scholarly journals 797. Infection Prevention and Control Training Needs and Preferences Among Frontline Health Professionals

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S494-S494
Author(s):  
Sarah Stream ◽  
M Salman Ashraf ◽  
Nada Fadul ◽  
Dan K German ◽  
Mounica Soma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prevention And Control ◽  
Infection Prevention ◽  
Online Survey ◽  
Rural Setting ◽  
High Yield ◽  
Infection Prevention And Control ◽  
Local Health ◽  
Training Topic ◽  
Peer Discussions ◽  
And Control

Abstract Background In 2020, the Nebraska Infection Control Assessment and Promotion program began collaborating with the Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services (NE DHHS) and the CDC to distribute infection prevention and control (IPC) training to frontline healthcare professionals (HCPs), focusing on nursing assistants (NAs), dentists, and other groups not traditionally targeted by IPC training. We conducted a learning needs assessment of these workers to plan high-yield curricula for each group. Methods We distributed an online survey to Nebraska’s frontline HCPs via local professional society email lists and the NE DHHS’s weekly newsletter. The survey asked respondents to identify their professional role, practice setting (urban vs suburban vs rural), preferred sources and formats of training, and perceived need for additional training across multiple IPC topics. Results 456 HCPs completed our survey, including 177 NAs, 72 nurses, and 59 dentists; most HCPs practiced in a rural setting (62%). HCPs viewed the CDC as the most trustworthy source of IPC training (92% trusted, vs 71% for local health authorities, 64% for professional societies, and 43% for academic institutions); versus other respondents, NAs had substantially lower trust in all groups except the CDC. Respondents were more often interested in self-paced learning (63%) or interactive discussion with experts (53%) versus peer discussions (40%) or lectures (34%). Compared with other respondents, dentists were least interested in peer discussions (27%) and NAs in lectures (15%). Triage and screening was the only IPC training topic a majority of all respondents (51%) requested, though majorities of nurses (58%) and dentists (51%) also wanted training on environmental cleaning. Hand hygiene (12%) and personal protective equipment use (27%) were the least requested IPC topics, especially among NAs (5% and 18%). Conclusion Nebraska’s frontline healthcare workers express high confidence in the CDC as a source of IPC training and prefer self-paced and expert discussion learning modalities. Key between-group differences indicate that individualizing curricula for NAs, dentists, and other HCPs may improve IPC training quality. Disclosures M. Salman Ashraf, MBBS, Merck & Co. Inc (Grant/Research Support, I have recieved grant funding for an investigator initiated research project from Merck & Con. Inc. However, I do not see any direct conflict of interest related to the submitted abstract) Nicolas W. Cortes-Penfield, MD, Nothing to disclose

scholarly journals Knowledge, Attitude and Practice of healthcare workers Towards Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 293-300 ◽  
Author(s):  
Prabina Ghimire ◽  
Samriddh Dhungel ◽  
Anil Pokhrel
Keyword(s):  
Prevention And Control ◽  
Healthcare Workers ◽  
Infection Prevention ◽  
Online Survey ◽  
Health Concern ◽  
Infection Prevention And Control ◽  
Attitudes And Practices ◽  
Attitude And Practice ◽  
And Control ◽  
Knowledge Attitude And Practice

Background: The emergence of SARS-CoV 2 pandemic is the greatest public health concern of the century. Healthcare workers are the front liners of pandemic management. Their knowledge, attitudes and practices can influence the outcome of pandemic. The study aims to determine the knowledge, attitude and practices among healthcare workers.Methods: Knowledge, attitude and practice related questionnaire based online survey through Google forms was conducted from Healthcare workers, following ethical approval from NHRC (ERB protocol registration number: 297/2020 P). Online forms were disseminated via Facebook, Instagram, Whatsapp, Viber and personal messaging. Responses containing anonymized data was collected analyzed in using SPSS-version 26, (Year: 2019). The results were interpreted in terms of percentage response, knowledge score, and practice and discussed on the possible solutions in improving the infection prevention and control practice.Results: 473 HCWs responded to the questionnaire, out of which 426 responses met inclusion criteria which is 90% of the total responses. The mean score for knowledge was 3.20 + 1.15 out of maximum seven; with 45.7% correct answers. 70.4 % (300) participants felt that Nepal will be unable to contain the pandemic, 64 % of the total employed participants felt that there was inadequate institutional preparedness to protect HCWs from exposure. 91% participants reported practicing hand hygiene after every patient encounter; whereas 31.7% (77) and 22.1% (59) participants did not know how to check sealing of the N95 masks and use personal protective equipment’s respectively.Conclusions: The survey findings showed deficiencies in knowledge and appropriate practice among the HCWs, in prevention of SARS-CoV-2 transmission. Attitudes towards COVID19 were a mix of both positive and negative viewpoints. Even in health care workers with access to internet, there is significant gap in universal infection prevention and control practices required for self-protection and limiting untoward transmission. Keywords: Attitude and practice; COVID-19; healthcare workers; infection prevention and control; knowledge, Nepal; SARS CoV 2

