790 Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Burn Patients: Analyzing the Effectiveness of a Standardized Protocol

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S230-S231
Author(s):  
Sarah A Folliard ◽  
Jared L Gabbert ◽  
Callie M Thompson
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Body Mass Index ◽  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Body Mass ◽  
Total Body Surface Area ◽  
Successful Implementation ◽  
Burn Patients ◽  
Vte Prophylaxis

Abstract Introduction Burn patients have a high risk of developing venous thromboembolism (VTE) due to extensive immobilization, surgical interventions, endothelial injury, and the presence of polytrauma. Studies have shown VTE rates ranging from 0.25% to 23.3% in this patient population. Although burn patients have a greater risk for VTE compared to other hospitalized patients, there are no standardized guidelines on how to approach VTE prophylaxis in the burn population. In March 2018, the Burn Intensive Care Unit (BICU) implemented a new VTE prophylaxis protocol that stratified patients based on risk factors for VTE. Patients were started on enoxaparin 30mg every 12 hours or 40mg every 12 hours depending on body mass index (BMI). The purpose of this study was to examine compliance with the new protocol and overall rates of VTE in the burn population. In March 2018, the Burn Intensive Care Unit (BICU) implemented a new VTE prophylaxis protocol that stratified patients based on risk factors for VTE. Patients were started on enoxaparin 30mg every 12 hours or 40mg every 12 hours depending on body mass index (BMI). Patients with impaired renal function or a contraindication to enoxaparin were given LDUH 5,000 units every 8 hours. The purpose of this study was to examine compliance with the new protocol and overall rates of VTE. Methods A single-center, retrospective analysis was conducted from March 1, 2018 to July 31, 2018. Patients included were admitted to the BICU with a documented burn injury for at least 48 hours and were ≥ 18 years of age. The primary outcome was compliance with the VTE prophylaxis protocol. Secondary outcomes included reasons for non-compliance and incidence of VTE events. Results Out of 105 patients that met inclusion criteria (median age, 53 years [36 to 63]; BMI 27.1 kg/m2 [25.7 to 33.2]; total body surface area 6% [3% to 18%]), the protocol was correctly utilized in 81 patients (77%). The most common reason for non-compliance to the protocol was incorrect dosing (60.9% [14/105]). Of 105 patients, 1 (0.9%) developed a VTE. Conclusions Overall, the compliance to the Burn Intensive Care Unit VTE pharmacologic prophylaxis protocol has room for improvement. Despite following the protocol, one VTE event occurred during the five-month study period. To improve compliance, additional education and training regarding the dosing of and monitoring anti-coagulants was provided to nursing and medical staff. Applicability of Research to Practice Although protocols can improve consistency of health care, reduce costs and improve health outcomes, they must be properly utilized in order to see the benefits. Successful implementation of protocols requires a multistep approach that includes a strong quality improvement process, multidisciplinary buy-in, ongoing education efforts, and assessment to review adherence to and efficacy of the protocols themselves.

628 Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Burn Patients: Analyzing the Effectiveness of a Standardized Protocol

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S169-S170
Author(s):  
Sarah A Folliard ◽  
Jared L Gabbert ◽  
Kelli Rumbaugh ◽  
Callie M Thompson ◽  
Cathy Oleis
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Burn Injury ◽  
Total Body Surface Area ◽  
Burn Patients ◽  
Thromboembolism Prophylaxis ◽  
Surgical Interventions ◽  
Vte Prophylaxis ◽  
Improve Compliance

