Conclusion
This chapter begins by recapitulating the answers given to the main questions pursued in the earlier chapters of book. It then tries to map out some of the issues that are raised but not pursued herein, in order to provide a guide for future inquiry. The first such question is: which meta-prudential view should we adopt? Should we realists, for example, or is some form of anti-realism superior? More generally, is it plausible that the true metaethical view also applies to prudential discourse, so there is one meta-normative theory to rule them all, so to speak? The chapter lays out options and explain some ways in which the foregoing discussion is probative for these debates.
Keyword(s):
2020 ◽
Vol 2019
(4)
◽
pp. 314-328
Keyword(s):