Effectiveness of individual and group multicomponent interventions for smoking cessation in primary care: a quasi-experimental study

2019 ◽  
Vol 36 (5) ◽  
pp. 627-633 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan Fernando Suárez-Varela Úbeda ◽  
Sara Rodríguez-Vázquez ◽  
José Antonio Ordóñez Barranco ◽  
Gilberto Vega Caldera ◽  
Pedro Pablo Pérez Alvárez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Smoking Cessation ◽  
Group Intervention ◽  
Drug Prescription ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Primary Care Practices ◽  
Multicomponent Interventions

Abstract Background The efficacy of smoking cessation interventions can be quite diverse in day-to-day clinical practice. Objective To analyse the effectiveness in smoking cessation of multicomponent interventions carried out in groups or individually in primary care practices. Methods A quasi-experimental, multicentre study of 12-month follow-up of patients treated in multicomponent smoking cessation interventions was carried out in Urban health care centres in Sevilla, Spain. Two hundred and twenty smoking patients, ≥18 years of age, participated either in a multicomponent intervention group (n = 145; mean age 51.7 years; 53.1% women) or in individual interventions (n = 77; mean age 50.5 years; 61.0% women). The abstinence or relapse status was computed from patient self-reports, confirmed by relatives or companions when possible and supplemented by CO-oxymetry tests in 89 patients. Results The overall percentage of smoking cessation was 36.9% (37.9% with group and 35.1% with individual intervention, P = 0.398). Patients who quit smoking were younger (48.7 versus 52.9 years old, P < 0.01), with fewer years of smoking (32.9 versus 36.8 years, P < 0.05), with higher education (39.0% versus 25.0%, P < 0.05) and had received pharmacological treatment (91.5% versus 67.9%, P < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, level of education [odds ratio (OR): 1.995; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.065–3.735, P < 0.01], group intervention (OR: 1.743; 95% CI: 1.006–3.287, P < 0.05) and drug prescription (OR: 2.368; 95% CI: 1.126–4.980, P < 0.05) were significantly associated with smoking cessation. Conclusions Our study found that multicomponent group and individual interventions in primary care were associated with an overall quit rate of smoking of 36.9% at 12-month follow-up, with higher probability of success among patients with higher education and those who received the group intervention and drug treatment.

Walking for Better Outcomes and Recovery: The Effect of WALK-FOR in Preventing Hospital-Associated Functional Decline Among Older Adults

2019 ◽  
Vol 74 (10) ◽  
pp. 1664-1670 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yaniv Cohen ◽  
Anna Zisberg ◽  
Yehudit Chayat ◽  
Nurit Gur-Yaish ◽  
Efrat Gil ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Group Intervention ◽  
Functional Decline ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Community Mobility ◽  
Steps Per Day ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Activity Survey

Abstract Background In-hospital immobility of older adults is associated with hospital-associated functional decline (HAFD). This study examined the WALK-FOR program’s effects on HAFD prevention. Methods A quasi-experimental pre-post two-group (intervention group [IG] n = 188, control group [CG] n = 189) design was applied in two hospital internal medical units. On admission, patients reported pre-hospitalization functional status, which was assessed again at discharge and 1-month follow-up. Primary outcome was decline in basic activities of daily living (BADL), using the Modified Barthel Index. Secondary outcomes were decline in instrumental ADL (Lawton’s IADL scale) and community mobility (Yale Physical Activity Survey). All participants (75.1 ± 7 years old) were cognitively intact and ambulatory at admission. The WALK-FOR included a unit-tailored mobility program utilizing patient-and-staff education with a specific mobility goal (900 steps per day), measured by accelerometer. Results Decline in BADL occurred among 33% of the CG versus 23% of the IG (p = .02) at discharge, and among 43% of the CG versus 30% in the IG (p = .01) at 1-month follow-up. Similarly, 26% of the CG versus 15% of the IG declined in community mobility at 1-month follow-up (p = .01). Adjusted for major covariates, the intervention reduced the odds of decline in BADL by 41% (p = .05) at discharge and by 49% at 1-month follow-up (p = .01), and in community mobility by 63% (p = .02). There was no significant effect of the intervention on IADL decline (p = .19). Conclusions The WALK-FOR intervention is effective in reducing HAFD.

