10. Implied Terms

Contract Law ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 328-362
Author(s):  
Ewan McKendrick

This chapter discusses implied terms. Terms may be implied into contracts from three principal sources: statute, custom, and the courts. Parliament has, on a number of occasions, implied terms into contracts. The precise reason for the implication of the term depends upon the particular statute. It may be to give effect to the presumed intention of the parties; it may be to reduce uncertainty by enacting a default rule out of which the parties can contract if they do not like the term that Parliament has seen fit to imply; or it may be to protect one party to the transaction from the superior bargaining power of the other. Terms can also be implied into contracts by custom where the custom is certain, reasonable, and notorious. Customs and usages are an important source of obligations in commercial contracts. Terms implied by the courts can be divided into two groups, namely terms implied in fact and terms implied in law. A term is implied in fact when it is implied into the contract in order to give effect to what is deemed by the court to be the unexpressed intention of the parties and is implied because it is necessary to make the contract work. Terms implied in law ‘are those terms that are consistently implied into all contracts of a particular type because of the nature of the contract, rather than the supposed intentions of the parties’.

Author(s):  
Ewan McKendrick

This chapter discusses implied terms. Terms may be implied into contracts from three principal sources: statute, custom, and the courts. Parliament has, on a number of occasions, implied terms into contracts. The precise reason for the implication of the term depends upon the particular statute. It may be to give effect to the presumed intention of the parties; it may be to reduce uncertainty by enacting a default rule out of which the parties can contract if they do not like the term that Parliament has seen fit to imply; or it may be to protect one party to the transaction from the superior bargaining power of the other. Terms can also be implied into contracts by custom where the custom is certain, reasonable, and notorious. Customs and usages are an important source of obligations in commercial contracts. Terms implied by the courts can be divided into two groups, namely terms implied in fact and terms implied in law. A term is implied in fact when it is implied into the contract in order to give effect to what is deemed by the court to be the unexpressed intention of the parties and are implied because they are necessary to make the contract work. Terms implied in law ‘are those terms that are consistently implied into all contracts of a particular type because of the nature of the contract, rather than the supposed intentions of the parties’.


2016 ◽  
Vol 46 (1) ◽  
pp. 38-47
Author(s):  
Geoffrey Squires

Modernism is usually defined historically as the composite movement at the beginning of the twentieth century which led to a radical break with what had gone before in literature and the other arts. Given the problems of the continuing use of the concept to cover subsequent writing, this essay proposes an alternative, philosophical perspective which explores the impact of rationalism (what we bring to the world) on the prevailing empiricism (what we take from the world) of modern poetry, which leads to a concern with consciousness rather than experience. This in turn involves a re-conceptualisation of the lyric or narrative I, of language itself as a phenomenon, and of other poetic themes such as nature, culture, history, and art. Against the background of the dominant empiricism of modern Irish poetry as presented in Crotty's anthology, the essay explores these ideas in terms of a small number of poets who may be considered modernist in various ways. This does not rule out modernist elements in some other poets and the initial distinction between a poetics of experience and one of consciousness is better seen as a multi-dimensional spectrum that requires further, more detailed analysis than is possible here.


2017 ◽  
Vol 92 (6) ◽  
pp. 1-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tim Baldenius ◽  
Beatrice Michaeli

ABSTRACT We demonstrate a novel link between relationship-specific investments and risk in a setting where division managers operate under moral hazard and collaborate on joint projects. Specific investments increase efficiency at the margin. This expands the scale of operations and thereby adds to the compensation risk borne by the managers. Accounting for this investment/risk link overturns key findings from prior incomplete contracting studies. We find that if the investing manager has full bargaining power vis-à-vis the other manager, he will underinvest relative to the benchmark of contractible investments; with equal bargaining power, however, he may overinvest. The reason is that the investing manager internalizes only his own share of the investment-induced risk premium (we label this a “risk transfer”), whereas the principal internalizes both managers' incremental risk premia. We show that high pay-performance sensitivity (PPS) reduces the managers' incentives to invest in relationship-specific assets. The optimal PPS, thus, trades off investment and effort incentives.


