scholarly journals DIPG-55. PATTERNS OF CEREBROSPINAL FLUID DIVERSION AND SURVIVAL IN CHILDREN WITH DIFFUSE INTRINSIC PONTINE GLIOMA: A REPORT FROM THE INTERNATIONAL DIPG REGISTRY

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. iii297-iii298
Author(s):  
Tabitha Cooney ◽  
Mariko DeWire-Schottmiller ◽  
Adam Lane ◽  
Raya Saab ◽  
Pratiti Bandopadhayay ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Survival Data ◽  
Clinical Symptoms ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Glioma ◽  
Pontine Glioma ◽  
Exact Test ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Csf Diversion

Abstract There is no standard of care for cerebrospinal (CSF) diversion in children with diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG), nor understanding of survival impact. We evaluated CSF diversion characteristics in children with DIPG to determine incidence, indications and potential impact on survival. Data was extracted from subjects registered in the International DIPG registry (IDIPGR). IDIPGR team personnel obtained clinical and radiographic data from the registry database and when appropriate, abstracted additional data from individual medical records. Univariable analyses were performed using the Fisher’s exact test or Wilcoxon rank sum test. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Evaluable patients (n=457) met criteria for DIPG diagnosis by central radiology review. Ninety-two patients (20%) had permanent CSF diversion. Indications for permanent diversion were hydrocephalus (41%), hydrocephalus and clinical symptoms (35%), and clinical symptoms alone (3%). Those with permanent diversion were significantly younger at diagnosis than those without diversion (median 5.3 years vs 6.9 years, p=0.0002), otherwise no significant differences in gender, race, or treatment were found. The progression-free and overall survival of those with permanent CSF diversion compared to those without permanent diversion was 4.5 and 10.9 months vs 6.9 and 11.2 months, respectively (p=0.001, p= 0.4). There was no significant difference in overall survival in patients with or without permanent CSF diversion among a large cohort of DIPG patients. Patients without permanent diversion had significantly prolonged progression free survival compared to those with permanent diversion. The qualitative risks and benefits of permanent CSF diversion need to be further evaluated.

Updated predictive analysis of the WHO-defined molecular subgroups of low-grade gliomas within the high-risk treatment arms of NRG Oncology/RTOG 9802.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2002-2002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erica Hlavin Bell ◽  
Minhee Won ◽  
Jessica L. Fleming ◽  
Aline P. Becker ◽  
Joseph P. McElroy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Survival Data ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Low Grade Gliomas ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Post Hoc

2002 Background: This study sought to update the predictive significance of the three WHO-defined molecular glioma subgroups ( IDHwt, IDHmt/noncodel, and IDHmt/codel) in the subset of specimens available for analysis in NRG Oncology/RTOG 9802, a phase III trial of high-risk low-grade gliomas (LGGs) treated with radiation (RT) with and without PCV after biopsy/surgical resection. Notably, this is the first phase III study to evaluate the predictive value of the WHO subgroups in LGGs using prospectively-collected, well-annotated long-term overall survival data, in a post-hoc analysis. Methods: IDH1/2 mutation status was determined by immunohistochemistry and/or next-generation sequencing. 1p/19q status was determined by Oncoscan and/or 450K methylation data. Treatment effects on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) by marker status were determined by the Cox proportional hazard model and tested using the log-rank test in a secondary and exploratory analysis. Results: Of all the randomized eligible high-risk G2 patients (N = 251) in NRG Oncology/RTOG 9802, 106(42%) patients had tissue available with sufficient quality DNA for profiling. Of these, 80(75%) were IDHmut; 43(41%) were IDHmut/non-co-deleted, 37(35%) were IDHmut/co-deleted, and 26(24%) were IDHwt. Upon univariate analyses, no significant difference in either PFS or OS was observed with the addition of PCV in the IDHwt subgroup. Both the IDHmut/non-co-deleted and IDHmut/co-deleted subgroups were significantly correlated with longer PFS (HR = 0.32; p = 0.003; HR = 0.13; p < 0.001) and OS (HR = 0.38; p = 0.013; HR = 0.21; p = 0.029) in the RT plus PCV arm, respectively. Conclusions: Our analyses suggest that both IDHmut/non-co-deleted and IDHmut/co-deleted subgroups received benefit from treatment with PCV although sample size is limited and analyses are post-hoc. Our results also support the notion that IDHwt high-risk LGG patients do not benefit from the addition of PCV to RT. Funding: U10CA180868, U10CA180822, and U24CA196067. Also, R01CA108633, R01CA169368, RC2CA148190, U10CA180850-01, BTFC, OSU-CCC (all to AC). Clinical trial information: NCT00003375.

