scholarly journals 1728. Effectiveness and Healthcare Personnel (HCP) Perceptions of a Multi-Site Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) Free Zone Intervention

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S55-S56
Author(s):  
Lindsay Visnovsky ◽  
Diane Mulvey ◽  
Yue Zhang ◽  
Molly Leecaster ◽  
Curtis J Donskey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Healthcare Personnel ◽  
Resistant Bacteria ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Sociotechnical System ◽  
Contact Precautions ◽  
Free Zone ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Red Tape ◽  
Generalized Linear Mixed Effects ◽  
Acute Care Facilities

Abstract Background CDC provides guidelines for using contact precautions (CP) when caring for patients with antibiotic-resistant bacteria or Clostridium difficile. However, HCP frequently report discomfort, difficulty of use, and interrupted workflow with CP. Modifying CP guidelines to balance these issues requires testing to assess benefits and maintenance of safe practices. A promising approach using a “PPE Free Zone” strategy within rooms of patients in CP has not been well-studied. Methods The PPE Free Zone comprised a 3–6 foot area inside door thresholds of CP patient rooms denoted by red tape placed on the floor. Within the zone, HCP were not required to don PPE. HCP were considered compliant if they performed hand hygiene (HH) and donned appropriate PPE before crossing the zone. Observers at 6 acute care facilities (ACF) were trained on observing HCP HH and use of PPE with CP. Observations were made before and after implementation of a PPE Free Zone. Intervention ACF conducted observations on 8 intervention units and 6 nonintervention units. Models of overall compliance and entry HH compliance were constructed using a generalized linear-mixed effects model with a logistic link function. Pre-intervention observations from all 6 ACF and intervention phase observations from the 3 intervention ACF were used in models. Results We observed 4,510 room entries. HH adherence declined over time in both intervention and control units but declined less among intervention units from pre to post intervention (β: 0.71, P = 0.007, Figure 1). Stratified by precautions type, the effect of the PPE Free Zone on HH was only significant for rooms in enteric precautions (P < 0.001). Compliance with PPE use was not significantly different pre- versus postintervention (P = 0.133). When surveyed, HCP had positive views of the PPE Free Zone: 65% (n = 172) agreed or strongly agreed the zone facilitates communication with patients, permits checking on patients more frequently, and saves time [n = 169] (Figure 2). Conclusion Although HCP viewed the zone positively and it had a significant effect on HH in enteric precautions rooms, the zone did not improve PPE compliance. Future interventions in the ACF setting should consider the complex sociotechnical system factors influencing behavior change. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Effectiveness of a multisite personal protective equipment (PPE)–free zone intervention in acute care

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (7) ◽  
pp. 761-766 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lindsay D. Visnovsky ◽  
Yue Zhang ◽  
Molly K. Leecaster ◽  
Nasia Safdar ◽  
Lauren Barko ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Care ◽  
Personal Protective Equipment ◽  
Healthcare Personnel ◽  
Protective Equipment ◽  
Risk Area ◽  
Sociotechnical System ◽  
Contact Precautions ◽  
Free Zone ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Quasi Experimental

AbstractObjective:Determine the effectiveness of a personal protective equipment (PPE)-free zone intervention on healthcare personnel (HCP) entry hand hygiene (HH) and PPE donning compliance in rooms of patients in contact precautions.Design:Quasi-experimental, multicenter intervention, before-and-after study with concurrent controls.Setting:All patient rooms on contact precautions on 16 units (5 medical-surgical, 6 intensive care, 5 specialty care units) at 3 acute-care facilities (2 academic medical centers, 1 Veterans Affairs hospital). Observations of PPE donning and entry HH compliance by HCP were conducted during both study phases. Surveys of HCP perceptions of the PPE-free zone were distributed in both study phases.Intervention:A PPE-free zone, where a low-risk area inside door thresholds of contact precautions rooms was demarcated by red tape on the floor. Inside this area, HCP were not required to wear PPE.Results:We observed 3,970 room entries. HH compliance did not change between study phases among intervention units (relative risk [RR], 0.92; P = .29) and declined in control units (RR, 0.70; P = .005); however, the PPE-free zone did not significantly affect compliance (P = .07). The PPE-free zone effect on HH was significant only for rooms on enteric precautions (P = .008). PPE use was not significantly different before versus after the intervention (P = .15). HCP perceived the zone positively; 65% agreed that it facilitated communication and 66.8% agreed that it permitted checking on patients more frequently.Conclusions:HCP viewed the PPE-free zone favorably and it did not adversely affect PPE or HH compliance. Future infection prevention interventions should consider the complex sociotechnical system factors influencing behavior change.

