Screening for chlamydia and gonorrhoea in men who have sex with men in clinical and non-clinical settings

Sexual Health ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 123 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marian J. Currie ◽  
Sarah J. Martin ◽  
Tuck Meng Soo ◽  
Francis J. Bowden
Keyword(s):  
Sexual Health ◽  
Health Centre ◽  
Anal Intercourse ◽  
Unprotected Anal Intercourse ◽  
Outreach Program ◽  
Published Data ◽  
Clinical Settings ◽  
Anatomical Site ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Sex With Men

Background: There are few published data on the rate of chlamydia and gonorrhoea infection in men who have sex with men (MSM). Our aim was to determine the rate of positive chlamydia and gonorrhoea tests in this population in the Australian Capital Territory (ACT). Methods: Results of all chlamydia and gonorrhoea tests generated by Canberra Sexual Health Centre between June 2001 and September 2003, including those from outreach clinics, were reviewed (audit one). Between September 2003 and April 2004, Canberra Sexual Health Centre outreach program staff and a general practitioner with a high caseload of MSM offered screening of the throat, urethra and rectum to all MSM, irrespective of their reported participation in unprotected anal intercourse. Chlamydia and gonorrhoea test results generated during this period were reviewed (audit two). Results: In the first audit, 1086 specimens from 314 individuals were tested and 30/314 (9.6%, 95% CI 6.6–13.4) men were positive for chlamydia in one or more anatomical site. A total of 306 specimens from 118 individuals were tested for gonorrhoea. Of these, eight (6.8%, 95% CI 3.0–12.9) individuals tested positive. In the second audit, 16 of 157 men (10.2%, 95% CI 9.5–16.0) tested positive for chlamydia and 4/155 (2.6%, 95% CI 0.7–6.5) tested positive for gonorrhoea. The rectum was the most commonly infected anatomical site for both infections. The overall proportions of positive chlamydia and gonorrhoea tests were 36/471 (7.6%, 95% CI 5.4–10.4) and 12/273 (4.4%, 95% CI 2.2–7.6) respectively. Conclusions: These data, collected in a range of settings, indicate high rates of chlamydia and gonorrhoea in MSM in the ACT and provide support for annual testing, particularly of the rectum, in this population.

Testing for HIV among men who have sex with men needs a paradigm shift in Australia, given the minimal increase between 2003 and 2013 in Melbourne, Australia

Sexual Health ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 373 ◽  
Author(s):  
An-Chieh Lin ◽  
Christopher K. Fairley ◽  
Krishneel Dutt ◽  
Karen M. Klassen ◽  
Marcus Y. Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hiv Testing ◽  
Paradigm Shift ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Health Centre ◽  
Anal Intercourse ◽  
Unprotected Anal Intercourse ◽  
Sexual Practices ◽  
Hiv Test ◽  
Sex With Men ◽  
First Time

Background Increasing the frequency of HIV testing in men who have sex with men (MSM) will reduce the incidence of HIV. Trends in HIV testing among MSM in Melbourne, Australia over the last 11 years have been investigated. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted using electronic medical records of the first presentation of MSM who attended the Melbourne Sexual Health Centre between 2003 and 2013. Factors associated with HIV testing (year, demographic characteristics and sexual practices) were examined in multivariable logistic regression analyses. Jonckheere–Terpstra tests were used to examine the significance of trends in the mean time since the last HIV test. Results: Of 17 578 MSM seen; 13 489 attended for the first time during the study period. The proportion of first attendances who had previously tested and reported a HIV test in the last 12 months increased from 43.6% in 2003 to 56.9% in 2013 (adjusted ptrend = 0.030), with a corresponding decrease in median time since the last HIV test from 19 months [interquartile range (IQR) 6–42] in 2003 to 10 months (IQR4–24) in 2013 (ptrend <0.001). The proportion of high-risk MSM (who reported unprotected anal intercourse and/or >20 partners in 12 months) who reported an HIV test in the last 12 months was unchanged (ptrend = 0.242). Conclusions: Despite HIV testing becoming more frequent, the magnitude of change over the last decade is insufficient to substantially reduce HIV incidence. A paradigm shift is required to remove barriers to testing through strategies such as point-of-care rapid testing or access to testing without seeing a clinician.

