scholarly journals CTNI-12. PRELIMINARY RESULTS OF THE ABEMACICLIB ARM IN THE INDIVIDUALIZED SCREENING TRIAL OF INNOVATIVE GLIOBLASTOMA THERAPY (INSIGHT): A PHASE II PLATFORM TRIAL USING BAYESIAN ADAPTIVE RANDOMIZATION

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. ii44-ii44
Author(s):  
Patrick Wen ◽  
Lorenzo Trippa ◽  
Eudocia Lee ◽  
Geoffrey Fell ◽  
Rifaquat Rahman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Survival Data ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Cyclin D ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Adaptive Randomization ◽  
Preliminary Results ◽  
Her2 Breast Cancer ◽  
Rb Pathway ◽  
Screening Trial

Abstract BACKGROUND The cyclin D-CDK4/6-Rb pathway is activated in most glioblastomas. Abemaciclib is a potent CDK4/6 inhibitor with good brain penetration approved for ER/PR/HER2- breast cancer. In order to efficiently evaluate the potential impact of abemaciclib on overall survival (OS) in newly diagnosed glioblastoma and to simultaneously develop information regarding potential genomic biomarker associations, abemaciclib was included as an arm on the Individualized Screening Trial of Innovative Glioblastoma Therapy (INSIGhT) trial. INSIGhT is a phase II platform trial using response adaptive randomization and deep genomic profiling to more efficiently test experimental agents in MGMT unmethylated glioblastoma and potentially accelerate identification of novel therapies for phase III testing. Initial randomization was equal between abemaciclib, control, and two other experimental arms but subsequent randomization was adapted based on efficacy as determined by progression-free survival (PFS). Ineffective arms were discontinued and new arms added by protocol amendment. We report preliminary results for the abemaciclib arm which has completed accrual. METHODS Patients with newly diagnosed MGMT-unmethylated glioblastoma were randomized to receive either radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide at standard doses or standard radiochemotherapy followed by adjuvant abemaciclib (150–200 mg orally BID) without temozolomide. Treatment continued until progression or development of unacceptable toxicities. The primary endpoint was OS. Association between abemaciclib efficacy and cyclin D-CDK4/6-Rb pathway genomic alterations was also investigated. RESULTS There were 123 patients (50 control; 73 treated with abemaciclib). Abemaciclib was generally well-tolerated with no new toxicity signals identified. PFS was significantly longer (p=0.03, logrank test) with abemaciclib (median 6.31 months 95% CI [5.29, 8.18]) compared to the control arm (5.16 months 95% CI [4.37, 6.28]). 28/50 control and 36/73 abemaciclib patients remain alive. CONCLUSION Preliminary analysis suggests that abemaciclib increases PFS compared to control. Updated toxicity, PFS and survival data and potential genomic biomarker associations will be presented.

Preliminary results of the abemaciclib arm in the Individualized Screening Trial of Innovative Glioblastoma Therapy (INSIGhT): A phase II platform trial using Bayesian adaptive randomization.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2014-2014
Author(s):  
Eudocia Quant Lee ◽  
Lorenzo Trippa ◽  
Geoffrey Fell ◽  
Rifaquat Rahman ◽  
Isabel Arrillaga-Romany ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
P Value ◽  
Cyclin D ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Adaptive Randomization ◽  
Preliminary Results ◽  
Rb Pathway ◽  
Screening Trial