scholarly journals 893. The SHIELD Orange County Project: A Decolonization Strategy in 35 Hospitals and Nursing Homes Reduces Multi-Drug-Resistant Organism (MDRO) Prevalence in a Southern California Region

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S23-S24
Author(s):  
James A McKinnell ◽  
Raveena Singh ◽  
Loren G Miller ◽  
Raheeb Saavedra ◽  
Lauren Heim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Homes ◽  
Resistant Organism ◽  
Equal Weight ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Contact Precautions ◽  
Acute Care Facilities ◽  
Southern California Region ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Patient movement between hospitals, nursing homes (NH), and long-term acute care facilities (LTACs) contributes to MDRO spread. SHIELD OC is a regional decolonization collaborative among adult facilities with high patient sharing designed to reduce countywide MDRO prevalence. We report pre- and post-intervention MDRO colonization prevalence. Methods Decolonization included chlorhexidine bath (CHG) (4% liquid or 2% cloth) and twice-daily nasal swab 10% povidone–iodine (PI). LTAC and NH used CHG for all baths and PI 5 days on admission and Monday–Friday every other week. Patients in contact precautions (CP) at hospitals had daily CHG and 5-days PI on admission. Point-prevalence screening for MRSA, VRE, ESBL, and CRE using nares, axilla/groin, and peri-rectal swabs was conducted pre-intervention (September 2016–March 2017) and post-intervention (August 2018–April 2019); 50 random LTAC and 50 CP hospitalized patients were sampled; for NH up to 50 were sampled at baseline and all residents post-intervention. Raw impact of the intervention was assessed by the average change in colonization prevalence, with each facility carrying equal weight. Generalized linear mixed models (GLM) stratified by facility type were used to assess the impact on MDRO colonization when clustering by facility. Results Across 35 facilities (16 hospitals, 16 NHs, 3 LTACs), the overall MDRO prevalence was reduced 22% in NHs (OR 0.58, P < 0.001), 34% LTACs (OR = 0.27, P < 0.001), and 11% CP patients (OR = 0.67, P < 0.001, Table 1). For MRSA, raw reductions were 31% NHs (OR = 0.58, P < 0.001), 39% LTACs (OR = 0.51, P = 0.01), and 3% CP patients (OR = 0.88, P = NS). For VRE, raw reductions were 40% NHs (OR = 0.62, P = 0.001), 55% LTACs (OR = 0.26, P < 0.001), and 15% CP patients (OR = 0.67, P = 0.004). For ESBLs, raw reductions were 24% NHs (OR = 0.65, P < 0.001), 34% LTACs (OR = 0.53, P = 0.01), and 26% CP patients (OR = 0.64, P < 0.001). For CRE, raw reductions were 24% NHs (OR = 0.70, P = NS), and 23% LTACs (OR = 0.75, P = NS). CRE increased by 26% in CP averaged across hospitals, although patient -level CRE declined 2.4% to 1.8% (OR = 0.74, P = NS). Conclusion MDRO carriage was common in highly inter-connected NHs, LTACs and hospitals. A regional collaborative of universal decolonization in long-term care and targeted decolonization of CP patients in hospitals led to sizeable reductions in MDRO carriage. Disclosures All Authors: No reported Disclosures.

scholarly journals Optimizing Contact Precautions to Curb the Spread of Antibiotic-resistant Bacteria in Hospitals: A Multicenter Cohort Study to Identify Patient Characteristics and Healthcare Personnel Interactions Associated With Transmission of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