Hospital and community infection prevention and control (IPC)

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Shears ◽  
Andrea Ledgerton ◽  
Rita Huyton
Keyword(s):  
Hand Hygiene ◽  
Prevention And Control ◽  
Infection Prevention ◽  
Infection Prevention And Control ◽  
Protective Equipment ◽  
Local Health ◽  
Community Settings ◽  
Infection Surveillance ◽  
And Control ◽  
Community Infection

This chapter outlines the key principles of infection prevention and control (IPC) in both hospital and community settings. This includes understanding the structures surrounding infection prevention and control in these two different environments. It outlines some of the practical components including hand hygiene, infection surveillance, personal protective equipment, decontamination, and policies and guidelines. The chapter also covers the investigation and management of clusters/outbreak, and provides an outline of situations that require local health protection team input. Finally, the interface between community and hospital IPC is discussed, along with the importance of providing a seamless IPC service in all geographical areas.

scholarly journals Personal protective equipment and infection prevention and control: a national survey of UK medical students and interim foundation doctors during the COVID-19 pandemic

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emma Jane Norton ◽  
Ioannis Georgiou ◽  
Alex Fung ◽  
Armin Nazari ◽  
Soham Bandyopadhyay ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Medical Students ◽  
Personal Protective Equipment ◽  
Prevention And Control ◽  
Infection Prevention ◽  
Online Survey ◽  
Infection Prevention And Control ◽  
Protective Equipment ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Multi Centre Study ◽  
And Control

Abstract Background The adequacy of personal protective equipment (PPE) and infection prevention and control (IPC) training in UK medical students and interim Foundation Year 1 (FiY1) doctors during the COVID-19 pandemic is unknown, as is its impact on COVID-19-related anxiety. Methods Cross-sectional, multi-centre study analysing self-reported adequacy of PPE and IPC training and correlation to a modified pandemic anxiety scale. Participants were current medical students and FiY1 doctors in the UK. Data were collected by an online survey. Results Participants reported that they received insufficient PPE information (43%) and IPC training (56%). Significantly, fewer participants identifying as women or BAME/mixed ethnicity reported receiving sufficient PPE information, compared with those identifying as men and White British/White Other, respectively. COVID-19-related anxiety was significantly higher in those without sufficient reported PPE or IPC training, in women compared with men, and in FiY1 doctors compared with medical students. Conclusions With medical students currently volunteering in and imminently returning to hospitals in an educational capacity, levels of self-reported PPE and IPC training are sub-optimal. Better training is paramount to avoid harm to patients and healthcare professionals and to reduce COVID-19-related anxiety among medical students and FiY1 doctors.

scholarly journals Psychological Distress During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Ethiopia: The Need for Equal Attention of Intervention

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Argaw Ambelu ◽  
Zewdie Birhanu ◽  
Yimenu Yitayih ◽  
Yohannes Kebede ◽  
Mohammed Mecha ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Psychological Distress ◽  
Prevention And Control ◽  
Infection Prevention ◽  
Online Survey ◽  
Control Measures ◽  
Infection Prevention And Control ◽  
High Psychological Distress ◽  
Prevention And Control Measures ◽  
Middle Aged Adults ◽  
And Control

