scholarly journals Inotuzumab Ozogamicin Monotherapy as an Outpatient Salvage Treatment in Relapsed Refractory B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Compassionate Access

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (02) ◽  
pp. 199-203
Author(s):  
Vivek S. Radhakrishnan ◽  
Ketan Modak ◽  
Saurabh J. Bhave ◽  
Jeevan Kumar ◽  
Mita Roychowdhury ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Salvage Therapy ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Sinusoidal Obstruction Syndrome ◽  
Inotuzumab Ozogamicin ◽  
Best Response

AbstractRelapsed and refractory (RR) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) poses unique and difficult challenges to a practicing clinician in India where access to novel immunotherapies is limited. Between 2017 and 2020, eight patients with B-cell ALL at our center received inotuzumab ozogamicin (IO) monotherapy on compassionate access, as salvage therapy after at least two lines of conventional therapy failure, and most often as outpatient infusion. Eight patients (21–60 years, three females) received IO. Three patients had morphologic relapse and five patients reported persistent measurable residual disease (MRD). The best response on IO therapy achieved was negative MRD in six of seven patients and complete response (CR) with persistent MRD in one. One patient died (intracranial hemorrhage) before completion of first cycle. All responding patients were transplant eligible and four patients (57%) underwent allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (Allo-HCT). Median follow-up of this cohort is 9 months (4–29.6 months), four patients (57%) are alive as stable with negative MRD. No significant infusion reactions occurred during therapy. Three patients developed grades III and IV neutropenia, two patients showed grade III transaminitis, and two patients developed post-HCT severe sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS). IO is a feasible outpatient based salvage therapy to improve the remission status in RR B-cell ALL.

scholarly journals Immuno-Target Therapy for Relapsed or Refractory Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

2020 ◽  
Vol 95 (5) ◽  
pp. 320-324
Author(s):  
Jae-Ho Yoon
Keyword(s):  
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Target Therapy ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Novel Agents ◽  
Survival Outcomes ◽  
Real World Data ◽  
Inotuzumab Ozogamicin ◽  
Term Survival

Standard post-remission therapy for adult patients with high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). However, 20–30% of patients treated with allo-HCT subsequently relapse, and their long-term survival outcomes are very poor even after the next allo-HCT. The poor survival outcomes reported by previous studies have mainly been due to low complete remission (CR) rates and high mortality from conventional salvage chemo-regimens, such as mitoxantrone plus etoposide plus cytarabine (MEC) or fludarabine plus cytarabine plus idarubicin (FLA-Ida). However, several novel agents with proven high remission rates and a good measurable residual disease response can now be administered. The representative novel agents recently introduced are blinatumomab (anti-CD19 bispecific T-cell engager) and inotuzumab ozogamicin (anti-CD22 antibody-calicheamicin conjugate). In South Korea, blinatumomab has been used since October 2016 and inotuzumab ozogamicin has been in use since October 2019 under coverage by the national insurance system. Studies on blinatumomab in Korea showed that this drug is effective when used as an early salvage line, even in patients who relapse after an initial allo-HCT. However, a previous study revealed that relapsed patients with a short CR duration of < 12 months post-HCT show a poor response to blinatumomab compared to patients with a longer CR duration. Also, some early relapsed cases with active acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) show aggravated GVHD with the use of blinatumomab. No real-world data are available in Korea for inotuzumab, but previous trials have reported a good CR and proceeding rates to allo-HCT comparable to blinatumomab. We have experienced hepatotoxicity including venoocclusive disease in post-HCT relapsed patients treated with inotuzumab.

scholarly journals A Phase I study of inotuzumab ozogamicin in pediatric relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ITCC-059 study)

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erica Brivio ◽  
Franco Locatelli ◽  
Marta Lopez-Yurda ◽  
Andrea Malone ◽  
Cristina Diaz de Heredia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Sinusoidal Obstruction Syndrome ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Antibody Drug Conjugate ◽  
Inotuzumab Ozogamicin ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem

This Phase I study investigated the recommended Phase II dose (RP2D) of inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO), a CD22-directed antibody-drug conjugate, in pediatric patients with multiple-relapsed/refractory (R/R) CD22-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Patients (≥1-&lt;18 years) received three InO doses (Days 1, 8, 15) per course. Dose-escalation was based on dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) during Course 1 . Dose level 1 (DL1)=1.4 mg/m2 (0.6-0.4-0.4 mg/m2); DL2=1.8 mg/m2 (0.8-0.5-0.5 mg/m2). Secondary endpoints included safety, anti-leukemic activity, and pharmacokinetics. Twenty-five patients (23 evaluable for DLT) were enrolled. In Course 1, first cohort, 1/6 (DL1) and 2/5 (DL2) patients experienced DLTs; subsequent review considered DL2 DLTs to be non-dose-limiting. Dose was de-escalated to DL1 while awaiting protocol amendment to re-evaluate DL2 in a second cohort, where 0/6 (DL1) and 1/6 (DL2) patients had a DLT. Twenty-three patients experienced Grade 3-4 adverse events; hepatic sinusoidal obstruction syndrome was reported in two patients after subsequent chemotherapy. Overall response rate after Course 1 was 80% [95% CI: 59-93%] (20/25 patients; DL1=75% [43-95%], DL2=85% [55-98%]); 84% [60-97%] of responders obtained minimal residual disease-negative CR; 12-month overall survival was 40% [95% CI: 25-66%]. Nine patients received hematopoietic stem cell transplant or chimeric-antigen receptor T-cells after InO. InO median maximum concentrations were comparable to simulated adult concentrations. InO was well tolerated, demonstrating anti-leukemic activity in heavily pre-treated children with CD22-positive R/R ALL. RP2D was established as 1.8 mg/m2/course, as in adults.

