scholarly journals Law Enforcement Activities of the Criminal Executive Special Forces Associated with the Use of Coercive Measures

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 ◽  
pp. 03021
Author(s):  
Sergey Vladimirovich Ponikarov ◽  
Vladimir Anatolievich Ponikarov ◽  
Tatyana Nikolaevna Dazmarova ◽  
Andrey Vladimirovich Zverev ◽  
Vasily Nikolaevich Chorny
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Legal Aspects ◽  
Empirical Method ◽  
Scientific Result ◽  
Special Forces ◽  
Coercive Measures ◽  
Special Means ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Law ◽  
First Time

Research prerequisites: Insufficient scientific knowledge of this issue dictates the advisability of considering and studying this topic. For the first time, the article highlights the legal aspects associated with the use of methods of struggle, special means, and military weapons by employees of special-purpose units of the criminal-executive (penitentiary) system of Russia. The paper states that only for the commission of criminal offences, it is possible to use military weapons by special forces units of the Federal Penitentiary Service and special escorting divisions of the criminalexecutive system of the Russian Federation. Purpose of the research: to investigate the law enforcement activities of the penitentiary special forces associated with the use of coercive measures including for criminal offences. Methods: when considering the essence of coercive measures in the law enforcement activities of special-purpose units, the article used the dialectical method. To formulate the conditions for the correct (legal) use of weapons in law enforcement directly by employees of special-purpose units of the Russian penitentiary system, systematized methods were used. The empirical method was used when interviewing special forces officers in the investigated activities. Results and novelty: the scientific result of this article is the first formulated many components aimed at improving the measures of coercion. In particular, the grounds for the correct use of methods of struggle, special means, and military weapons are proposed. The article identifies situations (circumstances) associated with a real threat to the life and health of a special-purpose employee. The negative and positive aspects associated with the use of coercive measures are emphasized.

Law enforcement practice of judicial authorities on tax disputes

2021 ◽  
pp. 550-563
Author(s):  
Alexandr V. Izmalkov ◽  
Alexander A. Kuznetsov ◽  
Pavel A. Kuznetsov ◽  
Ella Y. Kuzmenko
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Research Methods ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
The State ◽  
Effect Relationship ◽  
General Scientific ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Law ◽  
Qualitative Characteristics ◽  
State Body

We analyze the law enforcement practice of judicial authorities on taxes and fees, since the Tax Code of the Russian Federation is a rather controversial regulatory legal act. Tax disputes arise both at the initiative of tax authorities and at the initiative of taxpayers. Purpose: to determine the main directions of law enforcement practice of courts in tax disputes. We use general scientific and specially legal methods as research methods. The focus is on the method of analysis. In the course of the research, we analyze the con-sideration of cases by judicial authorities on tax disputes, their quantitative and qualitative characteristics. We conclude that the emergence of disagree-ments between taxpayers and the state body when resolving the issue of the legality of their actions (inaction), as well as the legality of a non-normative legal act is the main reason for the formation of law enforcement practice in tax disputes. During the passage of all stages of the application of the law, it is also necessary to establish the existence of a cause-and-effect relationship between the actions of the taxpayer and the resulting consequences. The main points of this process go through several stages. We define the main directions of the law enforcement practice of courts in tax disputes.

scholarly journals Local Self-Government in the Public Government System: A New Constitutional Dimension

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 23-26
Author(s):  
Oleg A. Kozhevnikov ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Framework ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Public Power ◽  
The Public ◽  
System A ◽  
International Obligations ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Law

The article analyzes certain provisions of the Law of the Russian Federation on the amendment to the Constitution of the Russian Federation of March 14, 2020 No. 1-FKZ “On improving the regulation of certain issues of the organization and functioning of public power” in terms of regulatory regulation of local self-government. According to the analysis the author comes to the conclusion that with the entry into effect of the mentioned legal act the content of individual elements of the constitutional-legal bases of local self-government will change, but the nature and scope of modifications in many respects will depend on the provisions of the rules of sectoral legislation aimed at implementing the relevant provisions of the Constitution. In this regard, the Federal legislator has a huge responsibility to create an “updated” legal framework for the implementation of the constitutional foundations of local self-government, taking into account the already established law enforcement practice, the positions of the constitutional court of the Russian Federation, as well as the state's international obligations under the European Charter on local self-government.

