Genetic and Epigenetic Models

Author(s):  
Rudolf Uher

Both genetic variation and environmental exposures play key roles in the development of mental health or psychopathology. Their roles are interdependent: The effects of genetic variants depend on environment, and the impact of environment depends on the genetic variants. This chapter will explain and critically review the most important models of gene–environment interplay, including gene–environment correlation, gene–environment interaction, and epigenetics. Gene–environment correlation describes a mechanism where genetic variants influence the likelihood of environmental exposure. Gene–environment interactions refer to a mechanism where genetic variants influence the impact of an environmental exposure on the individual. Finally, epigenetics provides a molecular mechanism through which environmental exposures affect the function of genes for long periods of time. The chapter concludes with a discussion of the limits of current knowledge, its implications for treatment and prevention, and directions for further research.

Circulation ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 143 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth E Westerman

Background: Gene-environment interaction (GEI) analysis enables us to understand how genetic variants modify the effects of environmental exposures on cardiometabolic risk factors, providing a foundation for genome-based precision medicine. Ideally, these interactions could be mapped comprehensively across all measured genetic variants, exposures, and outcomes, but this approach is computationally intensive and statistically underpowered. Recent studies have shown that variance-quantitative trait loci (vQTLs), or genetic variants that associate with differential variance of an outcome, are substantially enriched for underlying GEIs. Here, we sought to first identify vQTLs for cardiometabolic traits, then use this smaller genetic search space to uncover novel gene-environment interactions across thousands of environmental exposures. Methods: A two-stage, multi-ancestry analysis was conducted in 355,790 unrelated participants from the UK Biobank. First, we performed a genome-wide vQTL scan for each of 20 serum metabolic biomarkers, including but not limited to lipids, lipoproteins, and glycemic measures. This scan used Levene’s test to identify genetic markers whose genotypes are associated with the variance, rather than the mean, of the biomarker. Next, we collected over 2000 variables corresponding to socioeconomic, dietary, lifestyle, and clinical exposures, and conducted an interaction analysis for each combination of exposure and vQTL-biomarker pair. For each stage, the analysis was initially stratified by ancestry then meta-analyzed to generate the primary set of results. Results: vQTLs were identified at 514 independent regions in the genome, with most of these genetic variants already known to affect the mean biomarker level. In the subsequent gene-environment interaction analysis, we found 2,162 significant interactions passing a stringent significance threshold adjusted for multiple testing ( p < 0.05 / 578 vQTL-biomarker pairs / 2140 exposures = 4х10 -8 ). Some of these expanded on existing findings; for example, genetic marker rs2393775 in the HNF1A gene interacted with education level (as a proxy for socioeconomic status) to influence hsCRP ( p = 1.3х10 -10 ), building on a previous finding that HNF1A variants modify the effect of perceived stress on cardiovascular outcomes. Others highlighted novel biology, such as an interaction between variants near the fatty liver-associated gene TM6SF2 and oily fish intake on total and LDL-cholesterol levels ( p = 6.6х10 -9 ). Conclusions: Our systematic GEI discovery effort identified thousands of interactions that may impact cardiometabolic risk, both expanding on previous research and identifying novel biological mechanisms. This catalog of vQTLs and interactions can inform future mechanistic studies and provides a knowledge base for genome-centered precision approaches to cardiometabolic health.


Author(s):  
David M. Wineroither ◽  
Rudolf Metz

AbstractThis report surveys four approaches that are pivotal to the study of preference formation: (a) the range, validity, and theoretical foundations of explanations of political preferences at the individual and mass levels, (b) the exploration of key objects of preference formation attached to the democratic political process (i.e., voting in competitive elections), (c) the top-down vs. bottom-up character of preference formation as addressed in leader–follower studies, and (d) gene–environment interaction and the explanatory weight of genetic predisposition against the cumulative weight of social experiences.In recent years, our understanding of sites and processes of (individual) political-preference formation has substantially improved. First, this applies to a greater variety of objects that provide fresh insight into the functioning and stability of contemporary democracy. Second, we observe the reaffirmation of pivotal theories and key concepts in adapted form against widespread challenge. This applies to the role played by social stratification, group awareness, and individual-level economic considerations. Most of these findings converge in recognising economics-based explanations. Third, research into gene–environment interplay rapidly increases the number of testable hypotheses and promises to benefit a wide range of approaches already taken and advanced in the study of political-preference formation.