Neisseria gonorrhoeae positivity in clients presenting as asymptomatic contacts of gonorrhoea at a sexual health centre

Sexual Health ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 187 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sue Qian ◽  
Rosalind Foster ◽  
Christopher Bourne ◽  
Tobias Vickers ◽  
Ruthy McIver ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neisseria Gonorrhoeae ◽  
Sexual Health ◽  
Antibiotic Treatment ◽  
Health Centre ◽  
Anatomical Site ◽  
Bisexual Men ◽  
Country Of Birth ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Sex Worker ◽  
Empirical Antibiotic Treatment

Background Previous guidelines at the Sydney Sexual Health Centre (SSHC) recommended empirical antibiotic treatment for asymptomatic contacts of Neisseria gonorrhoeae at the time of testing. With increasing concerns around gonorrhoea antibiotic resistance, it has been suggested that asymptomatic contacts should only be treated based on test results. Methods: This retrospective study of data from the SSHC electronic medical record included a total of 295 gonorrhoea contacts from 1 January 2018 to 30 June 2018. The primary outcome was the proportion of asymptomatic gonorrhoea contacts with a positive gonorrhoea result from any anatomical site. Statistically significant differences in gonorrhoea positivity according to gender, sexual preference, use of PrEP, sex worker status, country of birth, preferred language and number of partners, were calculated using Fisher’s exact test. Results: The overall proportion of asymptomatic gonorrhoea contacts with a positive gonorrhoea result was 27.1% (95% CI: 22.1–32.6%). The proportion of gonorrhoea positivity was significantly higher in females compared to males (52.0% vs 25.7%, P &lt; 0.01), gay and bisexual men compared to heterosexual men (28.7% vs 0%, P &lt; 0.01) and non-users of PrEP compared to PrEP users (31.2% vs 12.5%, P &lt; 0.05). No statistically significant differences in gonorrhoea positivity were found in subgroups divided by sex worker status, country of birth, preferred language and number of partners. Conclusion: The relatively low gonorrhoea positivity rate (27.1%) in asymptomatic gonorrhoea contacts at the SSHC between January and June 2018 supports guideline changes to no longer provide empirical antibiotic treatment to asymptomatic contacts.

HIV results by phone: can we predict who will test HIV-negative?

Sexual Health ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 417 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon Wright ◽  
Nathan Ryder ◽  
Anna M. McNulty
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Sexual Health ◽  
Health Centre ◽  
Sexual Partners ◽  
Health Clinic ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Hiv Test ◽  
Sex With Men ◽  
Pro Forma

Introduction: In order to review the requirement for all patients to return for HIV test results, we sought to describe the number of cases of HIV infection detected at Sydney Sexual Health Centre among people who did not disclose known risk factors before testing. Method: The clinic database identified all HIV testing episodes between January 2004 and January 2007, along with gender, gender of sexual partners and test result. Pro-forma medical records were reviewed for each person who tested positive for gender of sexual partners, condom use, and sexual contact with a person from a country known to have a high HIV prevalence and injecting drug use. Results: During the 3-year period, a total of 13 290 HIV tests were performed. In men who have sex with men, 6194 tests were performed and 55 (0.88%) tested positive. In women and heterosexual men 7096 tests were performed, and only four (0.06%) tested positive. All four reported known risks for HIV before testing. Conclusion: Clients with no recognised risk factors for HIV are unlikely to test positive at our Australian sexual health clinic. Providing the option for low risk people to obtain their results other than face to face has advantages for both the clinic in terms of service provision and the clients in terms of time and the proportion who receive their result.

scholarly journals Bacterial Load of Chlamydia trachomatis in the Posterior Oropharynx, Tonsillar Fossae, and Saliva among Men Who Have Sex with Men with Untreated Oropharyngeal Chlamydia

2019 ◽  
Vol 58 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tiffany R. Phillips ◽  
Christopher K. Fairley ◽  
Kate Maddaford ◽  
Jennifer Danielewski ◽  
Jane S. Hocking ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chlamydia Trachomatis ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Sexual Health ◽  
Bacterial Load ◽  
Saliva Sample ◽  
Health Centre ◽  
Anatomical Site ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Sex With Men

ABSTRACT The aim of this study was to determine whether Chlamydia trachomatis could be detected in saliva and if infection is specific to an anatomical site in the oropharynx. Men who have sex with men (MSM) who were diagnosed with oropharyngeal chlamydia at the Melbourne Sexual Health Centre in 2017-2018 were invited to participate upon returning for treatment. Swabs at the tonsillar fossae and posterior oropharynx and a saliva sample were collected. Throat samples were tested for C. trachomatis by the Aptima Combo 2 assay. The bacterial loads of C. trachomatis in all samples were assessed by quantitative PCR (qPCR) detecting the ompA gene. We calculated the positivity and bacterial load of C. trachomatis for all samples. Forty-two MSM were included. The median age was 28 years (interquartile range [IQR], 24 to 33 years). Thirty-two participants (76.2%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 60.5% to 87.9%) had C. trachomatis detected by qPCR at both the tonsillar fossae and the posterior oropharynx, followed by 9.5% (n = 4; 95% CI, 2.7% to 22.6%) positive at the posterior oropharynx only and 4.8% (n = 2; 95% CI, 0.58% to 16.2%) positive at the tonsillar fossae only. Twenty-nine MSM had C. trachomatis detected in saliva (69.0%; 95% CI, 52.9% to 82.3%). The median C. trachomatis load in saliva was 446 copies/ml (IQR, 204 to 1,390 copies/ml), that in the tonsillar fossae was 893 copies/swab (IQR, 390 to 13,224 copies/ml), and that in the posterior oropharynx was 1,204 copies/swab (IQR, 330 to 16,211). There was no significant difference in C. trachomatis load between the tonsillar fossae and the posterior oropharynx (P = 0.119). Among MSM with oropharyngeal chlamydia, nearly three-quarters had chlamydia DNA detected in saliva, although the viability and implications for transmission are unknown.

