scholarly journals 1116. Impact of Antimicrobial Stewardship Incentive Goals for Pharmacists on Overall Antibiotic Use and Appropriate Duration of Therapy in Urinary Tract Infections

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S397-S397
Author(s):  
Matthew A Miller ◽  
Mattie Huffman ◽  
Nichole Neville ◽  
Misha Huang ◽  
Gerard Barber

Abstract Background Urinary tract (UTI), skin and soft tissue, and respiratory infections are among the most frequently reported indications for antibiotics, such that focusing stewardship efforts here would expectedly have dramatic effects. Antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programs vary in structure and available resources. At the University of Colorado Hospital, a 740-bed academic medical center, dedicated resources for AMS are limited to a pharmacist, pharmacy resident, and physician; however, there is a large clinical pharmacist group. For the past 2 years, pharmacy management incorporated AMS targets as group goals tied to performance bonuses. Methods This is a descriptive report utilizing incentives to achieve AMS goals. The first goal (July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017) set out to reduce inpatient antibiotic use by 10%. The second goal (July 1, 2018 to June 30, 2018) was a 10% reduction in median antibiotic duration for UTIs. The AMS team provided guidelines, education, and oversight throughout target periods. Antibiotic use was calculated as days of therapy (DOT) per 1000 patient-days. Data related to UTI treatment was collected retrospectively on a quarterly basis. This was compared with baseline data previously collected during a statewide hospital stewardship collaborative project. Results During the first period, overall antibiotic use declined from 497 to 403 DOT per 1000 patient-days (18.9%), and broad-spectrum antibiotic use declined 22%. During the second period, 30 patient charts were reviewed quarterly, and the median UTI duration declined from 10 to 7 days (P = 0.002). The most common UTI diagnoses were similar between periods with complicated cystitis and pyelonephritis comprising 60–70% of cases. The 30-day readmission rate was not different between the baseline and goal period, 11% vs. 6% respectively (P = 0.18). Conclusion The use of group pharmacist goals tied to annual performance bonuses was effective in achieving AMS goals at our institution. In larger facilities with fewer dedicated AMS personnel, clinical pharmacists covering ward and intensive care units are an essential resource to achieving AMS goals. Group performance incentives may be a feasible strategy to generate interest and motivation to achieve AMS program goals. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S188-S189
Author(s):  
Deepika Sivakumar ◽  
Shelbye R Herbin ◽  
Raymond Yost ◽  
Marco R Scipione

Abstract Background Inpatient antibiotic use early on in the COVID-19 pandemic may have increased due to the inability to distinguish between bacterial and COVID-19 pneumonia. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of COVID-19 on antimicrobial usage during three separate waves of the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods We conducted a retrospective review of patients admitted to Detroit Medical Center between 3/10/19 to 4/24/21. Median days of therapy per 1000 adjusted patient days (DOT/1000 pt days) was evaluated for all administered antibiotics included in our pneumonia guidelines during 4 separate time periods: pre-COVID (3/3/19-4/27/19); 1st wave (3/8/20-5/2/20); 2nd wave (12/6/21-1/30/21); and 3rd wave (3/7/21-4/24/21). Antibiotics included in our pneumonia guidelines include: amoxicillin, azithromycin, aztreonam, ceftriaxone, cefepime, ciprofloxacin, doxycycline, linezolid, meropenem, moxifloxacin, piperacillin-tazobactam, tobramycin, and vancomycin. The percent change in antibiotic use between the separate time periods was also evaluated. Results An increase in antibiotics was seen during the 1st wave compared to the pre-COVID period (2639 [IQR 2339-3439] DOT/1000 pt days vs. 2432 [IQR 2291-2499] DOT/1000 pt days, p=0.08). This corresponded to an increase of 8.5% during the 1st wave. This increase did not persist during the 2nd and 3rd waves of the pandemic, and the use decreased by 8% and 16%, respectively, compared to the pre-COVID period. There was an increased use of ceftriaxone (+6.5%, p=0.23), doxycycline (+46%, p=0.13), linezolid (+61%, p=0.014), cefepime (+50%, p=0.001), and meropenem (+29%, p=0.25) during the 1st wave compared to the pre-COVID period. Linezolid (+39%, p=0.013), cefepime (+47%, p=0.08) and tobramycin (+47%, p=0.05) use remained high during the 3rd wave compared to the pre-COVID period, but the use was lower when compared to the 1st and 2nd waves. Figure 1. Antibiotic Use 01/2019 to 04/2019 Conclusion Antibiotics used to treat bacterial pneumonia during the 1st wave of the pandemic increased and there was a shift to broader spectrum agents during that period. The increased use was not sustained during the 2nd and 3rd waves of the pandemic, possibly due to the increased awareness of the differences between patients who present with COVID-19 pneumonia and bacterial pneumonia. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures



2014 ◽  
Vol 35 (06) ◽  
pp. 685-691 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. L. Wald ◽  
B. Bandle ◽  
A. Richard ◽  
S. Min

Objective.To develop and validate a methodology for electronic surveillance of catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs).Design.Diagnostic accuracy study.Setting.A 425-bed university hospital.Subjects.A total of 1,695 unique inpatient encounters from November 2009 through November 2010 with a high clinical suspicion of CAUTI.Methods.An algorithm was developed to identify incident CAUTIs from electronic health records (EHRs) on the basis of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) surveillance definition. CAUTIs identified by electronic surveillance were compared with the reference standard of manual surveillance by infection preventionists. To determine diagnostic accuracy, we created 2 × 2 tables, one unadjusted and one adjusted for misclassification using chart review and case adjudication. Unadjusted and adjusted test statistics (percent agreement, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value [PPV], negative predictive value [NPV], and κ) were calculated.Results.Electronic surveillance identified 64 CAUTIs compared with manual surveillance, which identified 19 CAUTIs for 97% agreement, 79% sensitivity, 97% sensitivity, 23% PPV, 100% NPV, and κ of .33. Compared with the reference standard adjusted for misclassification, which identified 55 CAUTIs, electronic surveillance had 98% agreement, 80% sensitivity, 99% specificity, 69% PPV, 99% NPV, and κ of .71.Conclusion.The electronic surveillance methodology had a high NPV and a low PPV compared with the reference standard, indicating a role of the electronic algorithm in screening data sets to exclude cases. However, the PPV markedly improved compared with the reference standard adjusted for misclassification, suggesting a future role in surveillance with improvements in EHRs.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol2014;35(6):685–691



2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (10) ◽  
pp. 1087-1093 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haley J. Appaneal ◽  
Aisling R. Caffrey ◽  
Vrishali V. Lopes ◽  
Christopher J. Crnich ◽  
David M. Dosa ◽  
...  

AbstractObjective:To describe urinary tract infection (UTI) treatment among Veterans’ Affairs (VA) Community Living Centers (CLCs) nationally and to assess related trends in antibiotic use.Design:Descriptive study.Setting and participants:All UTI episodes treated from 2013 through 2017 among residents in 110 VA CLCs. UTI episodes required collection of a urine culture, antibiotic treatment, and a UTI diagnosis code. UTI episodes were stratified into culture-positive and culture-negative episodes.Methods:Frequency and rate of antibiotic use were assessed for all UTI episodes overall and were stratified by culture-positive and culture-negative episodes. Joinpoint software was used for regression analyses of trends over time.Results:We identified 28,247 UTI episodes in 14,983 Veterans. The average age of Veterans was 75.7 years, and 95.9% were male. Approximately half of UTI episodes (45.7%) were culture positive and 25.7% were culture negative. Escherichia coli was recovered in 34.1% of culture-positive UTI episodes, followed by Proteus mirabilis and Klebsiella spp, which were recovered in 24.5% and 17.4% of culture-positive UTI episodes, respectively. The rate of total antibiotic use in days of therapy (DOT) per 1,000 bed days decreased by 10.1% per year (95% CI, −13.6% to −6.5%) and fluoroquinolone use (ciprofloxacin or levofloxacin) decreased by 14.5% per year (95% CI, −20.6% to −7.8%) among UTI episodes overall. Similar reductions in rates of total antibiotic use and fluoroquinolone use were observed among culture-positive UTI episodes and among culture-negative UTI episodes.Conclusion:Over a 5-year period, antibiotic use for UTIs significantly decreased among VA CLCs, as did use of fluoroquinolones. Antibiotic stewardship efforts across VA CLCs should be applauded, and these efforts should continue.