2021 ◽  
pp. 174702182110315
Author(s):  
Motonori Yamaguchi ◽  
Husnain H. Shah ◽  
Bernhard Hommel

Two different variations of joint task switching led to different conclusions as to whether co-acting individuals share the same task-sets. The present study aimed at bridging this gap by replicating the version in which two actors performed two different tasks. Experiment 1 showed switch costs across two actors in a joint condition, which agreed with previous studies, but also yielded even larger switch costs in a solo condition, which contradicted the claim that actors represent an alternative task as their own when it is carried out by the co-actor but not when no one carries it out. Experiments 2 and 3 further examined switch costs in the solo condition with the aim to rule out possible influences of task instructions for and experiences with the other task that was not assigned to the actor. Before participants were instructed on the second of the two tasks, switch costs were still obtained without a co-actor when explicit task names (“COLOUR” and “SHAPE”) served as go/nogo signals (Experiment 2), but not when arbitrary symbols (“XXXX” and “​​​​”) served as go/nogo signals (Experiment 3). The results thus imply that switch costs depend on participants’ knowledge of task cues being assigned to two different tasks, but not on whether the other task is performed by a co-actor. These findings undermine the assumption that switch costs in the joint conditions reflect shared task-sets between co-actors in this procedure.


Mathematics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 617
Author(s):  
Yu-Hsien Liao

In many interactive environments, operators may have to deal with different work objectives at the same time. In a realistic context, such as differences in the target type to be addressed, or changes in the behavior of other operators, operators may therefore have to cope with by adopting different work levels (strategies) at any given time. On the other hand, the importance or influence brought by operators may vary depending on many subjective and objective factors, such as the size of the constituency represented by a congressman, and the bargaining power of a business personnel which may vary. Therefore, it is reasonable that weights are apportioned to operators and arbitrary usability should be distributed according to these weights under various working levels and multiattribute situations. In pre-existing results for allocation rules, weights might be always apportioned to the “operators” or the “levels” to modify the differences among the operators or its working levels respectively. By applying weights to the operators and its working levels (strategies) simultaneously, we adopt the maximal marginal variations among working level (strategy) vectors to propose an allocation rule under multiattribute situations. Furthermore, we introduce some axiomatic outcomes to display the rationality for this weighted allocation rule. By replacing weights to be maximal marginal variations, a generalized index is also introduced.


2011 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 264 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Aghazadeh-Habashi ◽  
Fakhreddin Jamali

Glucosamine (GlcN) is a naturally occurring aminosugar that is widely used to treat osteoarthritis despite controversial clinical trial results. Animal studies, on the other hand, unequivocally suggest anti-inflammatory and disease modifying effects for GlcN. Many explanations have been offered as to the root of the controversy. They include superiority of a crystalline sulphate salt over HCl, industry bias, insensitive assessment metrics and poor methodology. Herein, we rule out a difference in bioequivalence between GlcN salts and that of chemically equivalent doses and suggest additional factors; i.e., inconsistency in the chemical potency of some products used, under-dosing of patients as well as variable and erratic bioavailability indices for the lack of GlcN efficacy observed in some studies. Clinical trials using higher doses of pharmaceutical grade GlcN or formulations with greater bioavailability should yield positive results. This article is open to POST-PUBLICATION REVIEW. Registered readers (see “For Readers”) may comment by clicking on ABSTRACT on the issue’s contents page.