Abstract Background: The COVID-19 pandemic led individuals to suffer from different levels of mental health problems such as psychological distress, anxiety, depression, denial, panic, and fear. This study aimed at determining the prevalence of psychological distress and associated factors among the Ethiopian population during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods:A cross-sectional study was performed through an online survey using different online platforms. The questionnaire was created through Google Form and the survey link was administered by e-mail,LinkedIn,Telegram, and Facebook. Educated Ethiopian population who have access to the internet were invited to participate through an online survey and addressed to 929respondents. The psychological distress was assessed using the Kessler 10 item tool to measure psychological distress. Data were analyzed using SPSS andlogistic regression to examine mutually adjusted associations, expressed as adjusted odds ratios.A generalized additive model was also employed to identify additional predictors using R.Results:The prevalence of high psychological distress among the study population was 236(25.5%). Of all respondents, 421(45.1%) had low psychological distress, 274(29.4%) had moderate psychological distress, 164 (17.6%) had high psychological distress, and 72 (7.3%) had very high psychological distress.Psychological distress increased with being at young and middle-aged adults, getting information from social media, and not correctlypracticing infection prevention and control measures to prevent COVID-19 infection. Respondents with high perceived severity had increased psychological distress. On the contrary, those with the highest score of perceived response efficacy had low distress.Conclusion:Prevalence of psychological distress was substantial. Intervention of psychological distress is critically essential. The intervention target groupsare those whose information sourcesare from social media, young and middle-aged adults, and those who do not properly practice infection prevention and control measures to COVID-19 infection.

scholarly journals 1200. Parent Perspectives on Infection Prevention and Control in the NICU

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S431-S431
Author(s):  
Michelle Science ◽  
Sarah Khan ◽  
Callum Arnold ◽  
Pablo J Sanchez ◽  
Kyong-soon Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prevention And Control ◽  
Neonatal Intensive Care ◽  
Infection Prevention ◽  
Online Survey ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Infection Prevention And Control ◽  
Resistant Organism ◽  
Missed Opportunities ◽  
Common Information ◽  
And Control

Abstract Background Infants admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) are at high risk for healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) due to their immature immune systems and need for invasive devices. Parents have frequent contact with their infants and present an opportunity for prevention practices. The objective of this study was to evaluate parental opinions related to infection prevention and control (IPAC) in the NICU. Methods An online survey was sent to a network of 2,000 parents from the Canadian Premature Babies Foundation. The survey included questions about patient-centered outcomes, IPAC practices experienced during their infants’ NICU admission, and specifically, opinions regarding nonsterile glove use by both healthcare workers (HCWs) and parents. Results A total of 72 parents responded to the survey. The majority were parents of infants born at less than 37 weeks (94%) and had been admitted to an NICU after 2010 (89%). When asked about preventing infections in the NICU, 82% of parents indicated they had been given information on how the NICU prevents infection and 96% had been told how they can prevent infection in their infant (Table 1). The most common information was related to hand hygiene (96%) and what to do if they were unwell (89%). Opportunities for improvement included being bare below the elbow, nail care, and feeding human milk. With respect to IPAC outcomes of interest, 96% agreed that it was important to study interventions to reduce bloodstream infections (BSIs). Other outcomes of interest (Table 2) included necrotizing enterocolitis (72%), antibiotic-resistant organism acquisition (69%), and length of stay (67%). With respect to glove use, 89% of parents felt that it was acceptable for HCWs to wear gloves when caring for their infant. Only 37% of parents indicated that they would want to wear gloves if HCWs were wearing gloves, but 47% would consider wearing gloves if there was evidence that it reduced infection in their infant. Conclusion Reducing infections, specifically BSIs, in infants admitted to the NICU is an outcome of interest for parents. Nonsterile gloving by HCWs is considered an acceptable strategy by parents to reduce infections. Missed opportunities exist for the education of parents in the NICU on IPAC practices. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

scholarly journals Infection Prevention and Control Measures for COVID-19 among Medical Staff in Nineveh Governorate, Iraq.

