Level of evidence for FDA drug approvals in pivotal clinical trials of hematological malignancies

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Samer Al Hadidi ◽  
Carlos Almeida Ramos
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Hematological Malignancies ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Drug Approvals

scholarly journals Level of Evidence for FDA Drug Approvals in Pivotal Clinical Trials of Hematological Malignancies

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 6-6
Author(s):  
Samer Al Hadidi ◽  
Carlos A. Ramos
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Early Phase ◽  
Hematological Malignancies ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Phase Iii Clinical Trials ◽  
Early Phase Trials ◽  
Phase Iii Trials ◽  
Drug Approvals

BACKGROUND Clinical trials are integral to improve treatment outcomes for patients with hematological malignancies. Although early phase (I/II) clinical trials may provide evidence of clinical efficacy, the main goal for early phase trials is to assess safety signal. Results of phase III clinical trials provide the strongest evidence to support the use of new cancer medications. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is responsible to ensure appropriate control and supervision of pharmaceutical drugs. METHODS On the basis of publicly available study protocols and FDA reviews, the authors reviewed the level of evidence in 52 clinical trials supporting 49 drug approvals from 2016 to 2020. Data cut point was May 2020. These trials resulted in approval of medications to treat leukemia, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, Hodgkin lymphoma, myelodysplastic syndrome, myeloproliferative neoplasms and multiple myeloma. RESULTS A total of 52 clinical trials were assessed in the 5 years period. Phase III trials supported 61.5% while earlier phase trials supported 36.5% of subsequent FDA hematological malignancies approvals. The level of evidence to support FDA approvals improved with time with 50% of approvals in 2016 and 2017 supported by phase III clinical trials compared to 69% in 2019. Approvals were based on early phase trials in mantle cell lymphoma (100%), chronic myeloid leukemia (100%), diffuse large B cell lymphoma (100%), classic Hodgkin's lymphoma (67%) and acute myeloid leukemia (56%). Phase III trials enrolled 87% of the patients (14238 from16429 patients). Eighteen drug approvals (37% of all approvals) were based on 13% of the total number of patients in the studied period. CONCLUSIONS Level of evidence to support drug approvals in hematological malignancies was based on early phase trials in more than a third of the times. Although early phase studies are appropriate for safety signals, further clinical activity assessment should be done to support the use of new drugs to treat hematological malignancies. Previous successful early phase studies failed to show clinical activity in phase III studies. Despite the fact that use of new approved drugs based on early phase studies evidence may be needed, patients and healthcare providers should be aware of such possibility when using newly approved medications. Figure Disclosures Ramos: Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Tessa Therapeutics: Research Funding; Kuur Therapeutics: Research Funding.

Bridging the Knowledge Gaps in Arrhythmogenic Cardiovascular Conditions: The Critical Role of Registries

2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melody Hermel ◽  
Rebecca Duffy ◽  
Alexander Orfanos ◽  
Isabelle Hack ◽  
Shayna McEnteggart ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Natural History ◽  
Risk Stratification ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Knowledge Gaps ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
The Future

Cardiac registries have filled many gaps in knowledge related to arrhythmogenic cardiovascular conditions. Despite the less robust level of evidence available in registries when compared with clinical trials, registries have contributed a range of clinically useful information. In this review, the authors discuss the role that registries have played – related to diagnosis, natural history, risk stratification, treatment, and genetics of arrhythmogenic cardiovascular conditions – in closing knowledge gaps, and their role in the future.

scholarly journals Enabling patient-reported outcome measures in clinical trials, exemplified by cardiovascular trials

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Theresa M. Coles ◽  
Adrian F. Hernandez ◽  
Bryce B. Reeve ◽  
Karon Cook ◽  
Michael C. Edwards ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Contextual Factors ◽  
The United States ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Think Tank ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Evidentiary Standards

Abstract Objectives There has been limited success in achieving integration of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in clinical trials. We describe how stakeholders envision a solution to this challenge. Methods Stakeholders from academia, industry, non-profits, insurers, clinicians, and the Food and Drug Administration convened at a Think Tank meeting funded by the Duke Clinical Research Institute to discuss the challenges of incorporating PROs into clinical trials and how to address those challenges. Using examples from cardiovascular trials, this article describes a potential path forward with a focus on applications in the United States. Results Think Tank members identified one key challenge: a common understanding of the level of evidence that is necessary to support patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in trials. Think Tank participants discussed the possibility of creating general evidentiary standards depending upon contextual factors, but such guidelines could not be feasibly developed because many contextual factors are at play. The attendees posited that a more informative approach to PROM evidentiary standards would be to develop validity arguments akin to courtroom briefs, which would emphasize a compelling rationale (interpretation/use argument) to support a PROM within a specific context. Participants envisioned a future in which validity arguments would be publicly available via a repository, which would be indexed by contextual factors, clinical populations, and types of claims. Conclusions A publicly available repository would help stakeholders better understand what a community believes constitutes compelling support for a specific PROM in a trial. Our proposed strategy is expected to facilitate the incorporation of PROMs into cardiovascular clinical trials and trials in general.

