scholarly journals P128 The implications of SARS-CoV-2 on a Cardiothoracic unit

BJS Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rhys Luckwell ◽  
Rhys Luckwell
Keyword(s):  
University Hospital ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Limited Evidence ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Exclusion Criteria ◽  
Diagnostic Uncertainty ◽  
Surgical Services ◽  
Risk Of Mortality ◽  
Barrier Nursing ◽  
The Cost

Abstract Introduction The effort to prevent healthcare systems becoming overrun during the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic has come at the cost of delaying operations and with that bringing difficult risk analysis to help decide which operations should go ahead. With COVID-19 being a novel disease there is limited evidence for guidance on this issue. We have previously presented work highlighting the high risk of mortality associated with a perioperative cardiothoracic patient becoming COVID-19 positive and thus decided to implement a series of changes to departmental perioperative practice. This work presents these interventions and compares the infection and the mortality rate with those before the intervention was put in place. Method Two retrospective loops were performed. Pre intervention, 5/3/20 – 20/4/20, and post intervention, 21/4/20- 23/6/20. Inclusion criteria: patients who had received cardiothoracic surgery at University Hospital of Wales within 4 weeks of the positive COVID-19 PCR (1st loop n = 53, 2nd loop n = 40). Exclusion criteria included re-admissions from greater than 4 weeks (n = 2). Interventions included 14 day pre op isolation, a strict multifaceted screening regime, reverse barrier nursing and delaying operations if diagnostic uncertainty. Results 9/51 patients from the pre intervention loop and 2/40 from post intervention loop tested +ve for COVID-19. The pre intervention mortality was 5/9 and post intervention mortality was 0/2. Conclusion Our data suggest that simple changes to perioperative practice can decrease the transmission of COVID-19 during this period. Thus, allowing surgical services to run at a reduced risk

scholarly journals 974 Improving Safety for Tracheostomy and Laryngectomy Patients Within A Regional Head and Neck Unit

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽  
Author(s):  
L Simpson ◽  
G Watson
Keyword(s):  
Head And Neck ◽  
Standards Of Care ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Ward Staff ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Exclusion Criteria ◽  
Emergency Airway ◽  
Inpatient Episode ◽  
High Standards ◽  
Very High

Abstract Aim To improve the safety of tracheostomy and laryngectomy patients within a UK-based regional head and neck unit. Method This audit was conducted against standards taken from the National Tracheostomy Safety Project (NTSP). Inclusion criteria were all patients with a tracheostomy or laryngectomy on the ward, there were no exclusion criteria. Data was collected per inpatient episode for a one month period pre- and post- implementation of each intervention (1st March to 31st May 2020). Results Pre-intervention results showed that none of the 19 neck-breathing inpatients during March 2020 had a bedhead sign or emergency algorithm displayed, however all patients had required bedside equipment and the only unavailable ward equipment was capnography. Laminated bedhead signs and algorithms were implemented and 33% neck-breathing patients had signs displayed during April 2020. Further intervention in May 2020 to educate ward staff led to 90% of patients having a bedhead sign displayed and 80% having an algorithm displayed. Conclusions Overall, our unit has very high standards of care for neck-breathing patients. The use of bedhead signs and emergency airway algorithms is an integral part of providing safe care for neck-breathing patients and all members of staff are responsible for their use. The COVID-19 crisis has impacted on the number of elective procedures being performed which has impacted upon the numbers for the post-intervention arms of our audit. Reduced staffing due to sickness during the pandemic may have contributed to the substandard results.

