714 Venous Thromboembolism Risk Re-Assessment Within 24 and 72 Hours After Admission (Closed-Loop Audit)

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Aung

Abstract Introduction NICE and Poole Hospital guideline state venous thromboprophylaxis (VTE) risk assessment must be done on admission and at consultant review (within 24hr and 72hr after admission) Changing from paper to electronic patient records(EPR) system omits some mandatory protocols. Although VTE risk assessment on admission remains mandatory on EPR, records of re-assessment within 24 and 72hr becomes optional. Method 100 random patients admitted to the orthopaedic department, before and after implementation of change. Results The initial data indicates 0% of recording for re-assessment after admission. This action led to incorrect dosage and duration of chemical VTE prophylaxis in 20% of the patients. After presenting the data to stakeholders, an instruction of entering VTE re-assessment on EPR was done by a teaching session and by putting up posters. A discussion with the IT department resulted in setting up a dropdown-box for VTE re-assessment on EPR. Re-audit shows a slight improvement in the recording from 0% to 3% for within 24hr and 22% for within 72hr. Feedbacks indicates an insufficient time, a lack of senior staff member involvement and established workplace culture. Conclusions Despite some improvement, more junior and senior staff engagement, including cultural changes, are needed to achieve the national standard.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmad Almohtadi ◽  
Malvika Subramaniam ◽  
Anja Mattson ◽  
Bihu Malhotra ◽  
Frida Margaretha Eriksson

Abstract Background: Hospital-acquired venous thromboembolisms (VTEs) account for 50-60% of all VTEs observed. Surgical patients are particularly at risk, and preventative measures such as thromboembolism deterrent stockings (TEDs) and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) proves to be beneficial. The National Quality Requirement in the NHS Standard Contract 2017/19 mandates that 95% of patients undergo VTE risk assessments. Due to nationwide transitions into electronic patient records (EPR), it is important to observe the impact on the completion of vital assessments such as VTE risk. The aim of this study is to observe the effect of implementing EPR in a tertiary hospital on VTE assessments and prophylaxis administration in admitted surgical patients.Methods: Using consecutive sampling method, all acute surgical admissions at the St. George’s Surgical Admissions Unit from 26th February to 18th March (n=154) pre-EPR and 31st October to 25th November (n=151) post-EPR implementation were observed for VTE risk assessment, 24-hour re-assessment, prophylaxis (LMWH, TED stockings) prescription, administration, and patient compliance. These two sets of data were compared using a two-tailed Z test to evaluate the effect of EPR on assessment completion, and to observe if national targets were met.Results: Pre-EPR, 96% of patients had a completed VTE assessment, which increased after EPR implementation to 97% (p=0.39). LWMH prescription rates decreased from 82% to 77%, following EPR (p=0.14). Moreover, TEDs prescriptions decreased from 84% to 64% post-EPR (p<0.01). Administration rates of prophylaxis led to a general improvement post-EPR. The 24-hour re-assessment decreased from 62% to 54% of patients (p=0.08).Conclusions: This study demonstrated that current practice met national requirements of VTE assessment. EPR implementation is associated with improved rates in administration of thromboprophylaxis. However, there is still much room for improvement in adherence to risk assessment completion. Data collection post-EPR began immediately after EPR implementation. Thus, lack of confidence and familiarity of the new system could have influenced assessment rates. A multifactorial approach is required when making large transitions, including enhancing staff attitude, increasing EPR training and assessments in individual Trust’s technological needs to achieve a standard use capability.


2007 ◽  
Vol 84 (12) ◽  
pp. 1602-1609 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard I. Cook ◽  
John Wreathall ◽  
Alison Smith ◽  
David C. Cronin ◽  
Oswaldo Rivero ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Georgios Karagiannidis ◽  
Omar Toma

Abstract Aims Audit to assess Orthopaedic departments’ compliance with NICE guidelines on Venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis published in 2010, specifically looking at VTE practices for patients with lower limb injuries treated in a plaster cast. Methods A telephonic survey was carried out on junior doctors within orthopaedic departments of 66 hospitals across all regions of England. A questionnaire was completed regarding VTE risk assessment, prophylaxis and hospital guidelines etc. Data collected from August 2016 till February 2017. Results 83% (n = 55) of trusts routinely give VTE prophylaxis to these patients. 96% (n = 64) give Chemoprophylaxis of some sort. Formal VTE assessments are performed in 81% (n = 54) and 77% (n = 51) have a local VTE prophylaxis policy. Conclusions We conclude that Orthopaedic departments across England have increased compliance with NICE guidelines for VTE prophylaxis. However there is considerable variation in practice, especially in duration and chemoprophylaxis agent. We attribute this to the lack of specific NICE guidelines for this cohort of patients. We aim that this study can influence NICE to introduce added guidance that will standardise practice.


Author(s):  
J Wright ◽  
S Randhawa ◽  
C Gooding ◽  
S Lowery ◽  
D Eastwood ◽  
...  

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is widely understood to be an important cause both of morbidity and mortality in hospital inpatients. This has led to the development of guidelines for the management of VTE prophylaxis in adults by the national institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. In acknowledgement of the importance of this issue, there are government incentives in the form of Commissioning for Quality and innovation payments that are dependent on the performance of hospital trusts in certain quality indicators, such as risk assessment for VTE in the adult patient.


