774 Primary vs Deferred Ureteroscopies In Stone Management-Quality and Cost Evaluation
Abstract Introduction To investigate quality and cost benefits of primary ureteroscopies (URS) compared to deferred URS after initial ureteric stenting in patients presenting with urolithiasis. Method This was one-year, retrospective study, carried out to evaluate quality and cost benefits of primary URS in comparison to deferred URS after initial stenting. 85 patients underwent emergency stenting while as 148 patients underwent elective URS (Including both primary as well as deferred URS). The quality assessment was based on patient factors -including number of procedures, days spent at hospital, days off work and expertise of person operating. Cost analysis included hospital stay expenses and income loss due to off work. Results Study revealed the average stay of patients who had a stent inserted on index admission was 2.54 days compared to 1.35 in patients who underwent primary URS during index admission. Overall, additional expenditure in patients who did not undergo primary URS was in the range of £ 1800 for hospital alone, excluding loss of work for patients, who needed to return for multiple procedures. Conclusions We conclude approach of primary URS and management of stone in index admission in stone management is very effective in both improving quality of patients as well as bringing down cost.