Adverse Effects of Natural Products: A Brief Pre-Systematic Review

2020 ◽  
Vol 01 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carla Pires ◽  
Ana Fernandes
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Adverse Event ◽  
Natural Products ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Google Scholar ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Exclusion Criteria ◽  
Meta Analyses

Background: Natural products are commonly used for treating health problems. These products may be associated with adverse events, which are defined as "noxious and unintended response to a medicinal product" by the European Medicine Agency. Objectives: To identify studies describing at least one adverse event (or with potential to promote an adverse event) related to the use of natural products, as well as to describe the involved product(s) and adverse event(s). Methods: A pre-systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses criteria. Keywords: "natural product(s)" and ["adverse drug reaction(s)" or "adverse effect(s)"]. Screened databases: PubMed, SciELO, DOAJ and Google Scholar. Inclusion criteria: papers describing at least one adverse event associated with the use of natural products and published between 2017 and 2019. Exclusion criteria: Repeated studies, reviews and papers written in other languages than English, Portuguese, French or Spanish. Results: 104 studies were identified (20 PubMed; 0 SciELO; 2 DOAJ; 82 Google Scholar), but only 10 were selected (4 PubMed and 6 Google Scholar): 1 in-vitro study; 2 non-clinical studies, 1 study reporting in-vitro and clinical data and 5 studies were cases reports. Globally, 997 reports of adverse drug reactions with natural products were identified, mainly non-severe cases. Conclusion: Since a limited number of studies was found, we conclude that adverse events due to natural products may be underreported, or natural products may have a good safety profile. This review contributes for assuring the safety of natural products consumers, by evaluating the knowledge/information on the potential adverse events and interactions of these products.

scholarly journals Cost Effectiveness of Transbronchial Needle Aspiration

1999 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 332-335 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer A Crocket ◽  
Eric YL Wong ◽  
Dale C Lien ◽  
Khanh Gia Nguyen ◽  
Michelle R Chaput ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Diagnostic Procedures ◽  
Needle Aspiration ◽  
Benign Disease ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
High Yield ◽  
Transbronchial Needle Aspiration ◽  
Computed Tomographic ◽  
The Cost

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the yield and cost effectiveness of transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) in the assessment of mediastinal and/or hilar lymphadenopathy.DESIGN: Retrospective study.SETTING: A university hospital.POPULATION STUDIED: Ninety-six patients referred for bronchoscopy with computed tomographic evidence of significant mediastinal or hilar adenopathy.RESULTS: Ninety-nine patient records were reviewed. Three patients had two separate bronchoscopy procedures. TBNA was positive in 42 patients (44%) and negative in 54 patients. Of the 42 patients with a positive aspirate, 40 had malignant cytology and two had cells consistent with benign disease. The positive TBNA result altered management in 22 of 40 patients with malignant disease and one of two patients with benign disease, thereby avoiding further diagnostic procedures. The cost of these subsequent procedures was estimated at $27,335. No complications related to TBNA were documented.CONCLUSIONS: TBNA is a high-yield, safe and cost effective procedure for the diagnosis and staging of bronchogenic cancer.

scholarly journals The association of triglyceride levels with the incidence of initial and recurrent acute pancreatitis

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert J. Sanchez ◽  
Wenzhen Ge ◽  
Wenhui Wei ◽  
Manish P. Ponda ◽  
Robert S. Rosenson
Keyword(s):  
Acute Pancreatitis ◽  
Medical Records ◽  
Adult Population ◽  
Baseline Period ◽  
Prior History ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Exclusion Criteria ◽  
Recurrent Acute Pancreatitis ◽  
History Of ◽  
Nationally Representative

Abstract Background This retrospective cohort study assessed the annualized incidence rate (IR) of acute pancreatitis (AP) in a nationally representative US adult population, as well as the variation in the risk of AP events across strata of triglyceride (TG) levels. Methods Data were obtained from IQVIA’s US Ambulatory Electronic Medical Records (EMR) database linked with its LRxDx Open Claims database. Inclusion criteria included ≥1 serum TG value during the overlapping study period of the EMR and claims databases, ≥1 claim in the 12-month baseline period, and ≥ 1 claim in the 12 months post index. All TG measurements were assigned to the highest category reached: < 2.26, ≥2.26 to ≤5.65, > 5.65 to ≤9.94, > 9.94, and > 11.29 mmol/L (< 200, ≥200 to ≤500, > 500 to ≤880, > 880, and > 1000 mg/dL, respectively). The outcome of interest was AP, defined as a hospitalization event with AP as the principal diagnosis. Results In total, 7,119,195 patients met the inclusion/exclusion criteria, of whom 4158 (0.058%) had ≥1 AP events in the prior 12 months. Most patients (83%) had TGs < 2.26 mmol/L (< 200 mg/dL), while < 1% had TGs > 9.94 mmol/L (> 880 mg/dL). Overall, the IR of AP was low (0.08%; 95% confidence internal [CI], 0.08–0.08%), but increased with increasing TGs (0.08% in TGs < 2.26 mmol/L [< 200 mg/dL] to 1.21% in TGs > 11.29 mmol/L [> 1000 mg/dL]). In patients with a prior history of AP, the IR of AP increased dramatically; patients with ≥2 AP events at baseline had an IR of 29.98% (95% CI, 25.1–34.9%). Conclusion The risk of AP increases with increasing TG strata; however, the risk increases dramatically among patients with a recent history of AP.

