scholarly journals The Impact of Using Different Types of Soft Soils Treated by Stone Columns on Creep Behavior

2022 ◽  
Vol 961 (1) ◽  
pp. 012052
Author(s):  
Sura Tawfeeq Al-Auqbi ◽  
Nahla M. Salim ◽  
Mahmood R. Mahmood
Keyword(s):  
Soft Soil ◽  
Horizontal Displacement ◽  
Cohesive Soil ◽  
Stone Columns ◽  
Stone Column ◽  
Geometric Conditions ◽  
Improvement Factor ◽  
Soil Deposits ◽  
Different Types ◽  
The Impact

Abstract The stone column technique is an effective method to increase the strength of soft cohesive soil, which results in a reduction in foundation settlement and an increase in bearing capacity. The topic of restraining creep settlement through the use of stone columns techniques has gained increasing attention and consideration; because stone columns are widely used to treat soft soil deposits, caution should be applied in estimating creep settlement. We discovered a reversible relation between shear parameters and the creep settlement in floating stone columns; while, in case of end-bearing stone columns shows a direct positive relation between shear parameters and the creep settlement, and the creep settlement began at the primary settlement. The shear parameters affected the improvement factor (n) of creep settlement in both floating and end-bearing stone columns. The standard creep coefficient’s n values in floating and end-bearing conditions were more significant than the low creep coefficient’s n values in forwarded geometric conditions. The stress in both floating and end-bearing stone columns was increasing and uniformly distributed along the length of the floating stone column and in the case of end-bearing stone column was limited to the stiffness layer; the maximum vertical stress was in the central point of the embankment. The embankment’s maximum horizontal displacement occurred on the edge.

scholarly journals Comparison between unit cell and plane strain models of stone column ground improvement

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 263
Author(s):  
Maryam Gaber ◽  
Anuar Kasa ◽  
Norinah Abdul Rahman ◽  
Jamal Alsharef
Keyword(s):  
Stress Concentration ◽  
Plane Strain ◽  
Clayey Soil ◽  
Cell Model ◽  
Ground Improvement ◽  
Soft Soil ◽  
Unit Cell ◽  
Stone Columns ◽  
Stone Column ◽  
The Impact

This article presents a comparative study of the behaviour of clayey soil reinforcements using stone column ground improvement by means of numerical analyses. Two-dimensional finite element analyses with commercially available software, PLAXIS, were performed on end-bearing stone columns using 15-noded triangular elements to investigate the impact of the modelling type on the stress concentration ratio and failure mechanism of an improved foundation system. Consolidation analyses were conducted throughout the study using Mohr-Coulomb’s criterion. The computed values of the stress concentration ratios were compared for different key parameters, including the diameters of stone columns, c/c spacing of columns, friction angle of stone column material, and undrained cohesion of soft soil. The major conclusions of this study were that the stone column in the unit cell model shared between 2.5 to 3.14 times more loads than the surrounding soil, whilst in the plane strain model it shared between 1.7 to 2.9 times more loads. The use of plane strain approach to model the stone column gave a more comprehensive representation of the stress distribution and load transfer between the soil and columns, in addition to being a better method than the unit cell concept to evaluate the failure mode in this system.

scholarly journals Stone Columns - Determination of the soil improvement factor

2011 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 17-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Pivarč
Keyword(s):  
Analytical Methods ◽  
Soil Improvement ◽  
Stone Columns ◽  
Crushed Stone ◽  
Stone Column ◽  
Liquefaction Potential ◽  
Improvement Factor ◽  
Consolidation Effect ◽  
Laboratory Models

Stone Columns - Determination of the soil improvement factorA stone column is one of the soil stabilizing methods that is used to increase strength, decrease the compressibility of soft and loose fine graded soils, accelerate a consolidation effect and reduce the liquefaction potential of soils. The columns consist of compacted gravel or crushed stone arranged by a vibrator. This paper deals with Priebe's theory (1976) on the design of an improvement factor, which belongs among the most used analytical methods and also describes the numerical and laboratory models of stone columns. The improvement factors calculated from numerical and laboratory models are compared with the improvement factors resulting from Priebe's theory.

