Reflection

2019 ◽  
pp. 193-210
Author(s):  
Robert L. Wears ◽  
Kathleen M. Sutcliffe

Reviewing the evolution of patient safety over time, we see a discursive shift from harm to “error.” The “error” framing is used to advance the authority of scientific-bureaucratic managerial medicine and to diminish the traditional authority of clinical expertise. Psychologist Sidney Dekker noted that four different voices appear in patient safety discourses: epistemological (what happened?), preventative (how can it be prevented?), boundary-maintaining (were there violations or impermissible activities?), and existential (what is the reason for this suffering?). Discussions in one voice tend to be dissatisfying for the others, but the “error” framing addresses all four: an error occurred, errors can be prevented, violators should be punished, moral wrong leads to suffering. In summary, patient safety’s rise resulted from five factors: a general decrease in risk tolerance, the industrialization of healthcare, reframing harm as “error,” brief input from safety sciences holding out potential for improvement, and medicine’s effort to retain control of healthcare internally. Ironically, these factors also tended to make patient safety activity ineffective since they bounded out insights, skills, and theories from the safety sciences.

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (Supplement_5) ◽  
Author(s):  
E Scarpis ◽  
S Degan ◽  
D De Corti ◽  
F Mellace ◽  
R Cocconi ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Identification and measurement of adverse events (AEs) is crucial for patient safety in order to monitor them over time and to implement quality improvement programs, testing if they are effective. Global Trigger Tool (GTT) has been proposed as a low-cost method, being also the most effective to detect AEs. This study aims to describe the number of triggers, the rate and level of AEs identified by GTT and the most frequent type of AE. Methods The Italian version of the GTT was used. Ten paper-based clinical records (CRs) randomly selected every 2 weeks were reviewed from January to April 2019 by three independent reviewers (two nurses, one doctor) at the Academic Hospital of Udine. The AEs rates calculated are: AEs per 1,000 patient-days, AEs per 100 admissions, percentage of admissions with an AE. AEs were classified by harm levels according to National Coordinating Council for Medication Error Reporting and Prevention (NCC MERP). Results CRs reviewed were 80. Mean age of the patients was 69.3±16.4, women were 37.5%. Mean hospitalisation was 16.8±15.3. Nine were the cases of re-hospitalisation within 30 days (11.3%). The total number of trigger was 156. AEs were 31, with at least one AE on 27.5% of admissions, 38.8 AEs per 100 admissions and 23 AEs per 1,000 patient-days. AEs with harm level E, F and H were respectively 5 (16.1%), 24 (77.4%) and 2 (6.5%). The most frequent type of AE were hospital acquired infections with 15 cases (48.4%). Conclusions The most frequent type of AE was the hospital acquired infections. Rates and levels of AEs were higher than other international studies, probably because of the limited number of CRs reviewed. Key messages Global Trigger Tool is an effective method to detect adverse patient safety events in order to monitor them over time. The most frequent type of adverse events was the hospital acquired infections.


2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 1117
Author(s):  
Cristina Silva Sousa

RESUMOObjetivo: descrever os aspectos históricos da recuperação anestésica evidenciados nas publicações. Método: investigação histórico-social, exploratória e descritiva, com base nas publicações e legislações pertinentes ao exercício da enfermagem no Brasil, representando, dessa forma, o contexto histórico da recuperação anestésica para o reconhecimento e valorização da enfermagem perioperatória. Resultados: nesta evolução histórica, a enfermagem da recuperação anestésica construiu um caminho permeado pelo enfoque técnico, necessidade de assistência individualizada e área crítica com busca de conhecimento científico e processos de acreditação hospitalar para segurança do paciente. No Brasil, iniciada apenas em 1980, a recuperação anestésica dos anos 2000 tem sido baseada na assistência sistematizada, permeada por ações de segurança do paciente em busca de melhor capacitação da equipe. Conclusão: há um movimento da enfermagem brasileira na assistência da recuperação anestésica e aprimoramento destas ações com o decorrer do tempo. Descritores: Enfermagem em Pós-Anestésico; Período de Recuperação da Anestesia; História da Enfermagem; Enfermagem Perioperatória.ABSTRACT Objective: to describe the historical aspects of anesthesia recovery evidenced in the publications. Method: this is an exploratory and descriptive historical-social research, based on the publications and legislation about nursing practice in Brazil, representing the historical context of the anesthetic recovery for the recognition and valuation of perioperative nursing. Results: In this historical evolution, the nursing of the anesthetic recovery built a path permeated by the technical approach, need for individualized assistance and critical area, with a search of scientific knowledge and hospital accreditation processes for patient safety. In Brazil, initiated only in 1980, the anesthetic recovery of the 2000s has been based on systematized assistance, permeated by patient safety actions in search of better team training. Conclusion: there is a movement of the Brazilian nursing with the assistance of the anesthetic recovery and improvement of these actions over time. Descriptors: Post-Anesthesia Nursing, Anesthesia Recovery Period, History of Nursing, Perioperative Nursing.RESUMEN Objetivo: describir los aspectos históricos de la recuperación anestésica evidenciados en las publicaciones. Método: investigación histórico-social, exploratoria y descriptiva, con base en las publicaciones y legislaciones pertinentes al ejercicio de la enfermería en Brasil, representando de esa forma el contexto histórico de la recuperación anestésica para el reconocimiento y valorización de enfermería peri-operatoria. Resultados: en esta evolución histórica, la enfermería de la recuperación anestésica construye un camino lleno de un enfoque técnico, necesidad de asistencia individualizada y área crítica, con busca de conocimiento científico y procesos de acreditación hospitalaria para seguridad del paciente. En Brasil, iniciada apenas en 1980, la recuperación anestésica de los años 2000 ha sido basada en la asistencia sistematizada, permeada por acciones de seguridad del paciente en busca de mejor capacitación del equipo. Conclusión: hay un movimiento de la enfermería brasilera en la asistencia de la recuperación anestésica, y mejoramiento de estas acciones con el curso del tiempo. Descriptores: Enfermería Pos anestésica, Periodo de Recuperación de la Anestesia, Historia de la Enfermería, Enfermería Peroperatoria.


