P5582Predicting the clinical outcomes in moderate aortic stenosis: implementation of the newly proposed staging classification

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M R Amanullah ◽  
S M Pio ◽  
K Y Sin ◽  
N Ajmone Marsan ◽  
Z P Ding ◽  
...  

Abstract Background While symptomatic severe aortic stenosis (AS) carries a worse prognosis and early intervention is favoured, it is always assumed that patients with moderate AS are more stable and their disease progression can be monitored yearly. However, it is known that patients with moderate AS have a higher risk of cardiovascular events but is unclear if other factors may also affect the overall prognosis. Purpose In this multicentre registry of patients with moderate AS, the prognostic value of a new staging classification on the extent of cardiac damage was examined. Methods Based on the echocardiographic findings at the time of diagnosis of moderate AS (valve area >1.0 and ≤1.5 cm2), they were re-classified into five stages depending on the extra-aortic valvular cardiac damage: no signs of cardiac damage (Stage 0), left ventricular (LV) damage [LV ejection fraction <50%, LV mass index >95 g/m2 for women or >115 g/m2 for men or E/e' >14] (Stage 1), mitral valve or left atrial (LA) damage [LA volume index >34 ml/m2 or mitral regurgitation ≥grade 3 or presence of atrial fibrillation] (Stage 2), tricuspid valve or pulmonary artery vasculature damage [systolic pulmonary arterial pressure ≥60 mmHg or tricuspid regurgitation ≥grade 3] (Stage 3), or right ventricular damage [tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion <17 mm] (Stage 4). The clinical endpoint was all-cause mortality. The association between the extent of cardiac damage and all-cause mortality was assessed by the Kaplan Meier method using log-rank test. Results Of the included 522 patients with moderate AS (age 71±11 years, 54% males), 12% (63) of patients were re-classified as Stage 0, 30% (157) in Stage 1, 47% (245) in Stage 2, 6% (31) in Stage 3 and 5% (26) in Stage 4. During follow-up, 43% (226) of patients underwent surgical or transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Over a median follow-up of 6.2 [interquartile range 3.2–9.0] years, 254 (49%) patients died. The cumulative event rates for all-cause mortality increased with increasing stage, particularly for Stages ≥2: 39% for Stage 0, 55% for Stage 1, 67% for Stage 2, 68% for Stage 3 and 57% for Stage 4, respectively (Figure, log-rank test p=0.001). Cumulative death rates after re-staging Conclusion In a real-world registry of patients with moderate AS patients, worsening extra-aortic valvular cardiac damage portends a worse long-term prognosis.