scholarly journals Stability analysis of roadway embankments supported by stone columns with the presence of water table under short-term and long-term conditions

2018 ◽  
Vol 162 ◽  
pp. 01013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shaymaa Tareq Kadhim ◽  
Ziad Bashar Fouad
Keyword(s):  
Water Table ◽  
Factor Of Safety ◽  
Soft Soil ◽  
Stone Columns ◽  
Stone Column ◽  
Stability Factor ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Long Term Conditions ◽  
The Stability

Use of stone column technique to improve soft foundation soils under roadway embankments has proven to increase the bearing capacity and reduce the potential settlement. The potential contribution of stone columns to the stability of roadway embankments against general (i.e. deep-seated) failure needs to be thoroughly investigated. Therefore, a two-dimensional finite difference model implemented by FLAC/SLOPE 7.0 software, was employed in this study to assess the stability of a roadway embankment fill built on a soft soil deposit improved by stone column technique. The stability factor of safety was obtained numerically under both short-term and long-term conditions with the presence of water table. Two methods were adopted to convert the three-dimensional model into plane strain condition: column wall and equivalent improved ground methods. The effect of various parameters was studied to evaluate their influence on the factor of safety against embankment instability. For instance, the column diameter, columns’ spacing, soft soil properties for short-term and long-term conditions, and the height and friction angle of the embankment fill. The results of this study are developed in several design charts.

scholarly journals Behavior of foundation soil improved by stone column under cyclic load

2018 ◽  
Vol 239 ◽  
pp. 05015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kwa Sally Fahmi ◽  
Mohammed Fattah ◽  
Alena Shestakova
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element ◽  
Cyclic Load ◽  
Soft Soil ◽  
Current Method ◽  
Stone Columns ◽  
Elastic Response ◽  
Stone Column ◽  
Finite Element Analyses ◽  
Foundation Soil ◽  
Rate Of Loading

This paper deals with using the stone column as a technique for the enhancement of the soft ground. The key goal of utilizing stone column is to decrease settlement and to increment the soil bearing ability, as well as decreasing the consolidation period. Nowadays, the current method concerns with various kinds of soil granular and cohesive. It is clear that the delicate soils (cohesive) possess a good settlement because of the disability of the ground to control the sidelong development and protruding of the stone sections. Moreover, the ways of utilization of the geosynthetic materials for encasement of the stone sections are other perfect ways to enhance the implementation, the quality, and firmness of stone segments. The present work investigates the behavior of the soft soil reinforced with ordinary and encased stone columns with geogrid under cyclic load. Six model tests were carried out on a soil with shear strength of about 15 kPa for both ordinary stone columns (OSC) and geogrid encased stone columns (ESC). For validating the enhanced method of utilizing stone columns, finite element model using the software PLAXIS 3D and field load exams had been applied. It was concluded that the models subjected to cyclic loading under the rate of loading 10 mm/sec reached the failure level faster than models tested under the rate of loading 5 mm/sec. The results of the finite element analyses of settlement compared with the records of settlement after the laboratory load tests seem to yield reasonably comparable values up to 50% of the design load. Afterwards, the recorded settlements show up to 60% higher values in compare with the results of the finite element analyses. This observation can be attributed to the occurrence of plastic failures under increasing load after an initial elastic response.

Field performance of the port of Sepetiba test fills

1995 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 106-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vinod K. Garga ◽  
Luciano V. Medeiros
Keyword(s):  
Ground Improvement ◽  
Soft Soil ◽  
Soft Clay ◽  
Field Performance ◽  
Stone Columns ◽  
Field Investigations ◽  
Large Program ◽  
Soil Deposits ◽  
Load Tests ◽  
The Cost

