Would Lipophilic Statin Therapy as a Prognostic Factor Improve Survival in Patients With Uterine Cervical Cancer?

2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (7) ◽  
pp. 1431-1437 ◽  
Author(s):  
Moo-Kon Song ◽  
Byoung-Sub Shin ◽  
Chung-Sik Ha ◽  
Won-Young Park
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Statin Therapy ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Uterine Cervical Cancer ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Lipophilic Statin ◽  
Statin Use

ObjectivesIn vitro studies showed that lipophilic statins inhibit cell growth, adhesion, and invasion and induce apoptosis in cancer cell lines. In uterine cervical cancer, several important factors including age, stage, anemia, lymphovascular invasion, lymph node metastases, and parametrial spread were known to significantly predict survival. We investigated whether statin therapy as a prognostic factor would significantly predict survival in cervical cancer.MethodsPatients with stages IB to IV cervical cancer who received radical hysterectomy and/or para-aortic lymph node dissection were included. The statin-use group was identified as patients who were continuously prescribed with lipophilic statins from prediagnostic period of the cancer.ResultsThe baseline characteristics of both statin-use group and control group were comparable. During a median follow-up of 36.6 months, progression-free survival and overall survival of the statin-use group were significantly higher than the control group (P< 0.001 andP= 0.004, respectively). In multivariate analysis, the statin-use group had an independent prognostic significance compared with other prognostic factors (progression-free survival: hazards ratio = 0.062, 95% confidence interval = 0.008–0.517,P= 0.010; overall survival: hazards ratio = 0.098, 95% confidence interval = 0.041–0.459,P= 0.032).ConclusionsIn the present study, continuous lipophilic statin therapy from the prediagnostic period of uterine cervical cancer could reflect favorable outcome, independently.

Prognostic Relevance of Celiac Lymph Node Involvement in Ovarian Cancer

2014 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 48-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alejandra Martínez ◽  
Cristophe Pomel ◽  
Thomas Filleron ◽  
Marjolein De Cuypere ◽  
Eliane Mery ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Oncologic Outcome ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Disease Spread ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Increased Risk

ObjectiveThe aim of the study was to report on the oncologic outcome of the disease spread to celiac lymph nodes (CLNs) in advanced-stage ovarian cancer patients.MethodsAll patients who had CLN resection as part of their cytoreductive surgery for epithelial ovarian, fallopian, or primary peritoneal cancer were identified. Patient demographic data with particular emphasis on operative records to detail the extent and distribution of the disease spread, lymphadenectomy procedures, pathologic data, and follow-up data were included.ResultsThe median follow-up was 26.3 months. The median overall survival values in the group with positive CLNs and in the group with negative CLNs were 26.9 months and 40.04 months, respectively. The median progression-free survival values in the group with metastatic CLNs and in the group with negative CLNs were 8.8 months and 20.24 months, respectively (P = 0.053). Positive CLNs were associated with progression during or within 6 months after the completion of chemotherapy (P = 0.0044). Tumor burden and extensive disease distribution were significantly associated with poor progression-free survival, short-term progression, and overall survival. In multivariate analysis, only the CLN status was independently associated with short-term progression.ConclusionsDisease in the CLN is a marker of disease severity, which is associated to a high-risk group of patients with presumed adverse tumor biology, increased risk of lymph node progression, and worst oncologic outcome.

The effect of statins on overall survival and progression-free survival in veterans with prostate cancer: A retrospective single-center experience.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 169-169
Author(s):  
Brian Warnecke ◽  
Raissa Lakene Djoufack Djoumessi ◽  
Juan Garza ◽  
Michael Mader ◽  
Shreya Chaudhary ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Progressive Disease ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
The United States ◽  
Inverse Association ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
End Point ◽  
Anti Cancer ◽  
Statin Use

