scholarly journals Bipolar disorder and cannabis use: a bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization study

Author(s):  
Oskar Hougaard Jefsen ◽  
Maria Speed ◽  
Doug Speed ◽  
Søren Dinesen Østergaard

AbstractAimsCannabis use is associated with a number of psychiatric disorders, however the causal nature of these associations has been difficult to establish. Mendelian randomization (MR) offers a way to infer causality between exposures with known genetic predictors (genome-wide significant single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs)) and outcomes of interest. MR has previously been applied to investigate the relationship between lifetime cannabis use (having ever used cannabis) and schizophrenia, depression, and attention-deficit / hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), but not bipolar disorder, representing a gap in the literature.MethodsWe conducted a two-sample bidirectional MR study on the relationship between bipolar disorder and lifetime cannabis use. Genetic instruments (SNPs) were obtained from the summary statistics of recent large genome-wide association studies (GWAS). We conducted a two-sample bidirectional MR study on the relationship between bipolar disorder and lifetime cannabis use, using inverse-variance weighted regression, weighted median regression and Egger regression.ResultsGenetic liability to bipolar disorder was significantly associated with an increased risk of lifetime cannabis use: scaled log-odds ratio (standard deviation) = 0.0174 (0.039); P-value = 0.00001. Genetic liability to lifetime cannabis use showed no association with the risk of bipolar disorder: scaled log-odds ratio (standard deviation) = 0.168 (0.180); P-value = 0.351. The sensitivity analyses showed no evidence for pleiotropic effects.ConclusionsThe present study finds evidence for a causal effect of liability to bipolar disorder on the risk of using cannabis at least once. No evidence was found for a causal effect of liability to cannabis use on the risk of bipolar disorder. These findings add important new knowledge to the understanding of the complex relationship between cannabis use and psychiatric disorders.

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pengfei Wu ◽  
Xinghao Zhang ◽  
Ping Zhou ◽  
Wan Zhang ◽  
Danyang Li ◽  
...  

BackgroundObservational studies have indicated an association between polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and periodontitis, but it is unclear whether the association is cofounded or causal. We conducted a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) study to investigate the bidirectional relationship between genetically predicted PCOS and periodontitis.MethodsFrom two genome-wide association studies we selected 13 and 7 single nucleotide polymorphisms associated with PCOS and periodontitis, respectively, as instrumental variables. We utilized publicly shared summary-level statistics from European-ancestry cohorts. To explore the causal effect of PCOS on periodontitis, 12,289 cases of periodontitis and 22,326 controls were incorporated, while 4,890 cases of PCOS and 20,405 controls in the reverse MR. Inverse-variance weighted method was employed in the primary MR analysis and multiple sensitivity analyses were implemented.ResultsGenetically determined PCOS was not causally associated with risk of periodontitis (odds ratio 0.97; 95% confidence interval 0.88–1.06; P = 0.50) per one-unit increase in the log-odds ratio of periodontitis. Similarly, no causal effect of periodontitis on PCOS was shown with the odds ratio for PCOS was 1.17 (95% confidence interval 0.91–1.49; P = 0.21) per one-unit increase in the log-odds ratio of periodontitis. Consistent results were yielded via additional MR methods. Sensitivity analyses demonstrated no presence of horizontal pleiotropy or heterogeneity.ConclusionThe bidirectional MR study couldn’t provide convincing evidence for the causal relationship between genetic liability to PCOS and periodontitis in the Europeans. Triangulating evidence across further observational and genetic-epidemiological studies is necessary.


Author(s):  
Shuai Yuan ◽  
Maria Bruzelius ◽  
Susanna C. Larsson

AbstractWhether renal function is causally associated with venous thromboembolism (VTE) is not yet fully elucidated. We conducted a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) study to determine the causal effect of renal function, measured as estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), on VTE. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms associated with eGFR were selected as instrumental variables at the genome-wide significance level (p < 5 × 10−8) from a meta-analysis of 122 genome-wide association studies including up to 1,046,070 individuals. Summary-level data for VTE were obtained from the FinnGen consortium (6913 VTE cases and 169,986 non-cases) and UK Biobank study (4620 VTE cases and 356,574 non-cases). MR estimates were calculated using the random-effects inverse-variance weighted method and combined using fixed-effects meta-analysis. Genetically predicted decreased eGFR was significantly associated with an increased risk of VTE in both FinnGen and UK Biobank. For one-unit decrease in log-transformed eGFR, the odds ratios of VTE were 2.93 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.25, 6.84) and 4.46 (95% CI 1.59, 12.5) when using data from FinnGen and UK Biobank, respectively. The combined odds ratio was 3.47 (95% CI 1.80, 6.68). Results were consistent in all sensitivity analyses and no horizontal pleiotropy was detected. This MR-study supported a casual role of impaired renal function in VTE.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liu Miao ◽  
Yan Min ◽  
Chuan-Meng Zhu ◽  
Jian-Hong Chen ◽  
Bin Qi ◽  
...  

