scholarly journals The Effect of Problem Based Learning Model Application Reviewed From Mathematical Reasoning Ability

2020 ◽  
Vol 1477 ◽  
pp. 042040
Author(s):  
Anwar ◽  
L Eru Ugi ◽  
Sardin
2020 ◽  
Vol 1538 ◽  
pp. 012078
Author(s):  
M P Sari ◽  
Susanto ◽  
N Yuliati ◽  
E N Imamah ◽  
N I Laily

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 496
Author(s):  
Lilis ◽  
Togi

<pre><em>The purpose of this study was to examine differences in overall mathematical <br />reasoning abilities and based on indicators among students who received problem <br />based learning with students who obtained discovery learning based on early math <br />skills. This study was a quasi experimental research, with the study population was <br />all students of class XI SMK Laksamana Martadinata consisting of twenty classes. <br />By purposive sampling, two classes were chosen, with experimental class 1were <br />given problem-based learning treatment and experiment class 2 were given <br />discovery learning treatment. The instrument of mathematical reasoning ability, the <br />ability of early mathematics and observation sheet were stated to have fulfilled the <br />validity requirements of the contents, and the reliability coefficients of 0.740 and <br />0.830 respectively. Data analysis of mathematical reasoning ability was done by <br />analysis of covariance (ANAKOVA). The results showed that there were significant <br />differences in mathematical reasoning ability both overall and per indicator between <br />students who were given problem-based learning with students who were given <br />discovery learning, with problem-based learning showed better results. The results <br />suggest that problem-based learning is an alternative to improving the ability of <br />mathematical reasoning.</em><em></em></pre>


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sri Adi Widodo ◽  
Eva Rosiana Cahyani ◽  
I Istiqomah

This study aims to analyze the learning process of introverted students on algebraic operating materials and determine the results of treatment with Problem Based Learning on students' mathematical reasoning abilities. This type of research is an experiment with a single subject or Single Subject Research. The design used is A-B. Data collection techniques through observation, tests, interviews, and documentation. Data analysis uses analysis in conditions and analysis between conditions. Based on the results of the study, the introverted student learning process on algebraic operating material is the subject preparing needs, making designs, identifying, finding and delivering solutions, and conducting evaluations. While the treatment results in the form of Problem Based Learning showed a significant increase, the mean level of test results increased from 48.75 to 92.75 and the percentage of overlap was 0. It was concluded that the use of PBL models had a positive influence on the mathematical reasoning ability of introverted students. It is hoped that the Problem Based Learning model can be used as an alternative learning model to improve the mathematical reasoning ability of introverted students and learning when at school.


Author(s):  
Purnama Putra ◽  
M. Ikhsan

The ability of students to answer mathematical reasoning questions and to learn independence is still low. Mathematical reasoning and learning independence are important possessed by students. Therefore, a learning model of a relevant. One of the learning approaches is the Problem Based Learning (PBL) model. The purpose of the study to find out: Differences in the increase in mathematical reasoning abilities and student learning independence taught by using PBL with students taught with conventional learning in terms of (a) all students, and (b) student level (high, medium, low). This research is an experimental research design with a pretest-posttest control group design. The population of this study was all students of class X of the Delima 1 High School in Pidie. While the sample consisted of two classes, namely the experimental class (X-2) and the control class (X-3) taken by random sampling. The instrument used to obtain research data is a test of mathematical reasoning ability and student learning independence. To see the difference in mathematical reasoning abilities and student learning independence between classes PBL models with conventional classes using the t-test. The results showed that the improvement of students' mathematical reasoning abilities and student learning independence that obtained learning with PBL approach was better than students who obtained learning with conventional approach in terms of overall and initial abilities of students (high, medium, low), in quality there were significant differences between students who studied using PBL model with those using conventional learning.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rivdya Eliza ◽  
Khadijah Khadijah ◽  
Utari Wulandari

The purpose of this study is 1) To know the motivation to learn mathematics of taught by using cooperative learning model type Pair Check with reward higher than student motivation taught by convensional learning,and 2) To know the mathematical reasoning ability which was taught by using cooperative learning model type Pair Check with reward on material function is higher than students mathematical reasoning ability taught by convensional learning. This type of research is Quasi Experimental Research with Randomized Control Group Only Design. The population in this study is all eighth grade student of SMPN 19 Padang. In obtaining the sample class it is need to be done normality, homogeneity and equality of classroom average tests the class selected as the experimental class is VIII.5 class and the control class is VIII.3. The result of the research shows that 1) learning motivation of students which was taught by using cooperative learning Pair Check model with Reward is higher than student’s motivation taught by convensional learning. Hypothesis test that is t-score (7.034) > t-table (1.67), 2) students' mathematical reasoning ability after being taught by cooperative model type Pair Check with reward is higher than the students' mathematical reasoning abilities taught by conventional learning models. Seen from the average score of the experimental class test score of 80.16 and the average of the control class test score of 74.13. After hypothesis testing using t-test, obtained tscore > t-table (1.867 > 1.67) at 95%. So it can be student mathematical reasoning ability of class VIII SMPN 19 Padang which is taught by cooperative learning model type Pair Check with reward is higher than taught by using conventional learning.Keywords: Mathematic Reasoning Ability And Student Motivation, Model Cooperative Type Pair Check, Reward Fungsi, And Mathematic