scholarly journals DIPG-77. TREATMENT EXTENT AND THE EFFECT ON SURVIVAL IN DIFFUSE INTRINSIC PONTINE GLIOMA

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. iii302-iii302
Author(s):  
Joshua Baugh ◽  
Niclas Colditz ◽  
Geert Janssens ◽  
Stefan Dietzsch ◽  
Darren Hargrave ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Glioma ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Front Line ◽  
Pontine Glioma ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
Respective Treatment ◽  
Radiotherapy Alone ◽  
Radio Chemotherapy

Abstract BACKGROUND Front line radiotherapy for diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) remains the only standard of care. Is this still appropriate? PATIENTS AND METHODS We examined survival outcomes across six treatment modalities including I) no treatment (n=19), II) radiotherapy alone (n=38), III) radio-chemotherapy (n=101), IV) radiotherapy and relapse chemotherapy (n=35), V) radio-chemotherapy and relapse chemotherapy (n=163), and VI) radio-chemotherapy and relapse chemotherapy, plus reirradiation (n=54). Data were collected retrospectively using the Society of Pediatric Oncology and Hematology (GPOH) and the SIOPE DIPG Registry. 410 patients were included with radiologically centrally reviewed DIPG, mostly unbiopsied. Of note, the untreated patients and radiotherapy only cohorts chose limited treatment voluntarily. RESULTS Median overall survival (MOS) of the whole cohort was 11 months and progression free survival (PFS) 7 months. PFS was not significantly different between the treatment groups. OS and post-progression survival (PPS) were significantly different between cohorts. For the respective treatment groups, median OS was 3 months (I), 7 months (II), 8 months (III), 13 months (IV), 13 months (V), and 15 months (VI). For only front line vs at least one second line therapy, MOS was 8 months vs 14 months and PPS 2 months vs 5 months. CONCLUSIONS Although subject to biases to some extent, it seems that additional therapies beyond radiation therapy are of benefit to extending survival in DIPG patients. This is at least partially caused by the introduction of reirradiation regimens. To what extent other therapies contribute to survival and quality of life is subject to further investigation.

Retrospective analysis of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) patients treated initially with BCNU compared to temozolomide (TMZ) with concomitant radiation therapy

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2071-2071
Author(s):  
M. Vinjamuri ◽  
R. Adumala ◽  
R. Altaha ◽  
J. Hobbs ◽  
E. Crowell
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Retrospective Analysis ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Survival Curves ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Significant Difference

2071 Background: TMZ and radiation as initial treatment has become the standard of care for GBM. There are no randomized studies comparing TMZ to BCNU in GBM. Methods: We did a retrospective analysis of all 100 GBM patients (pts) diagnosed by our pathology department in the last 10 years. 20 pts were excluded, in 12 pts no chemotherapy was given and there was no data available for 8 pts. BCNU treatment was given in earlier years than TMZ generally. Overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS) and four prognostic factors were compared between BCNU and TMZ treated groups. Results: Results show that there is no significant difference in OS and PFS between the two groups. Survival curves were superimposable. This is despite the fact that tumor size and ECOG performance status were worse, though not significantly so in the BCNU group. Age was the only variable that correlated with survival. After correcting for age there was still no difference in PFS and OS between the BCNU and TMZ group. Conclusions: Our study fails to shows superiority of TMZ over BCNU despite the fact that the BCNU group had worse prognostic factors. A randomized comparison of these two agents seems justifiable. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.

scholarly journals DIPG-84. COMPLEMENTARY AND ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE IN DIFFUSE INTRINSIC PONTINE GLIOMA

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. iii303-iii304
Author(s):  
Fatma El-Khouly ◽  
Syed Adil ◽  
Harry Hendrikse ◽  
Gertjan Kaspers ◽  
Christof Kramm ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Alternative Medicine ◽  
Complementary And Alternative Medicine ◽  
Online Survey ◽  
Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Glioma ◽  
Survey Study ◽  
Pontine Glioma ◽  
Anticancer Effects ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Cam Use ◽  
Complementary And Alternative