2019 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 29
Author(s):  
Erin L. Caruana ◽  
Suzanne S. Kuys ◽  
Jane Clarke ◽  
Sandra G. Brauer

Objective Australian weekend rehabilitation therapy provision is increasing. Staff engagement optimises service delivery. The present mixed-methods process evaluation explored staff perceptions regarding implementation of a 6-day physiotherapy service in a private rehabilitation unit. Methods All multidisciplinary staff working in the rehabilitation unit were surveyed regarding barriers, facilitators and perceptions of the effect of a 6-day physiotherapy service on length of stay (LOS) and patient goal attainment at three time points: before and after implementation, as well as after modification of a 6-day physiotherapy service. Descriptive statistics and thematic analysis was used to analyse the data. Results Fifty-one staff (50%) responded. Before implementation, all staff identified barriers, the most common being staffing (62%) and patient selection (29%). After implementation, only 30% of staff identified barriers, which differed to those identified before implementation, and included staff rostering and experience (20%), timing of therapy (10%) and increasing the allocation of patients (5%). Over time, staff perceptions changed from being unsure to being positive about the effect of the 6-day service on LOS and patient goal attainment. Conclusion Staff perceived a large number of barriers before implementation of a 6-day rehabilitation service, but these did not eventuate following implementation. Staff perceived improved LOS and patient goal attainment after implementation of a 6-day rehabilitation service incorporating staff feedback. What is known about this topic? Rehabilitation weekend services improve patient quality of life and functional independence while reducing LOS. What does this study add? Staff feedback during implementation and modification of new services is important to address potential barriers and ensure staff satisfaction and support. What are the implications for practitioners? Staff engagement and open communication are important to successfully implement a new service in rehabilitation.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 12-23
Author(s):  
Michael Abbaszadeh ◽  
Mohammad Mosaferi ◽  
Parisa Firouzi ◽  
Mohammad Ali Abedpour ◽  
Samira Sheykholeslami

Abstract Background and Objectives: Water quality is important for preparation of dialysis solution due to its direct relationship with blood of patients with renal failure. The aim of this study was to evaluate the chemical and microbial quality of inlet and outlet water of dialysis devices in hospitals of East Azerbaijan province. Material and Methods: This study was a descriptive-analytical study in which the water of dialysis ward of three hospitals affiliated to East Azerbaijan University of Medical Sciences was investigated. The results of physicochemical (45 cases) and microbial (163 cases) of dialysis water were extracted from the relevant archives in two stages before and after reverse osmosis treatment during 2014-2016. Independent t-test and one-way ANOVA were used for statistical analysis while extracting descriptive statistical parameters. Data analysis was done using Excel and SPSS 23 software. Results: Evaluation of the efficiency of reverse osmosis system showed that there was a significant difference between water quality, before and after the system. Except for calcium, magnesium, fluoride and nitrate, the concentrations of other cations and anions in 100% of samples were lower than the European Pharmacopoeia standard. Incoming water samples to dialysis machine in 4.9% of cases had total coliform contamination and there was no fecal coliform in any of the samples. The frequency and frequency of tests in hospitals are not observed and despite the risk of heavy metals, heavy metals tests are not performed on dialysis water for the health of dialysis patients. Conclusion: The need to develop a national standard for controlling dialysis water, testing all quality parameters of dialysis water according to standards in regular times and timeframes, informing hospital managers and environmental health experts about the importance of dialysis water quality in health and increasing life expectancy of dialysis patients is felt.


Author(s):  
George Jacob ◽  
Martina N. Cummins

MRSA are S. aureus which become methicillin resistant by the acquisition of the mec A gene which is on a mobile chromosomal determinant called staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCC mec). The mec A gene encodes for a penicillin- binding protein (PBP2a) which has a low affinity for isoxazolyl-penicillins (MICs to oxacillin/ meticillin ≥ 4μg/ ml) and is resistant to all classes of beta-lactam antibiotics. Current Department of Health (DOH) guidance (2014) recommends that mandatory MRSA screening be streamlined to include only: ● All patient admissions to high- risk units; ● Healthcare workers; and ● All patients previously identified as colonized or infected with MRSA. The guidance also advises Trusts to follow local risk assessment policies to identify other potential high- risk units or units with a history of high endemicity of MRSA; and The guidance also recommends regular auditing of compliance with MRSA screening policy. The 2006 guideline for the control and prevention of MRSA in healthcare facilities recommends the following four measures. ● Isolation MRSA- positive patients should be nursed in a single room or if none is available, cohorting into a bay after risk assessment. Patient movement, and the number of staff and visitors looking after the patient, should be minimized. ● Hand hygiene and use of personal protective equipment (PPE) All staff and visitors should decontaminate their hands with soap and water/or an alcohol rub before and after contact with the patient or their immediate surroundings. Single-use disposable gloves and aprons/non- permeable gowns should be used by staff and visitors if there is a risk of contamination with body fluids. ● Disposal of waste and laundry All waste from colonized/ infected patients should be placed in the infectious waste stream. All linen and bedding from patients colonized/infected with MRSA should be considered as contaminated and processed as infected linen. ● Cleaning and decontamination The patient’s room should be cleaned/disinfected daily with an appropriate detergent/disinfectant as per local policy. On discharge of the patient, the room needs to be terminally cleaned before it is reused. All patient equipment should either be single-patient use or be cleaned, disinfected, and sterilized.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document