scholarly journals Analysis of BRAF V600E mutation status – concordance of results from circulating tumor DNA and tissue-based testing and impact on prediction of the clinical course in patients undergoing BRAFi therapy

2016 ◽  
Vol 27 ◽  
pp. vi392
Author(s):  
V.H. Haselmann ◽  
C. Gebhardt ◽  
I. Brechtel ◽  
A. Duda ◽  
A. Sucker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Course ◽  
Circulating Tumor Dna ◽  
Braf V600e Mutation ◽  
Braf V600e ◽  
Mutation Status ◽  
Tumor Dna

scholarly journals Small EVs-Associated DNA as Complementary Biomarker to Circulating Tumor DNA in Plasma of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 128
Author(s):  
Silvia Galbiati ◽  
Francesco Damin ◽  
Dario Brambilla ◽  
Lucia Ferraro ◽  
Nadia Soriani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Digital Pcr ◽  
Extracellular Vesicle ◽  
Circulating Tumor Dna ◽  
Mutation Status ◽  
Promising Practice ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Patients ◽  
Tumor Dna

It is widely accepted that assessing circular tumor DNA (ctDNA) in the plasma of cancer patients is a promising practice to evaluate somatic mutations from solid tumors noninvasively. Recently, it was reported that isolation of extracellular vesicles improves the detection of mutant DNA from plasma in metastatic patients; however, no consensus on the presence of dsDNA in exosomes has been reached yet. We analyzed small extracellular vesicle (sEV)-associated DNA of eleven metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients and compared the results obtained by microarray and droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) to those reported on the ctDNA fraction. We detected the same mutations found in tissue biopsies and ctDNA in all samples but, unexpectedly, in one sample, we found a KRAS mutation that was not identified either in ctDNA or tissue biopsy. Furthermore, to assess the exact location of sEV-associated DNA (outside or inside the vesicle), we treated with DNase I sEVs isolated with three different methodologies. We found that the DNA inside the vesicles is only a small fraction of that surrounding the vesicles. Its amount seems to correlate with the total amount of circulating tumor DNA. The results obtained in our experimental setting suggest that integrating ctDNA and sEV-associated DNA in mCRC patient management could provide a complete real-time assessment of the cancer mutation status.

scholarly journals Liquid Profiling of Circulating Tumor DNA in Plasma of Melanoma Patients for Companion Diagnostics and Monitoring of BRAF Inhibitor Therapy

2018 ◽  
Vol 64 (5) ◽  
pp. 830-842 ◽  
Author(s):  
Verena Haselmann ◽  
Christoffer Gebhardt ◽  
Ingrid Brechtel ◽  
Angelika Duda ◽  
Claudia Czerwinski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Course ◽  
Braf Inhibitor ◽  
Circulating Tumor Dna ◽  
Inhibitor Therapy ◽  
Response To Treatment ◽  
Companion Diagnostics ◽  
Mutational Status ◽  
Melanoma Patients ◽  
Braf Mutant ◽  
Tumor Dna

Abstract BACKGROUND The current standard for determining eligibility of patients with metastatic melanoma for BRAF-targeted therapy is tissue-based testing of BRAF mutations. As patients are rarely rebiopsied, detection in blood might be advantageous by enabling a comprehensive assessment of tumor mutational status in real time and thereby representing a noninvasive biomarker for monitoring BRAF therapy. METHODS In all, 634 stage I to IV melanoma patients were enrolled at 2 centers, and 1406 plasma samples were prospectively collected. Patients were assigned to 3 separate study cohorts: study 1 for assessment of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) as part of companion diagnostics, study 2 for assessment of ctDNA for patients with low tumor burden and for follow-up, and study 3 for monitoring of resistance to BRAF inhibitor (BRAFi) or mitogen-activated protein kinase inhibitor therapy. RESULTS Overall, a high degree of concordance between plasma and tissue testing results was observed at 90.9% (study 1) and 90.1% (study 2), respectively. Interestingly, discrepant results were in some cases associated with nonresponse to BRAFi (n = 3) or a secondary BRAF-mutant malignancy (n = 5). Importantly, ctDNA results correlated with the clinical course of disease in 95.7% and with response to treatment. Significantly, the detection of BRAF mutant ctDNA preceded relapse assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, and was more specific than serum S100 and lactate dehydrogenase. CONCLUSIONS Blood-based testing compares favorably with standard-of-care tissue-based BRAF mutation testing. Importantly, blood-based BRAF testing correlates with the clinical course, even for early-stage patients, and may be used to predict response to treatment, recurrence, and resistance before radioimaging under BRAFi therapy, thereby enabling considerable improvements in patient treatment.