Abstract INTRODUCTION Diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) is a rare and aggressive childhood brainstem malignancy with a two-year survival rate of ≤10%. In this international survey study we aim to evaluate the use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) in this patient population. METHODS Parents of-, and physicians treating DIPG patients were asked to participate in a retrospective online survey with questions regarding CAM use during time of illness. RESULTS 120 parents and 75 physicians contributed to the online survey between January and May 2020. Physicians estimated that &lt;50% of their patients used CAM, whereas 69% of the parents reported to have used CAM to treat their child during time of illness. Cannabis was the most widely used form of CAM, followed by vitamins and minerals, melatonin, curcumin and boswellic acid. CAM was mainly used to actively treat the tumor. Other motivations were to treat side effects of chemotherapy, or to comfort the child. Children diagnosed ≥2016 were more likely to use CAM (χ2=6.08, p=0.014). No significant difference was found between CAM users and non-users based on ethnicity (χ2=4.18, p=0.382) and country of residence (χ2=9.37, p=0.154). Almost 50% of the physicians do not frequently ask their patients about possible CAM use. CONCLUSION This survey demonstrates that worldwide a considerable number of DIPG patients use CAM. Physicians should be more aware of potential CAM use and more actively discuss the topic. More research is needed to gain knowledge about possible anticancer effects of CAM and their interactions with conventional therapies.

scholarly journals Evaluation of efficacy and toxicity of nivolumab combined with or without docetaxel in patients with advanced NSCLC

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yang Wang ◽  
Jun Nie ◽  
Ling Dai ◽  
Weiheng Hu ◽  
Jie Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Meaningful Improvement ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Doublet Chemotherapy ◽  
Platinum Doublet

Abstract Background The combination of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor and chemotherapy has been clinically confirmed to be beneficial as the first-line treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC. This study aimed to assess the effect of nivolumab + docetaxel versus nivolumab monotherapy in patients with NSCLC after the failure of platinum doublet chemotherapy. Materials and methods The efficacy and toxicity of nivolumab + docetaxel combination therapy versus nivolumab monotherapy were compared in this retrospective study. Primary endpoint of the study was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and toxicity. Results Between November 2017 and December 2019, 77 patients were included in this study, with 58 patients in the nivolumab group and 19 in the nivolumab + docetaxel group. The median follow-up was 18 months, and the PFS was 8 months for patients receiving nivolumab + docetaxel and 2 months for those receiving nivolumab alone (p = 0.001), respectively. Nivolumab + docetaxel showed superior OS compared with nivolumab, with the median OS unreached versus 7 months (p = 0.011). Among patients without EGFR/ALK variation, compared to nivolumab monotherapy, nivolumab + docetaxel showed better PFS (p = 0.04) and OS (p  = 0.05). There was no significant difference in grade 3–4 adverse events (AEs) between the two groups (p = 0.253). Conclusions The combination of nivolumab and docetaxel demonstrated a meaningful improvement in progression-free survival and overall survival compared to nivolumab monotherapy, in patients with NSCLC after the failure of platinum doublet chemotherapy, irrespective of EGFR/ALK variation status.

scholarly journals Are Hormonal Agents Better Than Chemo İn Metastati̇c Castrati̇on Resistant Prostate Cancer?

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Serkan Yıldırım ◽  
Atike Pınar ERDOĞAN ◽  
Cengiz Yılmaz ◽  
Ferhat Ekinci ◽  
Gülcan Bulut ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Therapy Group ◽  
Hormonal Treatment ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Chemotherapy Group ◽  
Randomized Controlled Studies ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Hormonal Therapies ◽  
Multi Center Study

Abstract İNTRODUCTİONIn this study, we aim to determine which treatment is more appropriate in castration-resistant chemotherapy-naive patients. Therefore, docetaxel and agents active in the androgen pathway (abiraterone and enzalutamide) were compared retrospectively in patients progressing on ADT.MATERİAL METHODThe study was designed as a retrospective and multi-center study. Patients from 5 centers in Turkey were included in the study. The primary endpoint of the study was ovreall survival and the secondary endpoint was progression-free survival.RESULTSMedian overall survival of the chemotherapy group was 18.66 months, it was 16.26 months in the hormonal treatment group. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups (p = 0.311). Median progression-free survival of the chemotherapy group was 5.6 months, while it was 9 months in the hormonal therapy group. There was statistically significant difference between the groups (p = 0.024).CONCLUSİONThere was statistical difference in progression-free survival in favor of hormonal therapies in our study. The difference did not reflect on overall survival and there was no difference between hormonal therapies and docetaxel. Heterogeneity in the selection of patients is considered to lead to this result; however, larger randomized controlled studies are needed to determine the most appropriate treatment in these patients.