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
A.L Van Wijngaarden ◽  
Y.L Hiemstra ◽  
P Van Der Bijl ◽  
V Delgado ◽  
N Ajmone Marsan ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The indication for surgery in patients with severe primary mitral regurgitation (MR) is currently based on the presence of symptoms, left ventricular (LV) dilatation and dysfunction, atrial fibrillation and pulmonary hypertension. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic impact of a new staging classification based on cardiac damage including the known risk factors but also including global longitudinal strain (GLS), severe left atrial (LA) dilatation and right ventricular (RV) dysfunction. Methods In total 614 patients who underwent surgery for severe primary MR with available baseline transthoracic echocardiograms were included. Patients were classified according to the extent of cardiac damage (Figure): Stage 0-no cardiac damage, Stage 1-LV damage, Stage 2-LA damage, Stage 3-pulmonary vasculature or tricuspid valve damage and Stage 4-RV damage. Patients were followed for all-cause mortality. Results Based on the proposed classification, 172 (28%) patients were classified as Stage 0, 102 (17%) as Stage 1, 134 (21%) as Stage 2, 135 (22%) as Stage 3 and 71 (11%) as Stage 4. The more advanced the stage, the older the patients were with worse kidney function, more symptoms and higher EuroScore. Kaplan-Meier curve analysis revealed that patients with more advanced stages of cardiac damage had a significantly worse survival (log-rank chi-square 35.2; p&lt;0.001) (Figure). On multivariable analysis, age, male, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, kidney function, and stage of cardiac damage were independently associated with all-cause mortality. For each stage increase, a 22% higher risk for all-cause mortality was observed (95% CI: 1.064–1.395; p=0.004). Conclusion In patients with severe primary MR, a novel staging classification based on the extent of cardiac damage, may help refining risk stratification, particularly including also GLS, LA dilatation and RV dysfunction in the assessment. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
K Hirasawa ◽  
P.J Rosendael ◽  
F Fortuni ◽  
G.K Singh ◽  
J Kuneman ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction A staging of severe aortic stenosis (AS) based on additional extra-valvular cardiac damage has been associated with prognosis after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Multi-detector row computed tomography (MDCT) has a central role in the evaluation of AS patients undergoing TAVI and can detect extra-valvular cardiac damage. Purpose To evaluate the prognostic implications of an MDCT staging system of severe AS in patients undergoing TAVI. Methods Patients who underwent full-beat MDCT prior to TAVI were included. Patients with intra-cardiac devices, prior valvular surgery, and insufficient image quality were excluded. The extent of cardiac damage was assessed by MDCT and classified into following 5 groups; stage 0 (no cardiac damage), stage 1 (left ventricular damage), stage 2 (left atrium and mitral valve damage), stage 3 (right atrial damage), stage 4 (right ventricular damage). The primary end-point was all-cause mortality. Results A total of 405 patients (80±7 years, 52% men) were stratified according to the MDCT staging system: 27 (7%) were in stage 0, 96 (24%) in stage 1, 152 (38%) in stage 2, 78 (19%) in stage 3, and 52 (13%) in stage 4 (left panel). During follow-up (median 3.7 years, IQR: 1.7–5.5 years), 150 (37%) died (right panel). On multivariable analysis, cardiac damage stage, presence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, NYHA ≥3, eGFR, and transapical approach were independently associated with all-cause mortality. When evaluating each stage, stage 3 (HR: 4.725, P=0.033) and stage 4 (HR 5.678, P=0.018) were independently associated with worse outcomes as compared to the other stages. Conclusion MDCT-based staging system of severe AS identifies the patients who are at higher risk of death after TAVI. MDCT staging and the mortality Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Private grant(s) and/or Sponsorship. Main funding source(s): ESC research grant


2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne George ◽  
Ajit Sebastian ◽  
Vinotha Thomas ◽  
Anitha Thomas ◽  
Rachel Chandy ◽  
...  

Objectives: To evaluate the outcome of women with uterine carcinosarcoma. Methods: The medical records of all patients admitted with uterine carcinosarcoma between January 2012 and October 2015 were reviewed. Baseline characteristics were compared and survival was calculated using Kaplan Meier method and compared using log rank test. Results: The total number of uterine malignancies operated in our centre over this time period was 247 of which 33 were sarcomas (13%). Median age of presentation was 56 years (21-77 years). Most women were postmenopausal (76%) and 46% of them presented with post menopausal bleeding.There were 16 carcinosarcomas of the uterus. Eight presented at Stage 1 (50%) and the remaining 8 in stage III or IV. All patients had TAH/BSO but only 15 had omentectomy and 12 had pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy. Adjuvant treatment was given only to 10 (63%). Seven patients had expired at the time of follow up. The mean survival was 502 days (304-699) with a median of 284 days. Patients who received adjuvant therapy did better compared to those who did not (p=0.05). Conclusions: Carcinosarcomas are aggressive tumours and the optimal therapy is yet to be determined. Adequate surgical staging followed by adjuvant therapy improves survival.


2017 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 158-166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arno J Gingele ◽  
Hanspeter Brunner-la Rocca ◽  
Bram Ramaekers ◽  
Anton Gorgels ◽  
Gerjan De Weerd ◽  
...  

