Network

Every year, the availability of public IPv4 addresses is running low. However, the IETF (Internet Engineering Task Force) has set a new addressing standard called IPv6 (Internet Protocol version 6). IPv6 implementations can not be immediately performed on all end-to-end lines, a transition phase is required, one of which is the GRE tunneling method. IPv6 has some differences with IPv4, then in line with the presence of IPv6 will required the protocol that compatible with IPv6, among which is the routing protocol. Some dynamic routing protocols are created to support and can run on IPv6 such as RIPng and OSPFv3. Aim of this study is examines OSPFv3 routing protocols and RIPng routing protocols in terms of Quality of Service (QoS). The test is done by using seven routers with three scenarios in each routing protocol, ie scenario with best path active condition, when the network changes in other words best path down, and the scenario with best path condition has changed and the network has returned to normal. Testing is done by testing QoS parameters (delay, packet loss, and throughput) when the client computer downloads files with the .iso extension from the server. Downloaded files have different sizes, from 100 Mega Byte to 1 Giga Byte. From the results obtained that OSPFv3 provides better QoS (delay, packet loss, and throughput) than RIPng on integrated IPv6 network using GRE tunnel and can be a reference when going to transition from IPv4 to IPv6 using GRE Tunnel.

Download Full-text

Analisis Perbedaan Peformance dan Quality Of Service (Qos) Antara Eigrp dengan Ospf (Studi Kasus Menggunakan 6 Router Melalui GNS 3 dan Wireshark)

International Journal of Natural Science and Engineering ◽

10.23887/ijnse.v2i1.13908 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 2 (1) ◽

pp. 10

Author(s):

Unung Verawardina

Keyword(s):

Quality Of Service ◽

Long Range ◽

Routing Protocol ◽

Packet Loss ◽

Routing Protocols ◽

Data Transfer ◽

Link State ◽

Routing Table ◽

The Difference

In a dynamic routing setting a routing protocol is required to perform the settings to find the shortest and best path. Routing protocols are of two types: vector distance and link state. Use of EIGRP routing that includes long-range vectors and link state OSPF Link link state coverage, peg well to be implemented in complex network because it can adapt well. In this research is the method used for routing and speed of time available EIGRP routing and OSPF routing through simulator GNS3 and wireshark application, then analyze the difference of peformance with speed of routing table and speed of time. While for Quality of Service (QoS) compare network service quality from EIGRP and OSPF routing which include delay, packet loss, and throughput. Based on the results of the research shows the EIGRP routing table is better in the selection path, EIGRP smaller time tansfer data then its data transfer faster than the OSPF. Overall Quality Of Service (Qos) delay, packetloss and throughput on EIGRP and OSPF are well balanced and good.

Download Full-text

Study and Optimized Simulation of OSPFv3 Routing Protocol in IPv6 Network

Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology ◽

10.34257/gjcstevol19is2pg11 ◽

2019 ◽

pp. 11-16

Author(s):

Md. Anwar Hossain ◽

Mst. Sharmin Akter

Keyword(s):

Routing Protocol ◽

Routing Protocols ◽

Internet Protocol ◽

The Internet ◽

Address Space ◽

Next Generation Internet ◽

Ipv6 Address ◽

Ipv6 Network ◽

Packet Tracer

Routing is a design way to pass the data packet. User is assigns the path in a routing configuration. A significant role played by the router for providing the dynamic routing in the network. Structure and Configuration are different for each routing protocols. Next generation internet protocol IPv6 which provides large address space, simple header format. It is mainly effective and efficient routing. It is also ensure good quality of service and also provide security. Routing protocol (OSPFv3) in IPv6 network has been studied and implemented using ‘cisco packet tracer’. ‘Ping’ the ping command is used to check the results. The small virtual network created in Cisco platform .It is also used to test the OSPFv3 protocol in the IPv6 network. This paper also contains step by step configuration and explanation in assigning of IPv6 address in routers and end devices. The receiving and sending the packet of data in a network is the responsibility of the internet protocol layer. It also contains the data analysis of packet forwarding through IPv6 on OSPFv3 in simulation mode of cisco packet virtual environment to make the decision eventually secure and faster protocol in IPv6 environment.