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sharef Al-Mulaabed ◽  
Zakria A Kassim ◽  
Saif W Younis ◽  
Ali A Abutiheen
Keyword(s):  
Medical Staff ◽  
Prevention And Control ◽  
Infection Prevention ◽  
Online Survey ◽  
Total Sample ◽  
Control Measures ◽  
Infection Prevention And Control ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Head Cover ◽  
And Control

Background: COVID-19 is a global pandemic that was first reported in Iraq on 24th February 2020, while it appeared in Nineveh on March 22nd, 2020. Infection prevention and control (IPC) is so important to minimize the risk of spreading infections.   Objectives: To assess the adherence to IPC measures among medical staff working in Nineveh governorate during COVID-19 pandemic.   Methods: A cross sectional study, using an online survey sent to different medical staff in Nineveh. The questionnaire was composed of two parts, the first included demographic information, and the second covered IPC measures. Survey was completed by medical staff witnessed COVID-19 pandemic in Nineveh governorate.   Results: The total sample was 412, of whom, 316 (77%) were males and 142 (35%) were physicians. Overall, the percentage of staff following different IPC measures was ranging from 31 % in wearing head cover, to 97% in keeping clean hands constantly. Main missed points were found in respiratory hygiene, physical distancing and self-isolation. Females were more likely to apply bandages to wounds and wearing gloves before examining patients. Compared to other medical staff, physicians were less compliant to washing hands, putting waste in designated places and wearing protective cloths. Those who work in hospitals were better compliant with sterilizing hands before entering home.   Conclusion: The adherence to IPC measures was ranging from less than one-half in wearing sterile head cover, to nearly all respondents in keeping clean hands. There is a great need to provide support as well as training in regards to IPC in Nineveh governorate city.

scholarly journals Experience and Perspectives of Infection Prevention Staff of the COVID-19 Response in Australian Hospitals

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alisha Baswa ◽  
Andrew Stewardson ◽  
Darshini Ayton ◽  
Phillip Russo ◽  
Joseph Doyle
Keyword(s):  
Prevention And Control ◽  
Infection Prevention ◽  
Online Survey ◽  
Guideline Implementation ◽  
Work Conditions ◽  
Infection Prevention And Control ◽  
Sufficient Information ◽  
Sources Of Information ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
And Control

Abstract Background Hospital infection prevention and control (IPC) staff have played a key role in adapting and implementing jurisdictional COVID-19 policy during the current pandemic. We aimed to describe the experiences of IPC staff in Australian hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic to inform future pandemic preparedness plans.Methods A cross-sectional study involving an online survey distributed to IPC practitioners employed in Australian hospitals. Survey content was informed by in-depth interviews, and addressed work conditions, redeployed workforce, personal protective equipment, communication, and guidelines. Participants were recruited through the mailing lists of Australasian College of Infection Prevention and Control and the Australasian Society of Infectious Diseases.Results We received fully or partially completed responses from 160 participants, including 38 (24%) and 122 (76%) with nursing and medical backgrounds, respectively. Respondents reported access to sufficient information about PPE (75%, 114/152), PPE was of sufficient quantity (77%, 117/152) and was of sufficient quality (70%, 106/152). Barriers to infection prevention guideline implementation included frequently changing guidelines (57%, 84/148), timing of updates (65%, 96/148) and contradictory sources of information (64%, 95/148). Respondents described a need for better communication channels from government authorities to hospital IPC teams. All respondents described an increase in workload leading to difficulty completing work (63%, 97/154) and feeling burnt out (48% 74/154)Conclusions These data identify avoidable barriers to implementation of COVID-19 infection prevention guidance in Australian hospitals. These findings can inform future national preparedness strategies.

scholarly journals Characteristics of On-Site Infection Prevention and Control Visits for COVID-19—California, February 2020–December 2020

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (S1) ◽  
pp. s50-s50
Author(s):  
Patrick Stendel ◽  
Ellora Karmarkar ◽  
Idamae Kennedy ◽  
Hosniyeh Bagheri ◽  
Teresa Nelson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prevention And Control ◽  
Infection Prevention ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Healthcare Facility ◽  
Source Control ◽  
Infection Prevention And Control ◽  
Local Health ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
California Department ◽  
And Control

