scholarly journals DDRE-23. THE COMBINATION PARP INHIBITOR OLAPARIB WITH TEMOZOLOMIDE IN AN EXPERIMENTAL GLIOBLASTOMA MODEL

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. ii66-ii66
Author(s):  
Kihwan Hwang ◽  
Kyeong-O Go ◽  
Sang Ho Kim ◽  
Hyunwoo Lee ◽  
Jung Ho Han ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Lines ◽  
Parp Inhibitor ◽  
Methylation Status ◽  
In Vivo Studies ◽  
Parp Inhibition ◽  
Glioblastoma Cell ◽  
Antitumor Effects ◽  
Glioblastoma Cell Lines

Abstract Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibition could enhance the efficacy of temozolomide and prolong survival in patients with glioblastoma. The aim of this study was to evaluate the combination of the PARP inhibitor olaparib with temozolomide in the treatment of glioblastoma by evaluating in vitro and in vivo antitumor effects in an experimental glioblastoma model. The authors investigated antitumor effects of olaparib on temozolomide-induced cytotoxicity on O6-methylguanine methyltransferase (MGMT) promotor methylated (U87MG, U251MG) and MGMT promotor unmethylated (T98G) glioblastoma cell lines using in vitro cell viability and apoptosis assay. We found that the combination of olaparib with temozolomide enhanced temozolomide-induced cytotoxicity in all glioblastoma cell lines regardless of the status of MGMT promotor methylation. For in vivo studies, nude mice bearing orthotopically xenografted glioblastoma cell lines (U87MG) were randomized to four experimental groups: (i) untreated, (ii) temozolomide alone, (iii) olaprib alone and, (iv) olaparib+temozolomide. Mice were treated daily for 4 weeks and monitored for tumor growth, and survival. However, the addition of olaparib had no impact on the efficacy of temozolomide. The combination of PARP inhibitor olaparib with temozolomide could be an effective therapeutic approach for treatment of glioblastoma regardless of MGMT promotor methylation status, although the efficacy still should be evaluated by in vivo and clinical studies.

In vitro and in vivo characterization of a novel hedgehog signaling antagonist in human glioblastoma cell lines

2012 ◽  
Vol 131 (2) ◽  
pp. E33-E44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pietro Ferruzzi ◽  
Federica Mennillo ◽  
Antonella De Rosa ◽  
Cinzia Giordano ◽  
Marco Rossi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Lines ◽  
Hedgehog Signaling ◽  
Glioblastoma Cell ◽  
Human Glioblastoma ◽  
Human Glioblastoma Cell ◽  
In Vivo Characterization ◽  
Glioblastoma Cell Lines

In vitro and in vivo evaluations of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor NSC�680410 against human leukemia and glioblastoma cell lines

2002 ◽  
Vol 50 (6) ◽  
pp. 479-489 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ioannis A. Avramis ◽  
Garyfallia Christodoulopoulos ◽  
Atsushi Suzuki ◽  
Walter E. Laug ◽  
Ignacio Gonzalez-Gomez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tyrosine Kinase ◽  
Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Cell Lines ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Human Leukemia ◽  
Glioblastoma Cell ◽  
Glioblastoma Cell Lines

Effect of inducing HR deficiency using AVB500, a receptor tyrosine kinase AXL inhibitor, on response to olaparib in uterine serous cancer.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18108-e18108
Author(s):  
Michael Driscoll Toboni ◽  
Barbara Blachut ◽  
Mary M Mullen ◽  
Jo'an Tankou ◽  
Hollie M Noia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Period ◽  
Cell Lines ◽  
Day Treatment ◽  
Parp Inhibitor ◽  
Tumor Burden ◽  
Scid Mice ◽  
In Vivo Studies ◽  
Treatment Groups