Download Full-text

Impact of Direction Parameter in Performance of Modified AODV in VANET

Journal of Sensor and Actuator Networks ◽

10.3390/jsan9030040 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 9 (3) ◽

pp. 40 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Afsana Ahamed ◽

Hamid Vakilzadian

Keyword(s):

Routing Protocol ◽

Packet Loss ◽

Routing Protocols ◽

Ad Hoc Network ◽

Ad Hoc ◽

End To End Delay ◽

Distance Vector ◽

End To End ◽

Route Request ◽

The Impact

A vehicular ad hoc network (VANET) is a technology in which moving cars are used as routers (nodes) to establish a reliable mobile communication network among the vehicles. Some of the drawbacks of the routing protocol, Ad hoc On-Demand Distance Vector (AODV), associated with VANETs are the end-to-end delay and packet loss. We modified the AODV routing protocols to reduce the number of route request (RREQ) and route reply (RREP) messages by adding direction parameters and two-step filtering. The two-step filtering process reduces the number of RREQ and RREP packets, reduces the packet overhead, and helps to select the stable route. In this study, we show the impact of the direction parameter in reducing the end-to-end delay and the packet loss in AODV. The simulation results show a 1.4% reduction in packet loss, an 11% reduction in the end-to-end delay, and an increase in throughput.

Download Full-text

ANALISA PERBANDINGAN ROUTING PROTOKOL PADA WIRELESS SENSOR NETWORKS (WSNs)

Voteteknika (Vocational Teknik Elektronika dan Informatika) ◽

10.24036/voteteknika.v7i2.105144 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 7 (2) ◽

pp. 177

Author(s):

Igor Novid ◽

Delsina Faiza ◽

Thamrin Thamrin ◽

Winda Agustiarmi

Keyword(s):

Wireless Sensor Networks ◽

Sensor Networks ◽

Routing Protocol ◽

Routing Protocols ◽

High Speed ◽

Internet Use ◽

Data Transfer ◽

Wireless Sensor ◽

High Data

The development of Internet use has spurred Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) technology so that it becomes a widely researched and applied device. With the need to use high WSNs, the quality of features provided such as high data transfer speeds and the smallest possible disruption is something that should be available. Although some uses of WSNs do not require high speed and have a tolerance for interference, there are very few types of use. Nevertheless, routing protocols are provided to meet the types of data transfer requirements. The protocols available for each type will be analyzed and compared to find out the best performance.Keywords: data transfer, routing protocol, WSN.

Download Full-text

ODCR: Energy Efficient and Reliable Density Clustered-based routing protocol for emergency sensor applications

Applied Computing and Informatics ◽

10.1016/j.aci.2020.03.003 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽

Author(s):

Mohammed S. Al-kahtani ◽

Lutful Karim ◽

Nargis Khan

Keyword(s):

Routing Protocol ◽

Packet Loss ◽

Routing Protocols ◽

Energy Efficient ◽

Disaster Recovery ◽

Performance Metrics ◽

Sensor Nodes ◽

Destination Node ◽

Sensor Applications ◽

Better Than

Designing an efficient routing protocol that opportunistically forwards data to the destination node through nearby sensor nodes or devices is significantly important for an effective incidence response and disaster recovery framework. Existing sensor routing protocols are mostly not effective in such disaster recovery applications as the networks are affected (destroyed or overused) in disasters such as earthquake, flood, Tsunami and wildfire. These protocols require a large number of message transmissions to reestablish the clusters and communications that is not energy efficient and result in packet loss. This paper introduces ODCR - an energy efficient and reliable opportunistic density clustered-based routing protocol for such emergency sensor applications. We perform simulation to measure the performance of ODCR protocol in terms of network energy consumptions, throughput and packet loss ratio. Simulation results demonstrate that the ODCR protocol is much better than the existing TEEN, LEACH and LORA protocols in term of these performance metrics.

Download Full-text

Analysis of Routing Protocols for Large Scale Multihop Multirate MANETs

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTERS & TECHNOLOGY ◽

10.24297/ijct.v10i3.3274 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 10 (3) ◽

pp. 1440-1444

Author(s):

Vincy Goyal ◽

Sunil Kumar Jangir ◽

Naveen Hemrajani

Keyword(s):