169 Background: Prostate cancer is the most common cancer in men in the United States. Death in prostate cancer patients is often related to other medical conditions and not prostate cancer itself. Hence, it is important to optimize other co-morbidities, such as hyperlipidemia, hypertension, and cardiovascular diseases in these patients. However, there are numerous studies portraying the ability of statins to increase progression free survival and overall survival of prostate cancer. This has led to significant interest of statins having anti-cancer properties and ultimately improving long term outcomes. Methods: This is a retrospective observational study with chart review of 1,011 patients diagnosed with prostate cancer from 1995 to 2010 in a VA Hospital in San Antonio, Texas. Variables included age at diagnosis, statin use, type of statin (1st, 2nd, or 3rd generation), dose of statin (4 dosage levels), length of statin use, time followed in months (from diagnosis to death or end of study period), death, cause of death, and time to first progressive disease. Progressive disease was defined using PSWG2 guidelines which is PSA increase > / = 25% and at least 2ng/dl above the nadir. The Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to estimate the hazard function, with age, co-morbities and other cancers used as a covariate. End points were death by prostate cancer (56), death by any cancer (140), and death by all causes (484). We also looked at the effects of statins on progression free survival of prostate cancer. Results: The hazard ratio (HR) for use of statins and death by prostate cancer was 0.35, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.20-0.62 (p = 0.0003), indicating that statin use has a statistically significant positive effect at delaying death by prostate cancer. Death by any cancer was significantly affected by statins with a HR of 0.47, 95% CI: 0.32-0.65 (p < 0.0001). Death by all causes was also affected significantly by statins with a HR of 0.64, 95% CI: 0.53-0.78 (p < 0.0001). Length of statin use, shorter versus longer than 4 years, showed an inverse association with our primary end point with a HR of 0.53, 95% CI: 0.40-0.69 (p < 0.0001). Dose level of statin, fourth level vs 1, 2, and 3, also showed an inverse association with our primary end point with a HR of 0.73, 95% CI: 0.57-0.94 (p = 0.014). Lastly, statin exposure significantly increased progression-free survival with a HR of 0.71, 95% CI: 0.53-0.95 (p < 0.021). Conclusions: It is clear that concomitant statin use increases overall survival in patients with prostate cancer, potentially even having anti-cancer protective effects against mortality. Longer duration of statin use and higher dose levels of statins increase length of overall survival in patients with prostate cancer. As mortality is often not due to prostate cancer, more interestingly, statin exposure is also shown to increase progression-free survival.

Stereotactic radiotherapy in patients with oligometastatic or oligoprogressive gynecological malignancies: a multi-institutional analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. 865-872 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cem Onal ◽  
Melis Gultekin ◽  
Ezgi Oymak ◽  
Ozan Cem Guler ◽  
Melek Tugce Yilmaz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Local Control ◽  
Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Oligometastatic Disease

IntroductionData supporting stereotactic body radiotherapy for oligometastatic patients are increasing; however, the outcomes for gynecological cancer patients have yet to be fully explored. Our aim is to analyze the clinical outcomes of stereotactic body radiotherapy in the treatment of patients with recurrent or oligometastatic ovarian cancer or cervical cancer.MethodsThe clinical data of 29 patients (35 lesions) with oligometastatic cervical cancer (21 patients, 72%) and ovarian carcinoma (8 patients, 28%) who were treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy for metastatic sites were retrospectively evaluated. All patients had <5 metastases at diagnosis or during progression, and were treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy for oligometastatic disease. Patients with ≥5 metastases or with brain metastases and those who underwent re-irradiation for primary site were excluded. Age, progression time, mean biologically effective dose, and treatment response were compared for overall survival and progression-free survival.ResultsA total of 29 patients were included in the study. De novo oligometastatic disease was observed in 7 patients (24%), and 22 patients (76%) had oligoprogression. The median follow-up was 15.3 months (range 1.9–95.2). The 1 and 2 year overall survival rates were 85% and 62%, respectively, and the 1 and 2 year progression-free survival rates were 27% and 18%, respectively. The 1 and 2 year local control rates for all patients were 84% and 84%, respectively. All disease progressions were observed at a median time of 7.7 months (range 1.0–16.0) after the completion of stereotactic body radiotherapy. Patients with a complete response after stereotactic body radiotherapy for oligometastasis had a significantly higher 2 year overall survival and progression-free survival compared with their counterparts. In multivariate analysis, early progression (≤12 months) and complete response after stereotactic body radiotherapy for oligometastasis were the significant prognostic factors for improved overall survival. However, no significant factor was found for progression-free survival in the multivariable analysis. No patients experienced grade 3 or higher acute or late toxicities.ConclusionsPatients with early detection of oligometastasis (≤12 months) and with complete response observed at the stereotactic body radiotherapy site had a better survival compared with their counterparts. Stereotactic body radiotherapy at the oligometastatic site resulted in excellent local control rates with minimal toxicity, and can potentially contribute to long-term survival.