Introduction Evidence suggests that telemonitoring decreases mortality and heart failure (HF)-related hospital admission in patients with HF. However, most studies follow their patients for only several months. Little is known about the long-term effects of telemonitoring after a period of application. Methods In 2007, the TEHAF study was initiated to compare tailored telemonitoring with usual care with respect to time until first HF-related hospital admission. In total, 301 patients completed the study after a follow-up period of one year. No differences could be found in time to first HF-related admission between intervention and control groups. Here, we performed a retrospective analysis in order to investigate potential long-term effects of telemonitoring. The primary endpoint was time to first HF-related hospital admission. Secondary endpoints were, amongst others, all-cause mortality, hospital admission due to HF and days alive and out of hospital (DAOOH). Electronic files of all included patients were reviewed between October 2007 and September 2015. Result Mean follow-up duration was 1652 days (standard deviation: 1055 days). No significant difference in time to first HF-related hospital admission (log-rank test, p = 0.15), all-cause mortality (log-rank test, p = 0.43), or DAOOH (two-sample t-test, p = 0.87) could be found. However, patients that underwent telemonitoring had significantly fewer HF-related hospital admissions (incident rate ratio 0.54, 95% confidence interval 0.31–0.88). Discussion Telemonitoring did not significantly influence the long-term outcome in our study. Therefore, extending the follow-up period of telemonitoring studies in HF patients is probably not beneficial.