Abstract Introduction Burn patients have a high risk of developing venous thromboembolism (VTE) due to extensive immobilization, surgical interventions, endothelial injury, and the presence of polytrauma. Studies have shown VTE rates ranging from 0.25% to 23.3% in this patient population. Although burn patients have a greater risk for VTE compared to other hospitalized patients, there are no standardized guidelines on how to approach VTE prophylaxis in the burn population. In March 2018, the Burn Intensive Care Unit (BICU) implemented a new VTE prophylaxis protocol that stratified patients based on risk factors for VTE. Patients were started on enoxaparin 30mg every 12 hours or 40mg every 12 hours depending on body mass index (BMI). The purpose of this study was to examine compliance with the new protocol and overall rates of VTE in the burn population. Methods A single-center, retrospective analysis was conducted from March 1, 2018 to July 31, 2018. Patients included were admitted to the BICU with a documented burn injury for at least 48 hours and were ≥ 18 years of age. The primary outcome was compliance with the VTE prophylaxis protocol. Secondary outcomes included reasons for non-compliance and incidence of VTE events. Results Out of 105 patients that met inclusion criteria (median age, 53 years [36 to 63]; BMI 27.1 kg/m2 [25.7 to 33.2]; total body surface area 6% [3% to 18%]), the protocol was correctly utilized in 81 patients (77%). The most common reason for non-compliance to the protocol was incorrect dosing (60.9% [14/105]). Of 105 patients, 1 (0.9%) developed a VTE. Conclusions Overall, the compliance to the Burn Intensive Care Unit VTE pharmacologic prophylaxis protocol has room for improvement. Despite following the protocol, one VTE event occurred during the five-month study period. To improve compliance, additional education and training regarding the dosing of and monitoring anti-coagulants was provided to nursing and medical staff.

scholarly journals Relation Between Preclinical Atherosclerosis and Venous Thromboembolism in Patients With Thrombophilias – Longitudinal Study

2014 ◽  
pp. S403-S409 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. AUZKÝ ◽  
R. DEMBOVSKÁ ◽  
J. MRÁZKOVÁ ◽  
Š. NOVÁKOVÁ ◽  
L. PAGÁČOVÁ ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Body Mass Index ◽  
Longitudinal Study ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Waist Circumference ◽  
Systolic Blood Pressure ◽  
Body Mass ◽  
History Of ◽  
Preclinical Atherosclerosis

Preclinical atherosclerosis may represent a risk factor for venous thromboembolism (VTE). In longitudinal study we followed longitudinally 96 patients (32 men) with thrombophilias with (n=51) and without (n=45) history of VTE. In both groups we studied the changes of preclinical atherosclerosis at peripherally located arteries detected by ultrasound. In addition, we assessed changes in selected risk factors of atherosclerosis. During the mean follow-up of 56.0±7.62 months we did not find significant change in preclinical atherosclerosis defined as Belcaro score in either group (–3 % in the VTE group vs 0 % in non VTE group). Significant increase in body mass index (1.03±1.98 kg*m-2, resp. 1.21±1.67 kg*m-2, p<0.01) and non-significant increase in systolic blood pressure were detected in both groups. Waist circumference increased significantly only in patients without VTE (4.11±7.84 cm, p<0.05). No differences in changes of risk factors under study between both groups were detected. In summary, patients with thrombophilia and history of VTE showed no evidence of greater progression of atherosclerosis or increase in traditional risk factors of atherosclerosis than patients with thrombophilia without history of VTE. Unfavorable changes of body mass index, waist circumference and systolic blood pressure were detected in both groups during study period.

Risk Factors Associated with Hospital-Acquired Venous Thromboembolism in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 2313-2313
Author(s):  
Minh Q Tran ◽  
Steven L Shein ◽  
Hong Li ◽  
Sanjay P Ahuja
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Pediatric Intensive Care ◽  
Primary Diagnosis ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Hospital Acquired