Stage IVA cervical cancer: outcomes of disease related complications and treatment

2020 ◽  
pp. ijgc-2019-000386
Author(s):  
Beman Roy Khulpateea ◽  
Annette Paulson ◽  
Matthew Carlson ◽  
David Scott Miller ◽  
Jayanthi Lea
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Percutaneous Nephrostomy ◽  
Emergency Department Visits ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Histologic Subtype ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Gynecology And Obstetrics

IntroductionStage IVA cervical cancer is an uncommon diagnosis. The course of the disease and the complications of treatment are not well characterized. The goal of this study was to report treatment outcomes of patients with stage IVA cervical cancer.MethodsA single institution retrospective review was carried out of all patients treated for stage IVA cervical cancer from January 2008 to July 2017. Patients were clinically staged using the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2009 staging criteria for cervical cancer. Inclusion criteria were patients with stage IVA cervical cancer of any histologic subtype, including patients with evidence of para-aortic lymph node involvement, treated at the institution during this time period. Overall survival and progression free survival were calculated using the Kaplan–Meyer method. Comparisons between survival were done using the Cox proportional hazards regression model and the log rank test.ResultsWe identified 25 patients with stage IVA cervical cancer. Mean age at diagnosis was 54 years (range 27–77). Squamous cell carcinoma was the histologic diagnosis in 24 of 25 patients (96%), with 1 case of small cell carcinoma (4%). 21 patients completed a full course of radiation. The median overall survival for patients who completed their treatment was 60 months (range 3–136), with a 2 year overall survival of 63%. The median progression free survival was 27 months (range 0–125), with a 2 year progression free survival of 40%. 11 of 25 patients (44%) developed fistulas during the course of their disease, and 55% of these were complex fistulas. 19 of 25 (76%) patients had a percutaneous nephrostomy for either hydronephrosis or diversion of vesicovaginal fistula. 111 unplanned admissions occurred among the 25 patients, and infections of the urinary tract was implicated in 46 (41%) of these. The cohort had a total of 92 emergency department visits, with pain control (36%) and medication refills (15%) being the most common presentations.DiscussionPatients with stage IVA cervical cancer may have substantial long term survival, although the sequelae of disease and treatment is associated with significant morbidity. Symptoms of fistula, percutaneous nephrostomy complications, and chronic pain present unique issues that require extensive supportive care.

Therapeutic efficacy of specific immunotherapy for glioma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 443-461 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara Hanaei ◽  
Khashayar Afshari ◽  
Armin Hirbod-Mobarakeh ◽  
Bahram Mohajer ◽  
Delara Amir Dastmalchi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Specific Immunotherapy ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Median Difference

Abstract Although different immunotherapeutic approaches have been developed for the treatment of glioma, there is a discrepancy between clinical trials limiting their approval as common treatment. So, the current systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to assess survival and clinical response of specific immunotherapy in patients with glioma. Generally, seven databases were searched to find eligible studies. Controlled clinical trials investigating the efficacy of specific immunotherapy in glioma were found eligible. After data extraction and risk of bias assessment, the data were analyzed based on the level of heterogeneity. Overall, 25 articles with 2964 patients were included. Generally, mean overall survival did not statistically improve in immunotherapy [median difference=1.51; 95% confidence interval (CI)=−0.16–3.17; p=0.08]; however, it was 11.16 months higher in passive immunotherapy (95% CI=5.69–16.64; p<0.0001). One-year overall survival was significantly higher in immunotherapy groups [hazard ratio (HR)=0.69; 95% CI=0.52–0.92; p=0.01]. As the hazard rate in the immunotherapy approach was 0.83 of the control group, 2-year overall survival was significantly higher in immunotherapy (HR=0.83; 95% CI=0.69–0.99; p=0.04). Three-year overall survival was significantly higher in immunotherapy as well (HR=0.67; 95% CI=0.48–0.92; p=0.01). Overall, median progression-free survival was significantly higher in immunotherapy (standard median difference=0.323; 95% CI=0.110–0.536; p=0.003). However, 1-year progression-free survival was not remarkably different between immunotherapy and control groups (HR=0.94; 95% CI=0.74–1.18; p=0.59). Specific immunotherapy demonstrated remarkable improvement in survival of patients with glioma and could be a considerable choice of treatment in the future. Despite the current promising results, further high-quality randomized controlled trials are required to approve immunotherapeutic approaches as the standard of care and the front-line treatment for glioma.

scholarly journals TILs and Anti-PD1 Therapy: An Alternative Combination Therapy for PDL1 Negative Metastatic Cervical Cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huanhuan Yin ◽  
Wei Guo ◽  
Xiangling Sun ◽  
Ruili Li ◽  
Cuihua Feng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Survival Time ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Multivariate Analyses ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Kaplan Meier

Background. We investigated the efficacy of TILs and anti-PD1 combination therapy in patients with metastatic cervical cancer with low MSI expression and PDL1-negative. Methods. A total of 80 patients were put on TILs and anti-PD1 combination therapy, and the progression-free survival time (PFS) and overall survival time (OS) were assessed by Kaplan–Meier analysis. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify factors that could predict the prognosis of metastatic cervical cancer in the previously described patients. Results. The objective response rate was 25%, whereas the mPFS and mOS were 6.1 and 11.3 months, respectively. The therapeutic efficacy was influenced by the characteristics of TILs, infection with HPV, and development of fever just after the therapy. Conclusion. Overall, our results show that the combination therapy of TILs and anti-PD1 significantly improves the prognosis of metastatic cervical cancer.