Ventricular size determination and management of ventriculomegaly and hydrocephalus in patients with diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma: an institutional experience

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Adriana Fonseca ◽  
Palma Solano ◽  
Vijay Ramaswamy ◽  
Uri Tabori ◽  
Annie Huang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Glioma ◽  
Survival Advantage ◽  
Ventricular Size ◽  
Pontine Glioma ◽  
Asymptomatic Patients ◽  
Institutional Experience ◽  
Csf Diversion ◽  
The Impact

OBJECTIVE There is no consensus on the optimal clinical management of ventriculomegaly and hydrocephalus in patients with diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG). To date, the impact on survival in patients with ventriculomegaly and CSF diversion for hydrocephalus in this population remains to be elucidated. Herein, the authors describe their institutional experience. METHODS Patients diagnosed with DIPG and treated with up-front radiation therapy (RT) at The Hospital for Sick Children between 2000 and 2019 were identified. Images at diagnosis and progression were used to determine the frontal/occipital horn ratio (FOR) as a method to measure ventricular size. Patients with ventriculomegaly (FOR ≥ 0.36) were stratified according to the presence of symptoms and categorized as follows: 1) asymptomatic ventriculomegaly and 2) symptomatic hydrocephalus. For patients with ventriculomegaly who did not require CSF diversion, post-RT imaging was also evaluated to assess changes in the FOR after RT. Proportional hazards analyses were used to identify clinical and treatment factors correlated with survival. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to perform survival estimates, and the log-rank method was used to identify survival differences between groups. RESULTS Eighty-two patients met the inclusion criteria. At diagnosis, 28% (n = 23) of patients presented with ventriculomegaly, including 8 patients who had symptomatic hydrocephalus and underwent CSF diversion. A ventriculoperitoneal shunt was placed in the majority of patients (6/8). Fifteen asymptomatic patients were managed without CSF diversion. Six patients had resolution of ventriculomegaly after RT. Of 66 patients with imaging at the time of progression, 36 (55%) had ventriculomegaly, and 9 of them required CSF diversion. The presence of ventriculomegaly at diagnosis did not correlate with survival on univariate analysis. However, patients with symptomatic hydrocephalus at the time of progression who underwent CSF diversion had a survival advantage (p = 0.0340) when compared to patients with ventriculomegaly managed with conservative approaches. CONCLUSIONS Although ventriculomegaly can be present in up to 55% of patients with DIPG, the majority of patients present with asymptomatic ventriculomegaly and do not require surgical interventions. In some cases ventriculomegaly improved after medical management with steroids and RT. CSF diversion for hydrocephalus at the time of diagnosis does not impact survival. In contrast, our results suggest a survival advantage in patients who undergo CSF diversion for hydrocephalus at the time of progression, albeit that advantage is likely to be confounded by biological and individual patient factors. Further research in this area is needed to understand the best timing and type of interventions in this population.

scholarly journals P14.56 Recurrent Glioblastomas: Should we operate a second and even a third time

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. iii80-iii80
Author(s):  
M Yahia-Cherif ◽  
O De Witte ◽  
C Mélot ◽  
F Lefranc
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Survival Benefit ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Recurrent Glioblastoma ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Significant Survival ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Second Surgery ◽  
Second Resection ◽  
Initial Resection

Abstract BACKGROUND The aim of this study was i) to analyse the effect of repeat surgeries on the survival of patients with focally recurrent glioblastoma who have benefited from temozolomide treatment and ii) to identify potential prognostic factors for survival. MATERIAL AND METHODS Cases from 2005 to 2014 in the glioblastoma database of our department were retrospectively reviewed. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate overall survival (OS) as a function of time after one, two and three surgical resections. All patients received the standard of care after the first surgery (temozolomide during and after radiotherapy) and adjuvant treatment after repeat surgeries. RESULTS One hundred-thirty-two glioblastoma patients (median age: 57 years) were included in the study. Among them, 68, 53 and 11 patients underwent one, two and three surgical resections, respectively. The median OS was 11, 16 and 18 months, respectively, for patients who underwent one, two and three surgical resections. Patients who underwent two (p<0.001) or three (p<0.01) surgeries survived significantly longer than patients who underwent only one. No significant difference was observed between patients who underwent two versus three surgeries (p=0.76). A second resection performed more than 6 months after the initial resection was the only factor associated with prolonged survival (p=0.008). CONCLUSION Glioblastoma patients who benefited from temozolomide treatment and underwent surgery for recurrent glioblastoma exhibited a significant increase in survival compared with patients who did not undergo a second surgery. By contrast, a third surgery for a second recurrence did not contribute to any significant survival benefit.

scholarly journals A descriptive report of outcomes of primary mucinous ovarian cancer patients receiving either an adjuvant gynecologic or gastrointestinal chemotherapy regimen