Author(s):  
Robert Wears ◽  
Kathleen Sutcliffe

Patient safety suddenly burst into public consciousness in the late 1990s and became a “celebrated” cause in the 2000s. It has since gradually faltered, and little improvement has been noted over almost 20 years. Both the rise and fall of patient safety demand explanation. Medical harm had been known long before the 1990s, so why did it suddenly become popular? And why were safety efforts ineffective? The authors propose that this rise was due to a discursive shift that reframed “medical harm” into “medical error” in the setting of anxiety about industrialization and great change in healthcare. The “error” framing, with its inherent notion of agency, was useful in advancing the agenda of a technocratic, managerial group of health professionals and diminishing the authority of the old guard based on clinical expertise. The fall was due to this “medicalization” of safety. Health professionals and managers with little knowledge of safety science came to dominate the patient safety field, crowding out expertise from the safety sciences (e.g., psychology, engineering) and thus keeping reform under the control of the healthcare establishment. Operating with a sort of delusional clarity, this scientific-bureaucratic cabal generated a great deal of activity but made little progress because they failed to engage with expertise in the safety sciences. Twenty years after sudden popularity, there is general agreement that little of value has been achieved. The future of patient safety is in doubt, and radical reform in approaches to safety will be required for progress to be made.


2009 ◽  
Vol 24 (S1) ◽  
pp. 1-1
Author(s):  
C. Silveira ◽  
A. Norton ◽  
A. Martins ◽  
I. Domingues ◽  
R. Moreira ◽  
...  

Background:An essential condition to validate a diagnosis is its stability over time. Since there are no biological markers for psychiatric disorders, the diagnosis relies on clinical expertise, with several consequences in treatment planning, disease burden and disability, affecting outcome and public health.Objectives:The aims of this study were:1.the assessment of long term stability of the diagnosis of psychotic disorders,2.its implications in patient treatment, and3.the evaluation of eventual predictors of diagnosis stability.Methods:This was a retrospective study carried out in the Department of Psychiatry of a large University Hospital (Hospital S. João, Porto, Portugal). Patients enrolled were admitted in the inpatient unit from 2000 to 2003 (n=190, 12.41% of 1531 patients admitted), experienced a first psychotic episode, and fulfilled criteria for one of the following diagnosis: schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder, drug induced psychosis, acute and transient psychotic disorders, schizophreniform disorder and psychosis NOS (ICD-10 classification). the diagnoses were extracted from clinical records, and reassessed five years after the initial diagnosis. the analysis focuses on diagnostic agreement over time; clinical and demographic variables were also collected and putative associations with diagnostic shift considered.Results:The study is now under statistic evaluation.


