Clinical Effectiveness and Potential Survival Benefit of US-Guided High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Therapy in Patients with Advanced-Stage Pancreatic Cancer

2018 ◽  
Vol 40 (05) ◽  
pp. 625-637 ◽  
Author(s):  
Milka Marinova ◽  
Hannah C. Huxold ◽  
Jana Henseler ◽  
Martin Mücke ◽  
Rupert Conrad ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Survival Benefit ◽  
Median Overall Survival ◽  
Focused Ultrasound ◽  
Tumor Volume ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Clinical Effectiveness ◽  
High Intensity Focused Ultrasound ◽  
Free Survival

Abstract Purpose Pancreatic cancer (PaC) is a life-limiting tumor with a wide range of incapacitating symptoms such as cancer pain in more than 80 % of patients. This prospective interventional study addresses the clinical effectiveness of ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) treatment for patients with advanced-stage PaC, including pain perception, tumor size and survival benefit. Materials and Methods 50 patients with late-stage PaC underwent HIFU. Clinical assessment included evaluation of tumor volume by imaging and pain burden (pain severity, pain sensation, interference with daily activities) using the Brief Pain Inventory at baseline and follow-up. Median overall survival, progression-free survival and time to local progression were estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Results In 84 % of patients, significant early relief of cancer-induced abdominal pain was achieved by HIFU independent of metastatic status; it persisted during follow-up. Tumor volume reduction was 37.8 ± 18.1 % after 6 weeks and 57.9 ± 25.9 % after 6 months. 21 % of HIFU-treated patients had local tumor progression with a median time of 14.4 months from intervention. The median overall survival and progression-free survival were 16.2 and 16.9 months from diagnosis and 8.3 and 6.8 months from intervention. Conclusion In patients with advanced pancreatic cancer and otherwise limited treatment options, HIFU resulted in significant early and long-lasting pain relief and tumor size reduction over time independent of metastatic status. Clinical data suggest an additional potential survival benefit.

scholarly journals Treatment of Angiosarcoma with Pazopanib and Paclitaxel: Results of the EVA (Evaluation of Votrient® in Angiosarcoma) Phase II Trial of the German Interdisciplinary Sarcoma Group (GISG-06)

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 1223
Author(s):  
Daniel Pink ◽  
Dimosthenis Andreou ◽  
Sebastian Bauer ◽  
Thomas Brodowicz ◽  
Bernd Kasper ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Median Overall Survival ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Future Studies ◽  
Entire Cohort

We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of paclitaxel combined with pazopanib in advanced angiosarcoma (AS). The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) rate at six months (PFSR6). Planned accrual was 44 patients in order to detect a PFSR6 of >55%, with an interim futility analysis of the first 14 patients. The study did not meet its predetermined interim target of 6/14 patients progression-free at 6 months. At the time of this finding, 26 patients had been enrolled between July 2014 and April 2016, resulting in an overrunning of 12 patients. After a median follow-up of 9.5 (IQR 7.7–15.4) months, PFSR6 amounted to 46%. Two patients had a complete and seven patients a partial response. Patients with superficial AS had a significantly higher PFSR6 (61% vs. 13%, p = 0.0247) and PFS (11.3 vs. 2.7 months, p < 0.0001) compared to patients with visceral AS. The median overall survival in the entire cohort was 21.6 months. A total of 10 drug-related serious adverse effects were reported in 5 patients, including a fatal hepatic failure. Although our study did not meet its primary endpoint, the median PFS of 11.6 months in patients with superficial AS appears to be promising. Taking recent reports into consideration, future studies should evaluate the safety and efficacy of VEGFR and immune checkpoint inhibitors with or without paclitaxel in a randomized, multiarm setting.

scholarly journals Cetuximab versus bevacizumab following prior FOLFOXIRI and bevacizumab in postmenopausal women with advanced KRAS and BRAF wild-type colorectal cancer: a retrospective study

BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chunlong Huang ◽  
Xiaoyuan Gu ◽  
Xianshang Zeng ◽  
Baomin Chen ◽  
Weiguang Yu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Postmenopausal Women ◽  
Survival Benefit ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Primary Endpoints ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Inductive Treatment ◽  
Advanced Colorectal Carcinoma