ATL

2012 ◽  
Vol 22 (7) ◽  
pp. 1226-1233 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jang Yoo ◽  
Joon Young Choi ◽  
Seung Hwan Moon ◽  
Duk Soo Bae ◽  
Soo Bin Park ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Fdg Pet ◽  
Tumor Volume ◽  
Metabolic Tumor Volume ◽  
Uterine Cervical Cancer ◽  
Lymph Node Status ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Node Status

ObjectiveWe compared the prognostic value of volume-based metabolic parameters determined using fluorine 18 (18F) fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) (18F-FDG PET) (with other prognostic parameters in uterine cervical cancer.MethodsThe subjects were 73 female patients who had an initial diagnosis of uterine cervical cancer and who underwent 18F-FDG PET. Various metabolic or volume-based PET parameters including maximum and average standardized uptake values, metabolic tumor volume, and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) were measured in primary cervical tumors. Survival analysis for disease-free survival or progression-free survival was performed with a Kaplan-Meier method using PET parameters and other clinical variables. For determining independent prognostic factors, Cox regression analysis was performed.ResultsRecurrence or disease progression occurred in 23 patients (31.5%). In univariate analysis, patient age (cutoff, 57 years, P < 0.05), International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage (P = 0.07), primary tumor size (cutoff, 6.7 cm; P < 0.05), lymph node status on PET (P < 0.005), treatment method (P < 0.01), metabolic tumor volume (cutoff, 82 cm3; P = 0.001), and TLG (cutoff, 7600; P = 0.005) were significant predictors of recurrence or progression. In multivariate analysis, both lymph node status on PET (hazard ratio, 1.042 [negative vs intrapelvic metastasis only], 7.008 [negative vs extrapelvic metastasis]; P < 0.001) and TLG (cutoff, 7600; hazard ratio, 2.981; P < 0.05) were independent prognostic factors for predicting recurrence.ConclusionsIn uterine cervical cancer, TLG, a volume-based metabolic parameter, and lymph node status on PET may be significant independent prognostic factors for event-free survival.

Salvage gastrectomy for unresectable advanced gastric cancer after combination chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, and S-1.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15113-e15113
Author(s):  
Kei Hosoda ◽  
Keishi Yamashita ◽  
Shinichi Sakuramoto ◽  
Hiroaki Mieno ◽  
Katsuhiko Higuchi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Pancreatic Head ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Primary Tumors ◽  
Free Survival

e15113 Background: The prognosis for patients with unresectable advanced gastric cancer treated with chemotherapy alone is extremely poor. We have evaluated the safety and efficacy of salvage gastrectomy following chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, and S-1 (DCS) in patients with unresectable advanced gastric cancer. Methods: We evaluated 30 patients with unresectable advanced gastric adenocarcinoma whose lesions were down-staged by DCS chemotherapy and who underwent salvage gastrectomy with lymph node dissection from 2006 to 2012, when visible lesions were judged resectable. We retrospectively reviewed their medical records to identify factors that would influence overall survival. Results: Of the 30 patients, 17 had extra-regional lymph node metastases, 5 had liver metastases, 9 had peritoneal dissemination and 6 had pancreatic head invasion prior to DCS chemotherapy. Of the 30 patients, 23, 3, and 4 underwent R0, R1, and R2 resection, respectively. No in-hospital deaths or reoperations occurred. Pathological evaluation of primary tumors revealed grades 3, 2, 1b, 1a, and 0 tumor regression in 4, 9, 7, 7, and 2 patients, respectively. Median progression-free survival was 19 months.Two-year progression-free survival and overall survival rates were 45% and 65%, respectively. Of 17 patients with target tumors, 15 had partial responses, making the overall response rate 88%. The most common grade 3/4 hematologic toxicity was neutropenia (56%); all treatment-related toxicities were resolved, and no patient died of toxicity-related causes. Univariate analysis showed that R1/2 surgery (p<0.001), diffuse type histology (p=0.054), histological grade 0/1a/1b following chemotherapy (p<0.033), ypN3 (p<0.001) and yply2/3 (p=0.003), were significantly prognostic of reduced overall survival. A multivariate proportional hazard model found that ypN3 (p=0.003) was the sole independent prognostic factor. Conclusions: Salvage gastrectomy after DCS chemotherapy was safe and effective in patients with unresectable advanced gastric cancer. Lymph node metastasis after chemotherapy was significantly prognostic of poor prognosis, suggesting the need for further treatment.

