scholarly journals Transformation of the Tanzania Medical Store Department through Global Fund support: lessons learned from the field

Author(s):  
Patrick Githendu ◽  
Linden Morrison ◽  
Rosemary Silaa ◽  
Sai Pothapregada ◽  
Sarah Asiimwe ◽  
...  

AbstractBackgroundThe Tanzania government sought support from The Global Fund to Fight AIDs, Tuberculosis and Malaria (Global Fund) to reform its Medical Stores Department (MSD), with the aim of improving performance. Our study aimed to assess the impact of the reforms and document the lessons learned.MethodsWe applied quantitative and qualitative research methods to assess the impact of the reforms. The quantitative part entailed a review of operational and financial data covering the period before and after the implementation of the reforms. We applied interrupted time series analysis to determine the change in average availability of essential health commodities at health zones. Qualitative data was collected through 41 key informant interviews. Participants were identified through stakeholder mapping, purposive and snowballing sampling techniques, and responses were analyzed through thematic content analysis.ResultsAvailability of essential health commodities increased significantly by 12.6% (95%CI, 9.6-15.6), after the reforms and continued to increase on a monthly basis by 0.2% (95%CI, 0.0-0.3) relative to the preintervention trend. Sales increased by 56.6% while the cost of goods sold increased by 88.6% between 2014/15 and 2017/18. Surplus income increased by 56.4% between 2014/15 and 2017/18, with reductions in rent and fuel expenditure. There was consensus among participants that the reforms, were instrumental in improving performance of MSD.ConclusionMany positive results were realized through the reforms at MSD. However, despite the progress, there were risks such as the increasing government receivable that could jeopardize the gains. Multi-stakeholder efforts are necessary, to sustain the progress and expand public health.

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. e040276
Author(s):  
Patrick Githendu ◽  
Linden Morrison ◽  
Rosemary Silaa ◽  
Sai Pothapregada ◽  
Sarah Asiimwe ◽  
...  

BackgroundThe Tanzania government sought support from The Global Fund to Fight AIDs, Tuberculosis and Malaria to reform its Medical Stores Department, with the aim of improving performance. The study sought to assess the impact of the reforms and document the lessons learnt.MethodsQuantitative and qualitative research methods were applied to assess the impact of the reforms. The quantitative part entailed a review of operational and financial data covering the period before and after the implementation of the reforms. Interrupted time series analysis was used to determine the change in average availability of essential health commodities at health zones. Qualitative data were collected through 41 key informant interviews. Participants were identified through stakeholder mapping, purposive and snowballing sampling techniques and responses were analysed through thematic content analysis.ResultsAvailability of essential health commodities increased significantly by 12.6% (95% CI 9.6% to 15.6%) after the reforms and continued to increase on a monthly basis by 0.2% (95%CI 0.0% to 0.3%) relative to the preintervention trend. Sales increased by 56.6% while the cost of goods sold increased by 88.6% between 2014/2015 and 2017/2018. Surplus income increased by 56.4% between 2014/2015 and 2017/2018 with reductions in rent and fuel expenditure. There was consensus among study participants that the reforms were instrumental in improving performance of the Medical Stores Department.ConclusionPositive results were realised through the reforms. However, despite the progress, there were risks such as the increasing government receivable that could jeopardise the sustainability of the gains. Therefore, multistakeholder efforts are necessary to make progress and expand public health.


2016 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 296-299 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica Gillon ◽  
Meng Xu ◽  
James Slaughter ◽  
M. Cecilia Di Pentima

Introduction: The use of vancomycin is common among hospitalized children. We sought to evaluate the impact of prospective audit with real-time feedback on vancomycin use and pharmacy costs. Methods: Vancomycin use was evaluated at Monroe Carell Jr Children’s Hospital at Vanderbilt (MCJCHV) before and after the implementation of prospective audit with intervention and feedback to providers in 2012. Antibiotic use was compared to academic children’s hospitals with established antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs). Two similar pediatric academic institutions without an ASP were used as nonintervention controls. Analysis of monthly days of antibiotic therapy (DoT) per 1000 patient-days was performed by interrupted time series analysis. Results: Monthly vancomycin use decreased from 114 DoTs/1000 patient-days to 89 DoTs/1000 patient-days ( P < .0001). We did not find significant differences in the slope of change in vancomycin use between MCJCHV and institutions with ASPs either before or after the intervention ( P = .86 and P = .71, respectively). When compared to children’s hospitals without ASPs, the use of vancomycin was significantly lower at MCJCHV ( P < .001). Conclusion: The use of vancomycin at academic children’s hospitals with an ASP is declining. In our experience, prospective audit with real-time intervention and feedback to providers significantly reduced the use and costs associated with vancomycin.


2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (Supplement_4) ◽  
Author(s):  
A C Chaslerie ◽  
B F Fuchs ◽  
F R Grude ◽  
H B Bourgeois ◽  
C V Vigneau Victorri ◽  
...  