2019 ◽  
Vol 69 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. S171-S177 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lyndsay M O’Hara ◽  
David P Calfee ◽  
Loren G Miller ◽  
Lisa Pineles ◽  
Laurence S Magder ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Healthcare Personnel ◽  
Resistant Bacteria ◽  
Bacterial Burden ◽  
Multicenter Cohort Study ◽  
Antibiotic Resistant ◽  
Contact Precautions ◽  
Multicenter Cohort

Abstract Background Healthcare personnel (HCP) acquire antibiotic-resistant bacteria on their gloves and gowns when caring for intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Yet, contact precautions for patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) remains controversial despite existing guidelines. We sought to understand which patients are more likely to transfer MRSA to HCP and to identify which HCP interactions are more likely to lead to glove or gown contamination. Methods This was a prospective, multicenter cohort study of cultured HCP gloves and gowns for MRSA. Samples were obtained from patients’ anterior nares, perianal area, and skin of the chest and arm to assess bacterial burden. Results Among 402 MRSA-colonized patients with 3982 interactions, we found that HCP gloves and gowns were contaminated with MRSA 14.3% and 5.9% of the time, respectively. Contamination of either gloves or gowns occurred in 16.2% of interactions. Contamination was highest among occupational/physical therapists (odds ratio [OR], 6.96; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.51, 13.79), respiratory therapists (OR, 5.34; 95% CI, 3.04, 9.39), and when any HCP touched the patient (OR, 2.59; 95% CI, 1.04, 6.51). Touching the endotracheal tube (OR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.38, 2.19), bedding (OR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.20, 1.70), and bathing (OR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.01, 1.75) increased the odds of contamination. We found an association between increasing bacterial burden on the patient and HCP glove or gown contamination. Conclusions Gloves and gowns are frequently contaminated with MRSA in the ICU. Hospitals may consider using fewer precautions for low-risk interactions and more for high-risk interactions and personnel.

scholarly journals 1837. Considerations for a Targeted Approach to Contact Precautions for Patients with MRSA in Hospitals: A Multicenter Cohort Study to Identify High-Risk Patient Characteristics and Healthcare Personnel Interactions

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S45-S45
Author(s):  
Lyndsay M O’Hara ◽  
David P Calfee ◽  
Loren G Miller ◽  
Lisa Harris ◽  
Laurence S Magder ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
High Risk ◽  
High Risk Patient ◽  
Healthcare Personnel ◽  
Resistant Bacteria ◽  
Bacterial Burden ◽  
Perianal Area ◽  
Multicenter Cohort Study ◽  
Contact Precautions ◽  
Multicenter Cohort

Abstract Background Healthcare personnel’s (HCP) gloves and gowns are frequently contaminated with antibiotic-resistant bacteria in the intensive care unit (ICU). Guidelines recommend contact precautions for patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA); however, this approach remains controversial. This study aimed to identify which patients are more likely to transfer MRSA to HCP gloves or gowns and to identify HCP interactions more likely to lead to glove or gown contamination. Methods In a multicenter cohort study of MRSA colonized patients, we observed HCP–patient interactions and cultured HCP’s gloves and gowns before doffing. We also assessed the association between bacterial burden and contamination by sampling patients’ anterior nares, perianal area, chest, and arm. Results We enrolled 402 MRSA-colonized patients and observed 3,982 HCP interactions. MRSA contamination of HCP gloves and gown occurred in 14.3% and 5.9% of interactions, respectively. Contamination of either gloves or gown occurred in 16.2% of interactions. Occupational/physical therapists had the highest rates of contamination (OR: 6.96 [95% CI: 3.51–13.79]), followed by respiratory therapists (OR: 5.34 [95% CI: 3.04–9.39]) when compared with the “Other” category. Touching the patient was associated with higher contamination (OR: 2.59 [95% CI: 1.04–6.51]) when compared with touching nothing in the room. Touching only the environment was not associated with glove or gown contamination (OR: 1.13 [95% CI: 0.43, 3.00]) when compared with touching nothing. Touching the endotracheal tube (OR: 1.75 [95% CI: 1.38–2.19]), bedding (OR: 1.43 [95% CI: 1.20–1.70]) and bathing a patient (OR: 1.32 [95% CI: 1.01–1.75]) increased odds of contamination when compared with not having such contacts (Figures 1 and 2). We found an association between increasing bacterial burden in the patient’s nares, perianal area, and chest skin and glove or gown contamination. Conclusion Contamination of HCP gloves and gowns with MRSA occurs frequently when caring for ICU patients. We identified interactions that are high-risk for transmission. Hospitals may consider optimizing contact precautions by using less precautions for low-risk interactions and more precautions for high-risk interactions. Disclosures All Authors: No reported Disclosures.