2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S269-S269
Author(s):  
Adam J Luetkemeyer ◽  
Nick Bennett ◽  
Laura Aragon ◽  
Jeannette Ploetz ◽  
Sarah E Boyd

Abstract Background COVID-19 pandemic data suggest risk for bacterial co-infection upon hospital presentation remain extremely low. Despite low co-infection rates, antibiotics are prescribed for most patients. Current data are limited regarding institutional-specific change in antibiotic use over the course of the pandemic. Given the low rates of co-infections, Saint Luke’s Health System’s COVID-19 Treatment Taskforce developed a COVID-19 evaluation and treatment order set which included procalcitonin (PCT) . As co-infection literature emerged, active education was provided, and order sets were modified to provide passive education regarding co-infection rates. We aimed to assess antibiotic practice changes as data and strategies to influence use evolved during the pandemic. Methods This was a multi-center, single health-system retrospective cohort study. Ten community hospitals and 1 academic medical center were included in analysis. Inclusion criteria were age ≥18 years, admitted during April or September 2020 and had a positive COVID-19 result on admission. Patients were excluded if they were readmitted for COVID-19 related issues. Both primary and secondary outcomes were analyzed from the first 7 days after admission. The primary outcome was rate of respiratory bacterial co-infections. This was determined through sputum and blood cultures, urinary antigens including Streptococcus pneumoniae and Legionella, and PCT. Secondary outcomes included rate of antibiotic use, antibiotic days of therapy (DOT), length of therapy, and antibiotic use trends. Baseline Characteristics Results A total of 294 patients were included with 69 patients in April 2020 and 225 in September 2020. Primary and secondary results are shown in Table 2. Rate of culture-confirmed bacterial co-infection when examining April 2020 was 4.38% and 4.44 % in September 2020. Antibiotic uses, antibiotic DOT, and length of therapy were all significantly lower in September 2020 compared to April 2020. Conclusion Our results show bacterial co-infections were extremely low in our health system. Despite positive trends in antibiotic use, prescribing remained high. More targeted interventions to decrease antibiotic exposure in COVID-19 patients are needed. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures



2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S330-S330
Author(s):  
Neal Fox ◽  
Lauren Haines ◽  
Rachel Bull ◽  
Zachary Jenkins ◽  
John Ballentine ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Excess durations of anti-infective therapy are a common problem that may lead to unintended consequences. Antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) is a growing field that largely focuses on inpatient anti-infective use. For this study, one site was an academic medical center whose AMS uses prospective auditing; the other was a community hospital with pharmacy-driven AMS. Little research has examined durations of anti-infective therapy at hospital discharge. Methods Patient charts were reviewed and 284 were included in the final analysis. Patients were excluded if discharged on non-oral anti-infectives or only agents for a non-study indication. Patients were included if they were discharged on oral anti-infective therapy for CAP, healthcare-associated pneumonia (HCAP), UTI, cellulitis, and superficial abscess. Evidence-based durations of therapy were utilized to determine the potential inappropriateness of anti-infective therapy. Guidelines from the study period were used. Total duration of therapy was derived from the combination of outpatient therapy plus inpatient therapy beginning with the first day of relevant coverage for the given indication. Descriptive statistics were utilized to compare durations of therapy. Chi-squared tests were utilized to examine differences in expected frequencies. All statistics were performed in SPSS v. 24. Results The average combined duration of therapy was 11.3 days. 190 patients (66.9%) were found to have a potentially inappropriate duration of oral anti-infective therapy at hospital discharge. Only 2 durations were too short. Figure 1 displays the distribution of excess days of therapy. Figure 2 shows the breakdown of potential inappropriateness of duration by diagnosis. Figure 3 displays the percentage of potentially inappropriate cases by site. There were no significant differences in the primary outcome between the sites. Conclusion CAP and cellulitis appear to be areas that are often overtreated. Discharge durations of therapy should be a focus of AMS teams. Many patients receive potentially inappropriate durations of therapy at discharge without any discernible benefit. Further research is needed in this area. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.