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
J Borrego Rodriguez ◽  
J.C Echarte Morales ◽  
C Minguito Carazo ◽  
P.L Cepas-Guillen ◽  
C Garrote Coloma ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Recent studies have shown that the extent of extravalvular (extra-aortic valve) cardiac damage in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) have important prognostic implications for clinical outcomes after aortic valve replacement (AVR). Aims The aim of the present study is to evaluate the prognostic impact of a defined staging classification (“Généreux Staging Classification”) (GSC) characterizing the extent of extravalvular cardiac damage in patients with severe AS undergoing percutaneous transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Methods A total of 102 consecutive patients, admitted in our institution between 2011–2017, with severe AS (echo-defined by peak aortic velocity, mean transvalvular gradient or aortic valve area) and symptoms related to AS (dyspnea, heart failure, angina or syncope) undergoing TAVI, were included. These patients were pooled and classified according to the presence or absence of cardiac damage as detected by echocardiography prior to TAVI, regarding the GSC: no extravalvular cardiac damage (Stage 0), left ventricular damage (Stage 1), left atrial or mitral valve damage (Stage 2), pulmonary vasculature or tricuspid valve damage (Stage 3), or right ventricular damage (Stage 4). Two-year outcomes were compared using Kaplan– Meier techniques and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify 2-year predictors of mortality. Results Out of 102 patients, 57 were male (55.9%). Mean age was 83.46±4.23 years. 2 patients (2.1%) were classified as Stage 0; 20 patients (20.3%) as Stage 1; 55 patients (54.2%) as Stage 2; 22 (21.6%) as Stage 3; and 3 patients (2.9%) as Stage 4. Two-year mortality was 0.0% in Stage 0, 5.0% in Stage 1, 5.5% in Stage 2, and 44.0% in Stages 3–4. After multivariable and univariate analysis, stage of cardiac damage was independently associated as predictor for all-cause mortality at 2-years, after TAVI (HR 2.8 [1.3±6.2], p&lt;0.01). There were not another identificable predictors of 2-years death (age, sex, hypertension [78.5% of total patients], dislipemia [64.7%], diabetes [30.3%], smoking [78.5%], O2-chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [27.5% of total patients], renal insufficiency [78.5%], previous coronary artery disease [37.3%], peak aortic velocity, mean transvalvular gradient, and aortic valve area). Conclusions Given the strong association demonstrated in this study between advanced staging of cardiac damage and worse clinical outcomes after TAVI in short-middle term survival, consideration of the GSC in patients with severe AS in future recommendations for risk stratification might be useful. Two-year all-cause death in TAVI by GSC. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
C Silva ◽  
S Maltes ◽  
P Freitas ◽  
A.M Ferreira ◽  
R.C Teles ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Recently, a new staging system for severe aortic stenosis (AS) based upon the extent of extra-aortic-valve cardiac damage has been developed (Genereux et al. Eur Heart J 2017). The present study aimed to: 1) determine the prevalence of the different stages of extra-aortic valvular cardiac damage and its impact on prognosis in a real-world Portuguese cohort and; 2) evaluate the distribution of aortic valve calcium score (AV-CaSc) and its prognostic value. Methods Consecutive patients evaluated at a single-centre TAVI-programme between Nov/2015 and Nov/2018 were retrospective selected. The extent of extra-aortic valve cardiac damage was defined by echocardiography as stage 0 (no cardiac damage), stage 1 (left ventricular damage), stage 2 (mitral valve or left atrial damage), stage 3 (tricuspid valve or pulmonary artery vasculature damage) or stage 4 (right ventricular damage). AV-CaSc was estimated routinely at CT-angiography as per TAVI-programme protocol. The primary endpoint was 1-year all-cause mortality after CT-angiography. Survival analysis (Cox-regression hazards model and Kaplan-Meier) was performed. To account for the effect of aortic valve replacement (AVR), this variable entered the Cox-regression model as a time-dependent covariate. Results A total of 443 patients (mean age 82±7 years, 44% men, median euroSCORE II 4% [IQR 2.4–5.8]) were identified. After Heart Team discussion, 79% (n=349) underwent AVR (TAVI=307; surgical valve repair=42); 9% (n=42) await intervention; 6% (n=25) remain under medical treatment; 4% (n=19) died during the period of evaluation; and 2% (n=8) underwent palliative aortic balloon valvuloplasty. According to the proposed classification, the distribution of patients from stages 0 through 4 was: 0.2% (n=1), 7.5% (n=34), 67.8% (n=306), 14% (n=63), and 10.4% (n=47). Additionally, for each increasing stage of cardiac damage, the burden of AV-CaSc was higher (from stage 1 through 4: 1776 [IQR 1217–2448]; 2448 [1796–3442]; 2448 [1832–3622]; 2960 [1936–4878] units; p for trend = 0.002). All-cause mortality at 1-year was 14% (n=63). Mortality increased alongside with increasing extent of cardiac damage (from stage 0 through 4: 0% [n=0], 6% [n=2], 12% [n=36], 20% [n=12], and 30% [n=13]) – Fig. Multivariable analysis revealed chronic renal disease (HR 1.37 per stage [1.15–1.64], p&lt;0.001), AV-CaSc (HR 1.02 per 100 units [1.01–1.03], p=0.007), AVR (HR 0.46 [0.26–0.81], p=0.007) and stage of cardiac damage (HR 1.54 per stage [1.15–2.05], p=0.004) as independent predictors of 1-year mortality. Conclusion In a real-world Portuguese cohort of severe AS patients, the extent of cardiac damage was associated with 1-year mortality. AV- CaSc grants additional prognostic information to this classification. Incorporation of this staging system into patient evaluation may be useful in the risk assessment of severe AS. Survival analysis Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fa Lin ◽  
Yu Chen ◽  
Qiheng He ◽  
Chaofan Zeng ◽  
Chaoqi Zhang ◽  
...  