Abstract Issue Granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSF), recommended by international oncology guidelines as a prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia are expensive drugs. Despite biosimilars marketing since 2008, G-CSF spending represents a major and growing expense for health insurance. Description of the problem Between 2010 and 2013 an unsustainable increase of G-CSF spending by 20% occurred in a French area: Pays-la-Loire. An intervention based on guidelines was carried out to the oncologists involved in ambulatory cancer care to reduce G-CSF spending by improving prescription and promoting biosimilars. Hospital oncologists have been the main target. A partnership between physicians and pharmacists of the Brittany - Pays-de-la-Loire Cancer Dedicated Observatory network and the Pays de la Loire Medical Department of Health insurance composed the operational team involved in the work. Interrupted time series analysis based on the French national health data system database were chosen to assess the impact of the intervention on G-CSF spending, their prescription and biosimilars use. Results Twelve professional meetings were performed to cancer medical teams from 7 community hospitals and 5 private hospitals of the Pays-de-la-Loire region. This intervention reduced G-CSF spending by 11% and improves G-CSF local use. Lessons This type of multi-stakeholder intervention carrying common to various health actor’s messages represents a promising tool to improve the quality of care and the control of health expenditure. These results and the possible cost saving showed have encouraged the heads of French health insurance to promote this action in 2019 in the whole France. Key messages In the current context of unsustainable increases in cancer cares related costs in France the rational use of G-CSF’s seemed to be one available resources. biosimilar promotion for ensure broad access to innovative cancer therapeutic for patients and finance cancer prevention campaigns.


2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 44-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Mott ◽  
Caroline Fairhurst ◽  
David Torgerson

Objectives To assess the impact of retraction on the citation of randomized controlled trials. Methods We used an interrupted time-series with matched controls. PubMed, CINHAL, Google and the Retraction Watch Database were searched. We identified retracted publications reporting the results of randomized controlled trials involving human participants with two years of available data before and after retraction. We obtained monthly citation counts across all articles for the 24 months before and after retraction, from Web of Science. We used a Poisson segmented regression to detect changes in the level and trend of citation following retraction. We also undertook a matched control analysis of unretracted randomized controlled trials and a sensitivity analysis to account for cases of large-scale, well-advertised fraud. Results We identified 387 retracted randomized controlled trial reports, of which 218 (56.3%) were included in the interrupted time-series analysis. A reduction of 22.9% (95% CI 4.0% to 38.2%, p = 0.02) was observed in the number of citations in the month after retraction, and a further reduction of 1.9% (95% CI 0.4% to 3.5%, p = 0.02) per month in the following 24 months, relative to the expected trend. There was no evidence of a statistically significant reduction among the matched controls. Authors with a large number of retractions saw a 48.2% reduction at the time of retraction (95% CI 17.7% to 67.3%, p = 0.01). Other cases had a more gradual reduction with no change at the time of retraction and a 1.8% reduction per month in the following 24 months (95% CI 0.2% to 3.4%, p = 0.03). Conclusions Retractions of randomized controlled trial reports can be effective in reducing citations. Other factors, such as the scale of the retractions and media attention, may play a role in the effectiveness of the reduction.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 115
Author(s):  
Danik Iga Prasiska ◽  
Sangchul Yoon

Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) as a global pandemic is ineluctable, transmission that originated from a foreign country became the local transmission in Indonesia. As several regional authorities implemented a large-scale social restriction policy to reduce the transmission of COVID-19, the Nganjuk Regency government chose to implement a different strategy with the implementation of Regent Regulation number 28 of 2020 about novel practice in the COVID-19 pandemic situation. Objective: This study aimed to analyze the impact of the implementation of the regulation on COVID-19 transmissibility and mortality at the Nganjuk Regency. Methods: Data were collected from the daily confirmed cases and death of COVID-19 made accessible for the public by the Nganjuk Regency Task Force for COVID-19 and Nganjuk Regency Health Office starting from March 30th to September 20th. Interrupted time series analysis was performed to estimate the impact of the implementation of regent regulation on COVID-19 transmission and mortality parameters. Result: The trend of new confirmed cases and deaths of COVID-19 in the Nganjuk Regency continued to fluctuate before and even after the implementation of regent regulation. It was found that there were reductions in case of fatality rates by -0.002 ± 0.003 (ρ 0.002) on CFR and -0.008 ± 0.008 (ρ 0.007) on eCFR after the regent regulation was implemented but there was no significant reduction on COVID-19 transmissibility parameter. Conclusion: Implementation of regent regulation in Nganjuk Regency significantly affected the reduction of case fatality rate but failed to slow down the COVID-19 transmissibility. Intensive community engagement to comply with the health preventive measures should be considered as an effective preventive strategy to reduce the transmission of COVID-19. 