e18108 Background: Evidence suggests DNA repair is a therapeutic target in endometrial cancer (EC). Given this, we determined whether combination therapy with AVB500, an AXL inhibitor, could improve response in a uterine serous cancer (USC) model. Methods: Two USC cell lines (ARK1 & ARK4) were treated with AVB500 (Aravive Biologics, Houston, TX) in combination with the poly ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitor, olaparib. Colony forming assays were assessed after 4 days of treatment with either AVB500 alone, olaparib alone or combination treatment (olaparib + AVB500); colonies were stained and absorbance was obtained to calculate relative cell viability using Graph Pad Prism. Baseline homologous recombination (HR) status was determined after radiating cells with 10Gy and identifying RAD51 foci by immunofluorescence (IF). Cell lines were considered to be HR proficient if over 30% of the cells expressed RAD51 ( > 5 foci per cell). IF was conducted using a Leica confocal microscope and foci were quantified using FociCounter. In vivo studies were performed using NOD-SCID mice injected with 1 x 107 ARK1 cells intraperitoneally followed by treatment q3 days for a 14 and 21 day treatment period. Treatment groups were vehicle control, AVB500 alone, olaparib alone and olaparib with AVB500. Results: The absorbance for olaparib + AVB500 was significantly less than the olaparib only group in two assays involving ARK1s (0.417nm vs 0.756nm, p = 0.001; 0.320nm vs 0.620nm, p = 0.008) as well as in ARK4s (0.186nm vs 0.641nm, p = 0.003). The HR assay indicated both cell lines were HR proficient. After baseline HR proficiency was established, the cell lines were pretreated with AVB500 prior to radiation. When compared to cells without treatment with AVB500, IF showed a decrease in RAD51 foci per cell in ARK1 (2.7 vs 7.3, p = 0.0003) and ARK4 (6.3 vs 13.0, p = 0.0054). The proportion of ARK1 cells expressing RAD51 decreased to 21%, indicating HR deficiency. Lastly, NOD-SCID mice receiving olaparib + AVB500 had less tumor weight than those treated with olaparib alone (0.008g vs 0.138g, p = 0.002) and AVB500 alone (0.008g vs 0.145g, p = 0.0006) in a 14 day and a 21 day treatment period (0.212g vs 0.586g, p = 0.027 and 0.212 vs 0.494g, p = 0.005, respectively). Conclusions: HR proficient USC cell lines treated in vitro and in vivo with the combination of AVB500 and olaparib demonstrate an improved response to olaparib or AVB500 alone with a greater decrease in tumor burden. AVB500 appears to induce HR deficiency. Additional therapeutic and mechanistic experiments are ongoing.

scholarly journals Neutralization of Adrenomedullin Inhibits the Growth of Human Glioblastoma Cell Lines in Vitro and Suppresses Tumor Xenograft Growth in Vivo

2002 ◽  
Vol 160 (4) ◽  
pp. 1279-1292 ◽  
Author(s):  
L'Houcine Ouafik ◽  
Samantha Sauze ◽  
Françoise Boudouresque ◽  
Olivier Chinot ◽  
Christine Delfino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Lines ◽  
Tumor Xenograft ◽  
Glioblastoma Cell ◽  
Human Glioblastoma ◽  
Human Glioblastoma Cell ◽  
Xenograft Growth ◽  
Tumor Xenograft Growth ◽  
Glioblastoma Cell Lines

Studies of pemetrexed and gemcitabine, alone and in combinations, in human lung cancer models

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 17114-17114 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. C. Chan ◽  
V. J. Chen ◽  
Z. Zhang ◽  
B. Helfrich ◽  
F. R. Hirsch ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tumor Growth ◽  
Cell Lines ◽  
In Vivo Studies ◽  
Human Lung Cancer ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Antitumor Effects ◽  
Nude Rats ◽  
Combination Regimens

