scholarly journals Intraspecific genetic variation and species coexistence in plant communities

2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 20150853 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bodil K. Ehlers ◽  
Christian F. Damgaard ◽  
Fabien Laroche

Many studies report that intraspecific genetic variation in plants can affect community composition and coexistence. However, less is known about which traits are responsible and the mechanisms by which variation in these traits affect the associated community. Focusing on plant–plant interactions, we review empirical studies exemplifying how intraspecific genetic variation in functional traits impacts plant coexistence. Intraspecific variation in chemical and architectural traits promotes species coexistence, by both increasing habitat heterogeneity and altering competitive hierarchies. Decomposing species interactions into interactions between genotypes shows that genotype × genotype interactions are often intransitive. The outcome of plant–plant interactions varies with local adaptation to the environment and with dominant neighbour genotypes, and some plants can recognize the genetic identity of neighbour plants if they have a common history of coexistence. Taken together, this reveals a very dynamic nature of coexistence. We outline how more traits mediating plant–plant interactions may be identified, and how future studies could use population genetic surveys of genotype distribution in nature and methods from trait-based ecology to better quantify the impact of intraspecific genetic variation on plant coexistence.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gaurav S. Kandlikar ◽  
Xinyi Yan ◽  
Jonathan M. Levine ◽  
Nathan J.B. Kraft

AbstractSoil microorganisms influence a variety of processes in plant communities. Many the-oretical and empirical studies have shown that dynamic feedbacks between plants and soil microbes can stabilize plant coexistence by generating negative frequency-dependent plant population dynamics. However, inferring the net effects of soil microbes on plant coexistence requires also quantifying the degree to which they provide one species an average fitness advantage, an effect that has received little empirical attention. We conducted a greenhouse study to quantify microbially mediated stabilization and fitness differences among fifteen pairs of annual plants that co-occur in southern California grasslands. We found that although soil microbes frequently generate negative frequency-dependent dynamics that stabilize plant interactions, they simultaneously mediate large average fitness differences between species. The net result is that if the plant species are otherwise competitively equivalent, the impact of plant-soil feedbacks is often to favor species exclusion over coexistence, a result that only becomes evident by quantifying the microbially mediated fitness difference. Our work highlights that comparing the stabilizing effects of plant-soil feedbacks to the fitness difference they generate is essential for understanding the influence of soil microbes on plant diversity.


Ecology ◽  
2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher J. Lortie

Species interactions are a cornerstone of ecological research wherein the effects of an individual of one species on another individual, frequently a different species, are studied. Within versus between species interactions are also commonly contrasted as a means to infer relative importance, but the majority of theory advances, at least at the community level, are associated with interactions between individuals of different species. Interactions can range from positive to negative, and effects are measured at all levels of development, or life history stages, of an organism. Positive interactions have been extensively studied in both population and community ecology. Facilitation, however, is a relatively specific term that has evolved primarily to describe positive plant–plant interactions (see Defining Facilitation). Facilitation, or positive interactions, is a relatively recent subset of these species interactions in general, including related processes, such as competition, mutualism, and parasitism. Facilitation is best viewed as the antithesis of the plant competition literature, as it shares many of the main attributes, both in terms of scope and approach, and arose as a comparator to this research. Facilitation studies mainly refer to positive plant–plant interactions, as the term was proposed in the plant literature and extensively used to describe interactions that include a positive effect of one species on another. Mutualism and parasitism research is often plant–insect based and formally identifies the reciprocal effect in the interaction, that is, (+, +) in mutualism and (+,−) in parasitism, whereas facilitation studies are generally (+,0) or (+,?), with the second effect often unreported. Interactions that include at least one negative interaction are usually described as competition in the plant literature and do not apply the term facilitation (although the frequency of both being discussed concomitantly is increasing). Hence, the term facilitation, owing to historical use, describes the subset of interactions that are (+,0) and is mostly specific to within plants, although its usage is expanding. The research on facilitation has most likely peaked, similar to plant competition studies, in that facilitation has been clearly established as an important process in the formation of plant communities. Additional studies simply demonstrating facilitation are increasing unlikely to be present in the literature. That said, the implications to theory and other, more nuanced aspects of interaction, such as context dependence, shifting balances, and importance of the environment, as they relate to facilitation, are still largely unexplored. In the early 21st century the most contentious debates, with respect to facilitation, center on either disagreement concerning what a community is and whether research should be conducted at this scale or on how to use environmental gradients (i.e., stress) most effectively. Both of these topics are described herein, with readings also included on Historical Background, Experimental and Analytical Approaches, Evolution, other taxa, and Applications.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xinyi Yan ◽  
Jonathan M. Levine ◽  
Gaurav S. Kandlikar