THE CONCEPT, ESSENCE, TYPES AND FORMS OF PROTECTION OF ENTREPRENEURSHIP

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sergey Vasilievich Mudritsky ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Legal Aspects ◽  
Economic Conditions ◽  
The Law

The article deals with the development of entrepreneurship in the new economic conditions, analyzes and reveals the concept and essence of the protection of the rights of entrepreneurs, the legal aspects of forms and methods of protecting the rights of subjects of entrepreneurship, the methods of restoration functions of violated rights in the law enforcement legal relations.

scholarly journals Operational and Intelligence Activities of the Law Enforcement Agencies in the System of Ensuring National Security

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 ◽  
pp. 03017
Author(s):  
Alexander Ivanovich Melikhov ◽  
Gennady Svyatoslavovich Pratsko ◽  
Victoria Aleksandrovna Chistova ◽  
Olga Dmitrievna Tyutyunik ◽  
Olga Aleksandrovna Nenakhova
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
National Security ◽  
Legal Aspects ◽  
Information Support ◽  
Scientific Development ◽  
Russian Society ◽  
Law Enforcement Agencies ◽  
Stage Of Development ◽  
Human Need ◽  
The Law

The transition to the postmodern stage of development of Russian society, by the subsequent change of the system of civilizational values, required the scientific development of a new attitude to security as a basic human need with regard to changing the nature of traditional threats and interests and the emergence of completely new ones. The process of globalization being developed in the information age weakens traditional state institutions and requires a new look at national security not only as a category of foreign policy and military matters but also as an internal problem solved through operational and intelligence activities. The purpose of the study was to identify the current problems in the theory of national security by means of an analysis of scientific studies of the phenomenon of security in Russia; to consider security as a function and feature of the social system; to consider the Operational and intelligence activities of the law enforcement agencies as a mean for ensuring national security; to identify the conditions and factors of operational and intelligence activities that negatively affect the effectiveness of ensuring national security. In the course of the research, using computer indexing, about 1300 scientific, educational and methodological sources on national security and internal affairs issues have been processed and analyzed in the semantic, philosophical and legal aspects. The study examines modern theoretical and practical problems of ensuring national security as part of operational and intelligence activities of the law enforcement agencies. Operational and intelligence activities is considered in the national security system as a means of its information support, as well as as a tool for combating criminal, military and other threats. For the first time, considered are the conditions and factors of the operational and intelligence activities that negatively affect the effectiveness of ensuring national security.

scholarly journals RUSSIAN INVESTIGATION AS VIEWED BY A HISTORIAN

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 3-10
Author(s):  
Aleksandr V. Fedorov ◽  
◽  
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
18Th Century ◽  
Legal Aspects ◽  
Russian Society ◽  
History Of ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Russian Law ◽  
The Government ◽  
Low Efficiency

The article is dedicated to the famous Russian historian and legal expert Doctor of History Dmitriy O. Serov and a brief analysis of his studies concerning the establishment and development of the Russian law enforcement authorities in the first third of the 18th century: courts, prosecutor’s office, fiscal service, investigative authorities. Having started his scientific activities from studies of history of the spiritual life of the Russian society from the 17th to the 18th century, D.O. Serov then moved on to the legal aspects of history of the 18th to the 20th century, history of the personnel of the national government machine focusing on investigative authorities and was recognized in our country and abroad as one of the best experts of the Peter the Great’s epoch, specialist in history of the Russian law enforcement and judicial systems, leading scientist studying history of the Russian investigative authorities. D.O. Serov developed new areas of historical and legal research; identified, researched and introduced into scientific discourse many earlier unknown or briefly mentioned archive files including the Instruction to Major’s Investigative Chancelleries of December 9, 1717. The educational course History of the Russian Investigative Authorities was launched based on his research; a new professional holiday, the Day of an Investigation Officer of the Russian Federation, was introduced by Resolution of the Government of the Russian Federation No. 741 of August 27, 2013 (July 25, the day of establishment of the first M.I. Volkonskiy investigative chancellery); some memorable dates of history of the national pre-trial investigation were introduced (including December 9, the Day of Establishment of Major’s Investigative Chancelleries). D.O. Serov justified that the Russian investigative authorities originated in the form of investigative chancelleries. The basis for acknowledgment of such chancelleries as investigative authorities is their characteristics as an independent permanent government authority, designated to investigate criminal cases on the pre-trial stage, being the only function of this authority. D.O. Serov’s research showed that the reason for a short life of such authorities was not their low efficiency. Quite the opposite, major’s investigative chancelleries were in advance of their time and turned out to be misfitting even for the reformed state mechanism of Russia.