scholarly journals ‘Quit and Stay Quit Monday’ as a Novel Approach to Smoking Cessation: A Pilot Experimental Study

2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 171-175
Author(s):  
Elaine De Leon ◽  
Norah L. Crossnohere ◽  
Laura W. Fuentes ◽  
Morgan Johnson ◽  
Kevin Welding ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Smoking Cessation ◽  
Information Seeking ◽  
Self Efficacy ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Standard Group ◽  
Novel Approach ◽  
Quitting Smoking ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Behaviour Changes

Introduction:Emerging evidence suggests a heightened interest in healthy behaviour changes, including smoking cessation, at the beginning of the week. Evidence from Google searches, quitlines, and cessation websites show greater information-seeking and interest in early week quitting.Aims:This pilot assesses the comparative effectiveness of a smoking cessation intervention that encourages participants to use Mondays as a day to quit or recommit to quitting smoking.Methods:We partnered with existing smoking cessation group programs to conduct a quasi-experimental, pre–post study. Both comparison and intervention groups received the same standard-care curriculum from program instructors. Intervention group participants received Monday materials including a wallet card and a mantra card during enrolment. On Mondays, intervention participants received an emailed tip-of-the-week and were encouraged to quit or recommit to quitting. Quit buddies were recommended in both groups, but intervention participants were encouraged to check-in with quit buddies on Mondays. The outcomes of smoking abstinence, number and length of quit attempts, and self-efficacy were assessed at the final program session and three months later.Results:At the last session, intervention group participants who were still smoking had a higher self-efficacy of quitting in the future, rated their programs as more helpful in quitting smoking, and were more likely to rate quit buddies as very helpful. Differences in self-efficacy were no longer observed at the second follow-up. No differences were observed between intervention and standard group participants in abstinence, number of quits, length of quits, or self-efficacy of staying quit at either follow-up.Conclusions:Encouraging results from this pilot study indicate that further research is needed to explore how Monday messaging may improve smoking cessation programs.

scholarly journals The effect of COVID-19 pandemic and lockdown on consultation numbers, consultation reasons and performed services in primary care: results of a longitudinal observational study

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ingmar Schäfer ◽  
Heike Hansen ◽  
Agata Menzel ◽  
Marion Eisele ◽  
Daniel Tajdar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Observational Study ◽  
Rural Areas ◽  
Longitudinal Observational Study ◽  
Multivariable Analyses ◽  
Gastrointestinal Complaints ◽  
Urban And Rural Areas ◽  
Quota Sampling ◽  
Primary Care Practices

Abstract Objectives The aims of our study were to describe the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic and lockdown on primary care in Germany regarding the number of consultations, the prevalence of specific reasons for consultation presented by the patients, and the frequency of specific services performed by the GP. Methods We conducted a longitudinal observational study based on standardised GP interviews in a quota sampling design comparing the time before the COVID-19 pandemic (12 June 2015 to 27 April 2017) with the time during lockdown (21 April to 14 July 2020). The sample included GPs in urban and rural areas 120 km around Hamburg, Germany, and was stratified by region type and administrative districts. Differences in the consultation numbers were analysed by multivariate linear regressions in mixed models adjusted for random effects on the levels of the administrative districts and GP practices. Results One hundred ten GPs participated in the follow-up, corresponding to 52.1% of the baseline. Primary care practices in 32 of the 37 selected administrative districts (86.5%) could be represented in both assessments. At baseline, GPs reported 199.6 ± 96.9 consultations per week, which was significantly reduced during COVID-19 lockdown by 49.0% to 101.8 ± 67.6 consultations per week (p < 0.001). During lockdown, the frequency of five reasons for consultation (-43.0% to -31.5%) and eleven services (-56.6% to -33.5%) had significantly decreased. The multilevel, multivariable analyses showed an average reduction of 94.6 consultations per week (p < 0.001). Conclusions We observed a dramatic reduction of the number of consultations in primary care. This effect was independent of age, sex and specialty of the GP and independent of the practice location in urban or rural areas. Consultations for complaints like low back pain, gastrointestinal complaints, vertigo or fatigue and services like house calls/calls at nursing homes, wound treatments, pain therapy or screening examinations for the early detection of chronic diseases were particularly affected.

