scholarly journals Antiproliferative function of glia maturation factor beta.

1990 ◽  
Vol 1 (10) ◽  
pp. 741-746 ◽  
Author(s):  
R Lim ◽  
W X Zhong ◽  
A Zaheer
Keyword(s):  
Growth Factors ◽  
Growth Factor ◽  
Target Cell ◽  
G1 Phase ◽  
Glia Maturation Factor ◽  
Pituitary Extract ◽  
Mitogenic Effect ◽  
Maturation Factor ◽  
Cultured Astrocytes

Recombinant human glia maturation factor beta (GMF-beta) reversibly inhibits the proliferation of neoplastic cells in culture by arresting the cells in the G0/G1 phase. This phenomenon is not target-cell specific, as neural and nonneural cells are equally inhibited. When tested simultaneously, GMF-beta suppresses the mitogenic effect of acidic fibroblasts growth factor (aFGF), but the two are synergistic in promoting the morphologic differentiation of cultured astrocytes. GMF-beta also counteracts the growth-stimulating effect of pituitary extract and cholera toxin on Schwann cells. The results underscore the regulatory role of GMF-beta and its intricate interaction with the mitogenic growth factors.

Post-transcriptional control of the onset of DNA synthesis by an insulin-like growth factor

1984 ◽  
Vol 4 (9) ◽  
pp. 1807-1814
Author(s):  
J Campisi ◽  
A B Pardee
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Growth Factors ◽  
Growth Factor ◽  
Dna Synthesis ◽  
Transcriptional Control ◽  
S Phase ◽  
G1 Phase ◽  
Insulin Like Growth Factor ◽  
Igf I ◽  
Translational Inhibition

The control of eucaryotic cell proliferation is governed largely by a series of regulatory events which occur in the G1 phase of the cell cycle. When stimulated to proliferate, quiescent (G0) 3T3 fibroblasts require transcription, rapid translation, and three growth factors for the growth state transition. We examined exponentially growing 3T3 cells to relate the requirements for G1 transit to those necessary for the transition from the G0 to the S phase. Cycling cells in the G1 phase required transcription, rapid translation, and a single growth factor (insulin-like growth factor [IGF] I) to initiate DNA synthesis. IGF I acted post-transcriptionally at a late G1 step. All cells in the G1 phase entered the S phase on schedule if either insulin (hyperphysiological concentration) or IGF I (subnanomolar concentration) was provided as the sole growth factor. In medium lacking all growth factors, only cells within 2 to 3 h of the S phase were able to initiate DNA synthesis. Similarly, cells within 2 to 3 h of the S phase were less dependent on transcription and translation for entry into the S phase. Cells responded very differently to inhibited translation than to growth factor deprivation. Cells in the early and mid-G1 phases did not progress toward the S phase during transcriptional or translational inhibition, and during translational inhibition they actually regressed from the S phase. In the absence of growth factors, however, these cells continued progressing toward the S phase, but still required IGF at a terminal step before initiating DNA synthesis. We conclude that a suboptimal condition causes cells to either progress or regress in the cell cycle rather than freezing them at their initial position. By using synchronized cultures, we also show that in contrast to earlier events, this final, IGF-dependent step did not require new transcription. This result is in contrast to findings that other growth factors induce new transcription. We examined the requirements for G1 transit by using a chemically transformed 3T3 cell line (BPA31 cells) which has lost some but not all ability to regulate its growth. Early- and mid-G1-phase BPA31 cells required transcription and translation to initiate DNA synthesis, although they did not regress from the S phase during translational inhibition. However, these cells did not need IGF for entry into the S phase.

scholarly journals Regulation of Cell Growth

1987 ◽  
Vol 80 (9) ◽  
pp. 591-593
Author(s):  
A J Barrett
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Growth Factors ◽  
Nerve Growth Factor ◽  
Growth Factor ◽  
Cell Growth ◽  
Cell Lines ◽  
Growth Regulation ◽  
Platelet Derived Growth Factor ◽  
Haemopoietic Stem Cells

At this meeting of the RSM's Section of Pathology, the regulation of haemopoietic stem cells and growth factors regulating various cell lines were described, and the role of oncogenes, platelet-derived growth factor and nerve growth factor in growth regulation was discussed.

Apoptosis in the haemopoietic system

1994 ◽  
Vol 345 (1313) ◽  
pp. 257-263 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Growth Factors ◽  
Growth Factor ◽  
Cell Survival ◽  
Lineage Differentiation ◽  
Haemopoietic Stem Cells ◽  
Underlying Causes ◽  
Membrane Bound ◽  
Survival Signals

Our previous studies have shown that haemopoietic stem cells undergo apoptotic death as a consequence of growth factor withdrawal. In this paper we review the new data that has accumulated since this observation and compare it with older data from the ‘pre-apoptotic’ age. Models of erythropoiesis and granulopoiesis that incorporate apoptosis as a normal physiological process controlling homeostasis are examined. The converse to cell death is cell survival, and we describe experiments which suggest that haemopoietic growth factors can not only act as mitogenic or differentiation stimuli but also act as survival signals. We, and others, have proposed that these growth factor-induced survival signals act through the membrane bound polypeptide receptors and share common features of signal transduction with proliferative responses. Enforced expression of bcl-2 in haemopoietic stem cells is able to overcome apoptosis following the withdrawal of growth factor, and the cells commit into different lineage differentiation programmes. Such cells spontaneously differentiate without cell division, suggesting a stochastic model of haemopoiesis in which the major role of haemopoietic growth factors is to suppress apoptosis and act as mitogens. We review the evidence that the underlying causes of some haematological diseases may be associated with change in the balance between cell survival and death.

Nitric oxide mediates mitogenic effect of VEGF on coronary venular endothelium

1996 ◽  
Vol 270 (1) ◽  
pp. H411-H415 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Morbidelli ◽  
C. H. Chang ◽  
J. G. Douglas ◽  
H. J. Granger ◽  
F. Ledda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nitric Oxide ◽  
Endothelial Cells ◽  
Growth Factor ◽  
No Synthase ◽  
Mitogenic Effect ◽  
Microvascular Endothelium ◽  
Proliferative Effect

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is a secreted protein that is a specific growth factor for endothelial cells. We have recently demonstrated that nitric oxide (NO) donors and vasoactive peptides promoting NO-mediated vasorelaxation induce angiogenesis in vivo as well as endothelial cell growth and motility in vitro; in contrast, inhibitors of NO synthase suppress angiogenesis. In this study we investigated the role of NO in mediating the mitogenic effect of VEGF on cultured microvascular endothelium isolated from coronary postcapillary venules. VEGF induced a dose-dependent increase in cell proliferation and DNA synthesis. The role of NO was determined by monitoring proliferation or guanosine 3',5'-cyclic monophosphate (cGMP) levels in the presence and absence of NO synthase blockers. The proliferative effect evoked by VEGF was reduced by pretreatment of the cells with NO synthase inhibitors. Exposure of the cells to VEGF induced a significant increment in cGMP levels. This effect was potentiated by superoxide dismutase addition and was abolished by NO synthase inhibitors. VEGF stimulates proliferation of postcapillary endothelial cells through the production of NO and cGMP accumulation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document