Correlates of Unprotected Anal Intercourse: The Influence of Anal Sex Position Among Men Who Have Sex with Men in Beijing, China

2014 ◽  
Vol 44 (2) ◽  
pp. 375-387 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heng Zhang ◽  
Hongyan Lu ◽  
Stephen W. Pan ◽  
Dongyan Xia ◽  
Yuejuan Zhao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anal Intercourse ◽  
Unprotected Anal Intercourse ◽  
Anal Sex ◽  
Sex With Men ◽  
Beijing China

Comparison of the patterns of chlamydia and gonorrhoea at the oropharynx, anorectum and urethra among men who have sex with men

2021 ◽  
pp. sextrans-2020-054632
Author(s):  
Marjan Tabesh ◽  
Christopher K Fairley ◽  
Jane S Hocking ◽  
Deborah A Williamson ◽  
Lei Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Centre ◽  
Single Site ◽  
Chlamydia Infection ◽  
Similar Proportion ◽  
Anatomical Site ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Site Specific ◽  
Sexually Transmitted ◽  
Sex With Men ◽  
First Time

ObjectiveChlamydia and gonorrhoea are common sexually transmitted infections that infect the oropharynx, anorectum and urethra in men who have sex with men (MSM). This study aimed to examine the pattern of infection at more than one site (multisite) for chlamydia and gonorrhoea among MSM.MethodsThis was a retrospective study of MSM attending the Melbourne Sexual Health Centre for the first time between 2018 and 2019. We included MSM aged ≥16 years who had tested for Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis at all three sites (oropharynx, anorectum and urethra). We compared infections that occurred at a single site (termed single-site infection) and those that occurred at more than one site (termed multisite infections).ResultsOf the 3938 men who were tested for chlamydia and gonorrhoea, 498/3938 men (12.6%, 95% CI 11.5% to 13.6%) had chlamydia at any site, of whom 400/498 (80.3%, 95% CI 78.9% to 81.2%) had single-site chlamydia infection, and 98/498 (19.7%, 95% CI 16.2% to 23.1%) had multisite infections. A similar proportion of men had gonorrhoea at any site (447/3938, 11.4%, 95% CI 10.3% to 12.2%), but among these 447 men, single-site infection was less common (256/447, 57.3%, 95% CI 52.6% to 61.7%, p<0.001) and multisite infection (191/447, 42.7%, 95% CI 38.2% to 47.3%, p<0.001) was more common than chlamydia. There were also marked differences by anatomical site. Urethral infection commonly occurred as single sites (75/122, 61.5%, 95% CI 52.8% to 70.1%) for chlamydia but uncommonly occurred for gonorrhoea (12/100, 12.0%, 95% CI 5.6% to 18.3%, p<0.001). In contrast, anorectal infection uncommonly occurred as multisite infection for chlamydia (98/394, 24.9%, 95% CI 20.6% to 29.1%) but was common (184/309, 59.5%, 95% CI 54.0% to 64.9%, p<0.001) for gonorrhoea.ConclusionsThe markedly different pattern of site-specific infection for chlamydia and gonorrhoea infections among the same MSM suggests significant differences in the transmissibility between anatomical sites and the duration of each infection at each site.