Abstract Introduction: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) in Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) patients is associated with central venous catheter (CVC) use. However, risk factors for VTE development in PICU patients with CVCs are not well established. The impact of Hospital-Acquired VTE in the PICU on clinical outcomes needs to be studied in large multicenter databases to identify subjects that may benefit from screening and/or prophylaxis. Method: With IRB approval, the Virtual Pediatric Systems, LLC database was interrogated for children < 18yo admitted between 01/2009-09/2014 who had PICU length of stay (LOS) <1 yr and a CVC present at some point during PICU care. The exact timing of VTE diagnosis was unavailable in the database, so VTE-PICU was defined as an "active" VTE that was not "present at admission". VTE-prior was defined as a VTE that was "resolved," "ongoing" or "present on admission." Variables extracted from the database included demographics, primary diagnosis category, and Pediatric Index of Mortality (PIM2) score. PICU LOS was divided into quintiles. Chi squared and Wilcoxon rank-sum were used to identify variables associated with outcomes, which were then included in multivariate models. Our primary outcome was diagnosis of VTE-PICU and our secondary outcome was PICU mortality. Children with VTE-prior were included in the mortality analyses, but not the VTE-PICU analyses. Data shown as median (IQR) and OR (95% CI). Results: Among 143,524 subjects, the median age was 2.8 (0.47-10.31) years and 55% were male. Almost half (44%) of the subjects were post-operative. The median PIM2 score was -4.11. VTE-prior was observed in 2498 patients (1.78%) and VTE-PICU in 1741 (1.2%). The incidence of VTE-PICU were 852 (1.7%) in patients ≤ 1 year old, 560 (0.9%) in patients 1-12 years old, and 303 (1.1%) in patients ≥ 13 years old (p < 0.0001). In univariate analysis, variables associated with a diagnosis of VTE-PICU were post-operative state, four LOS quintiles (3-7, 7-14, and 14-21 and >21 days) and several primary diagnosis categories: cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, infectious, neurologic, oncologic, genetic, and orthopedic. Multivariate analysis showed increased risk of VTE with cardiovascular diagnosis, infectious disease diagnosis, and LOS > 3 d (Table 1). The odds increased with increasing LOS: 7 d < LOS ≤ 14 d (5.18 [4.27-6.29]), 14 d < LOS ≤ 21 d (7.96 [6.43-9.82]), and LOS > 21 d (20.73 [17.29-24.87]). Mortality rates were 7.1% (VTE-none), 7.2% (VTE-prior), and 10.1% (VTE-PICU) (p < 0.0001). In the multivariate model, VTE-PICU (1.25 [1.05-1.49]) and VTE-prior (1.18 [1.002-1.39]) were associated with death vs. VTE-none. PIM2 score, trauma, and several primary diagnosis categories were also independently associated with death (Table 2). Conclusion: This large, multicenter database study identified several variables that are independently associated with diagnosis of VTE during PICU care of critically ill children with a CVC. Children with primary cardiovascular or infectious diseases, and those with PICU LOS >3 days may represent specific populations that may benefit from VTE screening and/or prophylaxis. Hospital-Acquired VTE in PICU was independently associated with death in our database. Additional analysis of this database, including adding specific diagnoses and secondary diagnoses, may further refine risk factors for Hospital-Acquired VTE among PICU patients with a CVC. Table 1. Multivariate analysis of Factors Associated with VTE-PICU. Factors Odds Ratio 95% Confidence Interval 3d < LOS ≤ 7d vs LOS ≤ 3d 2.19 1.78-2.69 7d < LOS ≤ 14d vs LOS ≤ 3d 5.18 4.27-6.29 14d < LOS ≤ 21d vs LOS ≤ 3d 7.95 6.44-9.82 LOS > 21d vs LOS ≤ 3d 20.73 17.29-24.87 Age 1.00 0.99-1.01 Post-operative 0.89 0.80-0.99 PIM2 Score 1.47 1.01-1.07 Primary Diagnosis: Cardiovascular 1.50 1.31-1.64 Primary Diagnosis: Infectious 1.50 1.27-1.77 Primary Diagnosis: Genetics 0.32 0.13-0.78 Table 2. Multivariate Analysis of Factors Associated with PICU Mortality. Factors Odds Ratio 95% ConfidenceInterval VTE-prior 1.18 1.00-1.39 VTE-PICU 1.25 1.05-1.49 PIM2 Score 2.08 2.05-2.11 Trauma 1.92 1.77-2.07 Post-operative 0.45 0.42-0.47 Primary Diagnosis: Genetic 2.07 1.63-2.63 Primary Diagnosis: Immunologic 2.45 1.51-3.95 Primary Diagnosis: Hematologic 1.63 1.30-2.06 Primary Diagnosis: Metabolic 0.71 0.58-0.87 Primary Diagnosis: Infectious 1.47 1.36-1.59 Primary Diagnosis: Neurologic 1.37 1.27-1.47 Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Predictive value of abdominal obesity vs. body mass index for determining risk of intensive care unit mortality

