scholarly journals Differences in clinical and prognosis patient's characteristics between acute heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction compared to heart failure with other ejection fraction groups

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
J Gorriz Magana ◽  
M.J Espinosa Pascual ◽  
R Olsen Rodriguez ◽  
R Abad Romero ◽  
C Perela Alvarez ◽  
...  

Abstract Background There are scarce data on clinical profile and prognosis of pts with Heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction (HFmrEF). The aim of this study was to analyse the patient's characteristics and their prognosis in terms of morbidity and mortality compared to those patients with acute heart failure with reduced (HFrEF) and preserved (HFpEF) ejection fraction Methods We performed a retrospective analysis from a prospective observational study developed in a University Hospital, which covers 220.000 individuals. We analysed 600 discharges with the main diagnosis of Heart Failure with 52 months of median follow up. We obtain clinical and demographic data at the moment of admission and during de follow up. To analyse mortality and readmission we used a Kaplan-Meier model. Results A total of 551 patients (91%) had a transthoracic echocardiogram (TEE) during the admission. Eleven percent (11.8%) of the patients (pts) had HFmrEF (35.6% of them were women), 66.7% HFpEF (81.8% women) and 20.6% HFrEF (29.0% women). Median age of HFmrEF was 80.5±1.3 years, similar to HFpEF (81±0.5 years). However, pts with HFrEF were younger (75.2±1.1 years). A higher percent of pts with HFrEF were on beta-blocker (BB) treatment at admission compared to HFmrEF (51.79% vs 47.54%) and HFpEF (39.91%). At discharge, all of them were on high doses of BB (64.55% HFrEF, 54.10% HFmrEF and 33.62% HFpEF). After an adjusted analysis by age, pts with HFmrEF had higher mortality compared to HEpEF (HR: 0.55; 95% CI: 0.38–0.80; p=0.002) with no statically significant difference compared to HFrEF (HR: 0.88; 95% IC: 0.57–1.35; p=0.5). Pts with HFmrEF were on a higher risk of readmission compared to HFpEF (HR 0.59; 95% CI 0.41–0.84, p=0.004). There was also no statistical difference compared to HFrEF (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.47–1.11; p=0.14). Conclusions According to our results, pts with HFmrEF and HFpEF are older compared to HFrEF. HFpEF were mostly women, compared to other groups. A lower percent of HFmrEF were also on BB treatment. HFmrEF and HFrEF had a similar prognosis in terms of readmission and mortality. HFmrEF pts were on higher risk of mortality and readmission compared to HFpEF. We need more studies to find more information and confirm these results. Graph 1 Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (8) ◽  
pp. 673-684
Author(s):  
CAMILLA HAGE ◽  
ULRIKA LÖFSTRÖM ◽  
ERWAN DONAL ◽  
EMMANUEL OGER ◽  
AGNIESZKA KAPŁON-CIEŚLICKA ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Parisa Gholami ◽  
Shoutzu Lin ◽  
Paul Heidenreich

Background: BNP testing is now common though it is not clear if the test results are used to improve patient care. A high BNP may be an indicator that the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is low (<40%) such that the patient will benefit from life-prolonging therapy. Objective: To determine how often clinicians obtained a measure of LVEF (echocardiography, nuclear) following a high BNP value when the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was not known to be low (<40%). Methods and Results: We reviewed the medical records of 296 consecutive patients (inpatient or outpatient) with a BNP values of at least 200 pg/ml at a single medical center (tertiary hospital with 8 community clinics). A prior diagnosis of heart failure was made in 65%, while 42% had diabetes, 79% had hypertension, 59% had ischemic heart disease and 31% had chronic lung disease. The mean age was 73 ± 12 years, 75% were white, 10% black, 15% other and the mean BNP was 810 ± 814 pg/ml. The LVEF was known to be < 40% in 84 patients (28%, mean BNP value of 1094 ± 969 pg/ml). Of the remaining 212 patients without a known low LVEF, 161 (76%) had a prior LVEF >=40% ( mean BNP value of 673 ± 635 pg/ml), and 51 (24%) had no prior LVEF documented (mean BNP 775 ± 926 pg/ml). Following the high BNP, a measure of LVEF was obtained (including outside studies documented by the primary care provider) within 6 months in only 53% (113 of 212) of those with an LVEF not known to be low. Of those with a follow-up echocardiogram, the LVEF was <40% in 18/113 (16%) and >=40% in 95/113 (84%). There was no significant difference in mean initial BNP values between those with a follow-up LVEF <40% (872 ± 940pg/ml), >=40% (704 ± 737 pg/ml), or not done (661 ± 649 pg/ml, p=0.5). Conclusions: Follow-up measures of LVEF did not occur in almost 50% of patients with a high BNP where the information may have led to institution of life-prolonging therapy. Of those that did have a follow-up study a new diagnosis of depressesd LVEF was noted in 16%. Screening of existing BNP and LVEF data and may be an efficient strategy to identify patients that may benefit from life-prolonging therapy for heart failure.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Banach ◽  
Ł. Wołowiec ◽  
D. Rogowicz ◽  
L. Gackowska ◽  
I. Kubiszewska ◽  
...  