Object: Patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) have an increased incidence of cardiac events and short-term unfavorable neurological outcomes during the acute phase of bleeding. We studied whether troponin I elevation after ictus can predict future major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) and long-term neurological outcomes after 2 years.Methods: Consecutive aSAH patients within 3 days of bleeding were eligible for review from a prospective observational cohort (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04785976). Potential predictors of future MACEs and unfavorable long-term neurological outcomes were calculated by Cox and logistic regression analyses. Additional Kaplan–Meier curves were performed.Results: A total of 213 patients were enrolled with an average follow-up duration of 34.3 months. Individuals were divided into two groups: elevated cTnI group and unelevated cTnI group. By the last available follow-up, 20 patients had died, with an overall all-cause mortality rate of 9.4% and an annual all-cause mortality rate of 3.8%. Patients with elevated cTnI had a significantly higher risk of future MACEs (10.6 vs. 2.1%, p = 0.024, and 95% CI: 1.256–23.875) and unfavorable neurological outcomes at discharge, 3-month, 1-, 2-years, and last follow-up (p = 0.001, p &lt; 0.001, p = 0.001, p &lt; 0.001, and p &lt; 0.001, respectively). In the Cox analysis for future MACE, elevated cTnI was the only independent predictor (HR = 5.980; 95% CI: 1.428–25.407, and p = 0.014). In the multivariable logistic analysis for unfavorable neurological outcomes, peak cTnI was significant (OR = 2.951; 95% CI: 1.376–6.323; p = 0.005). Kaplan–Meier analysis indicated that the elevated cTnI was correlated with future MACE (log-rank test, p = 0.007) and subsequent death (log-rank test, p = 0.004).Conclusion: cTnI elevation after aSAH could predict future MACEs and unfavorable neurological outcomes.


Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gurpreet Singh ◽  
Farnaz Namazi ◽  
Kensuke Hirasawa ◽  
Nina A Ajmone Marsan ◽  
Victoria Delgado ◽  
...  

Introduction: Patients with secondary mitral regurgitation (SMR) often show extra-mitral valvular cardiac damage which can influence the prognosis. SMR can be defined according to stages of extra-mitral valvular cardiac damage. The present study evaluated the prevalence of different stages of extra-mitral valvular cardiac damage and the prognostic implications in moderate and severe SMR patients. Methods: A total of 648 patients with moderate and severe SMR were classified according to the extent of cardiac damage on echocardiography: left ventricular damage (Stage 1), left atrial damage (Stage 2), pulmonary artery vasculature damage (Stage 3) or right ventricular damage (Stage 4). Cox proportional hazards analyses were performed, both on, non-censored and censored data (included till the occurrence of mitral valve intervention). The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. Results: The prevalence of each stage of the proposed classification was, 10% in Stage 1, 7% in Stage 2, 16% in Stage 3 and 67% in Stage 4. In the censored data, cardiac damage classification was independently associated with all-cause mortality (HR: 1.182, CI :1.019-1.370; P=0.027), and this was mainly driven by Stage 4 (HR: 1.726 CI: 1.034-2.881; p=0.037, Figure 1A). The non-censored data, showed that Stage 3 was independently associated with all-cause mortality (HR: 1.795 CI:1.121-2.876; P= 0.015), whereas Stage 4 showed an increased non-significant risk for all-cause mortality (HR: 1.472 CI:0.973-2.227; P=0.067, Figure 1B). Conclusions: A new proposed staging classification for moderate and severe SMR showed, that cardiac damage staging was independently associated with all-cause mortality in patients censored for mitral valve intervention, and this was mainly determined by RV dysfunction.