Evaluating the sustained effectiveness of a multimodal intervention aimed at influencing PIVC insertion practices in the emergency department

2020 ◽  
Vol 37 (7) ◽  
pp. 444-449
Author(s):  
Zheng Jie Lim ◽  
Daniel Nagle ◽  
Fern McAllan ◽  
Radha Ramanan ◽  
Claire Dendle ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Improve Patient Safety ◽  
Healthcare Personnel ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Healthcare Settings ◽  
Sustained Effect ◽  
Sustained Reduction ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Long Term Follow Up

IntroductionMultimodal interventions (MMI) are frequently used in various healthcare settings to encourage change in healthcare personnel practices and improve patient safety. In 2013, an MMI conducted in an Australian metropolitan ED used clinician champions, guidelines, education sessions and promotional materials to encourage a reduction in unused and inappropriate peripheral intravenous cannulas (PIVC). A 60-day postintervention demonstrated a successful reduction in the number of unused PIVCs without changes in appropriate insertions. We aimed to investigate if this MMI produced a sustained effect in reducing the frequency of unused PIVCs inserted in this ED.MethodsA single-centre retrospective cohort study of adult patients presenting to the above ED in Victoria, Australia, was conducted in April 2018. A random sample of 380 patients with a PIVC inserted in ED was assessed to determine if the PIVC was used (termed ‘Long-term follow-up’). The appropriateness of unused PIVCs was assessed. Our findings were compared with previously collected data in 2013 (‘Pre-Intervention’ and ‘Immediately Post-Intervention’) to determine a sustained reduction in the frequency of unused PIVC insertions was achieved. Long-term analysis of the MMI, including the overall frequency of PIVC insertions in ED before and after the MMI, was also collected.ResultsIn our Long-term follow-up cohort, 101 of 373 (27.1%, 95% CI 22.6% to 31.9%) PIVCs were unused (seven cases excluded). This was significantly lower than the Pre-Intervention cohort (139/376, 37.0%, 95% CI 32.1% to 42.1%). While not significant, the frequency of unused PIVCs in the Post-Intervention cohort was lower in comparison (73/378, 19.3%, 95% CI 15.4% to 23.7%). No significant change in the appropriateness of unused PIVCs was observed between the Post-Intervention and Long-term follow-up. The overall proportion of patients receiving a PIVC has remained low since the MMI.ConclusionAn MMI aimed at reducing unused PIVC insertions in ED has been effective in eliciting sustained change. Unused but appropriately inserted PIVCs seem unaffected by the intervention.

scholarly journals Promoting COVID-19 vaccination among healthcare personnel: a multifaceted intervention at a tertiary care center in Japan

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-26
Author(s):  
Akane Takamatsu ◽  
Hitoshi Honda ◽  
Tomoya Kojima ◽  
Kengo Murata ◽  
Hilary Babcock
Keyword(s):  
Medical Center ◽  
Care Center ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Vaccination Rate ◽  
Multifaceted Intervention ◽  
Vaccine Hesitancy ◽  
Healthcare Personnel ◽  
Tertiary Care Center ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Post Vaccination