2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Nira Nawastiti ◽  
Suyono Suyono ◽  
Wardini Rahayu

This study aims to see the effect of accelerated learning model of learning on the ability of mathematical reasoning in terms of self-regulated learning. This research was conducted at SMK Negeri Bekasi Regency in the academic year 2016-2017. The design of this research is Posttest-Only Control Design. The research method used is quasi experiment (quasi experiment). The reasonably affordable population of this study were four classes (two classes in two different schools, two classes at SMK Negeri 1 Tambun Selatan, which were treated with accelerated learning model and two classes at SMK Negeri 1 Tambun Utara were treated by conventional learning model) of the normal distribution, have the same or homogeneous variance, and have the same equality. The results of this study are (1) The mathematical reasoning ability of students who were treated with accelerated learning model is better than who where treated with the mathematical reasoning ability of students who were treated with conventional learning model , (2) there is interaction between learning model with self regulated learning to the ability of mathematical reasoning, (3) students' mathematical reasoning ability given treatment with accelerated learning model is better than who where treated with mathematical reasoning ability of students who are treated with learning model (4) The mathematical reasoning ability of students treated with conventional learning model is not better than who where treated with the mathematical reasoning ability of students who are treated with accelerated learning learning model.


2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 121
Author(s):  
Nurina Kurniasari Rahmawati

The purpose of this research is to know the influence of Teams Games Tournaments (TGT), Numbered Head Together (NHT) model to the students 'mathematical learning achievement that reviewed students' mathematical reasoning ability. This research is a quasi-experimental research with 3 × 3 factorial design. The researcher uses 2 indicators of learning achievement that is (1) Mathematics achievement test and (2) Test of mathematical communication ability. Analysis of the data used is the analysis of two-way variants with different cells. The results of this research can be summarized as follows. (1) Learning using TGT learning model makes better student's mathematical learning achievement compared to student's mathematical learning achievement with NHT learning model and conventional learning, while NHT model gives a better result of student's mathematical learning achievement from student's learning achievement with conventional learning. (2) Learners with high mathematical reasoning ability have better learning achievement compared with learners with medium ability as well as medium ability better than low ability. (3) Students have high and moderate reasoning abilities with the three learning models giving the same mathematical achievement, whereas students with low mathematical reasoning ability using TGT and NHT models provide the same mathematical achievement, but better than conventional learning models, and conventional learning models and NHT produces the same mathematical achievement. (4) The learning model of TGT and NHT in students with high, medium and low mathematical reasoning ability produce the same mathematical achievement, whereas conventional learning model on students with high and medium mathematical reasoning has the same mathematical achievement but better than students with reasoning low math.


2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 341-352
Author(s):  
Asurya Octaviyunas ◽  
Arta Ekayanti

AbstrakPenelitian ini didasari atas permasalahan pentingnya kemampuan penalaran matematis dan pencapaiannya yang masih rendah. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah mengetahui pengaruh model pembelajaran Giving Question Getting Answer dan Think Pair Share terhadap kemampuan penalaran matematika siswa, dan efektifitasnya dalam meningkatkan kemampuan tersebut. Populasi Penelitian eksperimen semu ini mencakup seluruh siswa kelas VII SMPN 1 Balong. Kelas VIIA diberi pembelajaran dengan model TPS sedangkan kelas VIIB dengan model GQGA. Instrumen pengumpulan data berbentuk tes, meliputi soal pretest dan posttest. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa model pembelajaran GQGA berpengaruh terhadap kemampuan penalaran siswa kelas VIIB dengan peningkatan yang terjadi dari nilai pretest ke posttest. Begitu juga dengan model pembelajaran TPS berpengaruh terhadap kemampuan penalaran matematika siswa kelas VIIA dengan peningkatan nilai pretest ke posttest. Model pembelajaran GQGA tidak lebih efektif daripada model pembelajaran TPS dalam meningkatkan kemampuan penalaran matematika siswa. The Effect of Learning Model Giving Question Getting Answer and Think Pair Share Toward Reasoning Mathematics Ability Student’s Grade VII AbstractThis research is based on the problem of the importance of mathematical reasoning abilities and their low achievement. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of Giving Question Getting Answer and Think Pair Share learning models on students' mathematical reasoning abilities and their effectiveness in enhancing these abilities. Population This quasi-experimental study included all seventh-grade students of Balong 1 Junior High School. The VIIA class is given learning with the TPS model while the VIIB class is with the GQGA model. The instruments of data collection are in the form of tests, including the questions of the pretest and posttest. The results showed that the GQGA learning model had an effect on the reasoning ability of students in class VIIB with an increase that occurred from the pretest to the posttest. Likewise, the TPS learning model influences the mathematical reasoning abilities of VIIA students with an increase in the value of the pretest to posttest. The GQGA learning model is no more effective than the TPS learning model in improving students' mathematical reasoning abilities.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document