Abstract Background An upgraded understanding of factors (sex/estrogen) associated with survival benefit in advanced colorectal carcinoma (CRC) could improve personalised management and provide innovative insights into anti-tumour mechanisms. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of cetuximab (CET) versus bevacizumab (BEV) following prior 12 cycles of fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan (FOLFOXIRI) plus BEV in postmenopausal women with advanced KRAS and BRAF wild-type (wt) CRC. Methods Prospectively maintained databases were reviewed from 2013 to 2017 to assess postmenopausal women with advanced KRAS and BRAF wt CRC who received up to 12 cycles of FOLFOXIRI plus BEV inductive treatment, followed by CET or BEV maintenance treatment. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), response rate. The secondary endpoint was the rate of adverse events (AEs). Results At a median follow-up of 27.0 months (IQR 25.1–29.2), significant difference was detected in median OS (17.7 months [95% confidence interval [CI], 16.2–18.6] for CET vs. 11.7 months [95% CI, 10.4–12.8] for BEV; hazard ratio [HR], 0.63; 95% CI, 0.44–0.89; p=0.007); Median PFS was 10.7 months (95% CI, 9.8–11.3) for CET vs. 8.4 months (95% CI, 7.2–9.6) for BEV (HR, 0.67; 95% CI 0.47–0.94; p=0.02). Dose reduction due to intolerable AEs occurred in 29 cases (24 [24.0%] for CET vs. 5 [4.8%] for BEV; p< 0.001). Conclusions CET tends to be superior survival benefit when compared with BEV, with tolerated AEs.

Use of nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine in pancreatic cancer without granulocyte colony-stimulating factor: A multicenter real-world experience

2021 ◽  
pp. 107815522110386
Author(s):  
Angela Chen ◽  
Vincent H Ha ◽  
Sunita Ghosh ◽  
Carole R Chambers ◽  
Michael B Sawyer
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Median Overall Survival ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor ◽  
Colony Stimulating Factor ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Colony Stimulating Factors ◽  
Median Progression Free Survival ◽  
Stimulating Factor

Introduction The metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma clinical trial (MPACT) trial established gemcitabine (gem) and nab-paclitaxel (nab) as a standard treatment for pancreatic cancer utilizing granulocyte colony-stimulating factors to manage neutropenia. This was a challenge for jurisdictions that do not use granulocyte colony-stimulating factors in palliative settings. We developed dosage guidelines to dose modify gem and nab without granulocyte colony-stimulating factors. We undertook a retrospective review to determine the efficacy and safety of these dose adjustment guidelines in the real world. Methods A multi-centered, retrospective chart review was performed on pancreatic patients between December 1, 2014, and August 21, 2018. Provincial electronic medical health records were reviewed. Using Log-rank statistics we determined the patient's progression-free survival and overall survival. Results Of 248 patients, 209 met patient selection criteria. Patients were excluded if they were lost to follow-up, on gem alone prior to nab/gem combination therapy or did not receive nab or gem. Patients who received nab/gem as first-line therapy had a median progression-free survival of 6.3 months (95% CI, 5.1–7.4), and median overall survival of 11.1 months (95% CI, 9.5–12.8). Those who received gem/nab in the second line had a median progression-free survival of 4.6 months (95% CI, 2.8–6.5), and median overall survival of 19.3 months (95% CI, 12.6–26.0). Conclusions The patient’s progression-free survival and overall survival taking nab/gem using our dose modification algorithm were equivalent or superior to the MPACT trial's progression-free survival and overall survival. Gem/nab can be given by our dose modification scheme without granulocyte colony-stimulating factor.

scholarly journals Clinical Presentation, Natural History, and Therapeutic Approach in Patients with Solitary Fibrous Tumor: A Retrospective Analysis

Sarcoma ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Schöffski ◽  
I. Timmermans ◽  
D. Hompes ◽  
M. Stas ◽  
F. Sinnaeve ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solitary Fibrous Tumor ◽  
Systemic Therapy ◽  
Median Overall Survival ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Response Rates ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Metachronous Metastasis ◽  
Third Line ◽  
Fibrous Tumor

