340 EXPANDING THE ROLE OF POEM TO ESOPHAGEAL EPIPHRENIC DIVERTICULA—FEASIBLE, SAFE AND EFFECTIVE.

2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Sudarshan ◽  
M Sanaka ◽  
S Adhikari ◽  
S Murthy ◽  
P Thota ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Motility Disorder ◽  
Column Height ◽  
Study Cohort ◽  
Surgical Morbidity ◽  
Esophageal Motility Disorder ◽  
Demeester Score ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Epiphrenic Diverticula

Abstract   Epiphrenic diverticula (ED) is a rare disorder which can be associated with significant surgical morbidity. Presence of an esophageal motility disorder, often achalasia, is classically associated with ED with some arguing that symptoms are primarily attributed to the motility disorder rather than the diverticula itself. The role of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is expanding for palliation of achalasia. The objective of our study is to investigate the outcomes of POEM in patients with epiphrenic diverticula. Methods A retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database was conducted in a tertiary care institution between April 2014 and July 2019. A total of 217 patients receiving a POEM during the study time period were identified with 13 patients having ED. Video recordings of POEM with and without ED were compared for technical differences. Patient demographics, prior esophageal procedures and epiphrenic diverticula characteristics were collected. Primary outcome was post-operative Eckardt scores. We also explored integrated resting pressure (IRP) on manometry, barium column height and width, complications and patient reported outcomes. Standard statistical methods were applied using R. Results Among 13 patients with ED (median age 74.2, 69% male), 7 small and 6 large diverticula were identified. No post-operative complications were noted. The median Eckardt score significantly decreased from 8 [IQR 5–9] pre POEM to 0 [IQR 0–2] post POEM, with similar improvements in median IRPs (24.5 mmHg [IQR 16.9–31.3] vs. 4.3 mmHg [IQR 2.4–7.6], 1 min barium column height (9.2 cm [IQR 6.3–17.9] vs. 3.2 cm [IQR 0–7.1] and 1 min barium column width (3.3 cm [IQR 2.7–3.5] vs. 0.75 cm [IQR 0–3.7]. Post-operative pH studies were conducted in 7 (53.8%) patients demonstrating a DeMeester score of more than 14.72 in 5 (71.4%) patients. Conclusion We demonstrate that POEM is technically feasible, safe and associated with excellent outcomes in patients with small and large diverticula. In our study cohort no further surgical therapy was required to address the diverticula. Reflux was managed medically. Considering its low morbidity profile POEM should be considered for therapy in selected patients with epiphrenic diverticula.

800 ASSOCIATION OF MULTIPLE RAPID SWALLOW PARAMETERS WITH SYMPTOMS IN PATIENTS WITH INEFFECTIVE AND NORMAL ESOPHAGEAL MOTILITY

2021 ◽  
Vol 34 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Deepika Razia ◽  
Deepika Razia ◽  
Sumeet K Mittal
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Motility ◽  
Motility Disorder ◽  
Study Cohort ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Provocative Test ◽  
Chicago Classification ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Integrated Relaxation Pressure ◽  
Acid Exposure Time

Abstract   Multiple rapid swallows (MRS) is a provocative test to assess inhibitory swallowing mechanisms and esophageal peristaltic reserve. MRS response has been purposed to predict post-fundoplication dysphagia and has been associated with increased acid exposure time. Recently it was added to the Chicago classification v 4.0 protocol as an adjunctive test. This study aimed to understand the association of MRS parameters with symptoms in patients within ineffective (IEM) or normal esophageal motility (NEM). Methods After IRB approval, a prospectively maintained esophageal motility database was retrospectively reviewed to identify patients with IEM and NEM who also had an MRS evaluation. Patients with previous gastroesophageal surgery, manometric hiatal hernia, or a diagnosed motility disorder (except IEM) were excluded. Patient-reported symptoms (0–4) (heartburn, regurgitation, dysphagia, and chest pain) were grouped by score: 0, 1–2, or 3–4. We compared the prevalence of normal or abnormal MRS and individual MRS parameters (distal contractile integral [DCI], integrated relaxation pressure, distal latency, adequate inhibition, and post-MRS DCI/mean single swallow DCI ratio) with patient-reported symptoms. Results From 2019–2020, a total of 531 patients (254 = IEM, 277 = NEM) met the inclusion criteria and formed the study cohort. The presence of normal or abnormal MRS results was not associated with any patient-reported symptom in either the NEM or IEM group. Furthermore, patient-reported symptoms were not associated with individual MRS parameters in either group. Conclusion In patients with IEM and NEM, adjunct assessment with MRS does not correlate with patient-reported symptoms. Further studies are needed to assess the role of MRS as an adjunctive test during routine manometry.