Routing Protocol ◽

Routing Protocols ◽

Large Scale ◽

Data Communication ◽

Data Sets ◽

Large Set ◽

Data Traffic ◽

Network Mobility ◽

Manet Routing

In this paper, we perform rigorous analysis of MANET routing protocols selected from different categories over various scenarios using a large set of performance evaluation metrics. The traffic that we model on source-destination pairs is the video streams that consist of varying sized data frames and the inter-packet time is very low. In this way, we can check the MANET routing protocols over varying data sets and can provide the analysis that among the existing MANET routing protocols which routing protocol is best suited for data transmission over MANETs. To analyze the behavior of various routing protocols during the data communication in MANETs, we generate simulation results over various MANET scenarios consists of varying number of nodes and source destination pairs. The simulation process is done by using the open source simulator NS-3. We generate and analyze the scenarios where the effects of data communication is evaluated and analyzed over the increase in network mobility and network data traffic. The work is helpful for the students working on the various issues on MANETs as attacks, Quality-of-Service etc to identify which protocol they should use for their work as a base routing protocol. Â

Download Full-text

Analisis Pengembangan Jaringan Komputer UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta Menggunakan Perbandingan Protokol Routing Statik dan Routing Dinamis OSPF

Jurnal Teknologi Informasi dan Ilmu Komputer ◽

10.25126/jtiik.2021822983 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 8 (2) ◽

pp. 235

Author(s):

Rahmadhan Gatra ◽

Bambang Sugiantoro

Keyword(s):

Routing Protocol ◽

Packet Loss ◽

Routing Protocols ◽

Network Performance ◽

Computer Network ◽

Performance Testing ◽

Literature Study ◽

Simulation Based ◽

Qos Parameters ◽

Static Routing

Penelitian ini menjelaskan tentang perbandingan routing sebagai salah satu manajemen jaringan komputer. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah melakukan analisis terhadap protokol routing statik dengan routing dinamis OSPF pada jaringan komputer di lingkungan Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta dengan metode studi literatur dan wawancara dalam pengumpulan data. Penelitian dibuat berdasarkan pemodelan (simulasi) berbasis aplikasi EVE-NG. Performa yang dihasilkan dari perbandingan routing tersebut diukur menggunakan parameter QoS meliputi nilai dari throughput, packet loss, delay, dan jitter. Pengujian kinerja jaringan menggunakan skenario normal dan sibuk pada routing statik dan dinamis OSPF antara lain skenario normal throughput untuk routing protokol statik sebanyak 598.10Bps dan nilai untuk OSPF sebanyak 598.34Bps, sedangkan skenario sibuk untuk routing protokol statik sebanyak 598.82Bps dan nilai untuk OSPF sebesar 597.58Bps. Packet loss skenario normal routing protokol statik sebanyak 0.23% dan nilai untuk OSPF sebanyak 0.27% serta skenario sibuk untuk routing protokol statik sebanyak 0.24% dan OSPF sebanyak 0.26%. Nilai delay skenario normal routing statik protokol sebanyak 59.39ms dan nilai untuk OSPF sebanyak 59.36ms, sedangkan skenario sibuk untuk routing protokol statik sebanyak 59.32ms dan nilai untuk OSPF sebanyak 59.44ms. Jitter menggunakan skenario normal protokol routing statik sebanyak 0.98ms dan nilai untuk OSPF sebanyak 0.98ms serta skenario sibuk routing protokol statik sebanyak 0.98ms dan nilai untuk OSPF sebanyak 0.99ms. Parameter QoS menunjukkan bahwa throughput dan delay maka routing statik lebih optimal dibandingkan OSPF pada skenario sibuk, sedangkan pada skenario normal dan sibuk jitter dan packet loss lebih optimal routing protokol statik. AbstractThis study describes the comparison of routing as one of computer network management. The purpose of this study is to analyze static routing protocols with OSPF dynamic routing on computer networks in the State Islamic University of Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta with literature study methods and interviews in data collection. The study was made based on modeling (simulation) based on EVE-NG applications. The performance resulting from the comparison of routing is measured using QoS parameters including the value of throughput, packet loss, delay, and jitter. Network performance testing uses normal and busy scenarios on static and dynamic OSPF routing, including normal throughput scenarios for static protocol routing as much as 598.10Bps and values for OSPF as much as 598.34Bps, while busy scenarios for static protocol routing as much as 598.82Bps and values for OSPF as 597.58 Bps. Normal packet routing scenario static routing protocols are 0.23% and OSPF values are 0.27% and busy scenarios for static protocol routing are 0.24% and OSPF are 0.26%. The normal scenario static routing protocol delay value is 59.39ms and the value for OSPF is 59.36ms, while the busy scenario for static protocol routing is 59.32ms and the value for OSPF is 59.44ms. Jitter uses a normal scenario of 0.98ms static routing protocol and 0.98ms for OSPF and 0.98ms for busy routing protocol scenarios and 0.99ms for OSPF. QoS parameters indicate that throughput and delay static routing is more optimal than OSPF in busy scenarios, whereas in normal and busy scenarios jitter and packet loss are more optimal static protocol routing.

