Entrainment and the Social Origin of Musical Rhythm

2019 ◽  
pp. 183-198
Author(s):  
Martin Clayton
Keyword(s):  
Social Interaction ◽  
Collective Agreement ◽  
Alfred Schutz ◽  
Social Origin ◽  
New Approach ◽  
Musical Rhythm ◽  
The Social ◽  
Rhythmic Coordination ◽  
Alfred Schütz

Chapter 12 develops Maurice Halbwachs’ concern with social interaction in theorizing rhythm. Taking inspiration from Halbwachs’ view of rhythm as social not natural, the chapter outlines a new approach to the question that Halbwachs leaves unanswered: If musical rhythm is social in origin, how does it come into being—how is his “prior collective agreement” reached? Alfred Schütz, although casting Halbwachs as the straw man in his famous essay “Making Music Together,” did not contest the latter’s point about the social origin of rhythm. Schütz’s argument—that all communication is made possible by what he called the “mutual tuning-in relationship” in which individuals come to share their experience of inner time—does contradict Halbwachs: for Schütz, rhythmic coordination is prior to any collective agreement. The author argues that rhythm in fact emerges spontaneously both in individuals and, crucially, in interactions between them, and that it is therefore both natural (physiological) and social in origin.

scholarly journals El problema de la “realidad” en el marco de la influencia Hispánica en la obra de Alfred Schutz

2021 ◽  
pp. 245
Author(s):  
Carlos Belvedere
Keyword(s):  
Don Quixote ◽  
Alfred Schutz ◽  
The Social ◽  
Alfred Schütz ◽  
The Individual ◽  
Pragmatic Dimension ◽  
The Way

En este trabajo paso revista a las diferentes acepciones del concepto de realidad en la obra de Alfred Schutz y las tensiones que lo surcan. Así es que describo una dimensión pragmatista de la realidad, y muestro cómo ella entra en contradicción con una idea marcadamente realista y objetivista. En este contexto, la obra de Schutz se presenta como atravesada por una tensión irresuelta en tres frentes problemáticos: realismo –constructivismo; egología– intersubjetividad; relativismo– fundacionalismo. La intrepretación schutziana del Quijote ilustra magníficamente de qué modo operan estas contradicciones. Al respecto, si bien Schutz se siente cercano a la exégesis de Ortega y Gasset, argumentamos que su Quijote es más afín al de Unamuno. Otra diferencia sustancial que lo distancia de Ortega, a pesar del profundo respeto que sentía por él, es el modo en que ambos cuestionan concepciones colectivistas de lo social como la de Durkheim: Schutz considera que lo social es abstracto y, por ende, irreal, mientras que Ortega lo concibe como una realidad sustituta. Además, Schutz piensa que lo social se enfrenta al individuo, mientras que Ortega muestra que se contrapone a la interacción.In my paper I review the different meanings of the concept of reality in the work of Alfred Schutz and the tensions that cross it. I describe a pragmatic dimension of reality and then I show how it clashes with an idea re-markably realistic and objectivist. In this con-text, Schutz's work is presented as crossed by an unresolved tension on three fronts: realism – constructivism; egology - intersubjectivity; relativism - foundationalism. The Schutzian intrepretación of Don Quixote superbly illustrates how these contradictions operate. In this regard, although Schutz felt close to the exegesis of Ortega y Gasset, I argue that his Quixote is more akin to that of Unamuno. Another substantial difference with Ortega, despite the deep respect Schutz had for him, is the way in which both challenge collectivist social concepts like Durkheim’s: Schutz considered that the social is abstract and therefore unreal, while Ortega conceived it as a substitute reality. Also, Schutz thinks that the social is opposed to the individual while Ortega shows that it opposes interaction.

scholarly journals An Approach to the Analysis of Religious Reality in the Social Phenomenology of Alfred Schütz