2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (Supplement_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sergio Sloboda ◽  
Andre Felipe Sloboda ◽  
Sheila Pinto ◽  
Claudia Monteiro

Abstract Background and Aims In January 2016 we initiated in our dialysis unit a Patient Safety Program (PSP) with the following goals: risk management, improvements in patient care and quality of hemodialysis. The program was based on four pillars: 1 - Individualized care through a Singular Therapeutic Plan (STP); 2 -Practices of processes surveillance and monitoring; 3 - Effective communication program (ECP), valuing the intensive and continuous education of the whole team and 4 –Technological management. The first results in the year of implementation were presented at the 54th ERA-ADTA Congress, Madrid 2017 (MP524). We analysed these established indicators results through three years of the program, comparing them to those found in 2015. The aim of this study is to verify the degree of response of the proposed model over time, and achieve the objectives set monthly (M), quarterly (Q) and annually (A): Hospitalization rate <5% (M); Seroconversion Rate of Viral Hepatitis, 0% (A); Mortality rate, < 5% (A); Patient with hemoglobin values> 10 g/dl, 80% (M); Patient with serum albumin>3 mg%, 90% (Q); SpKt/V ≥ 1.4, 80% (M); Patients with normal serum values of P3+, 60% (M); Rate of infections related to health care, < 5% (A). Method We conducted a longitudinal study in the period 2016-18, where we analysed the indicators stipulated. We systematically and continuously apply policies, procedures and conducts in the assessment of risks and events. We compared the results found to those collected in 2015. In the statistical analysis, we used in the indicators collected monthly the median ± standard error, as a measure of central trend and Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney Test for analysis of the samples. In the annual indicators, we used linear correlation coefficient. Results Among the 240 patients studied in a chronic dialysis program in the studied period, there was no exclusion of patients due to the etiology of kidney disease, presence of comorbidities, gender or age. The percentage of patients with Hemoglobin levels >10g/dl was 68±2.0 in 2015, and 71±1.8, 72±2.4, 76±1.4 from 2016 to 2018, respectively, with statistical significance only in 2018 when compared to 2015, p=0.01. The percentage of SpKt/V ≥ 1.4 in 2015 was 72±2.5, with an increase in 2016, 74±2.5, without statistical significance, in 2017 it was 80±2.4 with p=0.01 and in 2018 82±1.9, p=0.002. In the Patients with normal serum values of P3+ index, we observed in 2015 the percentage of 55±2.9, 2016 63±2.4, 2017, 68±2.0, and 2018 73±1.9 statistical significance in the last two years, p<0.05 and p=0.001, respectively.. There was no seroconversion to Hepatitis C in the whole period. Patient with serum albumin rate >3 mg% was achieved in the three years of the 2016-18 program, 92%, 91% and 95%, respectively, with statistical significance only in 2018, p=0.01, when compared to 2015, 85%. The Hospitalization rate was achieved in the three years of the study, 5% in 2016, and 4% in the following two years, r=0.92. Mortality rate decreased over the PSP, reaching the target in 2018, r=0.69. Finally, the Rate of infection related to healthcare we observed a progressive drop during the program, 8% in 2015, 6% in 2016 and 2017 and reached the target in 2018, 5%, r=0.85. Conclusion The Patient Safety Program brings good results in the quality of treatment and consequently decreases comorbidities, hospitalizations and mortality. The results become more evident over time because the improvement of many indicators depends on the direct and continuous work with each patient, and with incessant training of all professionals involved. We strongly believe this program will keep improving all those indicators, especially mortality rate, as patients will benefit clinically, in a cardiovascular standpoint, from P3+, albumin and haemoglobin normal levels over time.


2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (34_suppl) ◽  
pp. 235-235
Author(s):  
Thea Otto Mattsson ◽  
Kim Brixen ◽  
Janne Lehmann Knudsen ◽  
Jorn Herrstedt

235 Background: The Institute for Healthcare Improvement developed the Global Trigger Tool (GTT) for measuring harm rates over time in 2006. Few studies have been published on the measurement properties of GTT and no studies have assessed the value of adding specific modules to the generic GTT. We, therefore, aimed to determine inter-rater reliability, and to evaluate the effect of interrater variation on the reliability of the generic GTT to detect adverse event rates over time. Furthermore to evaluate the effect of adding an oncology specific module to the generic GTT on number and category of adverse events (AEs) identified. Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed by two teams consisting of two primary reviewers. One team used the general GTT, and the other used an oncology specific GTT (GTTO); consisting of the general GTT module plus an additional oncology module. A random sample of 10 charts was selected every two weeks between all discharged patients from a Department of Oncology in 2010. n=240. All charts were reviewed by both teams using standard GTT methods and measures. AEs per 1,000 admission days and AEs per 100 admissions where used to draw Statistical process control (SPC) charts for evaluation of the patient safety process. Inter-rater variability between review teams was assessed calculating the Kappa Cohen coefficient using data from the identical general GTT module. Results: Reliability between the two teams of reviewers to identify an AE was moderate [K=0.45]. A comparison of SPC charts, using the results from the identical general module, showed that moderate agreement gave rise to different conclusions on the patient safety process between teams. Comparing GTT with GTTO we found no significant difference (CI 95% [0.06-0.08]) in number of identified AEs and an equal distribution of the events on harm categories. GTT and GTTO identified 56 and 57 AEs respectively. Conclusions: Moderate agreement between review teams gave rise to different conclusions on the patient safety process suggesting limited use of the GTT to track harm rates over time. Addition of an oncology specific module showed no significant effect on the total number or distribution of AEs on harm categories.