17114 Background: Gemcitabine (GEM) is a deoxycytidine analog that inhibits DNA synthesis. Pemetrexed (ALIMTA, PEM) is a novel antifolate inhibiting multiple enzymes targets, including thymidylate synthase (TS). This study aimed at evaluating the antitumor effects of these antimetabolites against NSCLC and SCLC tumor models. Methods: In vitro growth inhibition (IC50) studies were done by 6-days MTT assays against a panel of 20 NSCLC and 17 SCLC cell lines. In vivo studies used only NSCLC H2122 tumor line, implanted either subcutaneously in athymic nude mice or orthotopically in athymic nude rats. Drugs were given via the ip route at the designated schedules. Results: Against NSCLC and SCLC cell lines, the averaged IC50s of GEM were 0.015 ± 0.008 μM and 0.055 ± 0.04 μM respectively. The corresponding averaged IC50s for PEM were 0.65 ± 0.2 μM and 0.091±0.018 μM respectively. When H2122 tumors reached 50–100mg, mice were treated with 10 daily doses of PEM at 100, 200 and 300 mg/kg, or three doses of GEM every 4 days at 30, 60 and 120 mg/kg. PEM delayed tumor growth by 12 to 18 days, and GEM delayed by 10 to 14 days, relative to vehicle control. Results of three combination regimens with GEM (30 mg/kg) and PEM (100 mg/kg) were: (1) GEM → PEM gave intermediate activities between the two single agents, but was toxic to animals; (2) PEM and GEM given concurrently were more active than single agents alone and delayed tumor growth by 12 days with some toxic side effects; (3) PEM → GEM was better than the single agents alone, and delayed tumor growth by ∼14 days without toxicity. Athymic nude rats bearing orthotopic H2122 tumors given PEM daily at 50, 100 and 200 mg/kg for 21 days had significantly prolonged survival, but not in a dose-dependent manner. PEM at 50 mg/kg was more effective than doses at 100 or 200 mg/kg. GEM was toxic to nude rats due to poor plasma deamination of GEM. Conclusions: In vitro, PEM was more potent against SCLC than NSCLC cell lines, but GEM had similar activities against all lung lines tested. Studies of H2122 xenografts in rodent supported PEM → GEM as the preferred sequence for the combined administration of these two drugs. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Synergistic antitumor effect of resveratrol and sorafenib on hepatocellular carcinoma through PKA/AMPK/eEF2K pathway

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meili Gao ◽  
Chun Deng ◽  
Fan Dang
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Lines ◽  
Tumor Response ◽  
Therapeutic Potential ◽  
Combined Treatment ◽  
In Vivo Studies ◽  
Antitumor Effects ◽  
Protein Levels

Although sorafenib (Sor) is the only effective drug for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), its therapeutic potential to date is mainly limited to the low tumor response. This study was designed to explore whether resveratrol (Res) could potentiate the anticancerous activity of Sor. We used HepG2 and Huh7 HCC cell lines and BALB/c nude mice for in vitro and in vivo studies, respectively. The cultured cell lines and tumor induction in the mice were treated with different concentrations of Res and Sor alone, and the combination of Res and Sor to observe the antitumor effects. Significant inhibitory effects were observed in the combined treatment of Res and Sor compared to Res and Sor alone treatments both in vitro and in vivo as demonstrated by significantly high number of S phase cells and apoptotic cells. Moreover, these findings were accompanied by the reduction of CDK2, CDC25A, PKA, p-AMPK, and eEF2K protein levels and the increment of cyclin A, cleavage caspase-3, caspase-8, and caspase-9 protein levels. The combinational treatment exhibited more significant anticancerous effect than the Res and Sor alone treatments in mice-bearing HepG2 xenograft. Overall, our results suggest that PKA/AMPK/eEF2K pathway is involved in the synergistic anticancerous activity of Res and Sor combination treatment in HCC cells. Thus, Res and Sor combination therapy may be promising in increasing the tumor response of Sor in the future.

scholarly journals PARP Inhibition Sensitize BCR-ABL1 Positive Cel

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 3367-3367 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haruka Hiroki ◽  
Masatoshi Takagi ◽  
Yuko Ishi ◽  
Jinhua Piao ◽  
Tomohiro Morio
Keyword(s):  
Cell Death ◽  
Cell Lines ◽  
Parp Inhibitor ◽  
Leukemic Cell ◽  
Leukemic Cells ◽  
Parp Inhibition ◽  
Akt Pathway ◽  
Leukemic Cell Lines