Applicability of the VOYAGER trial criteria: a cohort study on patients in the nationwide Danish Vascular Registry

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Soegaard ◽  
P.B Nielsen ◽  
F Skjoeth ◽  
T.B Larsen ◽  
N Eldrup
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Lower Extremity ◽  
Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Funding Source ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Private Company ◽  
Exclusion Criteria ◽  
Dual Pathway ◽  
Event Rates ◽  
Lower Extremity Revascularization

Abstract Introduction Peripheral artery disease (PAD) carries a high risk of debilitating stroke, myocardial infarction, and death. The VOYAGER PAD trial investigates whether rivaroxaban 2.5 mg plus aspirin vs aspirin alone leads to a reduction in major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with symptomatic PAD undergoing revascularization. However, it is unclear whether patients enrolled in VOYAGER PAD reflect those undergoing lower extremity revascularization in daily clinical practice. Purpose To describe the proportion of patients eligible for the VOYAGER PAD trial within the nationwide Danish Vascular Registry (DVR), the reasons for ineligibility, and rates of cardiovascular outcomes in VOYAGER-eligible and VOYAGER-ineligible patients. Methods We identified and characterized all patients from 2000–2016 undergoing open surgical or endovascular revascularization for symptomatic PAD in the DVR and applied the VOYAGER inclusion and exclusion criteria. We computed one-year rates per 100 person-years of VOYAGER PAD trial endpoints of MACE, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, major amputation, major bleeding, cardiovascular (CV) death, and all cause death. Results In the DVR, 32,911 patients underwent lower extremity revascularization for symptomatic PAD and were evaluated for eligibility. Among these, 32.2% had at least one exclusion criteria and an additional 40.6% without exclusion criteria did not fulfil inclusion criteria. The “VOYAGER-eligible” population therefore comprised 27.2% of the identified patients (Figure 1A). Main reasons for exclusion were atrial fibrillation (30.7%), poorly regulated hypertension (19.6%), PCI or ACS within 12 months before (16.0%), treatment with strong inhibitors or inducers of cytochrome P450 (9.2%), active cancer (8.8%), and severe renal failure (8.3%). Main reasons for non-inclusion were aorto-iliac procedures (79.0%), non-successful revascularization (13.1%), and age&lt;50 years (7.1%). Compared with “VOYAGER-eligible” patients, event rates were slightly lower among patients in the DVR not fulfilling inclusion criteria and markedly higher for “VOYAGER excluded” patients (Figure 1B). Conclusion In this nationwide cohort of symptomatic PAD patients undergoing lower extremity revascularization, 27.2% full filled the inclusion and exclusion criteria for dual pathway therapy in the VOYAGER PAD trial. Non-inclusion predominantly related to aorto-iliac procedures and were associated with lower event rates. Future studies are needed to clarify if these patients could also benefit from dual pathway therapy. Figure 1 Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Private company. Main funding source(s): Bayer AG, Berlin, Germany

Effectiveness of a vancomycin dosing protocol guided by area under the concentration-time curve to minimal inhibitory concentration (AUC/MIC) with multidisciplinary team support to improve hospital-wide adherence to a vancomycin dosing protocol: A pilot study

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Panipak Katawethiwong ◽  
Anucha Apisarnthanarak ◽  
Kittiya Jantarathaneewat ◽  
David J. Weber ◽  
David K. Warren ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mortality Rate ◽  
Multidisciplinary Team ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Routine Practice ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Coagulase Negative Staphylococci ◽  
Time Curve ◽  
Concentration Time ◽  
Quasi Experimental