Nose Picking and Nasal Carriage of Staphylococcus aureus

2006 ◽  
Vol 27 (08) ◽  
pp. 863-867 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heiman F. L. Wertheim ◽  
Menno van Kleef ◽  
Margreet C. Vos ◽  
Alewijn Ott ◽  
Henri A. Verbrugh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Clinical Signs ◽  
Positive Culture ◽  
Nasal Carriage ◽  
Study Cohort ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Hospital Employees ◽  
Nose And Throat

Objective.Nasal carriage ofStaphylococcus aureusis an important risk factor forS. aureusinfection and a reservoir for methicillin-resistantS. aureus. We investigated whether nose picking was among the determinants ofS. aureusnasal carriage.Setting and Participants.The study cohort comprised 238 patients who visited the ear, nose, and throat (ENT) disease outpatient clinic of a tertiary care hospital and did not have a nose-specific complaint (defined as ENT patients) and 86 healthy hospital employees (including medical students and laboratory personnel).Measurements.All participants completed a questionnaire on behavior regarding the nose and were screened forS. aureusnasal carriage; only ENT patients underwent nasal examination by an ear, nose, and throat physician for clinical signs of nose picking.Results.Among ENT patients, nose pickers were significantly more likely than non–nose pickers to carryS. aureus(37 [53.6%] of 69 vs 60 [35.5%] of 169 patients; relative risk, 1.51 [95% confidence interval, 1.03-2.19]). Among healthy volunteers, there was a statistically significant positive correlation between the self-perceived frequency of nose picking and both the frequency of positive culture results (R= 0.31;P= .004) and the load ofS. aureuspresent in the nose (R= 0.32;P= .003).Conclusion.Nose picking is associated withS. aureusnasal carriage. The role of nose picking in nasal carriage may well be causal in certain cases. Overcoming the habit of nose picking may aidS. aureusdecolonization strategies.

TO DETERMINE THE ROLE OF CA125 IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF ACUTE APPENDICITIS

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Vinod Kumar ◽  
Bhupen Songra ◽  
Richa Jain ◽  
Deeksha Mehta
Keyword(s):  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Clinical Diagnosis ◽  
Tertiary Care Hospital ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Ca 125 ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Serum Samples ◽  
Roc Curve Analysis ◽  
Surgery Department

Background: the present study was under taken to determine the role of CA-125 in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis (AA), to prevent its complications and also in preventing negative appendicectomies in tertiary care hospital. Methods: The study was conducted at a tertiary care and research center between 01/03/2018 to 30/06/2019. Patients admitted to the surgery department with diagnosis of AA were considered for the study. After informed consent, a, standardized history was obtained as a case Performa. Serum samples from all the cases with clinical diagnosis of AA were obtained and stored. Only the cases with histopathologically approved AA were included in the study. Cases operated for clinical diagnosis of AA, but not histopathologically proven AA was not included in the study. CA125 levels in cases with definitive diagnosis of AA were measured. Results: In present study, ROC curve analysis revealed the sensitivity of 87.27 % and specificity of 90.91 % when the CA 125 cut-off value of > 16.8 was taken to diagnose acute appendicitis. AUC was 0.911 with a standard error of 0.0292. Conclusion: In this study we have observed that CA125 showed a positive correlation with acute appendicitis, that was statistically not significant (P>0.05). We didn’t evaluate the correlation with the disease severity. We consider that CA125 can be used as a marker in acute appendicitis cases although further research is still needed. Keywords: CA125, Acute Appendicitis, Surgery.