Background: The novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic has caused significant morbidity and mortality in California: 2,218,000 cases and 24,598 deaths had occurred by December 31, 2020. Deaths at skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) and assisted living facilities (ALFs) comprise 26.2% of deaths in California; the fatality rate (299 per 10,000 SNF and ALF residents) in such facilities is nearly 50 times the statewide COVID-19 mortality rate (6.4 per 10,000 California residents). For healthcare facility (SNF, ALF, acute-care hospitals) and correctional facility outbreak management, the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAI) Program deployed trained infection preventionists (IPs) to perform on-site infection prevention and control (IPC) assessments and to provide recommendations to staff and local health departments (LHDs). We describe the number and distribution of visits across the state and common IPC challenges identified. Methods: From February 1, 2020, to December 31, 2020, CDPH IP visits were requested directly by facilities, coordinated through LHDs and other state agencies, or prompted by a facility’s increasing case count on twice weekly review of the daily California healthcare facility data survey (Survey 123). Deployed IPs evaluated facility COVID-19 IPC protocols, assessed facility staff adherence using a standardized assessment tool, and provided verbal feedback followed by written summary reports and recommendations. We categorized visits geographically into 5 California Health Officer Association regions and by month, and we reviewed visit reports for common findings. Results: In total, 623 visits were performed for 489 outbreaks at 465 distinct facilities across 46 LHDs; 71 facilities received ≥2 visits. Southern California facilities received 292 visits (46.9%), San Joaquin region facilities received 138 visits (22.2%), Bay Area facilities received 131 visits (21%), Greater Sacramento facilities received 54 visits (8.7%), and Rural North facilities received 8 visits (1.3%) (Figure 1). The highest number of visits per month occurred in December (n = 143, 22.9%), followed by July (n = 87, 13.9%), and April (n = 83, 13.3%). Common IPC challenges included inappropriate resident cohorting practices, improper use of personal protective equipment, and lapses in physical distancing, and source control in breakrooms. Conclusions: On-site visits by CDPH IPs during the COVID-19 pandemic in California, though resource-intensive, provided substantial technical support for healthcare facilities during outbreaks and identified key areas for IPC improvement. Ongoing CDPH HAI guidance and training materials for facility-based IP staff are now being informed by these IPC challenges.Funding: NoDisclosures: None

Surveying Cystic Fibrosis Care Centers to Assess Adoption of Infection Prevention and Control Recommendations

2018 ◽  
Vol 39 (6) ◽  
pp. 647-651 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa Saiman ◽  
Juyan J. Zhou ◽  
Xiaotong Jiang ◽  
Michael R. Kosorok ◽  
Marianne S. Muhlebach
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Cystic Fibrosis ◽  
Prevention And Control ◽  
Infection Prevention ◽  
Online Survey ◽  
The United States ◽  
Infection Prevention And Control ◽  
Educational Materials ◽  
English Speaking ◽  
And Control

OBJECTIVEIn 2013, the Cystic Fibrosis (CF) Foundation developed an updated guideline for infection prevention and control (IP&C) practices for CF. We sought to assess the adoption of specific recommendations by CF care centers.METHODSDirectors of the 277 CF care centers in the United States were asked to complete a confidential online survey regarding the adoption of selected IP&C recommendations. Selected recommendations were those we considered less likely to be incorporated into a center’s written IP&C policies.RESULTSCenter directors from 198 of 277 CF centers (71%) completed the survey between December 2015 and June 2016; pediatric and larger centers were more likely to do so. Overall, 70% have adopted ≥75% of the selected recommendations. As recommended, almost all provided education to CF center staff (98%) and patients and families (97%); fewer developed educational materials in collaboration with local IP&C teams (59%) and/or patients and families (37%). Among 108 centers with non–English-speaking patients, 65 (60%) provided educational materials in relevant languages. Most (74%) held group education events; of the 138 centers with in-person meetings, 45% allowed 1 individual with CF to attend, and 51% allowed no individuals with CF to attend. Most centers (93%) held outdoor events, and 84% allowed >1 individual with CF to attend. Audits of exam-room cleaning were performed by 49% of CF centers.CONCLUSIONSCystic fibrosis centers in the United States have adopted many of the recommendations addressed in this survey. Nonetheless, these findings suggest opportunities for improvement. More CF centers should provide education to non–English-speaking patients and families, and CF centers should perform audits of room cleaning.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2018;39:647–651

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document