Abstract Background: Limited data are available on the implementation of an area under the concentration-time curve (AUC)–based dosing protocol with multidisciplinary team (MT) support to improve adherence with vancomycin dosing protocol. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of an AUC-based dosing protocol with MT support intervention with adherence to a hospital-wide vancomycin dosing protocol at Thammasat University Hospital. Method: We conducted a quasi-experimental study in patients who were prescribed intravenous vancomycin. The study was divided into 2 periods; (1) the preintervention period when the vancomycin dosing protocol was already applied in routine practice and (2) the post-intervention period when the implementation of an AUC-based dosing protocol with MT support was added to the existing vancomycin dosing protocol. The primary outcome was the rate of adherence, and the secondary outcomes included acute kidney injury events, vancomycin-related adverse events, and 30-day mortality rate. Results: In total, 240 patients were enrolled. The most common infections were skin and soft-tissue infections (24.6%) and bacteremia (24.6%). The most common pathogens were coagulase-negative staphylococci (19.6%) and Enterococcus spp (15.4%). Adherence with the vancomycin dosing protocol was significantly higher in the postintervention period (90.8% vs 55%; P ≤ .001). By multivariate analysis, an AUC-based dosing protocol with MT support was the sole predictor for adherence with the vancomycin dosing protocol (adjusted odds ratio, 10.31; 95% confidence interval, 4.54–23.45; P ≤ .001). The 30-day mortality rate was significantly lower during the postintervention period (8.3% vs 20%; P = .015). Conclusions: AUC-based dosing protocol with MT support significantly improved adherence with vancomycin dosing protocol and was associated with a lower 30-day mortality rate.

scholarly journals Single-bone versus both-bone plating of unstable paediatric both-bone forearm fractures. A randomized controlled clinical trial

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamed Khaled ◽  
Amr A. Fadle ◽  
Ahmed Khalil Attia ◽  
Andrew Sami ◽  
Abdelkhalek Hafez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Forearm Fractures ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Fracture Union ◽  
Exclusion Criteria ◽  
Bone Fixation ◽  
Fixation Group ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Single Bone

Abstract Purpose This clinical trial compares the functional and radiological outcomes of single-bone fixation to both-bone fixation of unstable paediatric both-bone forearm fractures. Methods This individually randomized two-group parallel clinical trial was performed following the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) statement at a single academic tertiary medical centre with an established paediatric orthopaedics unit. All children aged between nine and 15 years who presented to the emergency department at Assiut university with unstable diaphyseal, both-bone forearm fractures requiring surgical intervention between November 1, 2018, and February 28, 2020, were screened for eligibility against the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Inclusion criteria were diaphyseal unstable fractures defined as shaft fractures between the distal and proximal metaphyses with an angulation of > 10°, and/or malrotation of > 30°, and/or displacement > 10 mm after attempted closed reduction. Exclusion criteria included open fractures, Galeazzi fractures, Monteggia fractures, radial head fractures, and associated neurovascular injuries. Patients who met the inclusion criteria were randomized to either the single-bone fixation group (intervention) or the both-bone fixation group (control). Primary outcomes were forearm range of motion and fracture union, while secondary outcomes were forearm function (price criteria), radius re-angulation, wrist and elbow range of motion, and surgical time Results A total of 50 children were included. Out of these 50 children, 25 were randomized to either arm of the study. All children in either group received the treatment assigned by randomization. Fifty (100%) children were available for final follow-up at six months post-operatively. The mean age of single-bone and both-bone fixation groups was 11.48 ± 1.93 and 13 ± 1.75 years, respectively, with a statistically significant difference (p = 0.006). There were no statistically significant differences in gender, laterality, affection of the dominant hand, or mode of trauma between single-bone and both-bone fixation groups. All patients in both groups achieved fracture union. There mean radius re-angulation of the single-bone fixation groups was 5.36 ± 4.39 (0–20) degrees, while there was no radius re-angulation in the both-bone fixation group, with a statistically significant difference (p < 0.001). The time to union in the single-bone group was 6.28 ± 1.51 weeks, while the time to union in the both-bone fixation group was 6.64 ± 1.75 weeks, with no statistically significant difference (p = 0.44). There were no infections or refractures in either group. In the single-bone fixation group, 24 (96%) patients have regained their full forearm ROM (loss of ROM < 15°), while only one (4%) patient lost between 15 and 30° of ROM. In the both-bone fixation group, 23 (92%) patients have regained their full forearm ROM (loss of ROM < 15°), while only two (8%) patients lost between 15 and 30° of ROM. There was no statistically significant difference between groups in loss of forearm ROM (p = 0.55). All patients in both groups regained full ROM of their elbow and wrist joints. On price grading, 24 (96%) and 23 (92%) patients who underwent single bone fixation and both-bone fixation scored excellent, respectively. Only one (4%) patient in the single-bone fixation group and two (8%) patients in the both-bone fixation group scored good, with no statistically significant difference in price score between groups (p = 0.49). The majority of the patients from both groups had no pain on the numerical pain scale; 22 (88%) patients in the single-bone fixation group and 21 (84%) patients in the both-bone fixation groups, with no statistically significant difference between groups (p = 0.38). The single-bone fixation group had a significantly shorter mean operative time in comparison to both-bones plating (43.60 ± 6.21 vs. 88.60 ± 10.56 (min); p < 0.001). Conclusion Single-bone ulna open reduction and plate fixation and casting are safe and had a significantly shorter operative time than both-bone fixation. However, single-bone ORIF had a higher risk radius re-angulation, alas clinically acceptable. Both groups had equally excellent functional outcomes, forearm ROM, and union rates with no complications or refractures. Long-term studies are required.