Author(s):  
Katarzyna Popek

The purpose of the text is to make some reconnaissance in the area of title "districts of metaphor" (or hunting grounds of metaphor) as well as reference to the unsolvable problems which are implied by a metaphorical mystery of metaphysical expressions. Thy are the order of the day in the main currents of philosophy. Starting from the rhetorical tradition of metaphor (the Aristotelian attempts of definition of metaphor as such) and of terms additional related with it (Max Black), I gradually illustrate what involves its post-rhetorical tradition. I show that philosophical symbolism derives from Aristotle’s hermeneutics, which becomes a gateway for understanding the mystery of metaphor. Like browsing in themselves mirrors, it grows also from simple phrases in complex sentences. In semantic sense, while the symbol has many meanings, the metaphor has a double meaning. It is not however limited by this matter, because in some sense, it has broader content than a symbol, as it introduces into language meanings that in the symbol are only internal (Paul Ricoeur). We also encounter reflective metaphors in our everyday speech and in the attempts of associative penetration into other people's expression. Conceptual decoding of metaphors is common for users of language (George Lakoff, Mark Johnson). On the other hand, there are specific districts of metaphorical expressions, which are reserved for poetic metaphors (Donald Davidson). Noteworthy are also the very unobvious contexts of metaphor in which the authors do not talk about this linguistic phenomenon directly (eg. Gottlob Frege, Ernst Cassirer). Declarative answer to the question whether the metaphor is a simply ornament of discourse or rather a mirror of the soul, is not possible too. Perhaps the metaphor as such includes the both variants. One must consider that being an ornament of speech or writing does not rule out it is also something more than just decoration. It wonders, bothers, disquiet, returning us into our souls. It is also like the unifying soul of all people – in cognitive sense.


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 395-414
Author(s):  
Parmujianto Parmujianto

Abstract: Sharia life insurance is an agreement between two parties. One is obliged to pay a contribution or premium, and the other must ensure a full guarantee of the insurers. It should undertake the protection of a contingent or uncertain loss based on the contract. This research used a descriptive qualitative approach. It seeks to explore and understand the central phenomenon to obtain in-depth data to reveal the facts on the research object. The theoretical contribution in this study can contribute to the insights about the insurance partnership of ASYKI, Inc. to increase the number of insurance participants. It is expected that people do not have doubts about sharia life insurance in a formal juridical manner related to insurance. The result of the research showed that Asuransi Shariah Keluarga Indonesia ASYKI, Inc Pasuruan Unit's performance is generally good. According to Law No.40 of 2014, its risk management is sharia-oriented. However, it does not rule out individuals who register individually. Still, ASYKI, Inc. Pasuruan Unit provides some solutions. They should register with the ASYKI partners. It opens an opportunity for the polis applicants to easily recognize and apply sharia life insurance without going through business entities or companies that act as intermediaries.الملخص: التأمين على الحياة في الشريعة هو تأمين أو اتفاق بين طرفين يلتزم فيه أحد الطرفين بدفع  تراكات أو أقساط والآخر ملزم بتقديم ضمانات كاملة لدافعي الاشتراكات / الاشتراكات / الأقساط إذا حدث شيء ما الطرف الأول أو ممتلكاته وفقًا للاتفاق المبرم. النهج المستخدم في هذه الدراسة هو نهج وصفي نوعي. يسعى هذا النهج إلى استكشاف وفهم الظاهرة المركزية من أجل الحصول على بيانات متعمقة لكشف الحقائق التي حدثت في موضوع البحث. يمكن أن تساهم المساهمات النظرية في هذه الدراسة في المعرفة حول شراكة التأمين لـ PT. ASYKI في زيادة عدد المشاركين في التأمين. من الناحية العملية حتى لا يساور الناس شك حول التأمين الشرعي على الحياة ، سواء من الناحية القانونية أو الرسمية المتعلقة بالتأمين .وقد أظهرت نتائج هذه الدراسة أن PT. تعتبر وحدة ASYKI Pasuruan  للتأمين الشرعي للأسرة الإندونيسية بشكل عام جيدة ووفقًا للقانون رقم 40 لعام 2014 في إدارة إدارة المخاطر على أساس مبادئ الشريعة الإسلامية ، على الرغم من أنه من الممكن للأفراد التسجيل بشكل فردي ، وهو الحل الذي تقدمه PT. يجب أن تسجل وحدة  ASYKI Pasuruan بوالص التأمين الموجهة بشكل فردي إلى أحد الشركاء الذين يعملون مع PT. سيفتح ASYKI وفي المستقبل فرصًا لمسجلي السياسة الفردية بحيث يكون الجمهور أكثر حرية في التعرف على التأمين على الحياة وتطبيقه وفقًا للشريعة بسهولة دون الحاجة إلى المرور عبر كيان تجاري أو شركة تعمل كوسيط. Abstrak: Asuransi jiwa syari’ah merupakan pertanggungan atau perjanjian antara dua belah pihak yangmana pihak satu berkewajiban membayar kontribusi atau premi dan yang lainnya memiliki kewajiban memberikan jaminan sepenuhnya kepada pembayar iuran/kontribusi/premi apabila terjadi sesuatu yang menimpa pihak pertama atau barang miliknya sesuai dengan perjanjian yang sudah dibuat. Pendekatan yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah pendekatan kualitatif deskriptif.  Pendekatan  ini berusaha mengekplorasi dan memahami gejala sentral agar mendapatkan data yang mendalam guna mengungkapkan fakta yang terjadi pada objek penelitian. Kontribusi teoritis  dalam penelitian ini dapat memberikan sumbangsih ilmu pengetahuan tentang kemitraan asuransi  PT. ASYKI dalam menambah jumlah peserta asuransi. Adapun secara praktis agar masyarakat tidak memiliki keraguan mengenai asuransi jiwa shariah, baik secara yuridis formal yang berhubungan dengan perasuransian. Hasil dari penelitian ini bahwa PT. Asuransi Shariah Keluarga Indonesia ASYKI Unit Pasuruan secara umum dan keseluruan sudah baik  dan sesuai dengan UU No.40 Tahun 2014 dalam pengelolaan manajemen resiko sudah berdasarkan prinsip shariah, meskipun tidak menutup kemungkinan ada individu yang mendaftarkan diri secara perorangan, namun solusi yang ditawarkan dari pihak PT. ASYKI Unit Pasuruan hendaknya pendaftar poli asuransi secara individu di arahkan pada salah satu mitra yang bekerja sama dengan PT. ASYKI dan ke depannya akan membuka peluang bagi pendaftar polis secara perorangan sehingga masyarakat lebih leluasa untuk mengenal dan menerapkan asuransi jiwa shariah dengan mudah tanpa harus melalui badan usaha atau perusahaan yang menjadi perantara.


