Response by wheat, rape, and field peas to pre-sowing herbicides and deep tillage

1987 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 431 ◽  
Author(s):  
PR Dann ◽  
AG Thomas ◽  
RB Cunningham ◽  
PHR Moore
Keyword(s):  
Grain Yield ◽  
Growth And Yield ◽  
Wheat Crop ◽  
Wheat Grain ◽  
Deep Tillage ◽  
Field Peas ◽  
Herbicide Treatments ◽  
Average Rainfall ◽  
Surface Disturbance ◽  
Crop Parameters

A field experiment near Yass, N.S.W., in 198 1 and 1982 compared several forms of deep tillage (loosening of the soil to depths from 15 to 60 cm, with little surface disturbance) following the application of various herbicides, on the growth and yield of wheat, rape, field peas and weeds. The deep tillage implements used were: Wallace Soil Reconditioning Unit, Domino Sub Tiller, and single tine ripper, cultivating to depths from 15 to 60 cm. The herbicides used were: glyphosate (Roundup at 1 L/ha), paraquat-diquat (Sprayseed at 2 L/ha) and paraquat-diquat (Sprayseed at 2 L/ha) plus dicamba (Banvel 200 at 0.4 Wha). A fallow treatment also was used in 1982. Crops, and weeds-which were a mixture of grass and broad-leaf species-responded more strongly to herbicide than to deep tillage treatments. At the rates used, paraquat-diquat plus dicamba controlled cereals more efficiently than did the other herbicides. The responses were generally increased growth of wheat and rape-field peas being much less responsive-and decreased growth of weeds. In 198 1, a year of average rainfall, herbicide (meaned over deep tillage treatments) increased wheat grain yield by 1.94 t/ha (1.8 1 v. 3.75 t/ha) and deep tillage (meaned over herbicide treatments) by 0.60 t/ha (2.81 v. 3.41 t/ha). In 1982, a year of below-average rainfall, fallow increased wheat grain yield by 1.67 t/ha (0.18 v. 1.85 t/ha), herbicide by 0.73 t/ha (0.18 v. 0.91 t/ha) and deep tillage by 0.36 t/ha (0.69 v. 1.05 t/ha). Covariance analyses indicated that, for all wheat crop parameters measured in 198 1, responses to both deep tillage and herbicide were strongly related to reduction in weed top growth, this effect being greater with the herbicide treatments than with the deep tillage treatments.

Increasing production of an annual medic - wheat rotation by grazing and grass removal with herbicides in the Victorian Mallee

1998 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 211 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. A. Latta ◽  
E. D. Carter
Keyword(s):  
Grain Yield ◽  
Wheat Yield ◽  
Wheat Crop ◽  
Stocking Rate ◽  
Annual Grass ◽  
Wheat Grain ◽  
Cereal Production ◽  
Herbicide Treatments ◽  
Seed Yields

Summary. The productivity of an annual medic-based pasture–pasture–wheat rotation in response to chemical grass control and stocking rate treatments was evaluated over 3 years. Fluazifop applied in 1991 reduced the annual grass component during the pasture years (to <2% in 1991 and <5% in 1992) and grass densities in the 1993 wheat phase. This improved winter herbage production in 1992 (>50%) and the 1993 wheat yield (>40%). Glyphosate applied during the winter of 1991 reduced the grass component and the winter and total herbage production in that year, and grass populations in 1992. Glyphosate applied during the spring of 1991 reduced the medic seed yields and the grass and medic densities in 1992. There were no pasture or cereal production benefits measured from the 1991 glyphosate applications. All the above comparisons were made with no herbicide in 1991 followed by glyphosate applied during the winter of 1992, a common district practice. Stocking at twice the district average, over all herbicide treatments, reduced the 1991 winter herbage production but maintained or improved the 1992 winter and total herbage production, compared with the district average stocking rate. The high stocking rate resulted in lower grass densities in the 1993 wheat crop and increased the wheat grain yield by 0.5 t/ha.