scholarly journals 0489 Initial Results from the Hypertension with Unsatisfactory Sleep Health (HUSH) Clinical Trial for Primary Care Patients with Insomnia and Comorbid Hypertension (INS-HTN)

SLEEP ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 43 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. A187-A188
Author(s):  
D J Buysse ◽  
L M Ritterband ◽  
J G Yabes ◽  
B L Rollman ◽  
P J Strollo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Sleep Disturbance ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Apnea Hypopnea Index ◽  
Dissemination And Implementation ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Primary Care Patients ◽  
Care Practices ◽  
Primary Care Practices

Abstract Introduction Insomnia is commonly comorbid with, and may contribute to, hypertension. Cognitive-behavioral treatments improve insomnia, but their effects on hypertension are uncertain, and they are often unavailable in primary care practices, where most INS-HTN patients are treated. We evaluated the efficacy of Brief Behavioral Treatment for Insomnia (BBTI) and Sleep Healthy Using the Internet (SHUTi) compared to enhanced usual care (EUC) on insomnia and home blood pressure (HBP) in primary care patients with INS-HTN. Methods Patients were recruited via electronic health records from 67 primary care practices and randomized 2:2:1 to BBTI delivered via telephone/videoconferencing; SHUTi, an automated, web-based CBT-I program; or EUC including a patient education video. Assessments included self-report questionnaires, home sleep apnea testing, and one week of sleep diary and HBP, measured at Baseline and 9 weeks/ 6 months post-treatment. The primary outcome was the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Sleep Disturbance scale. Linear mixed models were fitted for continuous variables on the intent-to-treat sample (n=548), adjusting for age and sex. Chi-square tests were used for proportions. Results Patients were 61.8±11.3 years old, 67.2% female, and 55.9% were taking hypnotics. Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) was 15.4±4.4, Apnea-Hypopnea Index 9.8±11.4, and HBP 130±14/81±9. BBTI and SHUTi were significantly better than EUC (p≤.002) at 9 weeks and 6 months on PROMIS Sleep Disturbance and Sleep-Related Impairment scales, ISI, and diary sleep efficiency, but had inconsistent effects on PROMIS depression and anxiety scales (p=0.001-0.9). Greater proportions of BBTI and SHUTi vs. EUC-treated patients had 9-week and 6-month ISI scores &lt;8 (p=.01, p=.04) and ISI changes scores ≥7 (p=.002, p=.003). HBP did not significantly differ by intervention group. Conclusion BBTI and SHUTi improved insomnia, but did not reduce HBP in patients with INS-HTN. These interventions appear suitable for dissemination and implementation in primary care, but may have limited effects on comorbid symptoms and conditions. Support NHLBI UH2/UH3 HL125103

scholarly journals Effectiveness of a motivational intervention based on spirometry results to achieve smoking cessation in primary healthcare patients: randomised, parallel, controlled multicentre study

2021 ◽  
pp. jech-2020-216219
Author(s):  
Francisco Martin-Lujan ◽  
Josep Basora-Gallisa ◽  
Felipe Villalobos ◽  
Nuria Martin-Vergara ◽  
Estefania Aparicio-Llopis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Smoking Cessation ◽  
Respiratory Disease ◽  
Primary Healthcare ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Smoking Cessation Advice ◽  
Registration Number ◽  
Brief Advice ◽  
Prolonged Abstinence