scholarly journals Experience of Hepatocellular Cancer Therapy with Multikinase Inhibitors in the Republic of Bashkortostan

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 183-189
Author(s):  
Sh. Kh. Gantsev ◽  
O. N. Lipatov ◽  
K. V. Menshikov ◽  
D. S. Tursumetov ◽  
Kh. S. Saydulaeva
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Chronic Hepatitis ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Elevated Serum ◽  
Malignant Neoplasm ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Overall Survival Rate ◽  
Free Survival

Introduction. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary malignant neoplasm of the liver. During the early stages, HCC is asymptomatic, which makes X-ray examination a particularly important diagnostic tool. According to WHO data, the mortality rate from HCC was 782,000 in 2018. HCC is associated with a number of risk factors: a high viral load, liver cirrhosis, detected HBeAg and elevated serum HBsAg levels. Inhibitors of tyrosine kinase receptors increase the overall survival and progression-free survival rates in patients with metastatic HCC. In this article, we conduct an analysis of results of the REFLECT study obtained for Russian patients by the Republican Clinical Oncological Dispensary, Ufa.Materials and methods. The experimental group included 9 patients (52.9%) receiving Lenvatinib. The control group included 8 patients (47.1%)) underwent therapy with Sorafenib at a dose of 800 mg per day 7 (41.17%) patients had a history of chronic hepatitis, of which hepatitis B and chronic hepatitis C was confirmed in 6 and 1 cases, respectively.Results and discussion. Over the period from 2017 up to the present, progression-free survival was observed in three patients (17.6%), of which 2 and 1 received Lenvatinib and Sorafenib, respectively. Overall survival was 10.5 months. The median overall survival rate in the experimental and control groups was 9.8 and 11.2 months, respectively. These parameters are considered comparable, provided that the sample was small.Conclusions. The use of Lenvatinib demonstrated the efficacy comparable to that of Sorafenib in terms of the overall survival rate in patients with inoperable HCC. Lenvatinib allowed statistically and clinically significant improvement in the progression-free survival and time to progression to be achieved. 

Is Primary Chemoradiation A Better Treatment? A Retrospective Study of Early Stage Node-positive Cervical Cancer.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nan Zhang ◽  
Hong Zheng
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Radical Hysterectomy ◽  
Radical Surgery ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Surgery Group ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background. Cervical cancer is the second most frequently diagnosed cancer and the third leading cause of cancer death for women in developing countries. Radical hysterectomy with bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection is usually preferred for patients of stage IB1-IIA2. Currently, image examinations have certain limitations in diagnose of lymph node metastasis and their detection accuracies are not satisfactory. Only the pathological examination after removal of the suspected metastatic lymph nodes during surgery can conclusively identify the presence of metastasis. If there is a positive result of lymphatic metastasis, there is no clear guideline whether to complete a radical surgery, or to only conduct a systematic lymphadenectomy, followed with adjuvant Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). This retrospective study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of the two treatment modalities. Methods. 49 stage IB1-IIA2 cervical cancer patients with lymphatic metastasis confirmed by systemic pelvic and para-aortic lymph node dissection from 2007 to 2018 were reviewed. The patients were treated with either primary chemoradiation or radical hysterectomy followed by adjuvant chemoradiation after lymphadenectomy. Survival states and adverse events of the two treatments were compared. Results. Median follow-up time was 45 (range 11-119 months) months. In non-radical surgery group, 1 patient (1/15, 6.7%) relapsed and died, while in radical surgery group, 7 patients (7/27, 25.9%) relapsed and 5 (5/27, 18.5%) died. Significant difference was found in the mean progression-free survival between the two groups, which was 69(95%CI 49.118-88.882) months in non-radical surgery group and 44(95%CI 35.857-52.143) months in radical surgery group (p＜0.01). There was significant difference in three-year progression-free survival(86%vs.71%, p＜0.01). Grade 3-4 toxicity was comparable between the two groups (26.7% vs. 25.9%, p=0.958). Conclusion. For stage IB1-IIA2 cervical cancer patients with positive lymph node, primary chemoradiation after pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy seems to have better survival outcomes compared with radical hysterectomy by laparoscopy plus chemoradiation in the retrospective study with limited cases. Evidence from a randomized controlled study is in need to confirm the optimal treatment for early stage node-positive cervical cancer.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document