2019 ◽  
Vol 66 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-33
Author(s):  
Priyam Mithawala ◽  
Edo-abasi McGee

Objective The primary objectives were to evaluate the prescriber acceptance rate of Antimicrobial Stewardship Program (ASP) pharmacist recommendation to de-escalate/discontinue meropenem, and estimate the difference in duration of meropenem therapy. The secondary objective was to determine incidence of adverse events in the two groups. Methods It was a retrospective study. All patients admitted to Gwinnett Medical Center and receiving meropenem from January–November 2015 were included in the study. Exclusion criteria were: patients admitted to intensive care unit, one-time dose, infectious disease consultation, and age <18 years. Electronic medical records were reviewed for data collection. The control group consisted of patients from January–July 2015 when there was no ASP pharmacist. The intervention group consisted of patients from August–November 2015 during which period the ASP pharmacist recommended de-escalation/discontinuation of meropenem based on culture and sensitivity results. Results A total of 41 patients were studied, 21 in the control group and 20 in the intervention group. There was no significant difference in baseline characteristics in the two groups and in terms of prior hospitalization or antibiotic use (within 90 days) and documented or suspected MDRO infection at the time of admission. De-escalation/discontinuation was suggested in 16/20 patients in the intervention group (80%), and intervention was accepted in 68%. The mean duration of therapy was significantly decreased in the intervention group (5.6 days vs. 8.1 days, p =0.0175). Two patients had thrombocytopenia (unrelated to meropenem), and none of the patients had seizure. Conclusion Targeted antibiotic review is an effective ASP strategy, which significantly decreases the duration of meropenem therapy.



Author(s):  
Megan E Klatt ◽  
Lucas T Schulz ◽  
Dan Fleischman ◽  
Barry C Fox ◽  
Stuart Burke ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose Small community hospitals often lack the human, financial, and technological resources necessary to implement and maintain successful antimicrobial stewardship programs now required by national regulatory and accrediting bodies. Creative solutions are needed to address this problem. Summary A 3-stage, quasi-experimental study including patients receiving antibiotics for pneumonia, skin and soft tissue infections, and urinary tract infections at a community hospital in Wisconsin from June 2013 to December 2015 was conducted. Remote telehealth prospective audit and feedback, guideline and order set management, and staff education targeting pharmacists, nurses, and physicians were provided during the 7-month intervention phase; these services were then removed for the postintervention period. Antimicrobial utilization (days of therapy [DOT] per 1,000 patient-days), hospital length of stay, and readmission and 30-day mortality rates were assessed to determine the impact of telehealth services on these outcomes. During the preintervention (baseline), intervention, and postintervention periods, 1,037 patients received antibiotics for the targeted infectious disease conditions. Patient demographics and rates of infectious disease conditions were similar among the different periods. Telehealth antimicrobial stewardship reduced broad-spectrum antibiotic use, including use of imipenem (from 83 to 31 DOT, P &lt; 0.001), levofloxacin (from 123 to 99 DOT, P &lt; 0.001), and vancomycin (from 104 to 85 DOT, P &lt; 0.001), compared to utilization during the baseline period; mean (SD) length of stay also decreased (from 4.6 [2.8] days to 4.2 [2.6] days, P = 0.02). After nonrenewal of telehealth stewardship, vancomycin and piperacillin/tazobactam usage returned to or exceeded baseline levels. Conclusion The partnership between an academic medical center and a small community hospital improved antimicrobial utilization and clinical outcomes. Successful telehealth antimicrobial stewardship models should be explored further as a means to provide optimal patient care.