2018 ◽  
Vol 48 (12) ◽  
pp. 1925-1936 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alyson Zwicker ◽  
Eileen M. Denovan-Wright ◽  
Rudolf Uher

AbstractSchizophrenia and other types of psychosis incur suffering, high health care costs and loss of human potential, due to the combination of early onset and poor response to treatment. Our ability to prevent or cure psychosis depends on knowledge of causal mechanisms. Molecular genetic studies show that thousands of common and rare variants contribute to the genetic risk for psychosis. Epidemiological studies have identified many environmental factors associated with increased risk of psychosis. However, no single genetic or environmental factor is sufficient to cause psychosis on its own. The risk of developing psychosis increases with the accumulation of many genetic risk variants and exposures to multiple adverse environmental factors. Additionally, the impact of environmental exposures likely depends on genetic factors, through gene–environment interactions. Only a few specific gene–environment combinations that lead to increased risk of psychosis have been identified to date. An example of replicable gene–environment interaction is a common polymorphism in theAKT1gene that makes its carriers sensitive to developing psychosis with regular cannabis use. A synthesis of results from twin studies, molecular genetics, and epidemiological research outlines the many genetic and environmental factors contributing to psychosis. The interplay between these factors needs to be considered to draw a complete picture of etiology. To reach a more complete explanation of psychosis that can inform preventive strategies, future research should focus on longitudinal assessments of multiple environmental exposures within large, genotyped cohorts beginning early in life.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Maugeri ◽  
Martina Barchitta ◽  
Maria Grazia Mazzone ◽  
Francesco Giuliano ◽  
Antonella Agodi

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the most common cause of visual loss in developed countries, with a significant economic and social burden on public health. Although genome-wide and gene-candidate studies have been enabled to identify genetic variants in the complement system associated with AMD pathogenesis, the effect of gene-environment interaction is still under debate. In this review we provide an overview of the role of complement system and its genetic variants in AMD, summarizing the consequences of the interaction between genetic and environmental risk factors on AMD onset, progression, and therapeutic response. Finally, we discuss the perspectives of current evidence in the field of genomics driven personalized medicine and public health.


CNS Spectrums ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cheryl Corcoran ◽  
Lilianne Mujica-Parodi ◽  
Scott Yale ◽  
David Leitman ◽  
Dolores Malaspina

ABSTRACTIt has long been considered that psychosocial stress plays a role in the expression of symptoms in schizophrenia (SZ), as it interacts with latent neural vulnerability that stems from genetic liability and early environmental insult. Advances in the understanding of the neurobiology of the stress cascade in both animal and human studies lead to a plausible model by which this interaction may occur: through neurotoxic effects on the hippocampus that may involve synaptic remodeling. Of late, the neurodevelopmental model of SZ etiology has been favored. But an elaboration of this schema that credits the impact of postnatal events and considers a role for neurodegenerative changes may be more plausible, given the evidence for gene-environment interaction in SZ expression and progressive structural changes observed with magnetic resonance imaging. Furthermore, new insights into nongliotic neurotoxic effects such as apoptosis, failure of neurogenesis, and changes in circuitry lead to an expansion of the time frame in which environmental effects may mediate expression of SZ symptoms.


2011 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. 544-552 ◽  
Author(s):  
Venla S. Laitala ◽  
Jacob Hjelmborg ◽  
Markku Koskenvuo ◽  
Ismo Räihä ◽  
Juha O. Rinne ◽  
...  

We analyzed the association between mean height and old age cognition in two Nordic twin cohorts with different childhood living conditions. The cognitive performance of 4720 twin individuals from Denmark (mean age 81.6 years, SD = 4.59) and Finland (mean age 74.4 years, SD = 5.26) was measured using validated cognitive screens. Taller height was associated with better cognitive performance in Finland (β-estimates 0.18 SD/10cm, p value < .001, for men and 0.13 SD, p = .008, for women), but this association was not significant in Denmark (β-estimates 0.0093 SD, p value = .16, for men and 0.0075 SD, p value = .016, for women) when adjusted for age and education/social class. Among Finnish participants higher variability of cognitive performance within shorter height quintiles was observed. Analysis using gene-environment interaction models showed that environmental factors exerted a greater impact on cognitive performance in shorter participants, whereas in taller participants' it was explained mainly by genetic factors. Our results suggest that shorter participants with childhood adversity are more vulnerable to environmental risk factors for cognitive impairment.


2009 ◽  
Vol 194 (5) ◽  
pp. 404-410 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kay Wilhelm ◽  
Bettina Meiser ◽  
Philip B. Mitchell ◽  
Adam W. Finch ◽  
Jennifer E. Siegel ◽  
...  

BackgroundRecent studies show that adverse life events have a significantly greater impact on depression onset for those with the s/s allele of the genotype for the 5-HT gene-linked promoter region. Research in genes related to risk of depression leads to the question of how this information is received by individuals.AimsTo investigate factors related to the response to receiving one's own serotonin transporter genotype results.MethodPredictors of the impact of receiving individual genotype data were assessed in 128 participants in a study of gene–environment interaction in depression onset.ResultsTwo-thirds decided to learn their individual genotype results (receivers) and prior to disclosure this decision was associated with a perception of greater benefit from receipt of the information (P=0.001). Receivers completing the 2-week (n=76) and 3-month follow-up (n=78) generally reported feeling pleased with the information and having had a more positive experience than distress. However, distress was related to genotype, with those with the s/s allele being most affected.ConclusionsThere was high interest in, and satisfaction with, learning about one's serotonin transporter genotype. Participants appeared to understand that the gene conferred susceptibility to depression rather than a direct causal effect.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document