Introduction: BCR-ABL1 play a key role in the development of chronic myelogenous leukemia and a part of Ph1 positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). BCR-ABL1 functions as a tyrosine kinase. Whereas, BCR-ABL1 induces genomic instability by downregulation of BRCA1. An innate error of BRCA1, a molecule involved in the homologous recombination repair pathway, causes hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. PARP inhibitor (PARPi) induces synthetic lethality in BRCA defective cell. Therefore, PARP inhibitor is expected to induce efficient cell death with BCR-ABL1 positive cell. In addition, in some previous reports, reduction of PARP1 activity leads to the upregulation of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT pathway and BCR-ABL1 tyrosine kinase activates PI3K/AKT pathway. These findings suggest activation of the PI3K/AKT pathway leading to PARPi resistance in BCR-ABL1 positive leukemic cells. Here, we demonstrate that PARP inhibition attenuates BCR-ABL1 mediated leukemogenesis and aberration of factors associated with PARP inhibitor resistance induces cell death to fully transformed leukemic cells. Method: Bone marrow-derived mononuclear cells (MNC) from wild type mice and BCR-ABL1 transgenic (Tg) mice were exposed to PARPi in vivo, and cell death was analyzed Annexin-V positivity. PARPi sensitivity to BCR-ABL1 expressed cell was also investigated in vivo bone marrow transplantation model using mouse hematopoietic stem cell (HCS) infected with BCR-ABL1 expressing retrovirus. To evaluate more precisely the results obtained in vitro and in vivo transplantation model, the genetical approach was also performed. The Parp1 knockout (KO) mice were crossed with BCR-ABL1 Tg mice. Then, Leukemia development and subsequent mouse death were observed. In vitro, HR activity was examined using DR-GFP assay. Genomic instability was investigated using the breakage-fusion-bridge (BFB) generation.Maintenance of HSC as a progenitor of the leukemic cell was analyzed by repopulation activity using colony assay. The growth-inhibitory effect was assessed using BCR-ABL positive cell lines with PARPi and PI3K inhibitor. Results: BCR-ABL1 Tg mice derived MNC showed more hypersensitivity to PARPi. Mouse HCS was infected with BCR-ABL1 expressing retrovirus and transplanted lethally Olaparib or vehicle was administrated intraperitoneal injection one day after transplantation. BCR-ABL1 mediated leukemic death was observed 1 month after transplantation in sham-treated mouse, whereas, Olaparib treated mouse did not develop BCR-ABL1 mediated leukemia. Parp1 KO BCR-ABL1 Tg mice attenuated leukemia development and extended their survival compared with BCR-ABL1 Tg mice. In vitro experiment revealed HR activity was down-regulated by BCR-ABL1 expression in DR-GFP assay. The number of BFB generation was increased in BCR-ABL1 Tg with Parp1 KO background. The colony-forming activity of BCR-ABL1 positive HSC was totally abolished by PARP inhibition after 3 times serial replating, whereas sham-treated HSC retained repopulation activity. However, the effect of PARPi on BCR-ABL positive leukemic cell lines was controversial. Therefore, leukemic cell lines were treated with the PARPi and inhibitors toward the molecules associated with PARPi resistance. As a result, a combination of PARPi with PI3K inhibitor effectively induce cell death in PARPi resistant BCR-ABL1 positive leukemic cell lines. Conclusion and discussion: Tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) is the gold standard of the therapeutic option of BCR-ABL1 positive leukemia. However, TKI monotherapy is not sufficient for complete eradication of leukemic cells. It is highly expected that molecules effectively induce cell death to leukemic cells combined with TKI. PARPi would be one of these candidates. However, PARPi could not induces efficient death in all of the cancer cells that carry the mutation of molecules associated with the HR defect. Comprehensive genetic analysis to reveal PARPi resistance is important for HRR defective cancer cells. Combination therapy of PARPi and inhibitorstoward the molecules associated with PARPi resistance would be a good therapeutic option for Ph1 positive leukemia. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Efficacy and Biomarker Analysis of Adavosertib in Differentiated Thyroid Cancer