2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S701-S701
Author(s):  
Jilan Shah ◽  
Dora Izaguirre-Anariba ◽  
Hariprasad Rao ◽  
Yash Patel ◽  
Kyaw Zin Win ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Antibiotic-resistant infections are one of the greatest public health issues with more than 2 million infections and 23,000 deaths per year in the United States. Reducing inappropriate antibiotic use is essential to reduce both antibiotic resistance and adverse events. The most important modifiable risk factor for antibiotic resistance is inappropriate prescribing of antibiotics. At least 30% of outpatient antibiotic prescriptions in the United States are unnecessary. We aimed to pilot our outpatient antimicrobial stewardship initiative to track and reduce antibiotic prescriptions among adult patients presenting with common acute respiratory infections in our hospital’s outpatient primary care settings. Methods A retrospective and prospective cohort study from October, 2017 to March, 2019. Implemented a robust outpatient antimicrobial stewardship initiative with a dedicated team and data analyst based on CDC core elements for outpatient antimicrobial stewardship and a prior UHF initiative. Data of common respiratory tract infections and the respective rates of antibiotic prescriptions from 3 adult primary care sites were collected from the EHR. Serials of educational interventions were performed between June, 2018 to September, 2018. We disseminated resources from the CDC and DOH like brochures, posters, viral prescription pads, pocket guidelines, grand rounds and electronic lectures for providers and periodic provider feedback reports. Results Our findings revealed that the physician compliance rate of antibiotics not prescribed for common respiratory tract infections remarkably improved from 72% to 85% after implementing our interventions (Figure 1). The chi-square test showed 40, and P value is 0.000034 which is less than 0.05. Thus, we are 95% confident that there is a significant association between our interventions and reduction of inappropriate antibiotic use (Figure 2). Conclusion Introduction of a robust and multifaceted Outpatient Antimicrobial Stewardship initiative with a dedicated team can substantially decrease outpatient antibiotic prescription rates for respiratory tract infections in metropolitan community hospital-based primary care settings. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.



2017 ◽  
Vol 38 (4) ◽  
pp. 455-460 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abigail L. Carlson ◽  
Satish Munigala ◽  
Anthony J. Russo ◽  
Kathleen M. McMullen ◽  
Helen Wood ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVETo describe the frequency of urine cultures performed in inpatients without additional testing for pyuriaDESIGNRetrospective cohort studySETTINGA 1,250-bed academic tertiary referral centerPATIENTSHospitalized adultsMETHODSThis study included urine cultures drawn on 4 medical and 2 surgical wards from 2009 to 2013 and in the medical and surgical intensive care units (ICUs) from 2012 to 2013. Patient and laboratory data were abstracted from the hospital’s medical informatics database. We identified catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs) in the ICUs by routine infection prevention surveillance. Cultures without urinalysis or urine microscopy were defined as “isolated.” The primary outcome was the proportion of isolated urine cultures obtained. We used multivariable logistic regression to assess predictors of isolated cultures.RESULTSDuring the study period, 14,743 urine cultures were obtained (63.5 cultures per 1,000 patient days) during 11,820 patient admissions. Of these, 2,973 cultures (20.2%) were isolated cultures. Of the 61 CAUTIs identified, 31 (50.8%) were identified by an isolated culture. Predictors for having an isolated culture included male gender (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.22; 95%; confidence interval [CI], 1.11–1.35], urinary catheterization (aOR, 2.15; 95% CI, 1.89–2.46), ICU admission (medical ICU aOR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.47–2.00; surgical ICU aOR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.51–2.19), and obtaining the urine culture ≥1 calendar day after admission (1–7 days aOR, 1.91; 95% CI. 1.71–2.12; >7 days after admission aOR, 2.81; 95% CI, 2.37–3.34).CONCLUSIONSIsolated urine cultures are common in hospitalized patients, particularly in patients with urinary catheters and those in ICUs. Interventions targeting inpatient culturing practices may improve the diagnosis of urinary tract infections.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol2017;38:455–460



Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document