scholarly journals Regulatory support and legal grounds for the coercion by the law enforcement agencies of Ukraine

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 84-91
Author(s):  
Yuriy Paida
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Law Enforcement Officers ◽  
Legal Framework ◽  
Diplomatic Relations ◽  
Law Enforcement Agencies ◽  
Coercive Measures ◽  
Special Means ◽  
Principle Of Proportionality ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Legal Grounds

The issue of coercion by law enforcement agencies significantly affects the rights and interests of an individual as a person, despite the fact that this person is most often the offender. At the same time, both international law and the national law of any state recognize the possibility of applying coercive measures to ensure order and security. Thus, the principle of proportionality requires the legal definition of the authority powers to interfere in the rights, freedoms and interests of the objects of influence and the proportionate exercise of these powers depending on the specific circumstances of the case, which would ensure the necessary balance between government, community, legal entities and individual citizens. The article analyzes the national legislation that is directly related to the legal framework and legal grounds for the use of coercion by law enforcement agencies of Ukraine. It also covers international legal acts ratified in the prescribed order, and international documents on diplomatic relations and immunities of diplomatic agents with regard to respect for human rights in the use of coercion by the relevant authorities: whether physical influence (force), or special means, or, moreover, firearms, which is most often related to the harming a citizen. Special attention is paid to the peculiarities of departmental regulation of this issue. It is noted that the legal grounds for the application of coercive measures regulated at the level of laws are not a departmental prerogative power of any ministry or other executive body. In addition to the above, it is emphasized that law enforcement officers must take into account the norms and principles of professional conduct in the performance of law enforcement functions in their activities. Thus, the legal grounds for the use of coercion by law enforcement agencies are widespread in regulations of various legal force. At the same time, the grounds and conditions for the application of coercive measures are regulated only by acts issued by the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, namely, by laws

scholarly journals Global Reform of the Labor Code of the Republic of Belarus in 2019-2020 (Issues of Labor and Collective Agreements)

Lex Russica ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 143-154
Author(s):  
K. L. Tomashevski ◽  
E. A. Volk
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Collective Agreement ◽  
Collective Agreements ◽  
Technical Errors ◽  
Legal Method ◽  
Labor Legislation ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Personnel Practice

The law of the Republic of Belarus of July 18, 2019 No. 219-Z "On changing laws" introduced significant changes and additions to the Labor Code of the Republic of Belarus. These innovations can be assessed as the third global reform of labor legislation. The importance of this reform is evidenced by the following facts. First, more than 170 articles were corrected. Second, the Code was supplemented with two new chapters. Third, 12 new articles were introduced (except for new chapters), about the same number of articles were excluded. Fourth, 25 articles of the Labor Code of the Republic of Belarus were set out in a new version. The paper analyzes in detail the new legal definitions of labor function, qualification, contract, and local legal acts. The Law of July 18, 2019 No. 219-Z introduced a new Chapter in the Labor Code of the Republic of Belarus on the contract system of employment, which implemented norms from a number of decrees and decrees of the President of the Republic of Belarus. In the course of the last reform, the Labor Code of the Republic of Belarus amended the provisions on the term of the employment contract, employment, transfer, changes in essential working conditions, and dismissal of an employee. The paper reveals a number of conflicts, legal and technical errors and legal uncertainties associated with the adoption of the Law of July 18, 2019 No. 219-Z, which may lead to problems in practice when applying the updated Labor Code of the Republic of Belarus. Special attention is given to the new rules of the Labor Code of the Republic of Belarus on the extension and scope of the collective agreement. The authors make suggestions for improving the labor legislation of Belarus. The comparative legal method is used, in particular, it is compared with the labor legislation of the Russian Federation. It is concluded that the Belarusian legislator has not approached the reform of the Labor Code of the Republic of Belarus in a well-thought-out and scientifically justified way. The shortcomings of the Law of July 18, 2019 No. 219-Z noted in this paper will be overcome and leveled by law enforcement and personnel practice.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document