Pediatric ganglioglioma of the brainstem and cervicomedullary junction: a retrospective cohort study

2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 30-36
Author(s):  
Soliman Oushy ◽  
Avital Perry ◽  
Christopher S. Graffeo ◽  
Aditya Raghunathan ◽  
Lucas P. Carlstrom ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Significant Risk ◽  
Foot Drop ◽  
Cranial Neuropathy ◽  
Primary Study ◽  
Tumor Control ◽  
Subtotal Resection ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Surgical Morbidity ◽  
Cervicomedullary Junction

OBJECTIVEGanglioglioma is a low-grade central nervous system neoplasm with a pediatric predominance, accounting for 10% of all brain tumors in children. Gangliogliomas of the cervicomedullary junction (GGCMJs) and brainstem (GGBSs) present a host of management challenges, including a significant risk of surgical morbidity. At present, understanding of the prognostic factors—including BRAF V600E status—is incomplete. Here, the authors report a single-institution GGCMJ and GGBS experience and review the pertinent literature.METHODSA prospectively maintained neurosurgical database at a large tertiary care academic referral center was retrospectively queried for cases of GGCMJ pathologically confirmed in the period from 1995 to 2015; appropriate cases were defined by diagnosis codes and keywords. Secondary supplemental chart review was conducted to confirm or capture relevant data. The primary study outcome was treatment failure as defined by evidence of radiographic recurrence or progression and/or clinical or functional decline. A review of the literature was conducted as well.RESULTSFive neurosurgically managed GGBS patients were identified, and the neoplasms in 4 were classified as GGCMJ. All 5 patients were younger than 18 years old (median 15 years, range 4–16 years) and 3 (60%) were female. One patient underwent gross-total resection, 2 underwent aggressive subtotal resection (STR), and 2 underwent stereotactic biopsy only. All patients who had undergone STR or biopsy required repeat resection for tumor control or progression. Progressive disease was treated with radiotherapy in 2 patients, chemotherapy in 2, and chemoradiotherapy alone in 1. Immunostaining for BRAF V600E was positive in 3 patients (60%). All 5 patients experienced at least one major complication, including wound infection, foot drop, hemiparesis, quadriparesis, cranial neuropathy, C2–3 subluxation, syringomyelia, hydrocephalus, aspiration, and coma. Overall mortality was 20%, with 1 death observed over 11 years of follow-up.CONCLUSIONSGGBS and GGCMJ are rare, benign posterior fossa tumors that carry significant perioperative morbidity. Contemporary management strategies are heterogeneous and include combinations of resection, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. The BRAF V600E mutation is frequently observed in GGBS and GGCMJ and appears to have both prognostic and therapeutic significance with targeted biological agents.

Assessing Patient Symptoms Due to Nasal Septal Perforation: Development and Validation of the NOSE-Perf Scale

2021 ◽  
pp. 019459982199201
Author(s):  
Cullen M. Taylor ◽  
Stephen F. Bansberg ◽  
Michael J. Marino
Keyword(s):  
Nasal Obstruction ◽  
Discriminant Validity ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Septal Perforation ◽  
Specific Symptom ◽  
Nose Scale ◽  
Nasal Septal Perforation ◽  
Patient Reported

Objective Reporting patient symptoms due to nasal septal perforation (NSP) has been hindered by the lack of a validated disease-specific symptom score. The purpose of this study was to develop and validate an instrument for assessing patient-reported symptoms related to NSP. Study Design Validation study. Setting A tertiary care center. Methods The Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scale was used as an initial construct to which 7 nonobstruction questions were added to measure septal perforation symptoms. The proposed NOSE-Perf instrument was distributed to consecutive patients evaluated for NSP, those with nasal obstruction without NSP, and a control group without rhinologic complaints. Questionnaires were redistributed to the subgroup with NSP prior to treatment of the perforation. Results The study instrument was completed by 31 patients with NSP, 17 with only nasal obstruction, and 22 without rhinologic complaint. Internal consistency was high throughout the entire instrument (Cronbach α = 0.935; 95% CI, 0.905-0.954). Test-retest reliability was demonstrated by very strong correlation between questionnaires completed by the same patient at least 1 week apart ( r = 0.898, P < .001). Discriminant validity was confirmed via a receiver operating characteristic ( P < .001, area under the curve = 0.700). The NOSE-Perf scale was able to distinguish among all 3 study groups ( P < .001) and between NSP and nasal obstruction ( P = .024). When used alone, the NOSE scale could not discriminate between NSP and nasal obstruction ( P = .545). Conclusions The NOSE-Perf scale is a validated and reliable clinical assessment tool that can be applied to adult patients with NSP.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document