2014 Background: The cyclin D-CDK4/6-Rb pathway is activated in most glioblastomas. Abemaciclib is a potent CDK4/6 inhibitor with good brain penetration approved for HR+/HER2- breast cancer. In order to efficiently evaluate the potential impact of abemaciclib on overall survival (OS) in newly diagnosed glioblastoma and to simultaneously develop information regarding potential genomic biomarker associations, abemaciclib was included as an arm on the Individualized Screening Trial of Innovative Glioblastoma Therapy (INSIGhT) trial. INSIGhT is a phase II platform trial using response adaptive randomization and deep genomic profiling to more efficiently test experimental agents in MGMT unmethylated glioblastoma and potentially accelerate identification of novel therapies for phase III testing. Initial randomization was equal between abemaciclib, control, and two other experimental arms but subsequent randomization was adapted based on efficacy as determined by progression-free survival (PFS). Ineffective arms were discontinued and new arms added by protocol amendment. We report preliminary results for the abemaciclib arm which has completed accrual. Methods: Patients with newly diagnosed MGMT-unmethylated glioblastoma were randomized to receive either radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide at standard doses or standard radiochemotherapy followed by adjuvant abemaciclib (150-200 mg orally BID). Treatment continued until progression or development of unacceptable toxicities. The primary endpoint was OS which was assessed using the log-rank test estimated via the Kaplan Meier method using a type I error of 5%. The hazard ratio (HR) was estimated using a cox proportional hazards model. Association between abemaciclib efficacy and cyclin D-CDK4/6-Rb pathway genomic alterations was also investigated. Results: There were 142 patients (69 control; 73 treated with abemaciclib). Abemaciclib was generally well-tolerated with no new toxicity signals identified. PFS was significantly longer (HR 0.67; p = 0.03, logrank test) with abemaciclib (median 6.54 months) compared to the control arm (median 5.88 months). For patients with activation of the CDK4 pathway the PFS HR was 0.64 (p-value = 0.04). However, there was no significant improvement in overall survival (HR 0.9; p-value > 0.05) between abemaciclib (median 15.5) compared to the control arm (median 15.5). Conclusions: Abemaciclib was well-tolerated and prolonged PFS but there is no evidence of an overall survival improvement compared to standard radiochemotherapy. Clinical trial information: NCT02977780.

CTNI-05. PRELIMINARY RESULTS OF THE NERATINIB ARM IN THE INDIVIDUALIZED SCREENING TRIAL OF INNOVATIVE GLIOBLASTOMA THERAPY (INSIGHT): A PHASE II PLATFORM TRIAL USING BAYESIAN ADAPTIVE RANDOMIZATION

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi59-vi59
Author(s):  
Isabel Arrillaga-Romany ◽  
Lorenzo Trippa ◽  
Geffrey Fell ◽  
Eudocia Quant Lee ◽  
Rifaquat Rahman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
P Value ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Logrank Test ◽  
Adaptive Randomization ◽  
Preliminary Results ◽  
Her2 Breast Cancer ◽  
Screening Trial

Abstract BACKGROUND EGFR is amplified in over 50% of glioblastoma and 20-30% have EGFRvIII mutations. Neratinib is a potent inhibitor of EGFR/HER2 approved for metastatic HER2+ breast cancer. To efficiently evaluate the potential impact of neratinib on overall survival (OS) in newly-diagnosed glioblastoma and to simultaneously develop information regarding potential genomic biomarker associations, neratinib was included as an arm on the Individualized Screening Trial of Innovative Glioblastoma Therapy (INSIGhT) trial. INSIGhT is a phase II platform trial using response adaptive randomization and deep genomic profiling to more efficiently test experimental agents in MGMT unmethylated glioblastoma and accelerate identification of novel therapies for phase III testing. Initial randomization was equal between neratinib, control, and two other experimental arms but subsequent randomization was adapted based on efficacy as determined by progression-free survival (PFS). We report preliminary results for the neratinib arm. METHODS Patients with newly diagnosed MGMT-unmethylated glioblastoma were randomized to receive either radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide or standard radiochemotherapy followed by adjuvant neratinib (240 mg daily). Treatment continued until progression or development of unacceptable toxicities. The primary endpoint was OS. Association between neratinib efficacy and EGFR amplification was also investigated. RESULTS There were 144 patients (70 control; 74 neratinib). Neratinib was reasonably well-tolerated with no new toxicity signals identified. PFS was compared (HR 0.84; p=0.38, logrank test – not significant) between the neratinib (median 6.05 months) and control (median 5.82 months) arms. For patients EGFR pathway activation the PFS HR was 0.53 (p-value=0.03 – significant, median PFS: neratinib, 6.21 months, control, 5.26 months). However, there was no significant improvement in OS in EGFR amplified/mutated patients (HR 1.05; p-value 0.87) between neratinib (median 14.2) compared to the control arm (median 14.6). CONCLUSION Neratinib prolonged PFS in the EGFR positive subpopulation but there was no overall PFS benefit, or any OS improvement.