Introduction. Procalcitonin (PCT) is an excellent marker of sepsis but was not extensively studied in cardiology. The present study investigated PCT plasma concentration in patients with chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and its prognostic value during 24-month follow-up. Material and Methods. Study group consisted of 130 patients with HFrEF (LVEF ≤ 45%) and 32 controls. PCT level was assessed on admission in all patients. Telephone follow-up was performed every three months over a period of 2 years. Endpoints were death of all causes and readmission for HFrEF exacerbation. Results. HFrEF patients had significantly higher PCT concentration than controls (166.95 versus 22.15 pg/ml; p<0.001). Individuals with peripheral oedema had increased PCT comparing to those without oedema (217.07 versus 152.12 pg/ml; p<0.02). In ROC analysis, PCT turned out to be a valuable diagnostic marker of HFrEF (AUC 0.91; p<0.001). Kaplan-Meier survival curves revealed that patients with PCT in the 4th quartile had significantly lower probability of survival than those with PCT in the 1st and 2nd quartiles. In univariate, but not multivariate, analysis, procalcitonin turned out to be a significant predictor of death during 24-month follow-up. (HR 1.002; 95% CI 1.000–1.003; p<0.03). Conclusions. Elevated PCT concentration may serve as another predictor of worse outcome in patients with HFrEF.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. e000100
Author(s):  
Sergey Kozhukhov ◽  
Alexander Parkhomenko ◽  
Nataliia Dovganych

Introduction: Acute heart failure (AHF) is one of the most frequent complication of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). It is not only associated with a several-fold increase of in-hospital mortality but also, worsens the long-term survival in comparison to those without AHF. The AHF is observed to be more in AMI patients whose in-hospital stay is more than 3 days. The clinical implications and prognostic accuracy of the AHF term in the setting of AMI are yet unknown. Methods: We observed 1,104 consecutive cardiac care patients, who were admitted with ST-elevation AMI (STEMI). They were divided into groups according to the AHF presence {AHF(+) n=334 and AHF(-) n=764}. Among 334 AHF(+) patients: 252 patients were found to have a transient AHFt(+), whereas 82 of AHF(+) patients had persistent AHFp(+) during in-hospital period.  Patients' baseline characteristics, blood analysis, left ventricle (LV) and renal function data were assessed and analyzed on the admission day and 10th day post-admission. The follow-up was conducted on the 30th day and after 2 years. Results. STEMI patients accompanied by AHF(+) were older, presented mostly with anterior AMI (p<0.01), had lower LV ejection fraction (EF) (p<0.01) and a higher heart rate (p<0.05). Their rates of comorbidities and of in-hospital complications such as recurrent angina, reinfarction, LV aneurism were higher in comparision to AHF(-) patients. AHFp(+) patients had the shortest time from symptoms onset before thrombolysis in comparision to AHFt(+) and AHF(-) groups. Partial recovery of cardiac function according to Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and end-systolic volume index, occurred mainly in AHF(-) and AHFt(+) patients on the 10th day post-admission, but not in AHFp(+). STEMI patients with AHFp(+) demonstrated a larger infarct size, higher C-reactive protein and VGEF level, fasting glucose and heart rate on admission, higher erythrocyte sedimentation rate, absence of heart rate normalization on the 10th day post-admission. All of these markers were the signs of severe myocardial damage and inflammation, which can reflect worse recovery in AHF patients despite optimal management. Patients with AHF(+) had renal dysfunction on admission while its creatinine clearance (CrCl) decreased during the in-hospital period which is the reflection of a poor prognosis. Сardiovascular mortality and non-fatal MI were significantly higher in the AHFp(+) group as compared to the AHFt(+) and the AHF(–) groups during the 30 days and 2 years of follow-up. Conclusion: The AHF is a frequent STEMI complication. AHF lasting >3 days had worse short- and long-term prognosis. Therefore, an aggressive strategy should be recommended particularly in patients who have clinical signs and symptoms of persistent AHF. Keywords: myocardial infarction, acute heart failure, infarct size, survival.


BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. e038294
Author(s):  
Shinichiro Suna ◽  
Shungo Hikoso ◽  
Takahisa Yamada ◽  
Masaaki Uematsu ◽  
Yoshio Yasumura ◽  
...  

IntroductionNeither the pathophysiology nor an effective treatment for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) has been elucidated to date. The purpose of this ongoing study is to elucidate the pathophysiology and prognostic factors for patients with HFpEF admitted to participating institutes. We also aim to obtain insights into the development of new diagnostic and treatment methods by analysing patient background factors, clinical data and follow-up information.Methods and analysisThis study is a prospective, multicentre, observational study of patients aged ≥20 years admitted due to acute decompensated heart failure with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (≥50%) and elevated N-terminal-pro brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) (≥400 pg/mL). The study began in June 2016, with the participation of Osaka University Hospital and 31 affiliated facilities. We will collect data on history in detail, accompanying diseases, quality of life, frailty score, medication history, and laboratory and echocardiographic data. We will follow-up each patient for 5 years, and collect outcome data on mortality, cause of death, and the number and cause of hospitalisation. The target number of registered cases is 1500 cases in 5 years.Ethics and disseminationThe protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Osaka University Hospital on 24 February 2016 (ID: 15471), and by the IRBs of the all participating facilities. The findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations.


2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 59-66
Author(s):  
Vinod Kumar ◽  
Pravin K. Goel ◽  
Roopali Khanna ◽  
Aditya Kapoor ◽  
Kunal Mahajan

Objective: The B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels could predict future cardiovascular events in congestive heart failure patients. Most studies have correlated basal BNP levels to long-term outcomes. Limited data exist on the prognostic significance of 1-month postdischarge BNP levels after acute heart failure. Methods: Consecutive patients admitted for worsening heart failure were enrolled. BNP was measured at admission, predischarge and at 1-month following discharge. Patients were followed for 1 year for end points of death and rehospitalization. Results: A total of 150 patients (mean age 60.8 + 13.8 years) were included in the heart failure study. 81 (54%) patients had acute heart failure secondary to acute coronary syndrome, while the rest (46%) had acute decompensation of chronic heart failure irrespective of etiology. Mean ejection fraction was 28.6 + 8.9%. 14 patients expired during hospitalization. BNP at admission was an important predictor of in hospital mortality ( P value = .003). Following discharge, 7 events (3 deaths and 4 rehospitalizations) occurred over next 1 month. 1-month outcome was predicted by baseline BNP ( P value = .01) as well as discharge BNP value ( P value = .001). A total of 55 events (26 rehospitalization and 29 deaths) occurred at follow-up of 1 year. Age > 50years, ejection fraction at baseline and all time sequential BNP levels (at admission, discharge, as well as 1 month) were univariate predictors of death and rehospitalization at 1 year. The BNP at 1 month had best discriminative power and remained the lone significant predictor in the multivariate analysis ( P = < .001). Conclusions: 1-month postdischarge BNP level is a useful prognostic factor that predicts mortality and rehospitalization at 1-year follow-up, in patients admitted with heart failure, and helps in identifying patients who need more intensive drug treatment and closer follow-up.


Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hao T Phan

Introduction: The presence of acute kidney injury in the setting of acute heart failure (AHF) or acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) is very common occurrence and was termed cardiorenal syndrome 1 (CRS1). Renal dysfunction is common in patients with AHF or ADHF and is associated with significant early and late morbidity and mortality. Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) is an early predictor of acute kidney injury and adverse events in various diseases; however, in AHF or ADHF patients, its significance remains poorly understood. This study was aimed to evaluate the 12 month prognostic value of plasma NGAL in AHF or ADHF patients Hypothesis: plasma NGAL has value in prognosis of 12-month all-cause mortality of Acute Heart Failure or Acute Decompensated Heart Failure Methods: This was a prospective cohort study Results: there were 46 all-cause mortality cases (rate 33.1%) 12 months follow up after discharge. There were 11 cases (rate 7.9%) lost to follow-up; mean age 66.12 ± 15.77, men accounted for 50.4%. The optimal cut-off of NGAL for 12-month all-cause mortality prognosis was > 383.74 ng/ml, AUC 0.632 (95% CI 0.53-0.74, p = 0.011), sensitivity 58.7 %, specificity 68.29 %, positive predictive value 50.9%, negative predictive value 74.7%. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that the high plasma NGAL (≥ 400 ng/ml) group exhibited a worse prognosis than the low plasma NGAL (< 400 ng/ml) group in 12-month all-cause death (Hazard Ratio 2.56; 95%CI 1.35-4.84, P=0.0039. Independent predictors of 12-month all-cause-mortality were identified using multivarable Cox proportional-hazards regression models with backward-stepwise selection method consisted of two variables: level of NGAL, mechanical ventialtion at admission. Conclusions: Plasma NGAL and mechanical ventilation at admission were independent predictors of 12-month all-cause mortality in patients with AHF or ADHF. The survival probability 12-month follow-up of high level NGAL (≥ 400 ng/ml) groups were lower than that of low level NGAL (<400 ng/ml,), difference was statistically significant χ2 = 8.31; p = 0.0047 by Kaplan-Meier curves.


2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
C Monteiro ◽  
A Cojoianu ◽  
R Savage ◽  
R Bone ◽  
C Hammond ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Over the last ten years, an increase in admission rates for acute heart failure (HF) has been noted in England and Wales, with one year mortality rates varying between 30% and 60%. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is recommended within 48 hours of admission for suspected acute heart failure, so to guide treatment accordingly. Our centre has a specialist team who assesses patients with suspected HF on admission, and refers them for urgent in-patient TTE, using two priority in-patient echo slots per day. Patients are initially referred for HF assessment by general medics and geriatricians, across non-specialist medical wards. We audited the referrals and results of those who received TTE in this context. Methods and results We screened the medical notes of 252 patients admitted with suspected HF between January and December 2017, and reviewed the echocardiography results of those who received it during their admission. 50% of these patients were female and 59% were elderly (over 80 years old). 245 of these patients (97.2%) had in-patient echocardiography performed during their hospital stay. The mean wait for echocardiography was 0.58 days, with 92% of the scans being performed within 24 hours. The mean admission duration was 8.6 days (SD 10.9). 17.9% of patients were readmitted with suspected heart failure within six months, 69% of which were elderly. The majority of this cohort presented with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), 50%), followed by heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF, 29%) and heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction (HFmrEF, 16%). 41% of the patients who received an echocardiogram were in atrial fibrillation, 51% of which were diagnosed with HFpEF. All patients had their HF medical treatment optimised post-echocardiography and only 18.4% were readmitted within 6 months of the first admission. The majority of these patients was elderly (68.9%). 38.8% of patients who received echocardiography were referred for specialist clinic follow-up, with HFrEF patients more likely to be seen in this setting (42%). Six-month mortality occurred in 19.8% of patients; cause of death (COD) was undocumented in 25.8% of cases. In those where a post-mortem was conducted, the main COD was HF (16.7%), followed by sepsis (13.6%), cardiac (6.1%) and respiratory arrest (6.1%). 66% of the deceased patients were elderly and 48% presented with HFpEF. Conclusion Our cohort is an accurate representation of the current HF statistics seen nationwide. Appropriate treatment was offered to the large majority of patients who received in-patient echocardiography within the first 24 hours of their admission, with low six-month readmission rates. This approach also allowed for the inclusion of these patients on a systematic review plan, including specialist cardiology follow-up. Our numbers are consistent with the higher awareness about HFpEF currently seen in the medical community.