Background. Solitary fibrous tumor (SFT) is a rare variant of soft tissue sarcoma (STS). Materials and Methods. We reviewed SFT patients (pts) treated at our institution between 12/1990 and 09/2017. Results. We identified 94 pts with a median follow-up (mFU) of 4.7 years (range: 0.1–21.53). Primary sites were the chest (33%), abdomen (21.3%), brain (12.8%), and extremities (9.6%); 6.4% of pts presented with synchronous metastasis. Median overall survival (mOS) from the first diagnosis was 56.0 months (m) (0.3–258.3). Doege–Potter syndrome was seen in 2.1% of pts. Primary resection was performed in 86 pts (91.5%). Median progression-free survival was 34.1 m (1.0–157.1), and 43% of pts stayed SFT-free during FU. Local recurrence occurred in 26.7% after a mFU of 35.5 m (1.0–153.8), associated with an OS of 45.1 m (4.7–118.2). Metachronous metastasis occurred in 30.2% after a mFU of 36.0 m (0.1–157.1). OS in metastatic pts was 19.0 m (0.3–149.0). Systemic therapy was given to 26 pts (27.7%) with inoperable/metastatic disease. The most common (57.7%) upfront therapy was doxorubicin, achieving responses in 13.3% of pts with a PFS of 4.8 m (0.4–23.8). In second line, pts were treated with ifosfamide or pazopanib, the latter achieving the highest response rates. Third-line treatment was heterogeneous. Conclusion. SFT is an orphan malignancy with a highly variable clinical course and a considerable risk of local failure and metachronous metastasis. Surgery is the only curative option; palliative systemic therapy is used in inoperable/metastatic cases but achieves low response rates. The highest response rates are seen with pazopanib in second/third line.

scholarly journals Conversion Chemotherapy With a Modified FLOX Regimen for Borderline or Unresectable Liver Metastases From Colorectal Cancer: An Alternative for Limited-Resources Settings

2019 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Renata Colombo Bonadio ◽  
Paulo Henrique Amor Divino ◽  
Jorge Santiago Madero Obando ◽  
Karolina Cayres Alvino Lima ◽  
Débora Zachello Recchimuzzi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Liver Metastases ◽  
Median Overall Survival ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Unresectable Liver Metastases

PURPOSE Conversion chemotherapy is often used for borderline or unresectable (B/U) liver metastases from colorectal cancer (CRC) with the aim of achieving resectability. Although intensive and costly regimens are often used, the best regimen in this scenario remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate the outcomes of patients with B/U liver metastases from CRC treated with conversion chemotherapy with the modified fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (mFLOX) regimen followed by metastasectomy. METHODS We performed a single-center retrospective analysis of patients with B/U liver metastases from CRC treated with chemotherapy with the mFLOX regimen followed by surgery. B/U disease was defined as at least one of the following: more than four lesions, involvement of hepatic artery or portal vein, or involvement of biliary structure. RESULTS Fifty-four consecutive patients who met our criteria for B/U liver metastases were evaluated. Thirty-five patients (64%) had more than four liver lesions, 16 (29%) had key vascular structure involvement, and 16 (29%) had biliary involvement. After chemotherapy, all patients had surgery and 42 (77%) had R0 resection. After a median follow-up of 37.2 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 16.9 months and median overall survival (OS) was 68.3 months. R1-R2 resections were associated with worse PFS and OS compared with R0 resection (PFS: hazard ratio, 2.65; P = .007; OS: hazard ratio, 2.90; P = .014). CONCLUSION Treatment of B/U liver metastases from CRC with conversion chemotherapy using mFLOX regimen followed by surgical resection was associated with a high R0 resection rate and favorable survival outcomes. On the basis of our results, we consider mFLOX a low-cost option for conversion chemotherapy among other options that have been proposed.

scholarly journals Stereotactic radiosurgery in the treatment of parasellar meningiomas: long-term volumetric evaluation

2018 ◽  
Vol 128 (2) ◽  
pp. 362-372 ◽  
Author(s):  
Or Cohen-Inbar ◽  
Athreya Tata ◽  
Shayan Moosa ◽  
Cheng-chia Lee ◽  
Jason P. Sheehan
Keyword(s):  
Tumor Volume ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Volume Control ◽  
Tumor Control ◽  
Who Grade ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Nerve Dysfunction

