scholarly journals SARS-CoV-2 Genomic Surveillance in Costa Rica: Evidence of a Divergent Population and an Increased Detection of a Spike T1117I Mutation

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jose Arturo Molina-Mora ◽  
Estela Cordero-Laurent ◽  
Adriana Godínez ◽  
Melany Calderón ◽  
Hebleen Brenes ◽  
...  

AbstractGenome sequencing is a key strategy in the surveillance of SARS-CoV-2, the virus responsible for the COVID-19 outbreak. Latin America is the hardest hit region of the world, accumulating almost 25% of COVID-19 cases worldwide. Costa Rica was first exemplary for the region in its pandemic control, declaring a swift state of emergency on March 16th that led to a low quantity of cases, until measures were lifted in early May. From the first detected case in March 6th to November 30th almost 140 000 cases have been reported in Costa Rica, 99.5% of them from May onwards. We analyzed the genomic variability during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in Costa Rica using 138 sequences, 52 from the first months of the pandemic, and 86 from the current wave.Three GISAID clades (G, GH, and GR) and three PANGOLIN lineages (B.1, B.1.1, and B.1.291) are predominant, with phylogenetic relationships that are in line with the results of other Latin American countries suggesting introduction and multiple re-introductions from other regions of the world. The sequences from the first months of the pandemic grouped in lineage B.1 and B.1.5 mainly, suggesting low undetected circulation and re-introductions of new lineages not detected in the country during early stages of the pandemic due to the extreme lockdown measures. The wholegenome variant calling analysis identified a total of 177 distinct variants. These correspond mostly to non-synonymous mutations (54.8%, 97) but 41.2% (73) corresponded to synonymous mutations. The 177 variants showed an expected power-law distribution: 106 single nucleotide mutations were identified in single sequences, only 16 single nucleotide mutations were found in >5% sequences, and only three single nucleotide mutations in >25% genomes. These mutations were distributed all over the genome. However, 61.5% were present in ORF1ab, and 15.0% in Spike gene and 9.6% in the Nucleocapsid. Additionally, the prevalence of worldwide-found variant D614G in the Spike (98.6% in Costa Rica), ORF8 L84S (1.5%) is similar to what is found elsewhere. Interestingly, the prevalence of mutation T1117I in the Spike has increased during the current pandemic wave beginning in May 2020 in Costa Rica, reaching 14.5% detection in the full genome analyses in August 2020. This variant has been observed in less than 1% of the GISAID reported sequences in other countries. Structural modeling of the Spike protein with the T1117I mutation suggest a possible effect on the viral oligomerization needed for cell infection. Nevertheless, in-vitro experiments are required to prove this in-silico analyses. In conclusion, genome analyses of the SARS-CoV-2 sequences over the course of COVID-19 pandemic in Costa Rica suggests re-introduction of lineages from other countries as travel bans and measures were lifted, similar to results found in other studies, but the Spike-T1117I variant needs to be monitored and studied in further analyses as part of the surveillance program during the pandemic.

2009 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 59-85 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruce M. Wilson

This article analyzes the conditions that allowed for expansive rights revolutions in Costa Rica and Colombia. My research suggests that many of the preconditions for rights revolutions in other regions of the world are also central to understanding Latin American cases. Of particular relevance is judicial system design including the high courts’ operating rules concerning access, standing, and judicial formality. These factors can and do mitigate the need for extensive resources and support structures necessary in other non-Latin American countries in which rights revolutions have occurred.


2020 ◽  
pp. 185-214
Author(s):  
Merlyn Gutiérrez Cruz ◽  
María Jesús Such Devesa ◽  
Patricia Gabaldón Quiñones

Este artículo analiza el fenómeno de la mujer emprendedora en el turismo rural en Costa Rica, enmarcándola en el contexto latinoamericano y en el de las emprendedoras rurales. A partir de una revisión sistemática de la literatura, se define el perfil de las empresarias, sus motivaciones y las barreras que enfrentan. Los resultados ponen de manifiesto las importantes similitudes entre las emprendedoras turísticas rurales costarricenses con el resto de las emprendedoras en Latinoamérica y del mundo. Este estudio contribuye al conocimiento de las emprendedoras dentro del marco del turismo rural, esencial para el desarrollo económico del país. This article analyzes the phenomenon of entrepreneurial women in rural tourism in Costa Rica, framed within the Latin-American and rural entrepreneurship context. Using a systematic literature review, the profile of business-women gets defined through their motivations to start their businesses and the barriers they face. The results show the important similarities between Costa Rican rural tourism entrepreneurs and other female entrepreneurs in Latin America and the world. This study contributes to the knowledge of these entrepreneurs within the framework of rural tourism, essential for the economic development of developing countries.


1982 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 189-201 ◽  
Author(s):  
James McCarthy

SummaryThe use of sterilization as a method of contraception is increasing rapidly throughout the world. This paper reports on sterilization rates for women in Colombia, Costa Rica, the Dominican Republic and Panama in relation to demographic characteristics. Comparisons are made with non-sterilized women using other efficient contraceptive methods.The sterilization rates range from 0·161 in Colombia to 0·552 in Panama; births averted are calculated as one-quarter in Colombia, one-half in Costa Rica and one in the Dominican Republic and Panama.