scholarly journals Comparative Analysis of Two Methods for the Detection of EGFR Mutations in Plasma Circulating Tumor DNA from Lung Adenocarcinoma Patients

Cancers ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 803 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ming-Szu Hung ◽  
Jr-Hau Lung ◽  
Yu-Ching Lin ◽  
Yu-Hung Fang ◽  
Shu-Yi Huang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Egfr Mutation ◽  
Circulating Tumor Dna ◽  
Egfr Mutations ◽  
Cancer Tissue ◽  
Lung Cancer Tissue ◽  
First Line ◽  
Mutation Status ◽  
Egfr Tki ◽  
Tumor Dna

Mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) are associated with various solid tumors. This study aimed to compare two methods for the detection of EGFR mutations in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) from lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) patients and to evaluate the clinical significance of EGFR mutations in ctDNA. In this prospective cohort study, the EGFR mutation status of 77 patients with stage IIIB or IV LUAD was first determined using lung cancer tissue. The amplification refractory mutation system (ARMS) and single allele base extension reaction combined with mass spectroscopy (SABER/MassARRAY) methods were also used to detect EGFR mutations in plasma ctDNA from these patients and then compared using the EGFR mutation status in lung cancer tissue as a standard. Furthermore, the relationship between the presence of EGFR mutations in ctDNA after receiving first-line EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) therapy and survival was evaluated. The overall sensitivity and specificity for the detection of EGFR mutations in plasma ctDNA by ARMS and SABER/MassARRAY were 49.1% vs. 56% and 90% vs. 95%, respectively. The agreement level between these methods was very high, with a kappa-value of 0.88 (95% CI 0.77–0.99). Moreover, 43 of the patients who carried EGFR mutations also received first-line EGFR-TKI therapy. Notably, patients with EGFR mutations in plasma ctDNA had significantly shorter progression-free survival (9.0 months, 95% CI 7.0–11.8, vs. 15.0 months, 95% CI 11.7–28.2; p = 0.02) and overall survival (30.6 months, 95% CI 12.4–37.2, vs. 55.6 months, 95% CI 25.8–61.8; p = 0.03) compared to those without detectable EGFR mutations. The detection of EGFR mutations in plasma ctDNA is a promising, minimally invasive, and reliable alternative to tumor biopsy, and the presence of EGFR mutations in plasma ctDNA after first-line EGFR-TKI therapy is associated with poor prognosis.

Assessment of EGFR mutation status in matched plasma and tumor tissue of NSCLC patients.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e20032-e20032
Author(s):  
Qin Feng
Keyword(s):  
Tumor Tissue ◽  
Egfr Mutation ◽  
Circulating Tumor Dna ◽  
Egfr Mutations ◽  
Amplification Refractory Mutation System ◽  
Circulating Dna ◽  
Mutation Status ◽  
Nsclc Patients ◽  
Tumor Dna ◽  
Egfr Tkis