CTNI-40. EVALUATING FEASIBILITY AND EFFICIENCY OF PHASE II ADAPTIVE PLATFORM TRIAL DESIGNS BASED ON THE INDIVIDUALIZED SCREENING TRIAL OF INNOVATIVE GLIOBLASTOMA THERAPY (INSIGhT) EXPERIENCE

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi68-vi69
Author(s):  
Rifaquat Rahman ◽  
Lorenzo Trippa ◽  
Eudocia Quant Lee ◽  
Isabel Arrillaga-Romany ◽  
Mehdi Touat ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
The United States ◽  
Experimental Therapy ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Adaptive Randomization ◽  
Common Control ◽  
The Status ◽  
Trial Efficiency ◽  
Screening Trial

Abstract BACKGROUND The Individualized Screening Trial of Innovative Glioblastoma Therapy (INSIGhT) is a phase II platform trial with Bayesian adaptive randomization and deep genomic profiling to more efficiently test experimental agents in newly diagnosed glioblastoma and to prioritize therapies for late-stage testing. METHODS In the ongoing INSIGhT trial, patients with newly diagnosed MGMT-unmethylated glioblastoma are randomized to the control arm or one of three experimental therapy arms (CC-115, abemaciclib, and neratinib). The control arm therapy is radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide, and primary endpoint is overall survival. Randomization has been adapted based on Bayesian estimation of biomarker-specific probability of treatment impact on progression-free survival (PFS). All tumors undergo detailed molecular sequencing, and this is facilitated with the companion ALLELE protocol. To evaluate feasibility of this approach, we assessed the status of this ongoing trial. RESULTS Since INSIGhT was activated 4.3 years ago, it has expanded to include 12 sites across the United States. A total of 247 patients have been enrolled. Randomization probabilities have been repeatedly adjusted over time based upon early PFS results to alter the randomization ratio from standard 1:1:1:1 randomization. All three arms have completed accrual and efficacy estimates are available based upon comparison to the common control arm in context of relevant biomarkers. There are 87 patients alive and in follow-up, and there are ongoing plans to add additional arms to evaluate further treatments in the future. CONCLUSION The INSIGhT trial demonstrates that a multi-center Bayesian adaptive platform trial is a feasible and effective approach to help prioritize therapies and biomarkers for newly diagnosed GBM. The trial has maintained robust accrual, and the simultaneous testing of multiple agents, sharing a common control arm and adaptive randomization serve as features to increase trial efficiency relative to traditional clinical trial designs.

Current survival statistics for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma treated with radiation and temozolomide on research studies in the United States

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2003-2003
Author(s):  
S. A. Grossman ◽  
X. Ye ◽  
S. Piantadosi ◽  
S. Desideri ◽  
L. B. Nabors ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Survival Data ◽  
Patient Population ◽  
Methylation Status ◽  
The United States ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Novel Agents ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Phase Ii Studies ◽  
Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma

2003 Background: Many novel agents are being studied in combination with radiation and temozolomide (RT+TMZ) in newly diagnosed glioblastoma using survival as the primary endpoint. These single arm phase II studies generally plan to compare their results with those reported from the phase III EORTC RT+TMZ study (Stupp, NEJM, 2005). Methods: The NABTT CNS Consortium has completed accrual to three RT+TMZ+ novel agent studies using the same eligibility criteria. A total of 281 patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma were enrolled. The novel agents included talampanel (72 pts), poly ICLC (97 pts), and cilengitide (112 pts). The survival data emerging from these three single arm phase II studies was compared with the published EORTC data. Results: The median age, KPS, and percent undergoing debulking surgery for EORTC patients was 56, 86% (WHO 0–1), and 84% and for NABTT patients receiving talampanel 60, 90, and 77%, poly ICLC 56, 90, 86%, and cilengitide 55, 90, and 76%. A total of 247 patients (88%) were ages 18–70 making them comparable to the EORTC patient population. Currently available survival data for these NABTT and EORTC studies are provided below. MGMT methylation status and survival based on dose levels are not currently available. Conclusions: Survival of newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients treated with RT+TMZ + novel agents at 9 NABTT institutions accruing from 2005 to 2008 appears increased compared to RT+TMZ at 85 EORTC institutions accruing from 2000 to 2002. These results do not appear related to a specific effective agent. As a result, caution should be exercised when comparing outcomes from recently conducted Phase II studies in this patient population to published EORTC data. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.

scholarly journals Three Drug Regimens for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Transplant-Ineligible Elderly Patients - a Systematic Review

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 5574-5574
Author(s):  
Abdul Aziz Siddiqui ◽  
Kazi Najamus-saqib Khan ◽  
Arafat Ali Farooqui ◽  
Muhammad Saad Farooqi ◽  
Muhammad Junaid Tariq ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Alkylating Agents ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Great Efficacy ◽  
Drug Regimens

Introduction: Patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) who are ineligible for autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) tend to have comorbidities and/or advanced age that make this subset of patients difficult to manage with current drug regimens. Methods: A comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Embase, Clinicaltrials.gov and Web of Science was performed from inception and completed on 07/17/2019. Studies focusing on efficacy and tolerability of 3-drug regimens in patients with NDMM were included for the review. Results: Out of 3579 studies, a total of 10 (08 phase II and 03 phase III) clinical trials in last ten years (2010-2019) using 3-drug regimens in NDMM elderly pts (893M/807F) ineligible for ASCT (determined by investigators) were selected. A total of 1703/1740 NDMM pts were evaluated. Proteasome inhibitors (PIs) such as carfilzomib (C), bortezomib (V) and ixazomib (I) showed promising results in elderly transplant-ineligible NDMM pts. CLARION trial (phase III, n=955) compared two PIs (C and V) with melphalan (M) and prednisone. There was no statistically significant difference in progression-free survival (PFS) between two groups (median: 22.3 vs 22.1 months; HR: 0.91; 95% CI, 0.75-1.10, p = 0.159) as well as overall survival (OS) (HR: 1.08; 95% CI: 0.82-1.43). Difference in the least square means of the HR-QoL (Health related- quality of life) was 4.99 (p<.0001) favoring C-group. M may not be an ideal drug to combine with carfilzomib in this setting given more AEs.(Facon et al 2019). V as 3-drug regimen in combination with lenalidomide (L) in 242 pts achieved statistically significant prolonged PFS (median 43 mo) and OS (median 75 mo) with great efficacy and acceptable risk-benefit profile. (Durie et al 2017; phase III). Multinational phase II trial (n=70) by Dimopoulos et al (2019) evaluated I, with different fixed doses of cyclophosphamide (Cy). Median duration was 19 cycles, indicating the long-term tolerability of regimen. With favorable toxicity profile and maintained QoL scores, trial concluded that this therapy is tolerable in elderly transplant-ineligible NDMM pts. Tuchman et al (2017) in phase II trial (n=14) investigated (V-Cy-d) and achieved ORR of 64%, with ≥VGPR of 57%. Low dose V showed great efficacy with M yielding ORR of 86% and VGPR or better of 49% in phase II trial (n=101) that also evaluated Cy as 3-drug combination but results were more productive with M with longer PFS and OS which reduced when impact of frailty was examined on outcomes. Since toxicity was higher with M, trial suggested that 2-drug combination should be preferred in elderly frail patients. (Larocca et al 2015). Efficacy was quite promising when Bringhen et al (2014) trialed C with Cy-d; 87% OS and 76% PFS at 1 y in phase II trial (n=58) with much favorable safety profile. Monoclonal antibodies (mAb) such as elotuzumab (E) and pembrolizumab (Pe) are also tested in elderly. First study conducted on NDMM pts using humanized mAb; E, in phase II trial (n=40) by Takezako et al (2017) attained primary endpoint of the study (ORR) of (88%) and VGPR or better of 45% in Japanese pts with tolerable toxicities in elderly. No subjects on this study experienced severe peripheral neuropathy. KEYNOTE-185; a phase III multinational trial by Usmani et al (2019) evaluated Pe with Ld in 151 pts. FDA halted this study due to unfavorable benefit-risk profile; 19 deaths, 6 due to disease progression (PD), and 13 due to treatment-related AEs. Median PFS and median OS were not reached in either group. Immunomodulators such as L achieved one of the longest PFS reported in a trial of transplant ineligible patients (35 mo) by using LVd regimen in phase II multicenter trial (n=50). (O'Donnell et al 2018) Alkylating agents like bendamustine (ben) and M have been tested in different novel regimens. Decreasing intensity and increasing duration of ben resulted in better outcomes in phase II trial (n=59) by Berdeja et al (2016) and can be given as first line treatment. Ben yielded great results with low dose dexa as compared to high dose achieving 92% ORR. Original regimen was effective but relatively more toxic. Incidence of herpes and neuropathy decreased dramatically with the treatment modifications. Conclusion: Three-drug regimens having PIs, mABs, immunomodulators and alkylating agents have shown desirable results in NDMM transplant (ASCT)-ineligible elderly patients and are likely the emerging standard of care for NDMM. Disclosures Anwer: In-Cyte: Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Evaluating the benefit of adaptive randomization in the CC-115 arm of the Individualized Screening Trial of Innovative Glioblastoma Therapy (INSIGhT): A phase II randomized Bayesian adaptive platform trial in newly diagnosed MGMT unmethylated glioblastoma.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2006-2006
Author(s):  
Rifaquat Rahman ◽  
Lorenzo Trippa ◽  
Geoffrey Fell ◽  
Eudocia Quant Lee ◽  
Isabel Arrillaga-Romany ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mammalian Target Of Rapamycin ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Adaptive Randomization ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Enrollment Rates ◽  
Dependent Protein ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Screening Trial