Download Full-text

KAJIAN PERBANDINGAN PERFORMANSI ROUTING PROTOCOL RIPNG, OSPFV3 DAN EIGRPV6 PADA JARINGAN IPV6

Kilat ◽

10.33322/kilat.v7i1.105 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 7 (1) ◽

pp. 56-65

Author(s):

Redaksi Tim Jurnal

Keyword(s):

Real Time ◽

Routing Protocol ◽

Routing Protocols ◽

Performance Testing ◽

Video Stream ◽

Network Routing ◽

Transport Protocol ◽

Network Simulator ◽

Ipv6 Network ◽

Better Than

The main purpose of IP next generation version 6 or called IPv6 is to meet the needs of IP addresses for the long term. With the presence of IPv6 it is also necessary routing protocol that supports IPv6 network. Routing protocols work to connect between networks, and choose paths or routes to reach other networks. There are three types of routing protocols that already support IPv6 services. Among other types of distance vector (RIPng), link-state (OSPFv3) and hybrid (EIGRPv6). This final project is designed to know the performance of the three types of routing protocols on IPv6 network. Testing is done by analyzing routing update process, ICMPv6 packet analysis and testing by sending Real-time Transport Protocol (RTP) packet in the form of audio video stream sent via server and accessed through client. In the simulation and analysis results using GNS3 (Graphic Network Simulator 3) and wireshark found that the OSPFv3 performance testing is better than EIGRPv6 and RIPng when performing routing updates or when link down occurs. Then the data analysis of test results with the delivery of Real-time Transport Protocol package so that it can be concluded that OSPFv3 algorithm better than EIGRPv6 and RIPng in terms of delay, packet loss, throughput and jitter.

Download Full-text

Analisis Routing Protocol Is-Is Dengan MPLS Traffic Engineering Menggunakan GNS3

Jurnal Ilmiah FIFO ◽

10.22441/fifo.2021.v13i1.004 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 13 (1) ◽

pp. 32

Author(s):

Hendra Bayu Susueno ◽

Imam Tri Wibowo ◽

Siti Ummi Masruroh ◽

Dewi Khairani ◽

I’im Umamil Khoiri

Keyword(s):

Routing Protocol ◽

Packet Loss ◽

Traffic Engineering ◽

Link State ◽

Digital Era ◽

The Status ◽

The Many ◽

And Control ◽

Label Switched Path

In the digital era is , the internet becomes a necessity . the increasing number of internet usage by various parties encourages ISPs to improve their service quality . To overcome the problem the IETF has introduced a service Multiprotcol . MPLS-TE allows for schemes TE where the tip router of the label switched path (LSP) can calculate the many routes efficiently through the network to the router tip of the tail of the LSP. TE consists of three steps principal that is the size , model, and control . MPLS-TE allows for schemes TE where the tip router of the label switched path (LSP) can calculate the many routes efficiently through the network to the router tip of the tail of the LSP. ISIS is one of the routing protocol that was created for the OSI mode, using the method of link state as a method of collecting the route , ISIS also will perform the collection of information and the status of all the links that exist in the network . Analysis of the IS-IS routing protocol with the Multiprotocol label switch Traffic Engineering based on the parameters of quality of service (QoS), namely throughput and packet loss where the simulation uses the GNS3 network emulator. The test results prove that the values of throughput and packet loss are not much different.

Download Full-text

Multipath Routing protocol: NCPR and QAMR

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTERS & TECHNOLOGY ◽

10.24297/ijct.v11i10.2975 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 11 (10) ◽

pp. 3065-3070

Author(s):

Roopali Garg ◽

Guneet Kaur

Keyword(s):

Routing Protocol ◽

Packet Loss ◽

Ad Hoc Network ◽

Ad Hoc ◽

Mobile Ad Hoc Network ◽

Routing Algorithm ◽

Multipath Routing ◽

Mobile Nodes ◽

Mobile Ad Hoc

Mobile ad hoc network is an assembly of mobile nodes with no centralized server. Due to mobility of nodes and decentralized network it is difficult to maintain the quality of service (QoS) in routing the packets from source to destination.Â QoS can be defined in terms of various metrics like delay, bandwidth, packet loss, routing overhead, jitter. Routing can be unicast, multicast or multipath.Â This paper presents the description about the QoS multipath routing algorithm.

Download Full-text