scholarly journals Intrafamily and intragenomic conflicts in human warfare

2017 ◽  
Vol 284 (1849) ◽  
pp. 20162699 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alberto J. C. Micheletti ◽  
Graeme D. Ruxton ◽  
Andy Gardner

Recent years have seen an explosion of multidisciplinary interest in ancient human warfare. Theory has emphasized a key role for kin-selected cooperation, modulated by sex-specific demography, in explaining intergroup violence. However, conflicts of interest remain a relatively underexplored factor in the evolutionary-ecological study of warfare, with little consideration given to which parties influence the decision to go to war and how their motivations may differ. We develop a mathematical model to investigate the interplay between sex-specific demography and human warfare, showing that: the ecology of warfare drives the evolution of sex-biased dispersal; sex-biased dispersal modulates intrafamily and intragenomic conflicts in relation to warfare; intragenomic conflict drives parent-of-origin-specific patterns of gene expression—i.e. ‘genomic imprinting’—in relation to warfare phenotypes; and an ecological perspective of conflicts at the levels of the gene, individual, and social group yields novel predictions as to pathologies associated with mutations and epimutations at loci underpinning human violence.

2018 ◽  
Vol 115 (42) ◽  
pp. E9962-E9970 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haifeng Zhu ◽  
Wenxiang Xie ◽  
Dachao Xu ◽  
Daisuke Miki ◽  
Kai Tang ◽  
...  

Genomic imprinting is a form of epigenetic regulation resulting in differential gene expression that reflects the parent of origin. In plants, imprinted gene expression predominantly occurs in the seed endosperm. Maternal-specific DNA demethylation by the DNA demethylase DME frequently underlies genomic imprinting in endosperm. Whether other more ubiquitously expressed DNA demethylases regulate imprinting is unknown. Here, we found that the DNA demethylase ROS1 regulates the imprinting of DOGL4. DOGL4 is expressed from the maternal allele in endosperm and displays preferential methylation and suppression of the paternal allele. We found that ROS1 negatively regulates imprinting by demethylating the paternal allele, preventing its hypermethylation and complete silencing. Furthermore, we found that DOGL4 negatively affects seed dormancy and response to the phytohormone abscisic acid and that ROS1 controls these processes by regulating DOGL4. Our results reveal roles for ROS1 in mitigating imprinted gene expression and regulating seed dormancy.


eLife ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne C Ferguson-Smith ◽  
Deborah Bourchis

The discovery of genomic imprinting by Davor Solter, Azim Surani and co-workers in the mid-1980s has provided a foundation for the study of epigenetic inheritance and the epigenetic control of gene activity and repression, especially during development. It also has shed light on a range of diseases, including both rare genetic disorders and common diseases. This article is being published to celebrate Solter and Surani receiving a 2018 Canada Gairdner International Award "for the discovery of mammalian genomic imprinting that causes parent-of-origin specific gene expression and its consequences for development and disease".


Author(s):  
Benjamin P. Oldroyd ◽  
Boris Yagound

Haplo-diploidy and the relatedness asymmetries it generates mean that social insects are prime candidates for the evolution of genomic imprinting. In single-mating social insect species, some genes may be selected to evolve genomic mechanisms that enhance reproduction by workers when they are inherited from a female. This situation reverses in multiple mating species, where genes inherited from fathers can be under selection to enhance the reproductive success of daughters. Reciprocal crosses between subspecies of honeybees have shown strong parent-of-origin effects on worker reproductive phenotypes, and this could be evidence of such genomic imprinting affecting genes related to worker reproduction. It is also possible that social insect fathers directly affect gene expression in their daughters, for example, by placing small interfering RNA molecules in semen. Gene expression studies have repeatedly found evidence of parent-specific gene expression in social insects, but it is unclear at this time whether this arises from genomic imprinting, paternal manipulation, an artefact of cyto-nuclear interactions, or all of these. This article is part of the theme issue ‘How does epigenetics influence the course of evolution?’


2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (7) ◽  
pp. 2227-2234 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yasuaki Takada ◽  
Ryutaro Miyagi ◽  
Aya Takahashi ◽  
Toshinori Endo ◽  
Naoki Osada

Abstract Joint quantification of genetic and epigenetic effects on gene expression is important for understanding the establishment of complex gene regulation systems in living organisms. In particular, genomic imprinting and maternal effects play important roles in the developmental process of mammals and flowering plants. However, the influence of these effects on gene expression are difficult to quantify because they act simultaneously with cis-regulatory mutations. Here we propose a simple method to decompose cis-regulatory (i.e., allelic genotype), genomic imprinting [i.e., parent-of-origin (PO)], and maternal [i.e., maternal genotype (MG)] effects on allele-specific gene expression using RNA-seq data obtained from reciprocal crosses. We evaluated the efficiency of method using a simulated dataset and applied the method to whole-body Drosophila and mouse trophoblast stem cell (TSC) and liver RNA-seq data. Consistent with previous studies, we found little evidence of PO and MG effects in adult Drosophila samples. In contrast, we identified dozens and hundreds of mouse genes with significant PO and MG effects, respectively. Interestingly, a similar number of genes with significant PO effect were detect in mouse TSCs and livers, whereas more genes with significant MG effect were observed in livers. Further application of this method will clarify how these three effects influence gene expression levels in different tissues and developmental stages, and provide novel insight into the evolution of gene expression regulation.