The design of the industrial port of Sepetiba, 50 km south of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, required a detailed evaluation of the underlying soft soil deposits. Initially, on the basis of laboratory tests, it was proposed to remove approximately 3.7 × 106 m3 of the very soft deposits in the stockpile area by dredging and substitute with hydraulic sand fill. Subsequently, in view of the cost of such a measure, a large program of field investigations was initiated to study the in situ characteristics of the soft clay to evaluate whether replacement of this material and (or) ground improvement was necessary. As part of this investigation, two large identically instrumented test fills (test fills B and D), each 65 m2 in plan and 5 m high, with 3:1 slopes were constructed. Test fill B was constructed over natural ground, whereas the subsoil beneath test fill D was treated with stone columns. The instrumentation for each test fill consisted of piezometers, deep settlement plates, surface settlement plates, and inclinometers. This paper provides a description of the field investigations, observations on installation of stone columns, analysis of instrumentation, a comparison of the behaviour of the two test fills, and a discussion on load tests on individual stone columns. Key words : case history, embankment, ground improvement, instrumentation, soft clay, stone columns.

scholarly journals Seismic Analysis of Floating Stone Columns in Soft Clayey Soil

2021 ◽  
Vol 318 ◽  
pp. 01008
Author(s):  
Mahdi O. Karkush ◽  
Amer G. Jihad ◽  
Karrar A. Jawad ◽  
Mustafa S. Ali ◽  
Bilal J. Noman
Keyword(s):  
Clayey Soil ◽  
Seismic Analysis ◽  
Lateral Displacement ◽  
Soft Soil ◽  
Soft Clay ◽  
Surface Displacement ◽  
Stone Columns ◽  
Stone Column ◽  
Plastic Behavior ◽  
Ground Acceleration

The response of floating stone columns of different lengths to diameter ratio (L/D = 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10) ratios exposed to earthquake excitations is well modeled in this paper. Such stone column behavior is essential in the case of lateral displacement under an earthquake through the soft clay soil. ABAQUS software was used to simulate the behavior of stone columns in soft clayey soil using an axisymmetric finite element model. The behavior of stone column material has been modeled with a Drucker-Prager model. The soft soil material was modeled by the Mohr-Coulomb failure criterion assuming an elastic-perfectly plastic behavior. The floating stone columns were subjected to the El Centro earthquake, which had a magnitude of 7.1 and a peak ground acceleration of 3.50 m/s2. The surface displacement, velocity, and acceleration in soft clayey enhanced by floating stone columns are also smaller than in natural soft clay. The findings of this research revealed that under the influence of earthquake waves, lateral displacement varies with stone columns of various lengths.

scholarly journals Settlement Behaviour of Soft Soil Reinforced with Geogrid Encased Stone Column under Sustained Loading

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 1307-1311
Keyword(s):  
Ground Improvement ◽  
Soft Soil ◽  
Stone Columns ◽  
Stone Column ◽  
Replacement Ratio ◽  
Sustained Loading ◽  
Settlement Behavior ◽  
Column Material ◽  
Area Replacement Ratio ◽  
Different Diameters

The use of stone columns in improving the bearing capacity of soft soil is well researched, but the understanding of settlement requires further studies. This paper presents the results of a series of laboratory tests carried out to study the settlement behavior of soft soil bed reinforced with ordinary stone column (OSC) and Geogrid encased stone columns (GESC). Kaolin was used as the soft soil and stones of size from 2.5 to 10 mm were used as column material. The stone columns of four different diameters were installed, by the method of replacement, into the soil having undrained shear strength of 22.5 kPa. The OSC and GESC test beds were subjected to pressure of 250 and 300 kPa. Each pressure was sustained for 24 hours and the settlement of the composite soil with time was noted. It is found that Geogrid encased stone columns have small settlement than the corresponding ordinary stone columns. The SRR (settlement reduction ratio) being a measure of ground improvement, is found increasing with the area replacement ratio. Further, at a particular sustained pressure SRR is found more for GESC than the corresponding value for OSC.

scholarly journals Laboratory Experimental Analysis on Encapsulated Stone Column

2013 ◽  
Vol 59 (3) ◽  
pp. 359-379 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y.K. Tandel ◽  
C.H. Solanki ◽  
A.K. Desai
Keyword(s):  
Carrying Capacity ◽  
Soft Soil ◽  
Stone Columns ◽  
Stone Column ◽  
Radial Deformation ◽  
Load Carrying Capacity ◽  
Column Length ◽  
Confinement Pressure ◽  
Load Carrying ◽  
Lower Load