OBJECTIVEParasellar meningiomas tend to invade the suprasellar, cavernous sinus, and petroclival regions, encroaching on adjacent neurovascular structures. As such, they prove difficult to safely and completely resect. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has played a central role in the treatment of parasellar meningiomas. Evaluation of tumor control rates at this location using simplified single-dimension measurements may prove misleading. The authors report the influence of SRS treatment parameters and the timing and volumetric changes of benign WHO Grade I parasellar meningiomas after SRS on long-term outcome.METHODSPatients with WHO Grade I parasellar meningiomas treated with single-session SRS and a minimum of 6 months of follow-up were selected. A total of 189 patients (22.2% males, n = 42) form the cohort. The median patient age was 54 years (range 19–88 years). SRS was performed as a primary upfront treatment for 44.4% (n = 84) of patients. Most (41.8%, n = 79) patients had undergone 1 resection prior to SRS. The median tumor volume at the time of SRS was 5.6 cm3 (0.2–54.8 cm3). The median margin dose was 14 Gy (range 5–35 Gy). The volumes of the parasellar meningioma were determined on follow-up scans, computed by segmenting the meningioma on a slice-by-slice basis with numerical integration using the trapezoidal rule.RESULTSThe median follow-up was 71 months (range 6–298 months). Tumor volume control was achieved in 91.5% (n = 173). Tumor progression was documented in 8.5% (n = 16), equally divided among infield recurrences (4.2%, n = 8) and out-of-field recurrences (4.2%, n = 8). Post-SRS, new or worsening CN deficits were observed in 54 instances, of which 19 involved trigeminal nerve dysfunction and were 18 related to optic nerve dysfunction. Of these, 90.7% (n = 49) were due to tumor progression and only 9.3% (n = 5) were attributable to SRS. Overall, this translates to a 2.64% (n = 5/189) incidence of direct SRS-related complications. These patients were treated with repeat SRS (6.3%, n = 12), repeat resection (2.1%, n = 4), or both (3.2%, n = 6). For patients treated with a margin dose ≥ 16 Gy, the 2-, 4-, 6-, 8-, 10-, 12-, and 15-year actuarial progression-free survival rates are 100%, 100%, 95.7%, 95.7%, 95.7%, 95.7%, and 95.7%, respectively. Patients treated with a margin dose < 16 Gy, had 2-, 4-, 6-, 8-, 10-, 12-, and 15-year actuarial progression-free survival rates of 99.4%, 97.7%, 95.1%, 88.1%, 82.1%, 79.4%, and 79.4%, respectively. This difference was deemed statistically significant (p = 0.043). Reviewing the volumetric patient-specific measurements, the early follow-up volumetric measurements (at the 3-year follow-up) reliably predicted long-term volume changes and tumor volume control (at the 10-year follow-up) (p = 0.029).CONCLUSIONSSRS is a durable and minimally invasive treatment modality for benign parasellar meningiomas. SRS offers high rates of growth control with a low incidence of neurological deficits compared with other treatment modalities for meningiomas in this region. Volumetric regression or stability during short-term follow-up of 3 years after SRS was shown to be predictive of long-term tumor control.

An update on BREAK-3, a phase III, randomized trial: Dabrafenib (DAB) versus dacarbazine (DTIC) in patients with BRAF V600E-positive mutation metastatic melanoma (MM).

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9013-9013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Axel Hauschild ◽  
Jean Jacques Grob ◽  
Lev V. Demidov ◽  
Thomas Jouary ◽  
Ralf Gutzmer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Median Overall Survival ◽  
Braf Inhibitor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Braf V600e ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Primary Analysis ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Independent Review ◽  
Clinical Trial Information