2006 Background: Adaptive randomization adjusts enrollment rates based upon early trial results, which can allow for decreased enrollment for therapies less likely to meet the primary endpoint of a trial. CC-115, a CNS-penetrant, oral inhibitor of mammalian target of rapamycin kinase (mTOR) and deoxyribonucleic acid-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK), was evaluated in the Individualized Screening Trial of Innovative Glioblastoma Therapy (INSIGhT) trial. As CC-115 was discontinued due to concerns about toxicity and unfavorable risk-to-benefit ratio, we sought to investigate the impact of adaptive randomization in its testing. Methods: In INSIGhT, adults with newly diagnosed MGMT-unmethylated glioblastoma and available genomic data are adaptively randomized to an experimental arm or the control arm of standard radiotherapy with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide. Patients randomized to CC-115 received it (10mg po BID) with radiotherapy and as adjuvant monotherapy, and a safety lead-in 3+3 design was used for this arm. By simulating the INSIGhT trial with standard uniform randomization, we estimated the reduction of enrollment rate and sample size of the CC-115 arm that was attributable to adaptive randomization. Results: Twelve patients were randomized to CC-115; 58% (n = 7) patients had possible treatment-related CTCAE grade > 3 toxicity. Compared to the control arm, there was no significant difference in progression-free survival (PFS, HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.32-1.36, p = 0.3) or overall survival (OS, HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.43-2.03, p = 0.8). Based on early PFS results, randomization probability to CC-115 decreased from 25% to 16%. At the time of the CC-115 arm closure, 14% of enrolled INSIGhT patients had been randomized to this arm. Compared to average expected enrollment by standard randomization, the use of adaptive randomization decreased the number of patients randomized to CC-115 by 50% (12 patients vs. 18 patients [95% CI 11-25 patients]). Conclusions: The INSIGhT trial, designed with adaptive randomization, facilitated more efficient testing of CC-115 and decreased the number of patients allocated to the CC-115 arm relative to a standard randomization design. Clinical trial information: NCT02977780.