Soil microorganisms play a major role in shaping plant diversity, not only through their direct effects as pathogens, mutualists, and decomposers, but also by altering interactions between plants. In particular, previous research has shown that the soil community often generates frequency-dependent feedback loops among plants that can either destabilize species interactions, or generate stabilizing niche differences that promote species coexistence. However, recent insights from modern coexistence theory have shown that microbial effects on plant coexistence depend not only on these stabilizing or destabilizing effects, but also on the degree to which they generate competitive fitness differences. While many previous experiments have generated the data necessary for evaluating microbially mediated fitness differences, these effects have rarely been quantified in the literature. Here we present a meta-analysis of data from 50 studies, which we used to quantify the microbially mediated (de)stabilization and fitness differences derived from a classic plant-soil feedback model. Across 518 pairwise comparisons, we found that soil microbes generated both stabilization (or destabilization) and fitness differences, but also that the microbially mediated fitness differences dominated. As a consequence, if plants are otherwise equivalent competitors, the balance of soil microbe-generated (de)stabilization and fitness differences drives species exclusion much more frequently than coexistence or priority effects. Our work shows that microbially mediated fitness differences are an important but overlooked effect of soil microbes on plant coexistence. This finding paves the way for a more complete understanding of the processes that maintain plant biodiversity.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valentin Gfeller ◽  
Meret Huber ◽  
Christiane Förster ◽  
Wei Huang ◽  
Tobias G. Köllner ◽  
...  

AbstractVolatile organic compounds (VOCs) emitted by plant leaves can influence the physiology of neighboring plants. In contrast to interactions above ground, little is known about the role of VOCs in belowground plant-plant interactions. Here, we characterize constitutive root volatile emissions of the spotted knapweed (Centaurea stoebe) and explore the impact of these volatiles on the germination and growth of different sympatric plant species. We show that C. stoebe roots emit high amounts of sesquiterpenes, with estimated release rates of (E)-β-caryophyllene above 3 μg g−1 dw h−1. Sesquiterpene emissions show little variation between different C. stoebe populations, but vary substantially between different Centaurea species. Through root transcriptome sequencing, we identify six root-expressed sesquiterpene synthases (TPSs). Two root-specific TPSs, CsTPS4 and CsTPS5, are sufficient to produce the full blend of emitted root sesquiterpenes. Volatile exposure experiments demonstrate that C. stoebe root volatiles have neutral to positive effects on the germination and growth of different sympatric neighbors. Thus, constitutive root sesquiterpenes produced by two C. stoebe TPSs are associated with facilitation of sympatric neighboring plants. The release of root VOCs may thus influence C. stoebe abundance and plant community structure in nature.


Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 5014-5014
Author(s):  
Gabriele Buda ◽  
Alessandro Martino ◽  
Daniele Campa ◽  
Juan Sainz ◽  
Rui Manuel Vieira Reis ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 5014 Exposure to toxic compounds and pesticides leads to an increased risk to develop Multiple Myeloma (MM). The metabolism and the excretion of xenobiotics are mediated by the enzymes and transporters acting in the detoxifying/elimination process. The nuclear receptors NR1I2 (or PXR) and NR1I3 (or CAR) act as xenosensor activating the detoxifying/elimination process in response to the intracellular levels of xenobiotics. It has been hypothesized that part of the individual variability in drug metabolism efficiency could be due to the genetic variations within these regulator genes affecting their expression and/or function. To investigate the impact of genetic variation within these genes on MM susceptibility, we selected and genotyped 10 tag Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) in the PXR gene and 7 tag SNPs in the CAR gene in 627 MM cases (320 males and 307 females) and 883 (459 males and 424 females) controls from different European populations. All the SNPs were in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (p>0.001), with the exception of the PXR SNP rs2461818 that was therefore excluded from the analysis. We found no association of any of the genotyped SNPs with MM risk. In the same way, haplotype distribution showed no differences between cases and controls. This was the first comprehensive investigation of genetic variation in xenobiotic regulators genes PXR and CAR in relation to MM risk and our data suggest that common variants in these genes have no impact in modifying MM risk. Table I. Genotype distribution of the PXR and CAR SNPs among MM cases and controls. SNP (rs) Cases (%) Controls (%) OR* 95%C.I. p-value p-trend PXR C/C 429 (69.5) 623 (70.7) 1.00 Ref 0.423 rs10511395 A/C 160 (25.9) 228 (25.9) 1.02 0.81 – 1.30 0.851 A/A 28 (4.6) 30 (3.4) 1.38 0.81 – 2.35 0.232 PXR C/C 452 (74.0) 656 (74.8) 1.00 Ref 0.451 rs1054190 C/T 137 (22.4) 200 (22.8) 1.00 0.78 – 1.28 0.993 T/T 22 (3.6) 21 (2.4) 1.56 0.84 – 2.88 0.155 PXR C/C 412 (65.9) 591 (67.2) 1.00 Ref 0.819 rs11917714 C/T 190 (30.4) 250 (28.5) 1.07 0.85 – 1.35 0.535 T/T 23 (3.7) 38 (4.3) 0.84 0.49 – 1.44 0.536 PXR C/C 223 (36.3) 296 (33.7) 1.00 Ref 0.126 rs12488820 C/T 289 (47.0) 407 (46.4) 0.93 0.74 – 1.18 0.574 T/T 103 (16.7) 175 (19.9) 0.79 0.58 – 1.06 0.119 PXR G/G 430 (69.6) 593 (67.4) 1.00 Ref 0.807 rs13071341 A/G 166 (26.9) 269 (30.6) 0.85 0.67 – 1.07 0.158 A/A 22 (3.5) 18 (2.0) 1.70 0.90 – 3.22 0.102 PXR A/A 352 (58.7) 516 (39.4) 1.00 Ref 0.981 rs3237359 A/G 209 (34.8) 291 (33.5) 1.04 0.83 – 1.30 0.720 G/G 39 (6.5) 62 (7.1) 0.90 0.59 – 1.37 0.619 PXR C/C 255 (41.2) 383 (43.6) 1.00 Ref 0.815 rs13059232 C/T 299 (48.3) 390 (44.4) 1.16 0.93 – 1.44 0.192 T/T 65 (10.5) 106 (12.0) 0.94 0.66 – 1.33 0.711 PXR A/A 300 (48.7) 437 (49.7) 1.00 Ref 0.258 rs3732357 A/G 240 (39.0) 361 (41.0) 0.94 0.75 – 1.17 0.589 G/G 76 (12.3) 82 (9.3) 1.31 0.92 – 1.85 0.130 PXR T/T 328 (53.6) 463 (52.9) 1.00 Ref 0.424 rs1357459 C/T 249 (40.7) 345 (39.4) 1.02 0.82 – 1.27 0.850 C/C 35 (5.7) 67 (7.7) 0.75 0.49 – 1.17 0.206 CAR A/A 218 (35.4) 335 (38.1) 1.00 Ref 0.571 rs3003596 A/G 296 (48.0) 393 (44.7) 1.16 0.93 – 1.46 0.191 G/G 102 (16.6) 151 (17.2) 1.04 0.77 – 1.41 0.799 CAR G/G 264 (42.7) 371 (42.0) 1.00 Ref 0.642 rs3813627 G/T 276 (44.7) 392 (44.4) 0.98 0.79 – 1.23 0.882 T/T 78 (12.6) 120 (13.6) 0.91 0.66 – 1.26 0.581 CAR A/A 441 (73.1) 635 (73.5) 1.00 Ref 0.911 rs11265571 A/T 147 (24.4) 207 (24.0) 1.01 0.79 – 1.29 0.911 T/T 15 (2.5) 22 (2.5) 0.97 0.49 – 1.89 0.921 CAR T/T 404 (64.2) 575 (65.7) 1.00 Ref 0.836 rs2307418 G/T 193 (31.1) 268 (30.6) 1.02 0.81 – 1.27 0.879 G/G 23 (3.7) 32 (3.7) 1.05 0.60 – 1.83 0.863 CAR C/C 348 (56.6) 508 (57.7) 1.00 Ref 0.527 rs2502805 C/T 220 (35.8) 313 (35.6) 1.05 0.84 – 1.30 0.693 T/T 47 (7.6) 59 (6.7) 1.16 0.77 – 1.74 0.484 CAR A/A 245 (39.8) 346 (39.4) 1.00 Ref 0.770 rs4073054 A/C 291 (47.2) 412 (46.9) 0.98 0.78 – 1.22 0.855 C/C 80 (13.0) 120 (13.7) 0.94 0.68 – 1.31 0.720 CAR C/C 360 (57.6) 524 (59.8) 1.00 Ref 0.391 rs4233368 A/C 225 (36.0) 302 (34.4) 1.09 0.88 – 1.36 0.439 A/A 40 (6.4) 51 (5.8) 1.15 0.74 – 1.78 0.538 Genotype distribution among MM cases and controls in the overall population. * OR are adjusted for age, gender and region of origin. Differences in samples numbers are due to failures in genotyping. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sabrina S. Gavini ◽  
Agustín Sáez ◽  
Cristina Tur ◽  
Marcelo A. Aizen