Abstract Background/Aims: While observational studies show an association between serum lipid levels and cardiovascular disease (CVD), intervention studies that examine the preventive effects of serum lipid levels on the development of CKD are lacking. Methods: To estimate the role of serum lipid levels in the etiology of CKD, we conducted a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) study on serum lipid levels. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), which were significantly associated genome-wide with plasma serum lipid levels from the GLGC and CKDGen consortium genome-wide association study (GWAS), including total cholesterol (TC, n = 187365), triglyceride (TG, n = 177861), HDL cholesterol (HDL-C, n = 187167), LDL cholesterol (LDL-C, n = 173082), apolipoprotein A1 (ApoA1, n = 20687), apolipoprotein B (ApoB, n = 20690) and CKD (n = 117165), were used as instrumental variables. None of the lipid-related SNPs was associated with CKD (all P > 0.05). Results: MR analysis genetically predicted the causal effect between TC/HDL-C and CKD. The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of TC within CKD was 0.756 (0.579 to 0.933) (P = 0.002), and HDL-C was 0.85 (0.687 to 1.012) (P = 0.049). No causal effects between TG, LDL-C- ApoA1, ApoB and CKD were observed. Sensitivity analyses confirmed that TC and HDL-C were significantly associated with CKD. Conclusions: The findings from this MR study indicate causal effects between TC, HDL-C and CKD. Decreased TC and elevated HDL-C may reduce the incidence of CKD but need to be further confirmed by using a genetic and environmental approach.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heejin Jin ◽  
Jeewon Lee ◽  
Oh Sohee ◽  
Sanghun Lee ◽  
Sungho Won

Objective: In many epidemiologic studies, type 2 diabetes has been reported to be associated with severe mental illness (SMI) such as schizophrenia (SCZ), bipolar disorder (BPD), and major depressive disorder (MDD). However, the relationship between SMI and type 2 diabetes is bi-directional, and the causal relationship remains unclear due to various confounders. Therefore, a Mendelian randomization (MR) study is necessary to identify the causality between them. Research Design and Methods: We conducted a two−sample MR study to identify the causal effect of SMI on type 2 diabetes using the inverse-variance weighted (IVW), MR−Egger, MR− Egger with a simulation extrapolation, weighted median approach, and MR-Pleiotropy RESidual Sum and Outlier methods. The most appropriate method was selected according to the instrument variables assumption. Results: We found that MDD had a significant causal effect on type 2 diabetes from the results obtained using the IVW method (Odds ratio (OR): 1.191, 95% CI: 1.036−1.372, P = 0.014); however, this was not observed for BPD (IVW, OR: 1.006, 95% CI: 0.918−1.104, P = 0.892) or SCZ (IVW, OR: 1.016, 95% CI: 0.974−1.059, P = 0.463). The absence of reverse-causality between MDD and type 2 diabetes was also demonstrated from bidirectional MR studies. Conclusions: These results clearly reveal important knowledge on the causal role of MDD in the risk of type 2 diabetes without a residual confounding, whereas the causality of BPD and SCZ was not shown. Therefore, careful attention should be paid to MDD patients in type 2 diabetes prevention and treatment.


2019 ◽  
Vol 48 (5) ◽  
pp. 1478-1492 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qingyuan Zhao ◽  
Yang Chen ◽  
Jingshu Wang ◽  
Dylan S Small