2010 ◽  
Vol 38 (5) ◽  
pp. 1308-1314 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Baptiste M. Paolini ◽  
Julien Mancini ◽  
Michèle Genestal ◽  
Hélène Gonzalez ◽  
Rachel Eshima McKay ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Body Mass Index ◽  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Body Mass ◽  
Abdominal Obesity ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Intensive Care Unit Mortality

scholarly journals Effect of maternal underweight on fetal outcome

Biomedicine ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 480-483
Author(s):  
Monteiro Geraldin ◽  
N Anupama ◽  
Rekha D. Kini ◽  
Nayanatara A. K. ◽  
Sneha Shetty ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Body Mass Index ◽  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Weight Gain ◽  
Body Mass ◽  
Neonatal Intensive Care ◽  
Fetal Outcome ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Chi Square Test ◽  
Nicu Admission

Introduction and Aim: Nutritional state of the mother before and during pregnancy is one of the important determinants along with factors like pre-pregnancy BMI, weight gain during pregnancy and gestational age which determines pregnancy outcome. Adequate gestational weight gain contributes for better pregnancy outcomes in both mother and infants for short- and long-term health. Materials and Methods: This is an observational study conducted retrospectively over a year comprised 300 pregnant subjects in their second trimester. Incidence of anemia, preterm labour, intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR) and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission were compared in women with various Body Mass index (BMI). Analysis of the data was done using SPSS version 13 using chi square test and p ? 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Out of 300 subjects, 79 developed anemia, among these 64(81%) were in the underweight category. 49 cases had a preterm delivery, out of these 49 cases, about 37(75.5%) belonged to the underweight BMI category. 39 cases delivered an intra-uterine growth retarded baby. Out of these 39 cases, about 25 (64.1%) belonged to the underweight BMI category. 56 neonates required intensive care unit (NICU) admission, of which 41 (73.2%) neonates born for underweight BMI mothers. Conclusion: The high proportions of underweight pregnancies in this study reflects the poor nutritional status. Adverse effects of maternal low body mass index target the fetus. Adequate weight gain of pregnant woman is an extremely important factor for the fetal outcome.  

scholarly journals Predictors of mortality and validation of burn mortality prognostic scores in a Malaysian burns intensive care unit

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Henry Tan Chor Lip ◽  
Mohamad Azim Md. Idris ◽  
Farrah-Hani Imran ◽  
Tuan Nur’ Azmah ◽  
Tan Jih Huei ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Burn Injury ◽  
Total Body Surface Area ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Prognostic Scores ◽  
Secondary Objective ◽  
Total Body

Abstract Background Majority burn mortality prognostic scores were developed and validated in western populations. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate and identify possible risk factors which may be used to predict burns mortality in a local Malaysian burns intensive care unit. The secondary objective was to validate the five well known burn prognostic scores (Baux score, Abbreviated Burn Severity Index (ABSI) score, Ryan score, Belgium Outcome Burn Injury (BOBI) score and revised Baux score) to predict burn mortality prediction. Methods Patients that were treated at the Hospital Sultan Ismail’s Burns Intensive Care (BICU) unit for acute burn injuries between 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2017 were included. Risk factors to predict in-patient burn mortality were gender, age, mechanism of injury, total body surface area burn (TBSA), inhalational injury, mechanical ventilation, presence of tracheotomy, time from of burn injury to BICU admission and initial centre of first emergency treatment was administered. These variables were analysed using univariate and multivariate analysis for the outcomes of death. All patients were scored retrospectively using the five-burn mortality prognostic scores. Predictive ability for burn mortality was analysed using the area under receiver operating curve (AUROC). Results A total of 525 patients (372 males and 153 females) with mean age of 34.5 ± 14.6 years were included. There were 463 survivors and 62 deaths (11.8% mortality rate). The outcome of the primary objective showed that amongst the burn mortality risk factors that remained after multivariate analysis were older age (p = 0.004), wider TBSA burn (p < 0.001) and presence of mechanical ventilation (p < 0.001). Outcome of secondary objective showed good AUROC value for the prediction of burn death for all five burn prediction scores (Baux score; AUROC:0.9, ABSI score; AUROC:0.92, Ryan score; AUROC:0.87, BOBI score; AUROC:0.91 and revised Baux score; AUROC:0.94). The revised Baux score had the best AUROC value of 0.94 to predict burns mortality. Conclusion Current study evaluated and identified older age, total body surface area burns, and mechanical ventilation as significant predictors of burn mortality. In addition, the revised Baux score was the most accurate burn mortality risk score to predict mortality in a Malaysian burn’s population.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document