Abstract Objective The COVID-19 vaccine may hold the key to ending the pandemic, but vaccine hesitancy is hindering the vaccination of healthcare personnel (HCP). Design Before-after trial Participants and setting Healthcare personnel at a 790-bed tertiary care center in Tokyo, Japan. Interventions A pre-vaccination questionnaire was administered to HCP to examine their perceptions of the COVID-19 vaccine. Then, a multifaceted intervention involving (1) distribution of informational leaflets to all HCP, (2) hospital-wide announcements encouraging vaccination, (3) a mandatory lecture, (4) an educational session about the vaccine for pregnant or breastfeeding HCP, and (5) allergy testing for HCP at risk of allergic reactions to the vaccine was implemented. A post-vaccination survey was also performed. Results Of 1,575 HCP eligible for enrollment, 1,224 (77.7%) responded to the questionnaire, 43.5% (n =533) expressed willingness to be vaccinated, 48.4% (n = 593) were uncertain, and 8.0% (n=98) expressed unwillingness to be vaccinated. The latter two groups were concerned about the vaccine’s safety rather than its efficacy. Post-intervention, the overall vaccination rate reached 89.7% (1,413/1,575), with 88.9% (614/691) of the pre-vaccination survey respondents who answered “unwilling” or “unsure” eventually receiving a vaccination. In the post-vaccination questionnaire, factors contributing to increased COVID-19 vaccination included information and endorsement of vaccination at the medical center (26.4%; 274/1,037). Conclusions The present, multifaceted intervention increased COVID-19 vaccinations among HCP at a Japanese hospital. Frequent support and provision of information were crucial for increasing the vaccination rate and may be applicable to the general population as well.

scholarly journals 600. Decreased Hospital Readmission After Programmatic Strengthening of an Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy (OPAT) Program

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S362-S363
Author(s):  
Gaurav Agnihotri ◽  
Alan E Gross ◽  
Minji Seok ◽  
Cheng Yu Yen ◽  
Farah Khan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Readmission ◽  
Multinomial Logistic Regression ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Full Time ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Before And After ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Although it is recommended that an OPAT program should be managed by a formal OPAT team that supports the treating physician, many OPAT programs face challenges in obtaining necessary program staff (i.e nurses or pharmacists) due to limited data examining the impact of a dedicated OPAT team on patient outcomes. Our objective was to compare OPAT-related readmission rates among patients receiving OPAT before and after the implementation of a strengthened OPAT program. Methods This retrospective quasi-experiment compared adult patients discharged on intravenous (IV) antibiotics from the University of Illinois Hospital before and after implementation of programmatic changes to strengthen the OPAT program. Data from our previous study were used as the pre-intervention group (1/1/2012 to 8/1/2013), where only individual infectious disease (ID) physicians coordinated OPAT. Post-intervention (10/1/2017 to 1/1/2019), a dedicated OPAT nurse provided full time support to the treating ID physicians through care coordination, utilization of protocols for lab monitoring and management, and enhanced documentation. Factors associated with readmission for OPAT-related problems at a significance level of p&lt; 0.1 in univariate analysis were eligible for testing in a forward stepwise multinomial logistic regression to identify independent predictors of readmission. Results Demographics, antimicrobial indications, and OPAT administration location of the 428 patients pre- and post-intervention are listed in Table 1. After implementation of the strengthened OPAT program, the readmission rate due to OPAT-related complications decreased from 17.8% (13/73) to 6.5% (23/355) (p=0.001). OPAT-related readmission reasons included: infection recurrence/progression (56%), adverse drug reaction (28%), or line-associated issues (17%). Independent predictors of hospital readmission due to OPAT-related problems are listed in Table 2. Table 1. OPAT Patient Demographics and Factors Pre- and Post-intervention Table 2. Factors independently associated with hospital readmission in OPAT patients Conclusion An OPAT program with dedicated staff at a large academic tertiary care hospital was independently associated with decreased risk for readmission, which provides critical evidence to substantiate additional resources being dedicated to OPAT by health systems in the future. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

scholarly journals Daily Bathing with Chlorhexidine-Based Soap and the Prevention of Staphylococcus aureus Transmission and Infection

2014 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 243-250 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melissa A. Viray ◽  
James C. Morley ◽  
Craig M. Coopersmith ◽  
Marin H. Kollef ◽  
Victoria J. Fraser ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
At Risk ◽  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Control Unit ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Icu Patients ◽  
Chlorhexidine Bathing ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Surgical Icu ◽  
Time Series Methodology