ObjectiveThis 12-month study in a primary healthcare network aimed to assess the effectiveness of usual smoking cessation advice compared with personalised information about the spirometry results.DesignRandomised, parallel, controlled, multicentre clinical trial.SettingThis study involved 12 primary healthcare centres (Tarragona, Spain).ParticipantsActive smokers aged 35–70 years, without known respiratory disease. Each participant received brief smoking cessation advice along with a spirometry assessment. Participants with normal results were randomised to the intervention group (IG), including detailed spirometry information at baseline and 6-month follow-up or control group (CG), which was simply informed that their spirometry values were within normal parameters.Main outcomeProlonged abstinence (12 months) validated by expired-CO testing.ResultsSpirometry was normal in 571 patients in 571 patients (45.9% male), 286 allocated to IG and 285 to CG. Baseline characteristics were comparable between the groups. Mean age was 49.8 (SD ±7.78) years and mean cumulative smoking exposure was 29.2 (±18.7) pack-years. Prolonged abstinence was 5.6% (16/286) in the IG, compared with 2.1% (6/285) in the CG (p=0.03); the cumulative abstinence curve was favourable in the IG (HR 1.98; 95% CI 1.29 to 3.04).ConclusionsIn active smokers without known respiratory disease, brief advice plus detailed spirometry information doubled prolonged abstinence rates, compared with brief advice alone, in 12-month follow-up, suggesting a more effective intervention to achieve smoking cessation in primary healthcare.Trial registration numberNCT01194596.

scholarly journals Comparing the content and quality of video, telephone, and face-to-face consultations: a non-randomised, quasi-experimental, exploratory study in UK primary care

2019 ◽  
Vol 69 (686) ◽  
pp. e595-e604 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victoria Hammersley ◽  
Eddie Donaghy ◽  
Richard Parker ◽  
Hannah McNeilly ◽  
Helen Atherton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
General Practice ◽  
Technical Problems ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Information Giving ◽  
Care Services ◽  
Primary Care Services ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Primary Care Clinicians

BackgroundGrowing demands on primary care services have led to policymakers promoting video consultations (VCs) to replace routine face-to-face consultations (FTFCs) in general practice.AimTo explore the content, quality, and patient experience of VC, telephone (TC), and FTFCs in general practice.Design and settingComparison of audio-recordings of follow-up consultations in UK primary care.MethodPrimary care clinicians were provided with video-consulting equipment. Participating patients required a smartphone, tablet, or computer with camera. Clinicians invited patients requiring a follow-up consultation to choose a VC, TC, or FTFC. Consultations were audio-recorded and analysed for content and quality. Participant experience was explored in post-consultation questionnaires. Case notes were reviewed for NHS resource use.ResultsOf the recordings, 149/163 were suitable for analysis. VC recruits were younger, and more experienced in communicating online. FTFCs were longer than VCs (mean difference +3.7 minutes, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.1 to 5.2) or TCs (+4.1 minutes, 95% CI = 2.6 to 5.5). On average, patients raised fewer problems in VCs (mean 1.5, standard deviation [SD] 0.8) compared with FTFCs (mean 2.1, SD 1.1) and demonstrated fewer instances of information giving by clinicians and patients. FTFCs scored higher than VCs and TCs on consultation-quality items.ConclusionVC may be suitable for simple problems not requiring physical examination. VC, in terms of consultation length, content, and quality, appeared similar to TC. Both approaches appeared less ‘information rich’ than FTFC. Technical problems were common and, though patients really liked VC, infrastructure issues would need to be addressed before the technology and approach can be mainstreamed in primary care.

scholarly journals Depression risk in patients with heart failure in primary care practices in Germany

2016 ◽  
Vol 28 (11) ◽  
pp. 1889-1894
Author(s):  
Marcel Konrad ◽  
Jens Bohlken ◽  
Michael A Rapp ◽  
Karel Kostev
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Health Insurance ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Patients With Heart Failure ◽  
Study Population ◽  
Care Practices ◽  
One Year ◽  
Primary Care Practices

ABSTRACTBackground:The goal of this study was to estimate the prevalence of and risk factors for diagnosed depression in heart failure (HF) patients in German primary care practices.Methods:This study was a retrospective database analysis in Germany utilizing the Disease Analyzer® Database (IMS Health, Germany). The study population included 132,994 patients between 40 and 90 years of age from 1,072 primary care practices. The observation period was between 2004 and 2013. Follow-up lasted up to five years and ended in April 2015. A total of 66,497 HF patients were selected after applying exclusion criteria. The same number of 66,497 controls were chosen and were matched (1:1) to HF patients on the basis of age, sex, health insurance, depression diagnosis in the past, and follow-up duration after index date.Results:HF was a strong risk factor for diagnosed depression (p < 0.0001). A total of 10.5% of HF patients and 6.3% of matched controls developed depression after one year of follow-up (p < 0.001). Depression was documented in 28.9% of the HF group and 18.2% of the control group after the five-year follow-up (p < 0.001). Cancer, dementia, osteoporosis, stroke, and osteoarthritis were associated with a higher risk of developing depression. Male gender and private health insurance were associated with lower risk of depression.Conclusions:The risk of diagnosed depression is significantly increased in patients with HF compared to patients without HF in primary care practices in Germany.