Abstract The application of stone column technique for improvement of soft soils has attracted a considerable attention during the last decade. However, in a very soft soil, the stone columns undergo excessive bulging, because of very low lateral confinement pressure provided by the surrounding soil. The performance of stone column can be improved by the encapsulation of stone column by geosynthetic, which acts to provide additional confinement to columns, preventing excessive bulging and column failure. In the present study, a detailed experimental study on behavior of single column is carried out by varying parameters like diameter of the stone column, length of stone column, length of geosynthetic encapsulation and stiffness of encapsulation material. In addition, finite-element analyses have been performed to access the radial deformation of stone column. The results indicate a remarkable increase in load carrying capacity due to encapsulation. The load carrying capacity of column depends very much upon the diameter of the stone column and stiffness of encapsulation material. The results show that partial encapsulation over top half of the column and fully encapsulated floating column of half the length of clay bed thickness give lower load carrying capacity than fully encapsulated end bearing column. In addition, radial deformation of stone column decreases with increasing stiffness of encapsulation material.

Different Types of Materials Used for Stone Column

2013 ◽  
Vol 405-408 ◽  
pp. 155-157
Author(s):  
Mohd Ashraf Mohamad Ismail ◽  
Lye Khong Ng ◽  
Hooi Min Yee
Keyword(s):  
Research Study ◽  
Soft Soil ◽  
Stone Column ◽  
Consolidation Process ◽  
Column Material ◽  
Different Types ◽  
Materials Used ◽  
Selection Of

The degree of improvement of a soft soil by stone column is due to the inclusion of a stiffer column material and the densification of the surrounding soft soil during the installation of the vibrocompacted stone column itself and the subsequent consolidation process occurring in the soft soil before the final loading of improved soil. Research study on different materials for stone column has not attracted much attention. A systematic verification of the effectiveness of different materials for stone column need to be carried out. It is an important output to be presented as a general guidelines for the selection of proper stone column material which can be used effectively and economically.

scholarly journals Effect of Spacing between Stone Columns on the Behavior of Soft Soil

2021 ◽  
Vol 318 ◽  
pp. 01006
Author(s):  
Zeena A. Al-Kazzaz ◽  
Moataz A. Al-Obaydi
Keyword(s):  
Bearing Capacity ◽  
Soft Soil ◽  
Soil Improvement ◽  
Stone Columns ◽  
The Finite Element Method ◽  
Slight Improvement ◽  
Short Columns ◽  
Sectional Shape ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Spacing Length

Soil improvement by stone columns is extensively used, especially for the soft ones. This is because of their efficiency and no environmental impact. Several factors affect its efficiency in improving the mechanical properties of the soil, and the most important of these factors are the spacing, length, and diameter of the stone columns. In this study, the finite element method was used to study the impact of the spacing between the stone columns on the amount of settlement and the bearing capacity of the soil. The study comprises three different spaces (s) that were taken in relation to the columns’ diameter (d), which are (s/d= 3, 4, and 5). In addition, three types of the sectional shape of column involved circular, rectangular, and square sections with different lengths of (L/d=2, 4, 6, 8, and 10). The results showed that the spacing between the stone columns is effective when the vertical load is greater than 30 kN/m2, and below this, there is no effect of the spacing. In general, the settlement decreases, and the bearing capacity increases with the decrease in the spacing between the stone columns. The spacing becomes a more pronounced effect with the longer length of the stone columns. All sections of the stone columns with a short length of (L/d=2) showed the same settlement of 271 mm at a distance (s/d=5), which decreases by 7.4, 6.6, and 8.9% at a distance (s/d=3) for the circular, rectangular and square sections respectively. In the case of long columns (L/d=10), the settlement at (s/d=3) improves by about 27.5% which drop to about 18% at (s/d=5). A slight improvement in the soil's bearing capacity is associated with decreases in the spacing between the stone columns. The improvements in the bearing of soil treated with short columns (L/d=2) are 6.0, 6.5, and 4.7% for circular, rectangular, and square sections, respectively, when changing the distance from (s/d=5) to (s/d=3). Whereas they become greater when increasing the columns’ length to (L/d=10) to be 7.9, 9.2, and 6.4%.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document