Abstract Background Summary-data Mendelian randomization (MR) has become a popular research design to estimate the causal effect of risk exposures. With the sample size of GWAS continuing to increase, it is now possible to use genetic instruments that are only weakly associated with the exposure. Development We propose a three-sample genome-wide design where typically 1000 independent genetic instruments across the whole genome are used. We develop an empirical partially Bayes statistical analysis approach where instruments are weighted according to their strength; thus weak instruments bring less variation to the estimator. The estimator is highly efficient with many weak genetic instruments and is robust to balanced and/or sparse pleiotropy. Application We apply our method to estimate the causal effect of body mass index (BMI) and major blood lipids on cardiovascular disease outcomes, and obtain substantially shorter confidence intervals (CIs). In particular, the estimated causal odds ratio of BMI on ischaemic stroke is 1.19 (95% CI: 1.07–1.32, P-value <0.001); the estimated causal odds ratio of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) on coronary artery disease (CAD) is 0.78 (95% CI: 0.73–0.84, P-value <0.001). However, the estimated effect of HDL-C attenuates and become statistically non-significant when we only use strong instruments. Conclusions A genome-wide design can greatly improve the statistical power of MR studies. Robust statistical methods may alleviate but not solve the problem of horizontal pleiotropy. Our empirical results suggest that the relationship between HDL-C and CAD is heterogeneous, and it may be too soon to completely dismiss the HDL hypothesis.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liu Miao ◽  
Yan Min ◽  
Chuan-Meng Zhu ◽  
Jian-Hong Chen ◽  
Bin Qi ◽  
...  

Abstract Background While observational studies show an association between serum lipid levels and cardiovascular disease (CVD), intervention studies that examine the preventive effects of serum lipid levels on the development of CKD are lacking. Methods To estimate the role of serum lipid levels in the etiology of CKD, we conducted a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) study on serum lipid levels. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), which were significantly associated genome-wide with plasma serum lipid levels from the GLGC and CKDGen consortium genome-wide association study (GWAS), including total cholesterol (TC, n = 187365), triglyceride (TG, n = 177861), HDL cholesterol (HDL-C, n = 187167), LDL cholesterol (LDL-C, n = 173082), apolipoprotein A1 (ApoA1, n = 20687), apolipoprotein B (ApoB, n = 20690) and CKD (n = 117165), were used as instrumental variables. None of the lipid-related SNPs was associated with CKD (all P > 0.05). Results MR analysis genetically predicted the causal effect between TC/HDL-C and CKD. The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of TC within CKD was 0.756 (0.579 to 0.933) (P = 0.002), and HDL-C was 0.85 (0.687 to 1.012) (P = 0.049). No causal effects between TG, LDL-C- ApoA1, ApoB and CKD were observed. Sensitivity analyses confirmed that TC and HDL-C were significantly associated with CKD. Conclusions The findings from this MR study indicate causal effects between TC, HDL-C and CKD. Decreased TC and elevated HDL-C may reduce the incidence of CKD but need to be further confirmed by using a genetic and environmental approach.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Songzan Chen ◽  
Fangkun Yan ◽  
Tian Xu ◽  
Yao Wang ◽  
Kaijie Zhang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Although several observational studies have shown an association between birth weight (BW) and atrial fibrillation (AF), controversy remains. In this study, we aimed to explore the role of elevated BW on the etiology of AF. Methods A two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) study was designed to infer the causality. The genetic data on the associations of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) with BW and AF were separately obtained from two large-scale genome-wide association study with up to 321,223 and 1,030,836 individuals respectively. SNPs were identified at a genome-wide significant level (p-value < 5 × 10− 8). The inverse variance-weighted (IVW) with fixed effects method was performed to obtain causal estimates as our primary analysis. MR-Egger regression was conducted to assess the pleiotropy and sensitivity analyses with various statistical methods were applied to evaluate the robustness of the results. Results In total, 122 SNPs were identified as the genetic instrumental variables. MR analysis revealed a causal effect of elevated BW on AF (OR = 1.21, 95% CI = 1.13–1.29, p-value = 2.39 × 10− 8). The MR-Egger regression suggested no evidence of directional pleiotropy (intercept = 0.00, p-value = 0.62). All the results in sensitivity analyses were consistent with the primary result, which confirmed the causal association between BW and AF. Conclusions The findings from the two-sample MR study indicate a causal effect of elevated BW on AF. This suggests a convenient and effective method to ease the burden of AF by reducing the number of newborns with elevated BW.


2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Liu Miao ◽  
Yan Min ◽  
Bin Qi ◽  
Chuan-Meng Zhu ◽  
Jian-Hong Chen ◽  
...  