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (5) ◽  
pp. 904-909
Author(s):  
Brooke A Schlappe ◽  
Qin C Zhou ◽  
Roisin O'Cearbhaill ◽  
Alexia Iasonos ◽  
Robert A Soslow ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Categorical Variables ◽  
Continuous Variables ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Exact Test ◽  
Clinical Criteria ◽  
Kaplan Meier

ObjectiveWe described progression-free survival and overall survival in patients with primary mucinous ovarian cancer receiving adjuvant gynecologic versus gastrointestinal chemotherapy regimens.MethodsWe identified all primary mucinous ovarian cancer patients receiving adjuvant gynecologic or gastrointestinal chemotherapy regimens at a single institution from 1994 to 2016. Gynecologic pathologists using strict pathologic/clinical criteria determined diagnosis. Adjuvant therapy was coded as gynecologic or gastrointestinal based on standard agents and schedules. Clinical/pathologic/treatment characteristics were recorded. Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used for continuous variables, and Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables. Progression-free and overall survival were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, applying landmark analysis.ResultsOf 62 patients identified, 21 received adjuvant chemotherapy: 12 gynecologic, 9 gastrointestinal. Median age (in years) at diagnosis: 58 (range 25–68) gynecologic cohort, 38 (range 32–68) gastrointestinal cohort (p=0.13). Median body mass index at first post-operative visit: 25 kg/m2(range 18–31) gynecologic cohort, 23 kg/m2(range 18–31) gastrointestinal cohort (p=0.23). History of smoking: 6/12 (50%) gynecologic cohort, 3/9 (33%) gastrointestinal cohort (p=0.66). Stage distribution in gynecologic and gastrointestinal cohorts, respectively: stage I: 9/12 (75%) and 3/9 (33%); stage II: 2/12 (17%) and 1/9 (11%); stage III: 1/12 (8%) and 5/9 (56%) (p=0.06). Grade distribution in gynecologic and gastrointestinal cohorts, respectively: grade 1: 8/12 (67%) and 1/9 (13%); grade 2/3: 4/12 (33%) and 7/9 (88%) (p=0.03). Three-year progression-free survival: 90.9% (95% CI 50.8% to 98.7 %) gynecologic, 53.3% (95% CI 17.7% to 79.6%) gastrointestinal. Three-year overall survival: 90.9% (95% CI 50.8% to 98.7%) gynecologic, 76.2% (95% CI 33.2% to 93.5%) gastrointestinal.ConclusionOngoing international collaborative research may further define associations between chemotherapy regimens and survival.

scholarly journals EPID-07. HEMATOLOGICAL ADVERSE EVENTS IN GLIOBLASTOMA PATIENTS TREATED WITH TEMOZOLOMIDE

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi75-vi76
Author(s):  
Catherine Garcia ◽  
Zin Myint ◽  
Rani Jayswal ◽  
Allison Butts ◽  
Heidi Weiss ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Protective Factor ◽  
Significant Proportion ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
History Of ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Severe Grade

Abstract BACKGROUND Temozolomide (TMZ) is the cornerstone for glioblastoma (GBM) treatment. A significant proportion of patients develops hematologic toxicities with limited investigations on outcomes and risk factors for their development. METHODS Our study combines data from the two largest group trials, RTOG 0525 and RTOG 0825, to analyze serious hematologic adverse events (HAE) associated with TMZ therapy for GBM. We analyzed frequency and outcomes of HAE during chemoradiation. RESULTS 1154 patients were evaluated with a median age of 57 years. Over 79% of patients developed HAE during the entire course of GBM treatment. During chemoradiation the most common HAE during chemoradiation was lymphopenia (41.5%), followed by thrombocytopenia (39.0%), and anemia (35.3%). Of these, 34.1% were severe (Grade 3 or 4) and 65.9% were mild (grade 1 or 2). During maintenance the most common HAE was leukopenia (50.7%), followed by neutropenia (50.4%), and lymphopenia (45.3%). MGMT methylation was not associated with HAEs. A history of HAEs during chemoradiation was a protective factor for developing HAEs during maintenance. MGMT methylated and age younger than 50 were protective factors for mortality. Patients that presented HAEs anytime during treatment had a longer overall survival and progression free survival. There was no significant difference in survival between mild or severe HAEs. CONCLUSION HAE are common during chemoradiation with TMZ for GBM, but are more commonly grade 1 or 2 per CTCAE. HAE during GBM treatment is associated with decreased progression free survival and overall survival.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document