2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
R Ventura Gomes ◽  
J Pais ◽  
A R Pereira ◽  
D Sebaiti ◽  
I Cruz ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction The cardiac consequences of aortic stenosis, besides left ventricular ejection fraction and systolic pulmonary artery pressure, aren't considered in the recommendations for surgical intervention in patients (pts) with severe aortic stenosis (SAS). In 2017, a new staging echo classification was presented to accurately describe them. Purpose To evaluate this new echo classification in risk stratification of pts with SAS with or without AVR, in a real–world setting. Methods Retrospective cohort study of pts with SAS (mean transvalvular pressure gradient (MG) ≥40 mmHg or a peak transvalvular velocity (PTV) ≥4.0 m/s), examined between January 2014 and December 2016. Pts were classified according to the new staging echo classification (no extravalvular cardiac damage - Stage 0, left ventricular damage - Stage 1, left atrial or mitral valve damage - Stage 2, pulmonary vasculature or tricuspid valve damage - Stage 3, or right ventricular damage - Stage 4). Follow-up (FU) was 2.6±1.0 years. The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization. Results 212 pts with SAS were included (age 76.1±9.1 years, 31.6% men; aortic valve area 0.69±0.21cm2; PTV 4.5±0.4m/s; MG 48.5±11.6mmHg; LVEF 58.8±12.2%). 19 (9.0%) pts were classified as Stage 0, 29 (13.7%) as Stage 1, 129 (60.8%) as Stage 2, 12 (5.7%) as Stage 3 and 23 (10.8%) as Stage 4. Pts with more advanced stages had more events (stage 0: 5.3%; stage 1: 10.3%; stage 2: 17.1%; stage 3: 50.0%; stage 4: 52.2%; p<0.0001). In the multivariate analysis, the classification system was also a predictor of the outcome, even when including the AVR in the model (table 1). Similar findings in the uni and multivariate analysis were identified when analyzing only the pts with SAS and no aortic intervention (events in stage 0: 16.7%; stage 1: 18.2%; stage 2: 29.3%; stage 3: 75.0%; stage 4: 64.7%, p<0.005; Figure 1). Table 1. Predictors of the outcome Variables Adjusted HR (95% CI) p-value Sex* 1.86 (1.01–3.44) 0.047 eGFR* 0.99 (0.98–1.01) 0.201 AVR* 8.97 (3.85–20.90) 0.0001 Classification* – 0.031   Stage 0 0.19 (0.02–1.537) 0.120   Stage 1 0.28 (0.08–1.01) 0.052   Stage 2 0.36 (0.17–0.74) 0,006   Stage 3 0.81 (0.30–2.19) 0.675   Stage 4 1 – *Variables with p<0.05 in univariate analysis. Figure 1. Survival of SAS pts with no AVR Conclusion In a real-world experience, the new staging echo classification showed a significant relationship between the extent of cardiac damage at baseline and the primary outcome in pts with SAS, even after controlling for AVR. This classification was also able to identify the SAS pts who did not perform AVR and had a significant risk of adverse events.


2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (11) ◽  
pp. 1248-1258 ◽  
Author(s):  
E Mara Vollema ◽  
Mohammed R Amanullah ◽  
Edgard A Prihadi ◽  
Arnold C T Ng ◽  
Pieter van der Bijl ◽  
...  

Abstract Aims Cardiac damage in severe aortic stenosis (AS) can be classified according to a recently proposed staging classification. The present study investigated the incremental prognostic value of left ventricular (LV) global longitudinal strain (GLS) over stages of cardiac damage in patients with severe AS. Methods and results From an ongoing registry, a total of 616 severe symptomatic AS patients with available LV GLS by speckle tracking echocardiography were selected and retrospectively analysed. Patients were categorized according to cardiac damage on echocardiography: Stage 0 (no damage), Stage 1 (LV damage), Stage 2 (mitral valve or left atrial damage), Stage 3 (tricuspid valve or pulmonary artery vasculature damage), or Stage 4 (right ventricular damage). LV GLS was divided by quintiles and assigned to the different stages. The endpoint was all-cause mortality. Over a median follow-up of 44 [24–89] months, 234 (38%) patients died. LV GLS was associated with all-cause mortality independent of stage of cardiac damage. After incorporation of LV GLS by quintiles into the staging classification, Stages 2–4 were independently associated with outcome. LV GLS showed incremental prognostic value over clinical characteristics and stages of cardiac damage. Conclusion In this large single-centre cohort of severe AS patients, incorporation of LV GLS by quintiles in a novel proposed staging classification resulted in refinement of risk stratification by identifying patients with more advanced cardiac damage. LV GLS was shown to provide incremental prognostic value over the originally proposed staging classification.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document