2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 32-37
Author(s):  
Christian Domingo Ribas

The COVID-19 pandemic is a recently emerging problem. This has caused that the knowledge of the disease has been progressive and, therefore, the therapeutic decisions have been conditioned by this lack of knowledge on the one hand and by the therapeutic limitations on the other. Many published studies are methodologically weak and their conclusions, of limited value, have contributed to creating confusion on the therapeutic approach of the disease. In the present paper, we propose a therapeutic approach based on a new disease staging. The therapeutic approach is divided into two big sections: the pharmacological treatment for the phase of viral replication, cytokine storm or late respiratory events (which includes the adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)) and the treatment of the respiratory failure In every stage, we discuss the pathophysiology and comment (accept or rule out) the pharmacological options according to the present evidence. Moreover, we indicate how respiratory failure should be treated. Some characteristics are based on the evidence found in the literature. Others are the result of my experience in other situations.


2020 ◽  
Vol 63 (1) ◽  
pp. 123-142
Author(s):  
Milos Bogdanovic

In this paper we will try to confront Quine?s and Davidson?s holistic position through Davidson?s thesis of mental as a non-ontological category. In this regard, since Davidson came to this position through the thesis of mental as a decidedly conceptual category, we will try to show how this approach does not, nevertheless, rule out the possibility of its interpretation in ontological terms. However, in what follows we will draw attention to the fact that mental can be interpreted so that it proves to be immune to ontologization in Quine?s sense. This would be the evidence of different ways, which are not necessarily compatible, to argue for Davidson?s central thesis - the thesis about holistic character of mental - as well as, which is closely related, a certain difference that exists between Davidson?s view of mental as a conceptual category on the one hand, and a holistic category on the other hand.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document