scholarly journals Inotuzumab: from preclinical development to success in B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 96-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph Wynne ◽  
David Wright ◽  
Wendy Stock
Keyword(s):  
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Antibody Drug Conjugate ◽  
Preclinical Development ◽  
Inotuzumab Ozogamicin ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Further Development

Abstract Inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO) is a recently US Food and Drug Administration–approved antibody–drug conjugate for the treatment of relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). InO consists of a CD22-targeting immunoglobulin G4 humanized monoclonal antibody conjugated to calicheamicin. Although initially developed for the treatment of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) because of activity in preclinical models and high response rates in indolent lymphomas, a phase 3 trial was negative and further development focused on CD22+ ALL. Although results in NHL were disappointing, parallel testing in early-phase trials of CD22+ ALL demonstrated feasibility and efficacy. Subsequently, the randomized phase 3 Study Of Inotuzumab Ozogamicin Versus Investigator's Choice Of Chemotherapy In Patients With Relapsed Or Refractory Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia trial showed that InO was superior to standard of care regimens with a significantly improved complete remission (CR) rate in patients with relapsed/refractory disease (80.7% vs 29.4%, P &lt; .001). Patients achieving CR with InO also had a significantly higher rate of undetectable minimal residual disease compared with chemotherapy (78.4% vs 28.1%, P &lt; .001). InO-specific side effects, including veno-occlusive disease, have been an ongoing area of concern, and consensus guidelines for minimizing toxicities are now available. Ongoing trials are investigating the combination of InO with other agents in the relapse setting and the addition of InO to frontline therapy. This review details the preclinical and clinical development of InO, focusing on how best to use it and future directions for further development.

scholarly journals Co-culture model of B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia recapitulates a transcription signature of chemotherapy-refractory minimal residual disease

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie L. Rellick ◽  
Gangqing Hu ◽  
Debra Piktel ◽  
Karen H. Martin ◽  
Werner J. Geldenhuys ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Tumor Cells ◽  
Minimal Residual Disease ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Adherent Cells ◽  
Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Minimal Residual

AbstractB-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is characterized by accumulation of immature hematopoietic cells in the bone marrow, a well-established sanctuary site for leukemic cell survival during treatment. While standard of care treatment results in remission in most patients, a small population of patients will relapse, due to the presence of minimal residual disease (MRD) consisting of dormant, chemotherapy-resistant tumor cells. To interrogate this clinically relevant population of treatment refractory cells, we developed an in vitro cell model in which human ALL cells are grown in co-culture with human derived bone marrow stromal cells or osteoblasts. Within this co-culture, tumor cells are found in suspension, lightly attached to the top of the adherent cells, or buried under the adherent cells in a population that is phase dim (PD) by light microscopy. PD cells are dormant and chemotherapy-resistant, consistent with the population of cells that underlies MRD. In the current study, we characterized the transcriptional signature of PD cells by RNA-Seq, and these data were compared to a published expression data set derived from human MRD B-cell ALL patients. Our comparative analyses revealed that the PD cell population is markedly similar to the MRD expression patterns from the primary cells isolated from patients. We further identified genes and key signaling pathways that are common between the PD tumor cells from co-culture and patient derived MRD cells as potential therapeutic targets for future studies.

A Systematic Review of Blinatumomab in the Treatment of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Engaging an Old Problem With New Solutions

2021 ◽  
pp. 106002802098841
Author(s):  
Zachery Halford ◽  
Carli Coalter ◽  
Vanessa Gresham ◽  
Tabitha Brown
Keyword(s):  
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
T Cell ◽  
B Cell ◽  
T Cell Activation ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Philadelphia Chromosome ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Cytotoxic T Cell ◽  
Bispecific T Cell Engager

Objective: To assess the current literature for blinatumomab in the treatment of adult and pediatric B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Data Sources: We conducted a PubMed (inception to December 11, 2020) and ClinicalTrials.gov systematic literature search using the following terms: blinatumomab, Blincyto, lymphoblastic leukemia, and bispecific T-cell engager. Study Selection and Data Extraction: All relevant published articles, package inserts, and meeting abstracts evaluating the use of blinatumomab in ALL were considered for inclusion. Data Synthesis: Blinatumomab, a first-in-class bispecific T-cell engager monoclonal antibody, facilitates cytotoxic T-cell activation and subsequent eradication of CD19-positive B cells. The confirmatory phase III TOWER trial demonstrated superior overall survival (OS) with blinatumomab compared with standard chemotherapy (7.7 months vs 4.0 months) in relapsed and refractory (R/R) B-cell ALL. In the phase II BLAST trial, blinatumomab achieved a complete measurable residual disease (MRD) response in 78% of evaluable patients, with a median OS of 36.5 months. Potentially life-threatening cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity occurred in approximately 15% and 65% of patients, respectively. Relevance to Patient Care and Clinical Practice: Following initial Food and Drug Administration approval in 2014, blinatumomab gained expanded approval in pediatric patients and in Philadelphia chromosome-positive R/R ALL. In 2018, blinatumomab became the first and only drug approved for the treatment of persistent MRD in any hematologic malignancy. Emerging data demonstrate promising efficacy with blinatumomab in specific ALL settings, including frontline therapy, as a bridge to transplantation, and in “chemotherapy-free” combination regimens. Conclusions: Blinatumomab provides a paradigm-shifting treatment option; however, many questions surrounding optimal patient selection, sequencing, and cost-effectiveness remain.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document