Objective.Determine whether daily bathing with chlorhexidine-based soap decreased methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) transmission and intensive care unit (ICU)-acquired S. aureus infection among ICU patients.Design.Prospective pre-post-intervention study with control unit.Setting.A 1,250-bed tertiary care teaching hospital.Patients.Medical and surgical ICU patients.Methods.Active surveillance for MRSA colonization was performed in both ICUs. In June 2005, a chlorhexidine bathing protocol was implemented in the surgical ICU. Changes in S. aureus transmission and infection rate before and after implementation were analyzed using time-series methodology.Results.The intervention unit had a 20.68% decrease in MRSA acquisition after institution of the bathing protocol (12.64 cases per 1,000 patient-days at risk before the intervention vs 10.03 cases per 1,000 patient-days at risk after the intervention; β, −2.62 [95% confidence interval (CI), −5.19 to −0.04]; P = .046). There was no significant change in MRSA acquisition in the control ICU during the study period (10.97 cases per 1,000 patient-days at risk before June 2005 vs 11.33 cases per 1,000 patient-days at risk after June 2005; β, −11.10 [95% CI, −37.40 to 15.19]; P = .40). There was a 20.77% decrease in all S. aureus (including MRSA) acquisition in the intervention ICU from 2002 through 2007 (19.73 cases per 1,000 patient-days at risk before the intervention to 15.63 cases per 1,000 patient-days at risk after the intervention [95% CI, −7.25 to −0.95]; P = .012)]. The incidence of ICU-acquired MRSA infections decreased by 41.37% in the intervention ICU (1.96 infections per 1,000 patient-days at risk before the intervention vs 1.15 infections per 1,000 patient-days at risk after the intervention; P = .001).Conclusions.Institution of daily chlorhexidine bathing in an ICU resulted in a decrease in the transmission of S. aureus, including MRSA. These data support the use of routine daily chlorhexidine baths to decrease rates of S. aureus transmission and infection.

scholarly journals Neonates with Maternal Colonization of Carbapenemase-Producing, Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae: A Mini-Review and a Suggested Guide for Preventing Neonatal Infection

Children ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 399
Author(s):  
Judy Seesahai ◽  
Paige Terrien Church ◽  
Elizabeth Asztalos ◽  
Melanee Eng-Chong ◽  
Jo Arbus ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neonatal Intensive Care ◽  
Neonatal Infection ◽  
Control Measures ◽  
Resistant Bacteria ◽  
Negative Consequences ◽  
Duration Of Treatment ◽  
Contact Precautions ◽  
Carbapenem Resistant ◽  
Carbapenem Resistant Enterobacteriaceae

Carbapenemase-producing, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CP-CRE) are highly drug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. They include New Delhi metallo-ß-lactamase (NDM)-producing carbapenemase (50.4% of all species in Ontario). Antibiotic challenges for resistant bacteria in neonates pose challenges of unknown dosing and side effects. We report two antenatally diagnosed CP-CRE colonization scenarios with the NDM 1 gene. The case involves extreme preterm twins who had worsening respiratory distress at birth requiring ventilator support, with the first twin also having cardiovascular instability. They were screened for CP-CRE, and a polymyxin antibiotic commenced. In the delivery room, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and the follow-up clinic, in collaboration with the interdisciplinary group, contact precautions and isolation procedures were instituted. None of the infants exhibited infection with CP-CRE. Consolidating knowledge with regard to CP-CRE and modifying human behavior associated with its spread can mitigate potential negative consequences. This relates to now and later, when travel and prolific human to human contact resumes, from endemic countries, after the current COVID-19 pandemic. Standardized efforts to curb the acquisition of this infection would be judicious given the challenges of treatment and continued emerging antibiotic resistance. Simple infection control measures involving contact precautions, staff education and parental cohorting can be useful and cost-effective in preventing transmission. Attention to NICU specific measures, including screening of at-risk mothers (invitro fertilization conception) and their probands, careful handling of breastmilk, judicious antibiotic choice and duration of treatment, is warranted. What does this study add? CP-CRE is a nosocomial infection with increasing incidence globally, and a serious threat to public health, making it likely that these cases will present with greater frequency to the NICU team. Only a few similar cases have been reported in the neonatal literature. Current published guidelines provide a framework for general hospital management. Still, they are not specific to the NICU experience and the need to manage the parents’ exposure and the infants. This article provides a holistic framework for managing confirmed or suspected cases of CP-CRE from the antenatal care through the NICU and into the follow-up clinic targeted at preventing or containing the spread of CP-CRE.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document