Abstract Background While observational studies show an association between serum lipid levels and cardiovascular disease (CVD), intervention studies that examine the preventive effects of serum lipid levels on the development of CKD are lacking. Methods To estimate the role of serum lipid levels in the etiology of CKD, we conducted a two-sample mendelian randomization (MR) study on serum lipid levels. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), which were significantly associated genome-wide with serum lipid levels from the GLGC and CKDGen consortium genome-wide association study (GWAS), including total cholesterol (TC, n = 187,365), triglyceride (TG, n = 177,861), HDL cholesterol (HDL-C, n = 187,167), LDL cholesterol (LDL-C, n = 173,082), apolipoprotein A1 (ApoA1, n = 20,687), apolipoprotein B (ApoB, n = 20,690) and CKD (n = 117,165), were used as instrumental variables. None of the lipid-related SNPs was associated with CKD (all P > 0.05). Results MR analysis genetically predicted the causal effect between TC/HDL-C and CKD. The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of TC within CKD was 0.756 (0.579 to 0.933) (P = 0.002), and HDL-C was 0.85 (0.687 to 1.012) (P = 0.049). No causal effects between TG, LDL-C- ApoA1, ApoB and CKD were observed. Sensitivity analyses confirmed that TC and HDL-C were significantly associated with CKD. Conclusions The findings from this MR study indicate causal effects between TC, HDL-C and CKD. Decreased TC and elevated HDL-C may reduce the incidence of CKD but need to be further confirmed by using a genetic and environmental approach.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guiwu Huang ◽  
Yanlin Zhong ◽  
Wenchang Li ◽  
Weiming Liao ◽  
Peihui Wu

BackgroundPrevious studies have demonstrated an inverse association between parathyroid hormone (PTH) and the risk of osteoarthritis (OA). However, it remains unknown whether such association reflects causality. We aimed to apply a Mendelian randomization (MR) approach to investigate the causal association between PTH and OA.Materials and MethodsWe performed a two-sample MR analysis using summary statistics from 13 cohorts (PTH, N = 29,155) and a recent genome-wide association study meta-analysis (OA, N = 455,221) by the UK Biobank and Arthritis Research UK OA Genetics (arcOGEN). MR analyses were carried out mainly using the inverse-variance-weighted method. Sensitivity analyses were performed to test the robustness of the associations using the weighted median method, the MR–Egger method, and “leave-one-out” analysis. Analyses were performed again to test whether the associations remained statistically significant after excluding any outlier variants that were detected using the MR-PRESSO (Mendelian Randomization Pleiotropy RESidual Sum and Outlier) test.ResultsFive single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were selected as instrumental variables at the genome-wide significance threshold (p &lt; 5 × 10–8). The causal effect between PTH and OA was genetically predicted using the inverse-variance-weighted method (odds ratio = 0.67, 95% confidence interval: 0.50–0.90; p = 0.008). This result was borne out using the weighted median method (odds ratio = 0.73, 95% confidence interval: 0.60–0.90; p = 0.004). The causality remained robust after discarding the outlier variants as well as SNPs associated with confounding factors.ConclusionMR analysis supported a potential causative relationship between decreased serum circulating PTH and a higher risk of hip and knee OA.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nabila Kazmi ◽  
George Davey Smith ◽  
Sarah J Lewis

Background: Severe Covid19 is characterised by a hyperactive immune response. Carnitine, an essential nutrient, and its derivative acetyl-carnitine can downregulate proinflammatory cytokines and has been suggested as a potential treatment for the disease. Methods: We carried out Mendelian randomization analyses using publicly available data from a large genome wide association study (GWAS) of metabolites and a collaborative genome wide study of Covid19 to investigate the nature of the relationship between carnitine and acetyl-carnitine and Covid19 infection, hospitalisation with Covid19 and very severe Covid19. We used the same methodology to determine whether carnitine was associated with co-morbidities commonly found among those with severe Covid19. Results: We found evidence of a protective effect against very severe Covid19 for both carnitine and acetyl-carnitine, with around a 40% reduction in risk associated with a doubling of carnitine or acetyl-carnitine (carnitine odds ratio (OR) = 0.56, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.33 to 0.95, p=0.03 and acetyl-carnitine OR=0.60, 95% CI 0.35 to 1.02, p=0.06), and evidence of protective effects on hopitalisation with Covid19. For acetyl-carnitine the largest protective effect was seen in the comparison between those hospitalised with Covid19 and those infected but not hospitalised (OR=0.34, 95%CI 0.18 to 0.62, p=0.0005). Conclusion: Carnitine and acetyl-carnitine merit further investigation in respect to the prevention of severe Covid19.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document