9013 Background: Dabrafenib is a selective BRAF inhibitor with demonstrated efficacy in BRAF V600E-positive mutation in MM. The primary analysis of BREAK-3 (NCT01227889) compared progression-free survival (PFS) in patients (pts) with BRAF V600E-positive mutation MM treated with dabrafenib or DTIC. Methods: Median PFS for dabrafenib of 5.1 months (mo) and study methods were previously described (Hauschild A, et al. Lancet. 2012,380:358–365). Independent review ended at the primary analysis. PFS was updated in Jun 2012 at median follow-up of 10.5 mo for dabrafenib (67% of PFS events), and 9.9 mo for DTIC. Median overall survival (OS) was not reached, so another analysis of OS and safety was performed with data as of Dec 2012, at which time the median follow-up was 15.2 (dabrafenib) and 12.7 (DTIC) mo. PFS of subjects who crossed over was also evaluated at that time. Results: PFS hazard ratio was 0.37 [95% CI; 0.23, 0.57]; median PFS was 6.9 mo dabrafenib and 2.7 mo DTIC. In Dec 2012, 36/63 DTIC pts crossed over; median PFS was 4.3 [95% CI; 4.1, 6.1] mos. OS is presented in the Table.The four most common adverse events (AE) on the dabrafenib arm were hyperkeratosis (39%), headache (35%), arthralgia (35%), and pyrexia (32%). Serious AEs ≥ 5% on the dabrafenib arm included cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma/keratoacanthoma (10%) and pyrexia (5%). Conclusions: Longer follow-up confirms the benefits of dabrafenib on PFS and response rate. Median OS in the dabrafenib arm was over 18 mo and over 15 mo in the DTIC arm. OS results are confounded by crossover of DTIC pts to dabrafenib and likely by subsequent therapy after progression. The effects of subsequent therapy results will be investigated. The safety profile had no significant changes. Clinical trial information: NCT01227889. [Table: see text]

Modified gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer (MPC): A single-institution experience.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 366-366 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kavya Krishna ◽  
Marlo A. Blazer ◽  
Lai Wei ◽  
Daniel H. Ahn ◽  
Christina Sing-Ying Wu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Cost Savings ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Borderline Resectable ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Cost Of Drugs

366 Background: The combination of gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel (GA) in first line treatment (tx) of MPC has a modest survival advantage over gemcitabine (gem) alone, but adds significant toxicities (tox) and increased cost. Based on data suggesting that biweekly administration (adm) of gem-based combinations preserves efficacy and improves tox profile, our institution adopted a modified regimen of GA (mGA). Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database of patients (pts) with pancreatic cancer treated with gem (1000 mg/m2) and nab-paclitaxel (125 mg/m2) on days 1 and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Survival curves were estimated using Kaplan-Meier method, with alive pts censored at time of last follow-up. Cost of tx includes cost of drugs, adm, and tox. Results: Of total 69 pts treated with mGA for MPC, locally advanced, or borderline resectable disease, 63 pts were evaluable for tox (table 1). A total of 49 pts (47 evaluable for response) received mGA for previously untreated MPC, with median progression free survival of 4.8 months(mo) (95% CI 2.6,7.4) and overall survival of 11.1 mo (95% CI 5.3,not reached). Overall, 27% of pts experienced neurotoxicity with rate of grade 3 tox of < 2%, and 8% required growth factors (GF). Average cost savings was $5500/pt/month with mGA compared to standard GA, excluding GF cost which was lower with mGA. Conclusions: A less intense regimen of GA maintains efficacy while significantly improving tox profile and cost in pts with MPC. [Table: see text]

Trecc: Re-challenge therapy with anti-EGFR in metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma (mCRC).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 683-683
Author(s):  
Amanda Karani ◽  
Tiago Felismino ◽  
Lara Azevedo Diniz ◽  
Mariana Petaccia Macedo ◽  
Larissa Machado ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Median Overall Survival ◽  
Colorectal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Resistance Mechanisms ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Free Interval