2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 309-327
Author(s):  
Alexey Sitnikov
Keyword(s):  
Everyday Life ◽  
Religious Tradition ◽  
Physical World ◽  
Alfred Schutz ◽  
Human Beings ◽  
Multiple Realities ◽  
Starting Point ◽  
The Social ◽  
Alfred Schütz ◽  
Social Phenomenology

The article deals with the social phenomenology of Alfred Schütz. Proceeding from the concept of multiple realities, the author describes religious reality, analyses its relationship with everyday, theoretical, and mythological realities, and identifies the areas where they overlap and their specifics. According to Schütz’s concept, reality is understood as something that has a meaning for a human being, and is also consistent and certain for those who are ‘inside’ of it. Realities are structurally similar to one another as they are similar to the reality that is most obvious for all human beings, i.e., the world of everyday life. Religious reality has one of the main signs of genuine reality, that of internal consistency. Religious reality has its own epoché (special ascetic practices) which has similarities with the epoché of the theoretical sphere since neither serve practical objectives, and imply freedom from the transitory issues of everyday life. Just as the theoretical sphere exists independently of the life of a scientist in the physical world and is needed to transfer results to other people, so the religious reality depends on ritual actions and material objects in its striving for the transcendent. Individual, and especially collective, religious practices are performed physically and are inextricably linked with the bodily ritual. The article notes that although Schütz’s phenomenological concept of multiple realities has repeatedly served as a starting point for the development of various social theories, its heuristic potential has not been exhausted. This allows for the further analyzing and development of topical issues such as national identity and its ties with religious tradition in the modern era, when religious reality loses credibility and has many competitors, one of which is the modern myth of the nation. Intersubjective ideas of the nation that are socially confirmed as the self-evident reality of everyday life cause complex emotions and fill human lives, thus displacing religious reality or forcing the latter to come into complex interactions with the national narrative.

scholarly journals Don Quixote and the social system: Interpreting Ronald Laing’s concept of ontological insecurity from Alfred Schütz’ and Talcott Parsons’ theories of social action

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 191-207
Author(s):  
Christopher Schlembach
Keyword(s):  
Social Action ◽  
Social System ◽  
Theoretical Perspective ◽  
Modern Society ◽  
Don Quixote ◽  
Alfred Schutz ◽  
Talcott Parsons ◽  
Starting Point ◽  
The Social ◽  
Alfred Schütz

Alfred Schütz and Talcott Parsons, two towering authorities of Weberian social thought are rarely interpreted in the same theoretical perspective (with the exception of Harold Garfinkel). This article intends to show that Schütz’s later writings about the constitution of social reality in the pluralized and differentiated modern society and Parsons’s concept of the social system converge with reference to their common problem of understanding interaction. In this article, I use Ronald Laing’s psychiatric thought of the early 1960s as a starting point to discuss some of the points of intersection between Schütz and Parsons. Laing argued that psychosis is not a phenomenon of the individual mind. Rather it must be understood in terms of an interaction system that is constituted by doctor and patient. The patient cannot maintain ego borders strong enough to establish a role-based social relationship and feels ontologically insecure. It is necessary to understand the patient in his existential position which constitutes his self as a kind of role. Schütz and Parsons reflected on similar interaction systems. Schütz analyzed the little social system that is established between Don Quixote and Sancho Panza; Parsons addressed the social system between doctor and patient. It is argued that Schütz and Parsons analyzed the conditions under which a social system can be established, but they also look at its breakdown leading to the situation as described by Laing.