2019 ◽  
Vol 73 (7) ◽  
pp. 674-679 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kate A Levin ◽  
Emilia Crighton

BackgroundIntermediate care (IC) acts as a bridging service between hospital and home, for those deemed medically fit for discharge but who are delayed in hospital. The aim of this study was to measure the effect of IC and a 72-hour discharge target on days delayed.MethodsRate of days delayed per 1000 population aged 75 years+ in Glasgow City was compared before and after onset of IC with a 6-month phase-in period, using segmented linear regression. Inverclyde and West Dunbartonshire (IWD) was a control. Autoregressive and moving average terms were included in the model, as well as a Fourier term to adjust for seasonality.ResultsPrior to IC, rate of days delayed increased in both Glasgow City and the rest of Scotland. There was a large reduction in rate of days delayed in Glasgow during the phase-in period, greater than the rest of Scotland but comparable with that observed in IWD, with subsequent increases thereafter. Adjusting for changes in IWD, the impact of IC and the discharge target in Glasgow City was a level change of −15.20 (95% CI −17.52 to –12.88) and a trend change of −0.29 (95% CI −0.55 to –0.02). This is equivalent to a predicted reduction due to IC of −16.04 days delayed per 1000 population per month, in June 2016, and a relative reduction of 35%.ConclusionIC and the 72-hour discharge target were associated with a reduction in days delayed. Rate of days delayed continued to increase over time, although at a slower rate than if IC had not been implemented.


2020 ◽  
Vol 110 (6) ◽  
pp. 863-867
Author(s):  
Ghassan B. Hamra ◽  
Leah H. Schinasi ◽  
D. Alex Quistberg

Objectives. To quantify the impact of a citywide bicycle share program on rates of motor vehicle collisions involving a bicycle. Methods. We conducted an interrupted time series analysis, using crash records from the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation for Philadelphia County from 2010 through 2018. We also calculated summary statistics to illustrate annual and monthly trends in rates of motor vehicle crashes involving a bicycle. Results. The baseline rate of bike events was 106% greater (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.25, 3.38) at the time bicycle share was implemented compared with January 2010. Before bicycle share implementation, the rate of bicycle events decreased 1% (95% CI = 0.95, 1.03) annually. After the bicycle share program started, the rate of bicycle events decreased 13% (95% CI = 0.82, 0.94) annually. Conclusions. In the long term, programs that increase the number of bicycles on the road, such as bike share, may reduce rates of motor vehicle crashes involving a bicycle.


2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Farhad Lotfi ◽  
Saeed Lohivash ◽  
Zahra Kavosi ◽  
Sakine Owjimehr ◽  
Mohsen Bayati

Abstract Objective This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of the Iran’s Health Transformation Plan on the frequency of natural vaginal deliveries (NVDs), cesarean sections (CSs), and total deliveries in the Fars province of Iran. Results Average number of total deliveries before and after the reform were 3946 and 3810, respectively (p  =  0.164). The ratio of CS to total deliveries in the first study month was 54%. This rate reached 47% in the last month (p  <  0.01). However, it had much fluctuation trend. The ITSA results showed that in the short-run, the NVD rate increased (β  =  492.79, p  <  0.01), the rate of CS decreased (β  =  − 407.09, p  <  0.01), and total deliveries increased (β  =  85.75, p  <  0.724). However, in the long-run, the NVD (β  =  5.74, p  <  0.423), CS (β  =  10.21, p  <  0.189), and total deliveries (β  =  15.96, p  <  0.256) had no significant changes after the reform. Encouraging the NVD package was influential in the short-run but not in the longrun in Iran. Pricing and supply-side policies could not reduce the rate of non-clinical CS on their own. Therefore, paying attention to demand-side policies and changes in consumer behaviors, such as educating the women at the age of pregnancy about the advantages and disadvantages of CS and NVD and correcting misconceptions, could be helpful.


2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucas Silva ◽  
Dalson Figueiredo Filho ◽  
Antônio Fernandes

In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, governments worldwide have implemented social distancing policies with different levels of both enforcement and compliance. We conducted an interrupted time series analysis to estimate the impact of lockdowns on reducing the number of cases and deaths due to COVID-19 in Brazil. Official daily data was collected for four city capitals before and after their respective policies interventions based on a 14 days observation window. We estimated a segmented linear regression to evaluate the effectiveness of lockdown measures on COVID-19 incidence and mortality. The initial number of new cases and new deaths had a positive trend prior to policy change. After lockdown, a statistically significant decrease in new confirmed cases was found in all state capitals. We also found evidence that lockdown measures were likely to reverse the trend of new daily deaths due to COVID-19. In São Luís, we observed a reduction of 37.85% while in Fortaleza the decrease was 33.4% on the average difference in daily deaths if the lockdown had not been implemented. Similarly, the intervention diminished mortality in Recife by 21.76% and Belém by 16.77%. Social distancing policies can be useful tools in flattening the epidemic curve.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document