Effect of deep tillage and seedbed preparation on the growth and yield of wheat on a hard-setting soil

1988 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 491 ◽  
Author(s):  
JA Mead ◽  
KY Chan
Keyword(s):  
Grain Yield ◽  
Water Infiltration ◽  
Growth And Yield ◽  
Wheat Crop ◽  
Seedling Vigour ◽  
Deep Tillage ◽  
Crop Establishment ◽  
Tillage Operation ◽  
Seedbed Preparation ◽  
Cultivation Techniques

The preparation of a seedbed using either conventional cultivation (3 scarifyings) or deep tillage increased the vegetative and grain yield of a wheat crop (cv. Banks in 1983, and Quarrion in 1984) when compared with the direct drill technique of crop establishment on a hard-setting red duplex soil (Dr 2.62). Neither vegetative nor grain yield was increased by the inclusion of a deep tillage operation on the conventionally cultivated treatment prior to seedbed preparation with a scarifier. The poor seedling vigour of direct drilled plots was eliminated by deep tillage. However, the effect of deep tillage was short-lived. The importance of good soil physical condition during crop establishment was highlighted by the recompaction of the cultivated soil to bulk density and shear strength levels similar to those of the uncultivated plots in the latter part of the growing season. Because of the fragile nature of the soil, there were no residual benefits from the deep tillage operation on the undisturbed plots in the following season. Although cultivation had obvious benefits in enhancing seedling vigour on the hard-setting soil, the destruction of the soil's macroporosity reduced water infiltration down the soil profile. The adoption of conservation farming practices on hard-setting soils should initially involve reduced cultivation techniques to promote early seedling vigour. This cultivation should be timed to minimise the risks of soil erosion and recompaction. Further work is needed to identify the optimal cultivation techniques for these soils.

scholarly journals Effect of brackish water irrigation on soil degradation and performance of salt tolerant wheat and maize genotypes

2018 ◽  
Vol 42 (4) ◽  
pp. 693-705
Author(s):  
MR Farooq ◽  
J Akhtar ◽  
MI Shahid ◽  
M Safdar
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Effect ◽  
Grain Yield ◽  
Brackish Water ◽  
Growth And Yield ◽  
Wheat Crop ◽  
Salt Tolerant ◽  
Wheat Grain ◽  
Maize Crop ◽  
Maize Genotypes ◽  
Fodder Yield

A field experiment was conducted to study the effect of brackish water on soil physical and chemical conditions and yield of wheat and maize genotypes at the farmers’ field. Two salt tolerant genotypes for each crop were selected from previous hydroponic and lysimeters studies. Wheat-maize cropping system was followed using tubewell brackish water alone and with chemical (gypsum) and organic (FYM) amendments. The results revealed that treatments have significant effect on all growth and yield parameters and followed the trend of T1>T3 >T4 > T2. Highest grain yield of wheat genotypes (SARC-1 & V-8670) was observed in control (4050 & 3800 kg/ha) and lowest was in T2 (2862 & 2200 kg/ha). Similar trend was observed in maize fodder yield that was 9625 & 8875 kg/ha in control and 4350 & 2253 kg/ha in T2 for Sahiwal-02 and Akbar, respectively. Maximum reduction in wheat grain and maize fodder yield observed in T2 (tubewell water alone) where high EC, SAR and RSC water was applied that was 39 & 57% for 1st year (wheat crop) and 89 & 74% for 2nd year (maize crop) respectively. Data revealed that use of gypsum and FYM along with brackish water improved the wheat grain yield and maize fodder as compared to T2. More adverse effect of brackish water was observed in high EC, SAR and RSC treatment (tubewell water alone) as compared to other treatments. Application of amendments (gypsum and FYM) along with brackish tubewell water reduced adverse effect of brackish water. Among genotypes SARC-1 and Sahiwal-2002 performed better in all treatments and textures especially under brackish water treatments.Bangladesh J. Agril. Res. 42(4): 693-705, December 2017

scholarly journals Growth and yield attributes of wheat crop in response to application of micronutrients: A review