Regionalismo e Sociedade Política

GEOgraphia ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 7
Author(s):  
Benno Werlen
Keyword(s):  
Action Theory ◽  
Social Geography ◽  
Social Philosophy ◽  
Social Processes ◽  
The Political ◽  
Alfred Schutz ◽  
Political Landscape ◽  
The Social ◽  
Space Action ◽  
Alfred Schütz

Resumo Regionalismo e Nacionalismo são forças transformadoras da paisagem política no final do século XX. Como todos nós sabemos, elas têm um alto potencial de destruição. Porque a geografia humana tradicional – como ciência do regional – tem tão pouco potencial explicativo para estes proces-sos? Forneço aqui algumas respostas a esta questão e sugiro – a partir da filosofia social de Alfred Schutz – uma perspectiva geográfica do mundo, proporcionando à geografia social uma maior capacidade de resolver problemas na modernidade tardia. Palavras-chave: regionalismo – globalização – espaço – teoria da ação.Abstract Regionalism and Nationalism are transformative forces of the political landscape at the end of the 20th century. As we all know, they have a high potential of destruction. Why has traditional human geography – as the science of the regional – so little explanatory potential when looking at these social processes? In this paper, I will give some answers to this question and suggest – drawing from the social philosophy of Alfred Schutz – a geographical perspective of the world, giving to social geography a higher capacity of problem-solving in the age of late-modernity. Keywords: regionalism – globalization – space – action theory

Alfred Schutz and ethnomethodology: Origins and departures

2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 59-75 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martyn Hammersley
Keyword(s):  
Social Sciences ◽  
Social Science ◽  
Alfred Schutz ◽  
Theory Formation ◽  
Harold Garfinkel ◽  
Social Inquiry ◽  
The Social ◽  
Early Influence ◽  
Alfred Schütz ◽  
The Relationship

The work of Alfred Schutz was an important early influence on Harold Garfinkel and therefore on the development of ethnomethodology. In this article, I try to clarify what Garfinkel drew from Schutz, as well as what he did not take from him, specifically as regards the task of social inquiry. This is done by focusing in detail on one of Schutz’s key articles: ‘Concept and Theory Formation in the Social Sciences’. The aim is thereby to illuminate the relationship between Schutz’s views on the character of social science and Garfinkel’s radical proposal for a re-specified focus of investigation. This is further pursued by examining an important debate about the link between Schutz and ethnomethodology.

scholarly journals Melacak State Of The Art Fenomenologi Dalam Kajian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 165 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isa Anshori
Keyword(s):  
Jacques Derrida ◽  
Social Life ◽  
Edmund Husserl ◽  
Social Institutions ◽  
Alfred Schutz ◽  
The Social ◽  
Philosophical Movement ◽  
Alfred Schütz ◽  
The Individual ◽  
Subjective Meanings

Phenomenology was originally a philosophical movement Edmund Husserl (1859-1838), influential to the sociologist Alfred Schutz (years 1899-1959), then developed by Peter L. Berger and Thomas Luckman, Sarte, Michel Foucault, and Jacques Derrida. Phenomenology is a part of science that has a relationship with philosophy, such as ontology, epistomology, logic and ethics. Phenomenology is not idealism, formalism, realism, positivism, but existentialism closer. Phenomenology examines human existence. Phenomenology tries to reveal subjective meanings. Researchers try to remember, understand seriously, and want to go to something beautiful and good, that's intentionality. As a science and method, phenomenology seeks meaning, positions the individual as the giver of meaning, which then results in action based on experience. Edmund Husserl and Alfred Schutz put individuals as creators, philosophical, while Peter L Berger and Thomas Luckman in "social construction" tended to find a balance between structure (society) and individuals. The phenomenological development of the social world was carried out by Alfred Schutz. The fundamental meaning of forming social is done by Sartre. Foucault looks for the origin of the meaning of social institutions in the form of prisons as a center of solitude. Whereas Jacques Derrida is more focused on examining the phenomenology of language, refining the social meaning of "deconstruction". Since then, classical phenomenology has focused on epistemology, logic, ontology and ethics. Then contemporary phenomenology seeks to dismantle various aspects behind social life, including education.