2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Takae ◽  
E Yamamoto ◽  
F Oike ◽  
T Nishihara ◽  
K Fujisue ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Inflammation, characterized by early leukocyte recruitment, is known to be associated with vascular endothelial dysfunction and atherosclerosis. Previous studies have reported that an increased leukocyte count is a risk factor for the progression of atherosclerosis in cardiovascular diseases, and we previously reported that a high monocyte count was an independent and incremental of cardiovascular events in patients with coronary artery disease. Furthermore, previous study also reported that inflammation play a role in the pathophysiology of heart failure (HF), but few studies have evaluated the prognostic role of monocyte in patients with HF. Purpose To elucidate the prognostic value of monocyte in HF, we investigated the association of monocyte counts in patients with HF with their future cardiovascular events, and compared them among new categories of HF in this study. Methods Consecutive HF patients referred for hospitalization at Kumamoto University Hospital between 2006 and 2015 were registered. Finally, a total of 678 HF patients were enrolled in the study, and were followed prospectively until 2016 or until the occurrence of cardiovascular events. We defined high monocyte group as monocyte counts ≥360/mm3 according to previous clinical reports. We further divided HF patients into three types according to left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (HF with reduced LVEF (HFrEF), HF with mid-range LVEF (HFmrEF), and HF with preserved LVEF (HFpEF)). Results In this study, HFrEF was 82 patients, HFmrEF was 118 patients and HFpEF was 478 patients, respectively. The average of total monocyte counts were 397±136 in HFrEF and 375±172 in HFmrEF, and 341±138 in HFpEF patients. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that both HFrEF and HFmrEF patients with high monocyte group (≥360 /mm3) had a significant higher risk of HF-related events (P=0.03 and P=0.02, respectively) but not of total cardiovascular events compared with those with low monocyte groups (<360/mm3) (P=0.001). By contrast, high and low monocyte groups in HFpEF patients had no significant difference in both total cardiovascular and HF-related events. Multivariate Cox hazard analysis identified a high monocyte count as an independent and significant predictor of future HF-related events in HFrEF and HFmrEF patients (hazard ratio: 3.02, 95% confidence interval: 1.20–7.59, p=0.018). Next, by whether they had ischemic heart disease (IHD), we divided HFrEF and HFmrEF patients into two groups. Non-ischemic HF group with high monocyte counts had a significant higher risk of HF-related events compared to those with low monocyte counts (P=0.014). By contrast, there was no statistically significant difference of the occurrences of future HF-related events between in ischemic HF group with high and low monocyte counts. Conclusion A high monocyte count was an independent and incremental predictor of HF-related events in HFrEF and HFmrEF especially with IHD, but not in HFpEF patients.


2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
N Matsusaki ◽  
Y Sotomi ◽  
T Kobayashi ◽  
T Hayashi ◽  
Y Takeda ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Appropriate pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) use may effectively decrease mortality in acute heart failure patients. The concept that the pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) is a valuable tool for hemodynamic monitoring when used in appropriately selected patients and by physicians trained well to interpret and apply the data correctly provided has not been evaluated adequately yet in acute heart failure patients with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Methods The PERSUIT-HFpEF Registry is a prospective, observational, multicenter cohort study on prognosis of HFpEF in Japan. Patients hospitalized for heart failure (diagnosed by using Framingham criteria) who met both of the following criteria were enrolled: 1) a left ventricular ejection fraction of 50% or more as measured at the local site by echocardiography; 2) an elevated level of N terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide (NT proBNP) (400 pg per milliliter or more) or brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) (100 pg per milliliter or more). In the present study, we evaluated the impact of PAC on all-cause death of the patients with HFpEF. PAC use was left at the discretion of attending physicians. Results The PERSUIT-HFpEF Registry enrolled 486 patients (81±9 years, 259 females, mean follow-up duration 198±195 days). Of these, data of PAC usage was available in 434 patients. Patients were further stratified according to use of a PAC: PAC 153 patients vs. non-PAC 281 patients. Length of hospitalization was numerically shorter in the PAC group than in the non-PAC group [20.3±14.7 vs. 22.5±17.4 days, p=0.182]. Kaplan-Meier estimated 1-year all-cause death rate was significantly lower in the PAC group than in the non-PAC group (9.5% vs. 19.1%, p=0.019). PAC use was associated with significant risk reduction of all-cause death [hazard ratio (HR) 0.425, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.203–0.890, p=0.023] in the crude analysis. The significant risk reduction still existed after multivariate adjustment including potential confounders [HR 0.427, 95% CI, 0.185–0.984, p=0.046] Kaplan Meier analysis Conclusions In the real-world Asian registry data, PAC use was associated with the improved all-cause death rate, suggesting that the PAC might be a useful guidance tool for treatment of the patients with HFpEF. Acknowledgement/Funding Roche diagnostics FUJIFILM Toyama Chemical


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document