Vaccine Hesitancy in Pediatric Primary Care Practices

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (13) ◽  
pp. 2071-2080 ◽  
Author(s):  
Salini Mohanty ◽  
Amy Carroll-Scott ◽  
Marissa Wheeler ◽  
Cecilia Davis-Hayes ◽  
Renee Turchi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Vaccine Hesitancy ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Vaccine Acceptance ◽  
Multiple Strategies ◽  
Efficiency And Effectiveness ◽  
Care Practices ◽  
Barriers And Challenges ◽  
Primary Care Practices

Understanding how pediatric practices handle parental vaccine hesitancy is important as it impacts the efficiency and effectiveness of pediatric practices. In total, 21 semi-structured interviews with pediatric practice staff within a primary care network were conducted between May 2012 and March 2013. Thematic analysis focused on the barriers and challenges of vaccine hesitancy and strategies to reduce the burden at the practice level. Barriers and challenges of vaccine hesitancy included time constraints, administrative challenges, financial challenges and strained patient-provider relationships. Strategies to minimize the burden of vaccine hesitancy included training for vaccine counseling, screening for vaccine hesitancy prior to immunization visits, tailored vaccine counseling, and primary care provider visits for follow-up immunization. Pediatric practices reported many challenges when caring for vaccine-hesitant families. Multiple strategies were identified to reduce the burden of vaccine hesitancy, which future studies should explore to determine how effective they are in increasing vaccine acceptance in pediatric practices.

scholarly journals Effects of a work-stress intervention in Swedish primary care versus treatment as usual: RCT-study

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (Supplement_4) ◽  
Author(s):  
C Sandheimer ◽  
T Hedenrud ◽  
G Hensing ◽  
K Holmgren
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Work Stress ◽  
Collaborative Care ◽  
High Stress ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Treatment As Usual ◽  
Primary Health ◽  
Rehabilitative Measures

Abstract Background Work stress is an increasing burden in society. To identify early symptoms of work stress in primary health care (PHC) could result in earlier and better adjusted care. A work stress questionnaire (WSQ) was developed in PHC for this task. We aimed to evaluate if the use of WSQ, in combination with physician’s feedback, results in differences in health care visits and treatment compared to treatment as usual (TAU) in patients reporting high stress. Our hypothesis was that patients receiving the intervention would generate more visits to rehabilitation providers during follow-up compared to TAU. Methods A two-armed RCT was conducted at seven primary health care centres (PHCC) in Region Västra Götaland, Sweden. One group received the WSQ-intervention and the controls received TAU. Employed not sick-listed persons aged 18-64 that sought care for mental and physical health complaints at the PHCCs participated. Register data on health care visits and treatments 12 months prior inclusion and 12 months after was obtained and analysed with Fisher’s exact test together with questionnaire data (WSQ and background features). Results A total of 271 participants were included in the study, 132 intervention and 139 controls. The proportion that visited psychologists/psychotherapists was higher among the intervention group with high stress (19.5%, n = 87) during follow-up compared to corresponding controls (7.2%, n = 97) (p = 0.048). Collaborative care measures were more common among the stressed intervention participants (23%) post-inclusion compared to the stressed controls (11.3%) (p = 0.048). Conclusions Significant differences were found between the WSQ intervention group and the controls reporting high stress in visits to psychologists and in amount of received collaborative care. This confirms our hypothesis that the WSQ can help physicians to identify work stress and give suitable rehabilitative measures at an earlier stage in the care process compared to TAU. Key messages The use of WSQ with physicians’ feedback generated more visits to psychologists and more received collaborative care compared to treatment as usual. Findings of the study indicate that the WSQ can assist in identifying work stress in primary care and accommodate rehabilitative measures compared to treatment as usual.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document