e20032 Background: Tumor tissue is currently used for EGFR testing non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, but the detection of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is being actively investigated as a new method for the detection and longitudinal monitoring of actionable mutations in plasma samples. Around 30% patients with EGFR mutation presented inconsistent status of EGFR mutation between in tissues and plasma. We compared EGFR mutation detection in circulating tumor DNA from blood to that in matched tissue. Methods: EGFR mutation status were assessed by the Human EGFR Gene Mutations Detection Kit (Beijing ACCB Biotech Ltd.) both in tissue and plasma. Retrospective analysis to evaluate the concordance of tissue and plasma EGFR determination for assessing eligibility for EGFR-TKIs therapy in NSCLC patients. 10 mL tubes of blood were collected from patients who never had been treated by EGFR TKI, and plasma circulating tumor DNA were extracted from plasma by Biomark Circulating DNA Kit. Qubit2.0 Fluorometer was used to make plasma circulating DNA tumor quantitation. The concentration of final DNA sample is ≦2ng/μl. Results: A total of 224 NSCLC patients were detected by Amplification Refractory Mutation System (ARMS), with 92 tissue positive and 49 blood positive. Results showed 53.3% sensitivity in overall samples, but 81.4% sensitivity in ⅢB~Ⅲ patients. The specificity is 100%. Conclusions: The high sensitivity and specificity between tissue and plasma EGFR determination supports the blood-based EGFR mutation testing to determinate the eligibility of NSCLC patients for EGFR-TKIs treatment, especialy in ⅢB~Ⅲ NSCLC patients. Blood, in particular plasma, is a good screening substitute when tumor tissue is absent or insufficient for testing EGFR mutations to guide EGFR TKIs treatment in patients with NSCLC. EGFR mutation positivity in blood could be used to recommend EGFR TKIs treatment, but the blood negativity should be confirmed with other sample, biopsy tissue, pleural effusion, etc..

Androgen receptor cfDNA longitudinal mutational analysis in metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 197-197
Author(s):  
Elisa Marie Ledet ◽  
Patrick Cotogno ◽  
Whitley Hatton ◽  
Ellen Jaeger ◽  
Marcus W. Moses ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Androgen Receptor ◽  
Mutational Analysis ◽  
Clinical Course ◽  
Circulating Tumor Dna ◽  
Driver Mutations ◽  
2Nd Generation ◽  
Castrate Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Castrate Resistant ◽  
Tumor Dna

197 Background: Androgen receptor (AR) mutations commonly occur in metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Methods: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) data were obtained from Guardant 360 assays throughout the clinical course of mCRPC patients (pts). Retrospective analysis for any pt with ≥ 3 Guardant assays at least 4 weeks apart were reviewed. Patients must have at least 1 AR mutation or amplification to qualify for inclusion. Statistical analyses, including chi-sq and longitudinal analyses, were conducted. Results: Of the 259 patients with Guardant testing, a total of 88 patients had at least 3 Guardant tests; of these, 59 (67%) had at least one AR alteration. Patients had a median of 4 Guardant assays (range 3-10). Patients with AR amplification, AR mutation or both were identified (23, 20, 16 respectively). The most common and clinically relevant AR mutations found alone or in combination with amplification were T878A (22%), L702H(19%), W742C (19%), and H875Y (10%). These particular functional AR mutations occurred alone in 16 patients. Only 3 patients had neither amplification nor common AR mutation. 17/59 patients were found to have at least one common AR mutation and amplification at some point (on same or different Guardant). One patient had seven different AR mutations with no amplification and two other patients had 3 AR mutations. Remainder of patients had either AR amplification or ≤ 2 alternative mutations. Patients with an AR amplification were 0.1138x (95% Cl 0.0289 - 0.4491) significantly less likely of having a common known functional mutation (p <0.002) at any point. Conclusions: Patients with the most frequently identified known functional AR mutations are less likely to have AR amplification in pts with mCRPC; these common AR mutations have been shown to be associated with resistance to 2nd generation androgen deprivation. Further clinical correlation between treatment regimen and %cfDNA of these and other non-AR driver mutations is planned.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document