scholarly journals Use of post-truth as a political tool

2021 ◽  
Vol 25 (109) ◽  
pp. 40-46
Author(s):  
Lolo Juan Mamani Daza ◽  
Ana Rosario Miaury Vilca ◽  
Liliana Rosario Álvarez Salinas ◽  
Hilda Lizbeth Pinto Pomareda ◽  
Miguel Ángel Pacheco Quico
Keyword(s):  
New York ◽  
Buenos Aires ◽  
Qualitative Content Analysis ◽  
Alfred Schutz ◽  
Redes Sociales ◽  
Weak Institutions ◽  
The Social ◽  
Innovación Educativa ◽  
Alfred Schütz ◽  
Filter Bubble

This paper shows, through the analysis of the literature and the most recent news, how through the use of neural algorithms and the application of strategies framed in what is called post-truth, certain political groups, mainly those who hold power in democracies with weak institutions, create a segmented reality that serves their interests and that in turn makes the task of exposing the factual facts more complicated.methodologies as long as appropriate teacher training and education processes are in place. Keywords: Post-truth, discrete reality, politics. References [1]P. Berger y T. Luckmann, Construcción social de la realidad, Buenos Aires: Amorrortu Editores, 2003. [2]F. B. Morales Romero y R. R. Martínez Martínez, «La posverdad: identidades colectivas que degeneran las democracias,» Anagramas Rumbos y Sentidos de la Comunicación, vol. 19, nº 37, pp. 111-126, 2020. [3]M. Barón Pulido, Á. Duque Soto, F. Mendoza Lozano y Q.P. Wilmer, «Redes sociales y relaciones digitales, una comunicación que supera el cara a cara,» Revista Internacional de Pedagogía en Innovación educativa, vol. 1, nº 1, pp. 123-148, 2020. [4]P. Iosifidis, «The battle to end fakenews: A qualitative content analysis of Facebook announcements on how it combats disinformation,» The International Communication Gazette, vol. 82, nº 1, pp. 60-81, 2020. [5]D. Kaufman y L. Santaella, «The role of artificial intelligence algorithms in the social web,» Revista Famecos- Midia, Cultura e Tecnologia, vol. 2020, nº Unique, pp. 20-26, 2020. [6]J. Habermas, Historía y crítica de la opinión pública, Barcelona: Gustavo Gili, 2002. [7]E. Noelle-Neumann, La espiral del silencio, Barcelona:Paidós, 2010. [8]D. Innerarity, Politica para perplejos, Barcelona: Galaxia Gutenberg, 2018. [9]I. Blanco Alfonso, «Posverdad, percepción de la realidad y opinión pública. Una aproximación desde la fenomenología, » Revista de Estudios Políticos, 187, vol. 2020, nº 187, pp. 167-186, 2020. [10]V. Bufacchi, «Truth, lies and tweets: A Consensus Theory of Post-Truth.,» Philosophy and Social Criticism, vol. 47, nº3, p. 347–361, 2021. [11]J. Ortega y Gasset, Meditaciones del Quijote, Madrid: Espasa-Calpe, 1969. [12]c. Belvedere, «El problema de la realidad en el marco de la influencia hispánica en la obra de Alfred Schutz,» Investigaciones Fenomenológicas, vol. 4, nº II, pp. 245-277, 2013. [13]A. Schutz, El problema de la realidad social, Buenos Aires: Amorrortu Editores, 1995. [14]Y. Hernández Romero y R. V. Galindo Sosa, «El concepto de intersubjetividad en Alfred Schutz,» espacios Públicos, vol. 10, nº 20, pp. 228-240, 2007. [15]L. Aguilar Villanueva, «Una reconstrucción del concepto de opinión pública,» Revista Mexicana de opinión pública, vol. 12, nº 23, pp. 125-148, 2017. [16]Wikipedia, «es.wikipedia.org,» Wikipedia, 27 March 2021. [En línea]. Available: https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gallup_(empresa). [Último acceso: 30 March 2021]. [17]W. Lippmann, La opinión público, Madrid: Cuadernos de Langre, 2003. [18]P. Capilla, «De qué hablamos cuando hablamos de posverdad? Análisis del término en siete diarios de calidad.,» ElProfesional de la Información , vol. 28, nº 3, pp. 1-12, 2019. [19]D. Peter, «Public Sphere Participation Online: the Ambiguities of Affect,» Dans Les Enjeux de l'information et de la communication , vol. 19, nº 1, pp. 5-20, 2019. [20]I. Schulze Schneider, «Los medios de comunicación en la Gran Guerra: Todo por la Patria,» Historia y Comunicación Social, vol. 18, nº 1, pp. 15-30, 2013. [21]E. Parisier, The Filter Bubble: What The Internet Is Hiding From, New York: Penguin, 2012. [22]TED, «www.ted.com,» TED, 1 March 2011. [En línea]. Available: https://www.ted.com/talks/eli_pariser_beware_online_filter_bubbles?language=es. [Último acceso: 25 January 2021]. [23]B.-C. Han, La sociedad de la transparencia, Barcelona: Herder, 2013. [24]J. A. O. y. Romero, «Desinformación: concepto y perspectivas,» Real Instituto Elcano, vol. 2019, nº 41, pp. 1-8, 2019. [25]M. Arias Maldonado, La democracia sentimental. politica y emociones del siglo XXI, Barcelona: Página Indómita, 2016. [26]S. Tesich, «A government of lies,» The Nation, p. Online, 6 January 1992. [27]d. Innerarity y C. Colomina, «La verdad en las democracias algorítmicas,» Revista CIDOB d’Afers Internacionals, vol. 2020, nº 124, pp. 11-23, 2020. [28]E. Herreras y M. García-Granero, «Sobre verdad, mentira y posverdad. Elementos para una filosofía de la información., » Bajo Palabra, vol. 2020, nº 24, pp. 157-176, 2020. [29]C. Iriarte, «La era de la inmediatez,» Milenio, p. online, 28 February 2017. [30]J. E. García-Guerrero, «Redes sociales e interés político, » Icono 14, vol. 17, nº 2, pp. 231-253, 2018. [31]A. M. Lorusso, «Between Truth, Legitimacy, and Legality in the Post truth,» International Journal Semiot law, vol. 2020, nº 33, pp. 1005-1017, 2020. [32]K. Amer y J. Noujaim, Dirección, The great hack. [Película]. EEUU: netflix, 2019. [33]R. Trejo, «Escepticismo democrático y medios en disputa en tiempos de la posverdad,» Revista de la asociación española de investigaci{on de la comunicación, vol. 4, nº 8, pp. 2-9, 2017.