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 823-829
Author(s):  
Ganpat Louhar
Keyword(s):  
Growth Rate ◽  
Grain Yield ◽  
Leaf Area ◽  
Foliar Application ◽  
Animal Health ◽  
Growth And Yield ◽  
Wheat Crop ◽  
Optimum Dose ◽  
Area Index ◽  
Yield Attributes

Wheat is one of the most important cereal crop and staple foods in the world. Increase in productivity of wheat by balance nutrient management is one of the most crucial factors. The main objective this study is to assessing the role of micronutrients in improving different components of wheat yield. There are different methods of application such as seed priming, soil application and fortification but foliar application is more beneficial. This is due to response of foliar application has positive and quadrate in nature i.e. the optimum dose of foliar application of zinc for grain yield of wheat was observed as 0.04%. Among treatments of micronutrient alone or combined forms give better results over control. Results have show that micronutrient application substantially improved leaf area index (LAI), leaf area duration, CGR (Crop growth rate), RGR (Relative growth rate), NAR (Net assimilation rate), plant height, spike length, spikelets/spike, grains/spike, test weight, tillers m-2, grain yield, chlorophyll content and biological yield as well as harvest index of wheat. The yield and quality of wheat products improved and boosted by micronutrient applications. Therefore, human and animal health will be protected with the feed of enriched and balanced nutrition of produce as well as it will help in facing the severe global food security.

scholarly journals Nitrogen application rate and timing management for improved grain quality parameters of wheat crop

2021 ◽  
Vol 58 (04) ◽  
pp. 1141-1153
Author(s):  
Gul Roz Khan
Keyword(s):  
Grain Yield ◽  
Grain Quality ◽  
Irrigation System ◽  
Quality Parameters ◽  
Wheat Crop ◽  
Change Scenario ◽  
Wheat Grain ◽  
Flood Irrigation ◽  
Recent Climate ◽  
Use Efficiency

Nitrogen use efficiency under flood irrigation system is generally low (30%) in field crops, which is one of the fundamental factors of high production cost in the developing countries. Optimum rate and timing of N-application is otherwise important to harvest good quality grain for backing in the recent climate change scenario. Optimum N-rate (NAR) corresponds with the application timing (NAT) has resulted in good quality grains. Aim of the study was to focus on spring wheat grain quality and N use efficiency (NUE) with NAR {i.e., 0, 100, 120, 140 and 160 kg ha-1) and NAT (i.e., 100% at sowing (NAR1), 50% at sowing and 50% at tillering (NAT2), 25% at sowing, 50% at tillering and 25% at booting (NAT3) and 25% at sowing, 25% at tillering and 50% at booting (NAT4)}. Treatment impacts were investigated focusing grain yield, grain-N, and quality parameters (i.e., crude protein, gluten, amylose and amylopectin). Experiment was a randomized complete block, in three replications, conducted at Agronomy Res. Farm of the University of Agric. Peshawar in 2016-17 and repeated in 2017-18. Results showed the highest NUE in100 kg N ha-1, followed by a decreasing rate (p<0.05) for every next N-increment. While averaged on N-rates, the highest NUE observed in NAT3 which did not differ fromNAT4 but decreased (p<0.05) for treatment NAT2 with lowest for theNAT1. Pakhtunkhuwa-2015 showed higher NUE among the varieties. Grain-N, grain yield, gluten and amylose did not differ with NAR 140 and 160 kg ha-1 as well as for the NAT3 and NAT4 but decreased for NAT2 and the lowest was noted for NAT1. The N-content of wheat grain was highest in Pakhtunkhuwa-2015, followed by Pirsabak-2015 and the lowest in DN-84. Nonetheless, grain amylopectin showed a reduction with increasing NAR and/or split N-applications from one to two and/or three doses. Cultivars did not show any changes in the amylopectin. It is concluded that in recent climate changes where flood irrigation system is practiced, three N-splits (NAT3 or NAT4) resulted higher quality grains with140 kg N ha-1 to wheat crop

Influence of preseason weed management and in-crop treatments in two successive wheat crops 1. Weed seedling numbers and wheat grain yield