Phase II testing of melphalan in children with newly diagnosed rhabdomyosarcoma: a model for anticancer drug development.

1988 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 308-314 ◽  
Author(s):  
M E Horowitz ◽  
E Etcubanas ◽  
M L Christensen ◽  
J A Houghton ◽  
S L George ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Drug Disposition ◽  
Clinical Performance ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Heavily Pretreated ◽  
Phase Iii Study ◽  
Successful Testing ◽  
Previously Treated Patients ◽  
Pretreated Patients

We describe events that led to successful testing of melphalan, one of the nitrogen mustard compounds, in children with newly diagnosed, poor-risk rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS). Preclinical studies with xenografts of human RMS, growing in the flanks of immune-deprived mice, had indicated superior oncolytic activity by melphalan compared with other agents commonly used to treat this tumor. However, in a conventional phase II trial, melphalan failed to produce partial responses in 12 of 13 heavily pretreated patients with recurrent tumors. Subsequent comparison of the drug's pharmacokinetics in mice and patients indicated that its poor clinical performance was not the result of interspecies differences in drug disposition. Therefore, we elected to retest melphalan in untreated patients, before they were enrolled in a phase III study. Of 13 children who received the drug for 6 weeks, ten had partial responses, confirming the significant antitumor activity seen in the xenograft system. These findings illustrate the inherent limitations of phase II drug trials in previously treated patients and suggest a useful paradigm for the development of antineoplastic drugs.

scholarly journals RTID-04. A RANDOMIZED PHASE II TRIAL TO COMPARE THE EFFICACY OF STANDARD VERSUS COMBINATION THERAPY (PERAMPANEL, MEMANTINE PLUS STANDARD) IN THE TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH NEWLY DIAGNOSED GBM-A STUDY DESIGN

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. ii194-ii194
Author(s):  
Xiao-Tang Kong ◽  
Bruce Albala ◽  
Senxi Du ◽  
Xiao-Tang Kong ◽  
Daniela Bota
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Nmda Receptor ◽  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Study Design ◽  
Survival Data ◽  
Standard Therapy ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Glioma Invasion

Abstract BACKGROUND Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most aggressive malignant brain tumor in adults with poor prognosis. Effective treatment is urgently needed. Recent studies demonstrated neurogliomal synaptic communication through AMPA and NMDA receptors promotes glioma invasion and progression in vitro and in vivo. Therefore, dual blocking AMPA and NMDA receptor therapy is a potential enhancing strategy to prevent and to treat GBM progression given the two blockers act through different anti-glioma mechanisms. OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS We hypothesize that adding AMPA blocker Perampanel (An anti-seizure medication) and NMDA blocker Memantine (An anti-dementia medication) to standard temozolomide plus radiation therapy (Stupp’s regimen) for the treatment of newly diagnosed GBM may prevent tumor progression. It may also reduce the frequency of onset/recurrence of seizure episodes and possibly improve radiation related cognition impairment. STUDY DESIGN This is a randomized, active controlled, open label, two arm phase II study of efficacy of treatment of GBM with combination therapy (dual AMPA and NMDA receptor blockers plus standard therapy) versus standard therapy. In the combination therapy arm, patients take Perampanel 2 mg daily and Memantine 5 mg bid, starting from -14 days to +14 days from initiation of concurrent chemo-radiation therapy. Titrating up at a 2 mg increment for Perampanel and 5 mg bid increment for Memantine until reaching MTD. If the patient has AE &gt;= grade 2, then reduce doses at a decrement of 2 mg for Perampanel and decrement of 5 mg bid for Memantine. In the standard therapy arm, the patients are treated with Stupp’s regimen. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY ENDPOINTS PFS, 12, 24 month survival rates and response duration. Safety will be assessed by CTCAE V5. We will use Kaplan-Meier estimates for survival data and a stratified log-rank test for the randomization strata.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document