AbstractPollinator-mediated plant–plant interactions have traditionally been viewed within the competition paradigm. However, facilitation via pollinator sharing might be the rule rather than the exception in harsh environments. Moreover, plant diversity could be playing a key role in fostering pollinator-mediated facilitation. Yet, the facilitative effect of plant diversity on pollination remains poorly understood, especially under natural conditions. By examining a total of 9371 stigmas of 88 species from nine high-Andean communities in NW Patagonia, we explored the prevalent sign of the relation between conspecific pollen receipt and heterospecific pollen diversity, and assessed whether the incidence of different outcomes varies with altitude and whether pollen receipt relates to plant diversity. Conspecific pollen receipt increased with heterospecific pollen diversity on stigmas. In all communities, species showed either positive or neutral but never negative relations between the number of heterospecific pollen donor species and conspecific pollen receipt. The incidence of species showing positive relations increased with altitude. Finally, stigmas collected from communities with more co-flowering species had richer heterospecific pollen loads and higher abundance of conspecific pollen grains. Our findings suggest that plant diversity enhances pollination success in high-Andean plant communities. This study emphasizes the importance of plant diversity in fostering indirect plant–plant facilitative interactions in alpine environments, which could promote species coexistence and biodiversity maintenance.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noora Poikela ◽  
Johanna Kinnunen ◽  
Mareike Wurdack ◽  
Hannele Kauranen ◽  
Thomas Schmitt ◽  
...  

AbstractThe impact of different reproductive barriers on species or population isolation may vary in different stages of speciation depending on evolutionary forces acting within species and through species’ interactions. Genetic incompatibilities between interacting species are expected to reinforce prezygotic barriers in sympatric populations and create character displacement between conspecific populations living within and outside the area of sympatry. The outcome of reinforcement has been suggested to be affected by the strength of postzygotic barriers, the history of species coexistence, and the impact of species abundancies on females’ discrimination against heterospecific males. We tested these predictions in Drosophila montana and Drosophila flavomontana populations from different geographic regimes. All barriers between D. montana females and D. flavomontana males were extremely strong, while in the reciprocal cross postzygotic isolation was less effective and the target of reinforcement varied according to population type. In long-established sympatric populations, where D. flavomontana is abundant, reinforcement targeted sexual isolation, and in populations, where this species is a new invader and rare, reinforcement targeted postmating prezygotic barriers. Reinforcement of these barriers also created respective barriers between different D. flavomontana populations. These findings show that interspecies interactions have far-reaching effects on strengthening species barriers and promoting speciation.


Author(s):  
Nur Widiastuti

The Impact of monetary Policy on Ouput is an ambiguous. The results of previous empirical studies indicate that the impact can be a positive or negative relationship. The purpose of this study is to investigate the impact of monetary policy on Output more detail. The variables to estimatate monetery poicy are used state and board interest rate andrate. This research is conducted by Ordinary Least Square or Instrumental Variabel, method for 5 countries ASEAN. The state data are estimated for the period of 1980 – 2014. Based on the results, it can be concluded that the impact of monetary policy on Output shown are varied.Keyword: Monetary Policy, Output, Panel Data, Fixed Effects Model


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yumiko Murai ◽  
Ryohei Ikejiri ◽  
Yuhei Yamauchi ◽  
Ai Tanaka ◽  
Seiko Nakano

Cultivating children’s creativity and imagination is fundamental to preparing them for an increasingly complex and uncertain future. Engaging in creative learning enables children to think independently and critically, work cooperatively, and take risks while actively engaging in problem solving. While current trends in education, such as maker movements and computer science education, are dramatically expanding children’s opportunities for engagement in creative learning, comparatively few empirical studies explore how creative learning can be integrated into the school curriculum. The educational design research described in this paper focuses on a curriculum unit that enables students to engage with creative learning through computer programming activities while meeting curriculum goals. The data provided in this paper were drawn from three classroom tryouts, the results of which were used to drive an iterative design process. This paper also shares several insights on the impact of creative learning in curriculum teaching.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document