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (14) ◽  
pp. 3487
Author(s):  
Yu-Ling Lu ◽  
Ming-Hsien Wu ◽  
Yi-Yin Lee ◽  
Ting-Chao Chou ◽  
Richard J. Wong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Thyroid Cancer ◽  
Cell Lines ◽  
Differentiated Thyroid Cancer ◽  
Xenograft Model ◽  
In Vivo Studies ◽  
Follicular Thyroid Cancer ◽  
Biomarker Analysis ◽  
Cancer Tumor

Differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) patients are usually known for their excellent prognoses. However, some patients with DTC develop refractory disease and require novel therapies with different therapeutic mechanisms. Targeting Wee1 with adavosertib has emerged as a novel strategy for cancer therapy. We determined the effects of adavosertib in four DTC cell lines. Adavosertib induces cell growth inhibition in a dose-dependent fashion. Cell cycle analyses revealed that cells were accumulated in the G2/M phase and apoptosis was induced by adavosertib in the four DTC tumor cell lines. The sensitivity of adavosertib correlated with baseline Wee1 expression. In vivo studies showed that adavosertib significantly inhibited the xenograft growth of papillary and follicular thyroid cancer tumor models. Adavosertib therapy, combined with dabrafenib and trametinib, had strong synergism in vitro, and revealed robust tumor growth suppression in vivo in a xenograft model of papillary thyroid cancer harboring mutant BRAFV600E, without appreciable toxicity. Furthermore, combination of adavosertib with lenvatinib was more effective than either agent alone in a xenograft model of follicular thyroid cancer. These results show that adavosertib has the potential in treating DTC.

TAMI-73. GLIOBLASTOMA CELL POPULATIONS WITH DISTINCT ONCOGENIC PROGRAMS RELEASE PODOPLANIN AS PROCOAGULANT EXTRACELLULAR VESICLES

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi213-vi213
Author(s):  
Nadim Tawil ◽  
Rayhaan Bassawon ◽  
Brian Meehan ◽  
Laura Montermini ◽  
Ali Nehme ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Cells ◽  
Cell Lines ◽  
Extracellular Vesicles ◽  
Glioblastoma Cell ◽  
Activation Markers ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Gradient Fractionation ◽  
D Dimer

Abstract BACKGROUND Vascular anomalies, including thrombosis, are a hallmark of glioblastoma (GBM) and an aftermath of dysregulated cancer cell genome and epigenome. Up-regulation of podoplanin (PDPN) by cancer cells has recently been linked to an increased risk of venous thromboembolism in glioblastoma patients. Thus, regulation of this platelet activating protein by transforming events and release from cancer cells is of considerable interest. AIMS I. Investigate the pattern of PDPN expression and characterize PDPN-expressing cellular populations in GBM. II. Evaluate the contribution of oncogenic drivers to PDPN expression in GBM models. III. Investigate the potential involvement of extracellular vesicles (EVs) as a mechanism for systemic dissemination of PDPN and tissue factor (TF). IV. Examine the role of PDPN in intratumoral and systemic thrombosis. METHODS Bioinformatics (single-cell and bulk transcriptome data mining), GBM cell lines and stem cell lines, xenograft models in mice, ELISA assays for PDPN and TF, platelet (PF4) and clotting activation markers (D-dimer), EV electron microscopy, density gradient fractionation, and nano-flow cytometry. RESULTS PDPN is expressed by distinct glioblastoma cell subpopulations (mesenchymal) and downregulated by oncogenic mutations of EGFR and IDH1 genes, via changes in chromatin modifications (EZH2) and DNA methylation, respectively. GBM cells exteriorize PDPN and/or TF as cargo of exosome-like EVs shed both in vitro and in vivo. Injection of glioma PDPN-EVs activates platelets. Increase of platelet activation (PF4) or coagulation markers (D-dimer) occurs in mice harboring the corresponding glioma xenografts expressing PDPN or TF, respectively. Co-expression of PDPN and TF by GBM cells cooperatively increases tumor microthrombosis. CONCLUSION Distinct cellular subsets drive multiple facets of GBM-associated thrombosis and may represent targets for diagnosis and intervention. We suggest that the preponderance of PDPN expression as a risk factor in glioblastoma and the involvement of platelets may merit investigating anti-platelets for potential inclusion in thrombosis management in GBM.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document