Author(s):  
Andrés G. de la Filia ◽  
Andrew J. Mongue ◽  
Jennifer Dorrens ◽  
Hannah Lemon ◽  
Dominik R. Laetsch ◽  
...  

AbstractGenetic conflict is considered a key driver in the evolution of new reproductive and sex determining systems. In particular, reproductive strategies with non-Mendelian inheritance, where parents do not contribute equally to the genetic makeup of their offspring. One of the most extraordinary examples of non-Mendelian inheritance is paternal genome elimination (PGE), a form of haplodiploidy which has evolved repeatedly across arthropods. Under PGE, males are diploid but only transmit maternally-inherited chromosomes to their offspring, while the paternal homologues are excluded from sperm. This asymmetric inheritance is thought to have evolved through an evolutionary arms race between paternal and maternal genomes over transmission to future generations. In several clades with PGE, such as the mealybugs (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae), paternal chromosomes are not just eliminated from sperm, but also heterochromatinised early in development and thought to remain inactive. Such paternal genome silencing could alleviate genetic conflict between paternal alleles over transmission. However, it is unclear if paternal chromosomes are indeed genetically inert in both soma and germline. Here, we present a parent-of-origin allele-specific transcriptome analysis in male mealybugs. We show that expression is globally biased towards the maternal genome, but detect activity of paternal chromosomes in both somatic and reproductive tissues. Up to 70% of somatically-expressed genes are to some degree paternally-expressed. However, paternal genome expression is much more restricted in the testis, with only 20% of genes showing paternal contribution. Finally, we show that the patterns of parent-of-origin-specific gene expression are remarkably similar across genotypes and that those genes with biparental expression show elevated rates of molecular evolution. Our results provide the clearest example yet of genome-wide genomic imprinting (parent-of-origin specific gene expression) in insects. Furthermore, it enhances our understanding of PGE, which will aid future empirical tests of evolutionary theory regarding the origin of this unusual reproductive strategy.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (6) ◽  
pp. 479-490 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hollie Marshall ◽  
Jelle S. van Zweden ◽  
Anneleen Van Geystelen ◽  
Kristof Benaets ◽  
Felix Wäckers ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 59 (4) ◽  
pp. 403-415 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ken Kraaijeveld

AbstractConflicts of interest between male and females over reproduction and gene expression are thought to be widespread among animals. However, most research on sexual conflict focuses on diploid, bisexual organisms. It is not obvious that the role of sexual conflict is the same in diploids as in organisms with different reprodutive systems. Here, I consider the potential for evolutionary change through sexual conflict in haplodiploids. As very little sexual conflict theory has been developed specifically for haplodiploids, I rely on the analogy between haplodiploid reproduction and X-chromosomal inheritance. The main conclusions are that the opportunity for between-locus sexual conflict should be the same for haplodiploids as for diploids, provided that the sexually antagonistic alleles involved are sex-limited from when they first appear. Empirical data testing this hypothesis are almost non-existent. The dynamics of within-locus sexual conflict are likely to differ strongly between haplodiploid and autosomal diploid genes depending on the dominance interactions between male and female alleles. In general, it is expected that this type of conflict will often be resolved in favour of females in haplodiploids. A number of factors, such as genomic imprinting and lack of recombination between male and female genomes may prevent this outcome.


2021 ◽  
Vol 118 (29) ◽  
pp. e2104445118
Author(s):  
Jessica A. Rodrigues ◽  
Ping-Hung Hsieh ◽  
Deling Ruan ◽  
Toshiro Nishimura ◽  
Manoj K. Sharma ◽  
...  