Diagnosis ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 97-103 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Zwaan ◽  
Hardeep Singh

AbstractDiagnostic errors have emerged as a serious patient safety problem but they are hard to detect and complex to define. At the research summit of the 2013 Diagnostic Error in Medicine 6th International Conference, we convened a multidisciplinary expert panel to discuss challenges in defining and measuring diagnostic errors in real-world settings. In this paper, we synthesize these discussions and outline key research challenges in operationalizing the definition and measurement of diagnostic error. Some of these challenges include 1) difficulties in determining error when the disease or diagnosis is evolving over time and in different care settings, 2) accounting for a balance between underdiagnosis and overaggressive diagnostic pursuits, and 3) determining disease diagnosis likelihood and severity in hindsight. We also build on these discussions to describe how some of these challenges can be addressed while conducting research on measuring diagnostic error.


Author(s):  
Serena Oliveri ◽  
Clizia Cincidda ◽  
Giulia Ongaro ◽  
Ilaria Cutica ◽  
Alessandra Gorini ◽  
...  

AbstractDespite the widespread diffusion of direct-to-consumer genetic testing (GT), it is still unclear whether people who learn about their genetic susceptibility to a clinical condition change their behaviors, and the psychological factors involved. The aim of the present study is to investigate long-term changes in health-related choices, individual tendencies and risk attitudes in an Italian sample of GT users. In the context of the Mind the Risk study, which investigated a sample of Italian adults who underwent GT in a private laboratory, 99 clients participated in the follow up assessment. They completed a self-administered questionnaire investigating: (a) clinical history and motivation for testing, (b) lifestyle and risk behaviors, (c) individual tendencies toward health, and (d) risk-taking attitude and risk tolerance. Such variables were measured at three different time-points: T0—before GT, T1—at 6 months after genetic results, and T2—at 1 year from results. Results showed that, at baseline, participants who stated they intended to modify their behavior after GT results, effectively did so over time. This result held both for participants who received a positive or negative test result. In general, a healthier diet was the most frequently observed long-term behavioral change. As regards psychological variables, a risk-taking attitude and risk tolerance did not seem to affect the decision to change the lifestyle. Finally, we found an overall reduction in anxiety and worry over health over time, but also a reduction in the motivation for health promotion and prevention, health esteem, and positive expectations for their health in the future.


2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
H Ashraf ◽  
M Sodergren ◽  
G Mylonas ◽  
A Darzi

Abstract Introduction Adverse surgical events remain at an unacceptably high level despite multiple global safety initiatives being introduced. As yet, however there is no conclusive evidence to identify whether physiological markers can be used to predict whether a surgeon will make an error Method Surgeons were asked to complete a simulated laparoscopic cholecystectomy task while physiological metrics and gaze behaviour was tracked. LightGBM and CatBoost were used to predict the physiological metric most useful in predicting whether a surgeon was about to make an error. The binary task used a boolean value of “does an error occur in the next 5 seconds” as the dependent variable, while the multiclass task classified the severity of error (0, 1, 2, 3). Results Autocorrelation with lag (eventually calculated with a lag of timestep 2) measured the tendency of this timeseries to correlate with itself. The degree of correlation, or lack of correlation, and sudden changes in correlation over time were gleaned from this feature. Conclusions Skin conductance was most likely to successfully predict impending error. However when gaze features were added, overall model performance improved by 6.4%. The potential for reduction in surgical error rate and improvement in patient safety are important factors to consider.


2008 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 107-130 ◽  
Author(s):  
GAOBO PANG ◽  
MARK WARSHAWSKY

AbstractThis study quantifies the possible consequences to stakeholders of reforms to the excise tax on reversions of excess pension assets. Under the US Pension Protection Act (PPA) of 2006, funding in defined benefit (DB) plans is likely to improve significantly. Many plans may become overfunded over time, owing to the shortfall amortizations mandated by the PPA, as well as to precautionary contributions by sponsors and to plan investment returns. This analysis shows that a more moderate excise tax rate together with a reasonable funding threshold for asset reversions would not only enable sponsors to spend the excess funds on other corporate needs, thereby lowering the cost of sponsorship of DB plans, but also would open a considerable revenue source for the government, with only a small increase in bankruptcy cost for the PBGC. Plan participants could also gain in an alternative reform, which would require a partial transfer of excess assets to them along with a still-lower reversion tax rate. These findings also hold for plan sponsors with various degrees of risk tolerance or only making the PPA-required minimum contributions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document