Prognosis in patients with prior myocardial infarction and PEGASUS-TIMI 54 criteria in the CLARIFY registry

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
S Biscaglia ◽  
G Campo ◽  
K Fox ◽  
J.C Tardif ◽  
M Tendera ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Artery Bypass ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Prolonged Treatment ◽  
Funding Source ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Private Company ◽  
Exclusion Criteria ◽  
Coronary Syndrome

Abstract Background/Introduction The PEGASUS-TIMI 54 trial showed that prolonged treatment with ticagrelor reduces the cumulative occurrence of ischemic adverse events. CLARIFY is the biggest real life registry on chronic coronary syndrome. Purpose - To evaluate the percentage of patients eligible for long-term ticagrelor therapy in the CLARIFY registry. – To compare the outcome of this subgroup of patients with those with PEGASUS exclusion criteria or without PEGASUS inclusion criteria. Methods Within the CLARIFY population, we selected post MI patients and we excluded those with missing info (post MI evaluable population). Then, we divided patients into 3 groups: excluded (meeting PEGASUS exclusion criteria, namely use of P2Y12 receptor antagonists or chronic oral anticoagulant, any stroke, coronary-artery bypass grafting in the past 5 years); eligible (meeting PEGASUS high-risk inclusion criteria, namely age≥65 years; diabetes; multivessel disease; creatinine clearance &lt;60 ml/min) and ineligible (not meeting PEGASUS high-risk inclusion criteria). We therefore compared the ischemic (CV death, MI and stroke) and bleeding (major bleeding) outcome of the 3 groups adjusting for age, sex, smoking and geographical region. Results Among the 11811 post-MI evaluable patients, 4706 (39.8%) were included in the eligible group, 5715 (48.4%) in the excluded group, and 1390 in the ineligible group (11.8%). Both the ischemic and bleeding endpoints were significantly different among the 3 groups with the excluded patients with the worst and ineligible patients with the best outcome (see table). The same trend was shown for CV death, while the occurrence of MI was not significantly different among the 3 groups. In the eligible group, the ratio between ischemic and bleeding events was 6:1, whereas between CV death and major bleeding was 3.5:1. Conclusions Around 40% of CLARIFY post-MI patients could benefit from prolonged ticagrelor therapy. In this group of patients, ischemic risk seems to be higher than the bleeding one. Ischemic & bleeding risk in the 3 groups Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Private company. Main funding source(s): CLARIFY registry was funded by Servier

scholarly journals Seasonal Influenza and Low Flu Vaccination Coverage as Important Factors Modifying the Costs and Availability of Hospital Services in Poland: A Retrospective Comparative Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (10) ◽  
pp. 5173
Author(s):  
Robert Susło ◽  
Piotr Pobrotyn ◽  
Lidia Brydak ◽  
Łukasz Rypicz ◽  
Urszula Grata-Borkowska ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Influenza Season ◽  
Influenza Infection ◽  
Hospital Staff ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Admission Rates ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Retrospective Comparative Study ◽  
The Cost