Parent-of-origin–dependent gene expression in mammals and flowering plants results from differing chromatin imprints (genomic imprinting) between maternally and paternally inherited alleles. Imprinted gene expression in the endosperm of seeds is associated with localized hypomethylation of maternally but not paternally inherited DNA, with certain small RNAs also displaying parent-of-origin–specific expression. To understand the evolution of imprinting mechanisms in Oryza sativa (rice), we analyzed imprinting divergence among four cultivars that span both japonica and indica subspecies: Nipponbare, Kitaake, 93-11, and IR64. Most imprinted genes are imprinted across cultivars and enriched for functions in chromatin and transcriptional regulation, development, and signaling. However, 4 to 11% of imprinted genes display divergent imprinting. Analyses of DNA methylation and small RNAs revealed that endosperm-specific 24-nt small RNA–producing loci show weak RNA-directed DNA methylation, frequently overlap genes, and are imprinted four times more often than genes. However, imprinting divergence most often correlated with local DNA methylation epimutations (9 of 17 assessable loci), which were largely stable within subspecies. Small insertion/deletion events and transposable element insertions accompanied 4 of the 9 locally epimutated loci and associated with imprinting divergence at another 4 of the remaining 8 loci. Correlating epigenetic and genetic variation occurred at key regulatory regions—the promoter and transcription start site of maternally biased genes, and the promoter and gene body of paternally biased genes. Our results reinforce models for the role of maternal-specific DNA hypomethylation in imprinting of both maternally and paternally biased genes, and highlight the role of transposition and epimutation in rice imprinting evolution.


Reproduction ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 130 (4) ◽  
pp. 389-399 ◽  
Author(s):  
A K E Swales ◽  
N Spears

Genomic imprinting is the parent-of-origin specific gene expression which is a vital mechanism through both development and adult life. One of the key elements of the imprinting mechanism is DNA methylation, controlled by DNA methyltransferase enzymes. Germ cells undergo reprogramming to ensure that sex-specific genomic imprinting is initiated, thus allowing normal embryo development to progress after fertilisation. In some cases, errors in genomic imprinting are embryo lethal while in others they lead to developmental disorders and disease. Recent studies have suggested a link between the use of assisted reproductive techniques and an increase in normally rare imprinting disorders. A greater understanding of the mechanisms of genomic imprinting and the factors that influence them are important in assessing the safety of these techniques.


Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 2521-2521
Author(s):  
Dong-Myung Shin ◽  
Ewa Zuba-Surma ◽  
Rui Liu ◽  
Mariusz Z Ratajczak ◽  
Magdalena Kucia

Abstract Abstract 2521 Poster Board II-498 Recently, we identified a population of pluripotent VSELs in murine adult bone marrow (BM; Leukemia 2006:20;857). Compared with other adult stem cells (SCs), VSELs show unique epigenetic features including: i) open chromatin structures in the promoter of Oct-4 and Nanog; and ii) parent-of-origin-specific reprogramming of genomic imprinting. These features explain the pluripotent embryonic-like nature and quiescent status of these cells, respectively (Leukemia 2009:In press), and indicate their relation to an epiblast/germ-line pluripotent (P)SC population. To better understand the developmental origin of VSELs, we examined gene expression profiles and the epigenetic status of epiblast and germ-line related genes in these cells. We employed real time quantitative PCR (RQ-PCR) to evaluate gene expression, a bisulfite sequencing strategy to evaluate DNA methylation, and chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) to elucidate histone codes in genes of interest. VSELs were isolated from murine BM by multiparameter fluorescence-activated cell sorter (FACS) as a population of Sca+lin−CD45− along with Sca+lin−CD45+ hematopoietic (H)SCs and BM mononuclear cells (MNCs). We noticed that VSELs, similarly to epiblast PSCs (EpiSCs), highly express the stemness genes (e.g., Oct-4, Nanog, Sox2, Klf4) and epiblast markers (Gbx2, Fgf5, Nodal). However, the Rex1 gene is expressed at a lower level compared to the murine ESC-D3 line. Moreover, VSELs also highly express the Stella, Blimp1, Dnd1, and Nanos3, which are developmental regulators during specification in the proximal epiblast of PGCs. Accordingly, the Stella promoter in VSELs was partially demethylated and highly enriched for transcriptionally active histones (acetylated H3, trimethylated lysine4 of H3) while being simultaneously less enriched for repressive ones (dimethylated lysine9 and trimethylated lysine27 of H3). In particular, we noticed that VSELs resemble migratory PGCs. To support this notion, VSELs: i) express several markers of migratory PGCs (Dppa2, Dppa4, Mvh); ii) do not express post-migratory PGCs genes (Dazl, Sycp3); and iii) have reprogrammed DNA demethylation in the repetitive sequence (LINE1) and the promoters of Mvh, Dazal, and Sycp3. Finally, VSELs express less the transcripts for cMyc, Stat3, Snai, and Ecat1, which are expressed in early specified PGCs. In conclusion, our previous data showing reprogramming of genomic imprinting in VSELs with the present gene expression profile and epigenetic studies strongly supports VSELs developmentally originating from epiblast-derived germ-line SCs (PGCs), particularly migratory PGCs. We believe VSELs are deposited during embryogenesis in the adult tissues as a backup for tissue-committed SCs and that epigenetic reprogramming tightly controls their proliferative potential. Thus, identification of mechanisms that control and modify the epigenetic marks in VSELs will be crucial for developing more powerful strategies to “unleash the power” of these cells and employ them in regenerative medicine. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document