Safety-Related Postmarketing Modifications of Drugs for Hematological Malignancies

2019 ◽  
Vol 143 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-77
Author(s):  
Anat Gafter-Gvili ◽  
Ariadna Tibau ◽  
Pia Raanani ◽  
Daniel Shepshelovich
Keyword(s):  
Hematological Malignancies ◽  
New Drugs ◽  
Priority Review ◽  
Regulatory Review ◽  
Regulatory Pathways ◽  
The Us ◽  
Black Box Warnings ◽  
Accelerated Approval ◽  
Drug Approvals ◽  
Approved Drugs

The prevalence of safety-related postmarketing label modifications of medications for hematological malignancies is unknown. We identified 35 new drugs indicated for hematological malignancies approved by the US Food and Drug Administration between January 1999 and December 2014. Characteristics of supporting trials and safety-related label modifications from approval to December 2017 were collected from drug labels. Regulatory review and approval pathways were also collected. New drug approvals were supported by trials with a median of 167 patients (interquartile range 115–316). All drugs were approved based on surrogate endpoints. Twenty-seven drug approvals (77%) were not supported by randomized controlled trials. All drugs received orphan drug designation, and most were granted fast track designation, priority review, and accelerated approval (83, 74, and 60%, respectively). A total of 28 drugs (80%) had postmarketing safety-related label modifications. Additions to black box warnings, contraindications, warnings and precautions, and common adverse reactions were identified in 31, 11, 77, and 46% of drugs, respectively. Five drugs (14%) were permanently or temporarily withdrawn from the US market. Drugs for hematological malignancies are often approved based on limited evidence through expedited regulatory pathways with incomplete safety profiles. Hematologists should be vigilant for unrecognized side effects when prescribing newly approved drugs.

scholarly journals EFFICACY OF SPIRULINA FOR ALLERGIC RHINITIS

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Iury Gomes Batista ◽  
Osmar Cleyton Person ◽  
Fernando Veiga Angelico Junior ◽  
Priscila Bogar
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Allergic Rhinitis ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Nasal Congestion ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Cochrane Central Register ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Runny Nose ◽  
Trial Quality ◽  
Central Register

Introduction: Allergic rhinitis is a condition of high prevalence in the population and widely studied, with several treatments being consecrated for its control. Spirulina is a dietary supplement that modulates immune function, and has been shown to modulate the inflammatory response of allergic rhinitis. Purpose: To evaluate spirulina in the treatment and control of allergic rhinitis. Material and Methods: This is a systematic review of randomized clinical trials. Searches were performed for randomized clinical trials relating spirulina to allergic rhinitis in five electronic databases: Cochrane - Central Register of Controlled Trials - CENTRAL (2021), PUBMED (1966-2021), EMBASE (1974-2021), LILACS (1982-2021) AND SCOPUS (2021). Two investigators independently extracted data and assessed trial quality. Results: Two clinical trials involving a total of 215 patients were included. Both studies assessed the efficacy of spirulina in improving allergic rhinitis as the primary outcome. The first study described a significant reduction in runny nose, nasal congestion and itching over time of medication use (p 0.001) and in the second study the prevalence of rhinorrhea (P = 0.021), nasal congestion or obstruction (P = 0.039) and decreased smell (P = 0.030) were significantly less in the experimental group than in the control group. Conclusions: The included studies were in favor of the use of spirrulina. However, the level of evidence is very low and limited. We should have caution due to the small number of clinical trials and participants in these studies. It is recommended to carry out new RCTs following the CONSORT standardization.

scholarly journals Disparity of Race Reporting and Representation in Clinical Trials Leading to Cancer Drug Approvals From 2008 to 2018

JAMA Oncology ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (10) ◽  
pp. e191870 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan M. Loree ◽  
Seerat Anand ◽  
Arvind Dasari ◽  
Joseph M. Unger ◽  
Anirudh Gothwal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Cancer Drug ◽  
Drug Approvals

scholarly journals Cannabidiol as a Treatment for Mood Disorders: A Systematic Review

2019 ◽  
Vol 65 (4) ◽  
pp. 213-227 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jairo Vinícius Pinto ◽  
Gayatri Saraf ◽  
Christian Frysch ◽  
Daniel Vigo ◽  
Kamyar Keramatian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Mood Disorders ◽  
Observational Studies ◽  
Case Reports ◽  
Health Conditions ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Cochrane Central Register ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Mood Symptoms ◽  
Affective Symptoms