1993 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 167 ◽  
Author(s):  
PM Dowling ◽  
PTW Wong
Keyword(s):  
Grain Yield ◽  
Weed Management ◽  
Seed Set ◽  
Seedling Emergence ◽  
Grass Species ◽  
Wheat Crop ◽  
Annual Grass ◽  
Wheat Grain ◽  
Heavy Grazing ◽  
Annual Grasses

The effect of 5 preseason management treatments on seed set reduction of annual weed grasses and their regeneration in the following autumn was evaluated in a 2-year field experiment commencing at Orange in spring 1986. Preseason (spring) treatments were paraquat, glyphosate (2 rates), unsprayed heavy grazing, and unsprayed control. In the first of 2 successive wheat crops (planted 1987), 3 in-crop weed control treatments [control, chlorsulfuron (both sod-seeded), and trifluralin plus cultivation] were imposed. In 1988, the second wheat crop was sown into a cultivated seedbed or direct-drilled. The preseason treatments reduced potential annual grass regeneration by 91-99% compared with the control, with heavy grazing being the best treatment. For each preseason treatment compared with the control, the pattern of actual seedling emergence within the crop during 1987 was similar to that of potential emergence for each grass species (except Lolium rigidum), but numbers were lower and more variable (7-86% of potential numbers). The proportion of Bromus spp. and Vulpia spp. emerging within the crop declined from the first to the second crop, while L. rigidum increased to an average of 93% of the annual grass population in 1988. Trifluralin plus cultivation increased the control of annual grasses in 1987. In 1988, the 1987 in-crop treatments had little carryover effect on annual grass control; however, wheat grain yield was increased by both chlorsulfuron and trifluralin. Preseason management reduced seed set of annual grass weeds, and this control was maintained under cropping for at least 2 years (except for L. rigidum). Wheat grain yield responded to this control. Long-term control of L. rigidum where soil is disturbed appears difficult because of apparent long-lived seed in the soil.

scholarly journals Accentuating the Role of Nitrogen to Phosphorus Ratio on the Growth and Yield of Wheat Crop

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 2253
Author(s):  
Maria Mussarat ◽  
Muhammad Shair ◽  
Dost Muhammad ◽  
Ishaq Ahmad Mian ◽  
Shadman Khan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Grain Yield ◽  
Chlorophyll Content ◽  
N Uptake ◽  
Growth And Yield ◽  
Yield Potential ◽  
Wheat Crop ◽  
P Deficiency ◽  
Spad Value ◽  
Biological Yield ◽  
The Impact

Nitrogen (N) and Phosphorus (P) deficiency is a major yield limiting factor across the globe and their proper management plays a vital role in optimizing crop yield. This field experiment was conducted to assess the impact of soil and plant nitrogen N and P ratio on the growth and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in alkaline calcareous soil. The study consisted of various levels of nitrogen (0, 40, 80, and 160 kg ha−1 as urea) and phosphorus (0, 30, 60, and 90 kg P2O5 ha−1 as diammonium phosphate), and was carried out in randomized complete block design (RCBD) with factorial arrangement having three replications. The result showed that the addition of 160 kg N ha−1 significantly improved biological yield (10,052 kg ha−1), grain weight (3120 kg ha−1), chlorophyll content at tillering stage soil plant analysis development (SPAD) value (35.38), N uptake in straw (33.42 kg ha−1), and K uptake in straw (192 kg ha−1) compared to other N levels. In case of P, 90 kg P2O5 ha−1 had resulted maximum biological yield (9852 kg ha−1), grain yield (3663 kg ha−1), chlorophyll content at tillering stage (SPAD value 34.36), P (6.68 mg kg−1) and K (171 kg ha−1) uptake in straw. The sole use of N and P have positively influenced the biological and grain yield but their interaction didn’t response to biological yield. The present study reveals that SPAD value (chlorophyll meter) is the better choice for determining plant N and P concentrations to estimate the yield potential.