scholarly journals Regionalismo e Sociedade Política

GEOgraphia ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 7
Author(s):  
Benno Werlen
Keyword(s):  
Action Theory ◽  
Social Geography ◽  
Social Philosophy ◽  
Social Processes ◽  
The Political ◽  
Alfred Schutz ◽  
Political Landscape ◽  
The Social ◽  
Space Action ◽  
Alfred Schütz

Resumo Regionalismo e Nacionalismo são forças transformadoras da paisagem política no final do século XX. Como todos nós sabemos, elas têm um alto potencial de destruição. Porque a geografia humana tradicional – como ciência do regional – tem tão pouco potencial explicativo para estes proces-sos? Forneço aqui algumas respostas a esta questão e sugiro – a partir da filosofia social de Alfred Schutz – uma perspectiva geográfica do mundo, proporcionando à geografia social uma maior capacidade de resolver problemas na modernidade tardia. Palavras-chave: regionalismo – globalização – espaço – teoria da ação.Abstract Regionalism and Nationalism are transformative forces of the political landscape at the end of the 20th century. As we all know, they have a high potential of destruction. Why has traditional human geography – as the science of the regional – so little explanatory potential when looking at these social processes? In this paper, I will give some answers to this question and suggest – drawing from the social philosophy of Alfred Schutz – a geographical perspective of the world, giving to social geography a higher capacity of problem-solving in the age of late-modernity. Keywords: regionalism – globalization – space – action theory

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document