Objective: To review the current evidence for efficacy of cannabidiol in the treatment of mood disorders. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, PsychInfo, Scielo, ClinicalTrials.gov , and The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for studies published up to July 31, 2019. The inclusion criteria were clinical trials, observational studies, or case reports evaluating the effect of pure cannabidiol or cannabidiol mixed with other cannabinoids on mood symptoms related to either mood disorders or other health conditions. The review was reported in accordance with guidelines from Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses protocol. Results: Of the 924 records initially yielded by the search, 16 were included in the final sample. Among them, six were clinical studies that used cannabidiol to treat other health conditions but assessed mood symptoms as an additional outcome. Similarly, four tested cannabidiol blended with Δ-9-tetrahydrocannabinol in the treatment of general health conditions and assessed affective symptoms as secondary outcomes. Two were case reports testing cannabidiol. Four studies were observational studies that evaluated the cannabidiol use and its clinical correlates. However, there were no clinical trials investigating the efficacy of cannabidiol, specifically in mood disorders or assessing affective symptoms as the primary outcome. Although some articles point in the direction of benefits of cannabidiol to treat depressive symptoms, the methodology varied in several aspects and the level of evidence is not enough to support its indication as a treatment for mood disorders. Conclusions: There is a lack of evidence to recommend cannabidiol as a treatment for mood disorders. However, considering the preclinical and clinical evidence related to other diseases, cannabidiol might have a role as a treatment for mood disorders. Therefore, there is an urgent need for well-designed clinical trials investigating the efficacy of cannabidiol in mood disorders.

scholarly journals Applying advanced technologies to improve clinical trials: a systematic mapping study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Esther Nanzayi Ngayua ◽  
Jianjia He ◽  
Kwabena Agyei-Boahene
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Evaluation Studies ◽  
Empirical Studies ◽  
Systematic Mapping Study ◽  
Mapping Study ◽  
Systematic Mapping ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Clinical Interventions ◽  
Main Research ◽  
Advanced Technologies

AbstractThe increasing demand for new therapies and other clinical interventions has made researchers conduct many clinical trials. The high level of evidence generated by clinical trials makes them the main approach to evaluating new clinical interventions. The increasing amounts of data to be considered in the planning and conducting of clinical trials has led to higher costs and increased timelines of clinical trials, with low productivity. Advanced technologies including artificial intelligence, machine learning, deep learning, and the internet of things offer an opportunity to improve the efficiency and productivity of clinical trials at various stages. Although researchers have done some tangible work regarding the application of advanced technologies in clinical trials, the studies are yet to be mapped to give a general picture of the current state of research. This systematic mapping study was conducted to identify and analyze studies published on the role of advanced technologies in clinical trials. A search restricted to the period between 2010 and 2020 yielded a total of 443 articles. The analysis revealed a trend of increasing research interests in the area over the years. Recruitment and eligibility aspects were the main focus of the studies. The main research types were validation and evaluation studies. Most studies contributed methods and theories, hence there exists a gap for architecture, process, and metric contributions. In the future, more empirical studies are expected given the increasing interest to implement the AI, ML, DL, and IoT in clinical trials.

scholarly journals Cancer-associated thrombosis: updates and controversies

Hematology ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 (1) ◽  
pp. 626-630 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alok A. Khorana
Keyword(s):  
Molecular Weight ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Low Molecular Weight ◽  
Clinical Settings ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Multiple Biomarkers ◽  
Cancer Associated Thrombosis

Abstract Emerging data have enhanced our understanding of cancer-associated thrombosis, a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with cancer. This update will focus on recent findings, including the phenomenon of incidental venous thromboembolism (VTE), novel approaches to risk assessment, and the results of randomized clinical trials focusing on prophylaxis of cancer outpatients. Incidental VTE is an important contributor to rates of cancer-associated VTE and, in terms of outcomes, appears to be as consequential for patients as symptomatic VTE. Multiple biomarkers have been studied, with the highest level of evidence for prechemotherapy elevated platelet counts, elevated leukocyte counts, and low hemoglobin. Other candidate biomarkers, including D-dimer and tissue factor, are currently being evaluated. A recently validated risk score for chemotherapy-associated VTE has now been evaluated in more than 10 000 cancer patients in a variety of clinical settings and trials and is ready for clinical use (Level 1 clinical decision rule). Several randomized clinical trials in solid-tumor patients with low-molecular-weight heparins and semuloparin, an ultra-low-molecular-weight heparin, demonstrate clearly that outpatient thromboprophylaxis is feasible, safe, and effective. Selecting the appropriate patients for prophylaxis, however, continues to be a matter of controversy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document