Manipulation of ley pastures with herbicides to control take-all

1993 ◽  
Vol 44 (6) ◽  
pp. 1235 ◽  
Author(s):  
WJ MacLeod ◽  
GC MacNish ◽  
CW Thorn
Keyword(s):  
Grain Yield ◽  
Crop Rotation ◽  
Broad Spectrum ◽  
Dry Matter ◽  
Crop Yields ◽  
Wheat Crop ◽  
Herbicide Treatments ◽  
Second Year ◽  
Pasture Yield ◽  
Take All

The effect of grass-selective and broad-spectrum herbicides in pasture:wheat rotation experiments were studied from 1981 to 1986 at Esperance, W.A. The quantity of pasture and the proportion of grass present in the pasture phases were determined. Pastures were grazed by sheep. Incidence and severity of take-all and grain yield were measured in the wheat phases. The rotations studied were either a 2 year pasture: 1 year crop or 1 year pasture: 1 year crop. Herbicide treatments greatly decreased the grass content of pastures in the year of application, and this effect carried over to the second year in the 2 year pasture: 1 year crop rotation. Herbicide reduced total pasture yield in the year of application, but not in the year following. Herbicide treatment of pastures decreased the incidence and severity of take-all in the following wheat crop. Crop yields were increased following treated pastures and to a greater extent than could be exdained bv decreased take-all alone. Incidence of take-all depended primarily upon the quantity of grass in the previous pasture (5.4% incidence of take-all per 100 kg ha-1 grass dry matter in the previous pasture). Incidence of take-all was also related to the incidence of take-all in previous wheat crops and the quantity of grass in the pasture in the preceding two years.

scholarly journals Pyroxsulam: Sulfonamide Herbicide for Weed Control in Wheat in Brazil

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
L.H.S. ZOBIOLE ◽  
R. GAST ◽  
R.A. MASTERS ◽  
G.R. PEREIRA ◽  
R. RUBIN
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Effect ◽  
Grain Yield ◽  
Weed Control ◽  
Field Experiments ◽  
Lolium Multiflorum ◽  
Wheat Crop ◽  
Wheat Grain ◽  
Excellent Control

ABSTRACT: Few herbicides are currently registered in Brazil for weed control in wheat. The objective of this research was to determine the wheat crop selectivity and the response of Lolium multiflorum to pyroxsulam. Field experiments were conducted at two locations in Paraná, Brazil. At the proposed commercial rates of 15 and 18 g a.i. ha-1 pyroxsulam did not cause visual injury above 10% in wheat. Pyroxsulam caused >10% injury in wheat at one location (Cascavel) when applied at 21, 30, 36 and 42 g a.i. ha-1; however, the crop fully recovered from the injury by 28 days after application and did not have an adverse effect on wheat grain yield, regardless of the rate applied. Pyroxsulam applied at 15 or 18 g a.i. ha-1 provided excellent control (>85%) of Lolium multiflorum in both trials.

Herbicide-Grazing Interactions in Cheat (Bromus secalinus)–Infested Winter Wheat (Triticum aestivum)1

Weed Science ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 38 (6) ◽  
pp. 532-535 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey A. Koscelny ◽  
Thomas F. Peeper
Keyword(s):  
Triticum Aestivum ◽  
Winter Wheat ◽  
Grain Yield ◽  
Yield Components ◽  
Harvest Index ◽  
Field Experiments ◽  
Wheat Yield ◽  
Wheat Grain ◽  
Bromus Secalinus ◽  
Herbicide Treatments

Field experiments were conducted to determine the interaction of grazing and herbicide treatments on cheat control and biomass, wheat biomass, wheat grain yield, and wheat yield components. Ethyl-metribuzin at 1120 g ai ha−1and metribuzin at 420 g ai ha−1reduced cheat biomass 91 to 99 and 97 to 98%, respectively. Grazing had no effect on herbicide efficacy. Grazing increased cheat biomass in the check by 24% at only one location but did not affect total wheat plus cheat biomass. With one exception, controlled cheat was replaced by wheat on a 1:1 biomass basis when herbicides caused no crop injury. All herbicide treatments increased grain yield, but grazing did not alter yield. At two locations, increased heads m−2and spikelets/head accounted for most of the grain yield increases, but at one location seeds/spikelet and weight/seed were also increased. Harvest index was unaffected.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document