683 Background: Anti-EGFR plus chemotherapy (CT) promotes high response rates (RR) and median overall survival (OS) surpasses 30 months in RASwt/BRAFwt mCRC. After disease progression (PD), resistance mechanisms have been described. The aim of our study was to evaluate efficacy of anti-EGFR re-challenge (TRECC). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of patients (pts) with mCRC. All pts had received anti-EGFR plus CT and were discontinued for different reasons. During the treatment, there was re-challenge with an anti-EGFR + CT. We aimed to evaluate progression-free survival (PFS) and OS after re-challenge and prognostic factors associated with PFS. Results: Sixty eight pts met the study criteria. Median follow-up after re-challenge was 39.3m. Discontinuation after first exposure was 25% due to PD; 75% for other reasons. Median anti-EGFR free interval was 10.5m. At re-challenge, main CT regime was: FOLFIRI 58.8%, Cetuximab and Panitumumab were used in 59 and 9 pts respectively. mPFS after re-challenge was 6.6m; mOS was 24.4m. Objective response rate (CR + PR) at re-challenge was 42.6%. In an univariate analysis, adverse prognostic factors related to PFS were: absence of objective response at 1st EGFR exposure (HR 2.12, CI:1.20-3.74 p = 0.009); PD as reason for 1st discontinuation (HR 3.44, CI:1.88-6.29 p < 0.0001); re-challenge at fourth or later lines (HR 2,51, CI:1.49-4.23 p = 0.001); panitumumab use (HR 2.26 CI:1.18-5.54 p = 0.017). In a multivariate model, only PD as reason for 1st discontinuation remained statistically significant (HR = 2.63, CI:1.14-6.03 p = 0.022). mPFS was 3.3m and 8.4m and mOS was 7,5m and 33,4m in patients with PD as reason for 1st discontinuation and other reasons respectively. Conclusions: Re-challenge therapy is commonly used due to paucity of effective lines of treament for mCRC. In our analysis, pts that stopped 1st anti-EGFR therapy due to PD have shorter survival, suggesting these pts do not benefit from TRECC. However, interruption due to treatment holiday after PR/CR resulted in longer PFS. In conclusion, for a selected group of pts, TRECC could be considered a strategy of treatment. Due to the limited number of pts, our data should be evaluated in a prospective cohort of patients.

Stereotactic radiosurgery for cerebellopontine angle meningiomas

2014 ◽  
Vol 120 (3) ◽  
pp. 708-715 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seong-Hyun Park ◽  
Hideyuki Kano ◽  
Ajay Niranjan ◽  
John C. Flickinger ◽  
L. Dade Lunsford
Keyword(s):  
Stereotactic Radiosurgery ◽  
Cerebellopontine Angle ◽  
Tumor Volume ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Tumor Control ◽  
Improvement Rate ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Neurological Improvement ◽  
Presenting Symptoms

Object To assess the long-term outcomes of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for cerebellopontine angle (CPA) meningiomas, the authors retrospectively reviewed data from a 20-year experience. They evaluated progression-free survival as well as improvement, stabilization, or deterioration in clinical symptoms. Methods Seventy-four patients with CPA meningiomas underwent SRS involving various Gamma Knife technologies between 1990 and 2010. The most common presenting symptoms were dizziness or disequilibrium, hearing loss, facial sensory dysfunction, and headache. The median tumor volume was 3.0 cm3 (range 0.3–17.1 cm3), and the median radiation dose to the tumor margin was 13 Gy (range 11–16 Gy). The median follow-up period was 40 months (range 4–147 months). Results At last imaging follow-up, the tumor volume had decreased in 46 patients (62%), remained stable in 26 patients (35%), and increased in 2 patients (3%). The progression-free survival after SRS was 98% at 1 year, 98% at 3 years, and 95% at 5 years. At the last clinical follow-up, 23 patients (31%) showed neurological improvement, 43 patients (58%) showed no change in symptoms or signs, and 8 patients (11%) had worsening symptoms or signs. The neurological improvement rate after SRS was 16% at 1 year, 31% at 3 years, and 40% at 5 years. The post-SRS deterioration rate was 5% at 1 year, 10% at 3 years, and 16% at 5 years. A multivariate analysis demonstrated that trigeminal neuralgia was the symptom most likely to worsen after SRS (HR 0.08, 95% CI 0.02–0.31; p = 0.001). Asymptomatic peritumoral edema occurred in 4 patients (5%) after SRS, and symptomatic adverse radiation effects developed in 7 patients (9%). Conclusions Stereotactic radiosurgery for CPA meningiomas provided a high tumor control rate and relatively low risk of ARE. Tumor compression of the trigeminal nerve by a CPA meningioma resulted in an increased rate of facial pain worsening in this patient experience.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document