Introduction: Influenza infection is associated with potential serious complications, increased hospitalization rates, and a higher risk of death. Materials and Methods: A retrospective comparative analysis of selected indicators of hospitalization from the University Hospital in Wroclaw, Poland, was carried out on patients with confirmed influenza infection in comparison to a control group randomly selected from among all other patients hospitalized on the respective wards during the 2018–2019 influenza season. Results: The mean laboratory testing costs for the entire hospital were 3.74-fold higher and the mean imaging test costs were 4.02-fold higher for patients with confirmed influenza than for the control group; the hospital expenses were additionally raised by the cost of antiviral therapy, which is striking when compared against the cost of a single flu vaccine. During the 2018–2019 influenza season, influenza infections among the hospital patients temporarily limited the healthcare service availability in the institution, which resulted in reduced admission rates to the departments related to internal medicine; the mean absence among the hospital staff totaled approximately 7 h per employee, despite 7.3% of the staff having been vaccinated against influenza at the hospital’s expense. Conclusions: There were significant differences in the hospitalization indicators between the patients with confirmed influenza and the control group, which markedly increased the hospital care costs in this multi-specialty university hospital.

scholarly journals The effect of vitamin K on prothrombin time in critically ill patients: an observational registry study

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sofia Dahlberg ◽  
Ulf Schött ◽  
Thomas Kander
Keyword(s):  
Propensity Score ◽  
Prothrombin Time ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Vitamin K ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
International Normalized Ratio ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Red Blood Cell Transfusion ◽  
Registry Study ◽  
Exclusion Criteria

Abstract Background Previous studies have indicated that vitamin K deficiency is common in non-bleeding critically ill patients with slightly prolonged prothrombin time-international normalized ratio (PT-INR). It has never been investigated thoroughly whether the administration of vitamin K to these patients could affect their PT-INR. Therefore, the aim of this registry study was to evaluate changes in PT-INR in response to vitamin K in critically ill patients with PT-INR in the range of 1.3–1.9. Methods Patients admitted to a mixed 9-bed general intensive care unit at a University Hospital, between 2013 and 2019 (n = 4541) with a PT-INR between 1.3 and 1.9 at any time during the stay were identified. Patients who received vitamin K with appropriate sampling times for PT-INR and without exclusion criteria were matched with propensity score to patients from the same cohort who did not receive vitamin K (controls). PT-INR was measured at admission, within 12 h before vitamin K administration and 12–36 h following vitamin K administration. Exclusion criteria included pre-existing liver cirrhosis, any plasma or platelet transfusion, or > 1 unit red blood cell transfusion between PT-INR samplings. Results Propensity score matching resulted in two groups of patients with 129 patients in each group. PT-INR decreased in both groups (1.4 [1.3–1.4] in the vitamin K group and 1.4 [1.3–1.6] in the controls, p < 0.001 and p = 0.004, respectively). The decrease in PT-INR was slightly more pronounced in patients who received vitamin K (delta PT-INR − 0.10 [− 0.30 to − 0.10] in the vitamin K group and − 0.10 [− 0.20 to 0.10] in the controls, p = 0.01). Conclusion In critically ill patients with a PT-INR of 1.3–1.9, the administration of vitamin K resulted in a slightly larger decrease of PT-INR 12–36 h after administration compared to controls. Future studies should focus on identifying which patient populations may benefit most from vitamin K administration as well as whether vitamin K could be a better alternative than plasma or prothrombin complex concentrate to improve PT-INR before non-emergent invasive procedures.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document