Metabolic flexibility, insulin sensitivity and genetic variations in newly diagnosed patients with type 2 diabetes

2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (S 01) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Apostolopoulou ◽  
K Strassburger ◽  
B Knebel ◽  
J Kotzka ◽  
J Szendroedi ◽  
...  
Diabetologia ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 59 (10) ◽  
pp. 2203-2207 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Apostolopoulou ◽  
◽  
Klaus Strassburger ◽  
Christian Herder ◽  
Birgit Knebel ◽  
...  

Diabetes ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 69 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 970-P
Author(s):  
KRISHNAMOORTHY SATHEESH ◽  
CHAMUKUTTAN SNEHALATHA ◽  
ARUN NANDITHA ◽  
ARUN RAGHAVAN ◽  
RAMACHANDRAN VINITHA ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuan Gao ◽  
Xinchi Wu ◽  
Qi Fu ◽  
Yanyun Li ◽  
Tao Yang ◽  
...  

The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between serum 25-hydroxy vitamin D (25-OHD) and insulin sensitivity andβ-cell function in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes. 395 newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes patients were enrolled in this study. Venous blood samples were collected at 0 min, 30 min, and 120 min of OGTT to measure serum glucose and insulin. Matsuda ISI and HOMA-IR were used to determine insulin sensitivity. The ratio of 0–120 min area under curve of insulin to glucose (insulin release index, INSR) was calculated as surrogate index ofβ-cell insulin secretion function. The products of insulin secretion indices multiplied by Matsuda insulin sensitivity index were used as disposition indices. Patients were divided into three groups according to tertiles (T1, T2, and T3) of 25-OHD concentration. There was significant difference among three groups for HOMA-IR, Matsuda ISI, and INSR. HOMA-IR, Matsuda ISI, INSR, and DI were undifferentiated among three groups in male patients. But HOMA-IR, Matsuda ISI, and INSR were significantly different among three groups in female patients after being adjusted by confounding factors. In conclusion, serum 25-OHD is associated with insulin sensitivity andβ-cell function for female newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes patients, and the association is ambiguous in males.


2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guang Yang ◽  
Chunlin Li ◽  
Yanping Gong ◽  
Fusheng Fang ◽  
Hui Tian ◽  
...  

Aim.To evaluate the differences in insulin resistance (IR) among subjects with normal glucose tolerance (NGT), hyperinsulinemia with NGT (HINS), impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), and newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).Methods.5 NGT, 25 HINS, 25 IGT, and 25 T2DM subjects participated in this research. The hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp technique (HECT) was performed in all of them to evaluate IR levels. The relative factors influencing IR were evaluated. The simple insulin sensitivity indices were calculated, and the correlation between each index and the M value was analyzed.Results.TheMvalues of NGT, HINS, IGT, and T2DM groups were 11.88 ± 2.93 mg·kg−1·min−1, 6.23 ± 1.73 mg·kg−1·min−1, 6.37 ± 2.12 mg·kg−1·min−1, and 6.19 ± 1.89 mg·kg−1·min−1, respectively.Mvalues in HINS, IGT, and T2DM groups were lower than those in the NGT group (P=0.005); however, the differences among the HINS, IGT, and T2DM groups were not statistically significant (P=0.835). The independent factors influencing theMvalue were waistline and fasting insulin level (FINS). The simple insulin sensitivity indices, especially Matsuda and Gutt index, were significantly associated with theMvalue (P<0.01).Conclusion.IR existed in the HINS, IGT, and T2DM groups, and IR levels were consistent in the three groups. The independent factors influencing IR were waistline and FINS.


2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (9) ◽  
pp. 235 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marta Seghieri ◽  
Eleni Rebelos ◽  
Andrea Mari ◽  
Luigi Sciangula ◽  
Carlo Giorda ◽  
...  

The ß-cell dysfunction of type 2 diabetes is partly reversible. The optimal time window to induce glycemic remission is uncertain; short courses of insulin treatment have been tested as a strategy to induce remission. In a pilot study in 38 newly-diagnosed patients, we assessed the time-course of insulin sensitivity and ß-cell function (by repeat oral glucose tolerance tests) following a 6-week basal insulin treatment compared to metformin monotherapy in equipoised glycemic control. At 6 weeks, insulin secretion and sensitivity were increased in both groups whilst ß-cell glucose sensitivity was unchanged. From this time onwards, in the insulin group glycemia started to rise at 3 months, and was no longer different from baseline at 1 year. The initial improvement in insulin secretion and sensitivity dissipated. In the metformin group, fasting plasma glucose and HbA1c levels reached a nadir at 8 months, at which time insulin secretion, glucose and insulin sensitivity were significantly better than at baseline and higher than in the insulin group. A short course of basal insulin in newly-diagnosed patients does not appear to offer clinical advantage over recommended initiation with metformin.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document