Unprotected Anal Intercourse and Substance Use Among Men Who Have Sex With Men With Recent HIV Infection

2006 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. 344-350 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lydia N Drumright ◽  
Susan J Little ◽  
Steffanie A Strathdee ◽  
Donald J Slymen ◽  
Maria Rosario G Araneta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Substance Use ◽  
Hiv Infection ◽  
Anal Intercourse ◽  
Unprotected Anal Intercourse ◽  
Sex With Men ◽  
Recent Hiv Infection

Prevalence of rectal Mycoplasma genitalium and macrolide resistance in men who have sex with men attending Sydney Sexual Health Centre

Sexual Health ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 114
Author(s):  
Isabella Bradley ◽  
Rick Varma ◽  
Vickie Knight ◽  
Dimitra Iliakis ◽  
Leon McNally ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Sexual Health ◽  
Rectal Swab ◽  
Health Centre ◽  
Mycoplasma Genitalium ◽  
Macrolide Resistance ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Screening Guidelines ◽  
Sexually Transmissible Infections ◽  
Sex With Men

Background Sexually transmissible infections (STIs) have been increasing in men who have sex with men (MSM) in recent years; however, few studies have investigated the prevalence or antimicrobial resistance in rectal Mycoplasma genitalium in this group. This study aimed to determine the prevalence and predictors of rectal M. genitalium in MSM attending an urban sexual health service in Sydney, Australia, namely the Sydney Sexual Health Centre (SSHC), as well as estimate the rate of macrolide resistance. Methods: A prospective cross-sectional analysis was conducted of rectally asymptomatic MSM having a rectal swab collected as part of their routine care. Participants self-collected a rectal swab to be tested for M. genitalium and completed a 14-item questionnaire that provided information on behavioural risk factors. The prevalence of rectal M. genitalium was determined and multivariate analysis was performed to assess the associations for this infection. Positive specimens then underwent testing for macrolide-resistant mutations (MRMs) using the ResistancePlus MG assay (SpeeDx, Eveleigh, NSW, Australia). Results: In all, 742 patients were consecutively enrolled in the study. The median age was 31 years (interquartile range 27–39 years), with 43.0% born in Australia. Overall, 19.0% of men were bisexual, 22.9% were taking pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and 4.3% were HIV positive. The prevalence of rectal M. genitalium was 7.0% (95% confidence interval (CI) 5.3–9.1) overall and 11.8% in those taking PrEP. On multivariate analysis, PrEP use was significantly associated with having rectal M. genitalium (odds ratio 2.01; 95% CI 1.09–3.73; P = 0.01). MRMs were detected in 75.0% (36/48; 95% CI 60.4–86.4%) of infections. Conclusion: Rates of rectal M. genitalium infection were high among asymptomatic MSM attending SSHC and MRMs were detected in 75% of infections. PrEP use was found to be significantly associated with rectal M. genitalium infection. These data contribute to the evidence base for screening guidelines in MSM.

Getting to the Bottom of It: Sexual Positioning and Stage of Syphilis at Diagnosis, and Implications for Syphilis Screening

2019 ◽  
Vol 71 (2) ◽  
pp. 318-322
Author(s):  
Vincent J Cornelisse ◽  
Eric P F Chow ◽  
Rosie L Latimer ◽  
Janet Towns ◽  
Marcus Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Centre ◽  
Anal Intercourse ◽  
Human Immunodeficiency Virus Status ◽  
Secondary Syphilis ◽  
Multivariable Logistic Regression Analysis ◽  
Computer Assisted ◽  
Receptive Anal Intercourse ◽  
Primary Stage ◽  
Primary Syphilis ◽  
Sex With Men

Abstract Background Syphilis control among men who have sex with men (MSM) would be improved if we could increase the proportion of cases who present for treatment at the primary stage rather than at a later stage, as this would reduce their duration of infectivity. We hypothesized that MSM who practiced receptive anal intercourse were more likely to present with secondary syphilis, compared to MSM who did not practice receptive anal intercourse. Methods In this retrospective analysis of MSM diagnosed with primary or secondary syphilis at Melbourne Sexual Health Centre between 2008 and 2017, we analyzed associations between the stage of syphilis (primary vs secondary) and behavioral data collected by computer-assisted self-interviews. Results There were 559 MSM diagnosed with primary (n = 338) or secondary (n = 221) syphilis. Of these, 134 (24%) men reported not practicing receptive anal sex. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, MSM were more likely to present with secondary rather than primary syphilis if they reported practicing receptive anal intercourse (adjusted odds ratio 3.90; P &lt; .001) after adjusting for age, human immunodeficiency virus status, and condom use. MSM with primary syphilis who did not practice receptive anal intercourse almost always (92%) had their primary syphilis lesion on their penis. Conclusions The finding that MSM who practiced receptive anal intercourse more commonly presented with secondary syphilis—and hence, had undetected syphilis during the primary stage—implies that anorectal syphilis chancres are less noticeable than penile chancres. These men may need additional strategies to improve early detection of anorectal chancres, to reduce their duration of infectivity and, hence, reduce onward transmission. Men who practiced receptive anal intercourse (AI) were more likely to present with secondary syphilis, compared to men who exclusively practiced insertive AI. Hence, men who practice receptive AI may need additional strategies to detect anal chancres, to reduce transmission.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document