2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 83-86
Author(s):  
Elisa Salas ◽  
Julio Gabriel ◽  
Marcelo Huarte

In this work, the “state of art” of the Latin American Potato Journal is analyzed, as a means of scientific and technical diffusion of the potato crop, which is published by the Latin American Potato Association (LAPA). The objectives of the document are: i) to make a current analysis of the Journal and its challenges in the world of information and ii) to share the strategy developed for achieving visibility. The journal has a biannual frequency (June and December). Original and unpublished articles are accepted in biotechnologies, genomics, physiology, nutrition and fertilization of crops, genetics and plant breeding,entomology, phytopathology, integrated phytoprotection, agroecology, malherbology, geomatics, soils, water and irrigation, postharvest and agro-industrialization, rural development and agro-business, agricultural economy and marketing of agriculturalproducts. Since 1988, the LAPA Journal has published 25 issues. Twelve invited articles, 170 scientific articles, 25 short communications and 8 reviews, totaling 215 publications. From this total, 29% are from Bolivia, 23% from Peru, 13% from Argentina, 8% from Colombia, 8% from Ecuador, 4% from Venezuela, 3% from Mexico and 4% from Brazil. Countries such as Spain, Costa Rica, Honduras, Panama, Nicaragua, Chile, USA and Denmark have contributed 1% each country. The main publication topics were in phytopathology, entomology, plant breeding, agronomy and physiology, agro-industry, genetics resources, participatory methodologies and economics, seed production, biotechnology and microbiology.


2019 ◽  
Vol 63 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
James A. Karlowsky ◽  
Krystyna M. Kazmierczak ◽  
Samuel K. Bouchillon ◽  
Boudewijn L. M. de Jonge ◽  
Gregory G. Stone ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT The International Network for Optimal Resistance Monitoring (INFORM) global surveillance program collected clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceae (n = 7,665) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 1,794) from 26 medical centers in six Latin American countries from 2012 to 2015. The in vitro activity of ceftazidime-avibactam and comparators was determined for the isolates using the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) reference broth microdilution method. Enterobacteriaceae were highly susceptible (99.7%) to ceftazidime-avibactam, including 99.9% of metallo-β-lactamase (MBL)-negative isolates; 87.4% of all P. aeruginosa isolates and 92.8% of MBL-negative isolates were susceptible to ceftazidime-avibactam. Susceptibility to ceftazidime-avibactam ranged from 99.4% to 100% for Enterobacteriaceae and from 79.1% to 94.7% for P. aeruginosa when isolates were analyzed by country of origin. Ceftazidime-avibactam inhibited 99.6% to 100% of Enterobacteriaceae isolates that carried serine β-lactamases, including extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs), AmpC cephalosporinases, and carbapenemases (KPC and OXA-48-like) as well as 99.7%, 99.6%, 99.5%, and 99.2% of MBL-negative isolates demonstrating ceftazidime-nonsusceptible, multidrug-resistant (MDR), meropenem-nonsusceptible, and colistin-resistant phenotypes, respectively. Among carbapenem-nonsusceptible isolates of P. aeruginosa (n = 750), 14.7% carried MBLs with or without additional acquired serine β-lactamases, while in the majority of isolates (70.0%), no acquired β-lactamase was identified. Ceftazidime-avibactam inhibited 89.5% of carbapenem-nonsusceptible P. aeruginosa isolates in which no acquired β-lactamase was detected. Overall, clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceae collected in Latin America from 2012 to 2015 were highly susceptible to ceftazidime-avibactam, including isolates that exhibited resistance to ceftazidime, meropenem, colistin, or an MDR phenotype. Country-specific variations were noted in the susceptibility of P. aeruginosa isolates to ceftazidime-avibactam.


2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. e0009073
Author(s):  
Diana Mora-Obando ◽  
Davinia Pla ◽  
Bruno Lomonte ◽  
Jimmy Alexander Guerrero-Vargas ◽  
Santiago Ayerbe ◽  
...  

Background Bothrops asper represents the clinically most important snake species in Central America and Northern South America, where it is responsible for an estimated 50–80% of snakebites. Compositional variability among the venom proteomes of B. asper lineages across its wide range mirrors clinical differences in their envenomings. Bothropic antivenoms generated in a number of Latin American countries commonly exhibit a certain degree of paraspecific effectiveness in the neutralization of congeneric venoms. Defining the phylogeographic boundaries of an antivenom's effectivity has implications for optimizing its clinical use. However, the molecular bases and impact of venom compositions on the immune recognition and neutralization of the toxic activities of across geographically disparate populations of B. asper lineages has not been comprehensively studied. Methodology/Principal findings Third-generation antivenomics was applied to quantify the cross-immunorecognizing capacity against the individual components of venoms of three B. asper lineages (B. asper (sensu stricto), B. ayerbei and B. rhombeatus) distributed in south-western (SW) Colombia, of six Latin American antivenoms, produced against homologous (Colombia, INS-COL and PROBIOL) and Costa Rica (ICP)), and heterologous (Argentina (BIOL), Perú (INS-PERU) and Venezuela (UCV)) bothropic venoms. In vivo neutralization assays of the lethal, hemorrhagic, coagulant, defibrinogenating, myotoxic, edematogenic, indirect hemolytic, and proteolytic activities of the three SW Colombian B. asper lineage venoms were carried to compare the preclinical efficacy of three (Colombian INS-COL and PROBIOL, and Costa Rican ICP) antivenoms frequently used in Colombia. Antivenomics showed that all the six antivenom affinity matrices efficiently immunoretained most of the B. asper lineages venom proteins and exhibited impaired binding towards the venoms' peptidomes. The neutralization profile of the INS-COL, PROBIOL and ICP antivenoms towards the biological activities of the venoms of SW Colombian B. asper (sensu stricto), B. ayerbei and B. rhombeatus lineages was coherent with the antivenomics outcome. In addition, the combination of in vitro (antivenomics) and in vivo neutralization results allowed us to determine their toxin-specific and venom neutralizing antibody content. Noteworthy, heterologous INS-PERU, BIOL, and UCV bothropic antivenoms had equal or higher binding capacity towards the venoms components of SW Colombian B. asper lineages that the homologous Colombian and Costa Rican antivenoms. Conclusions/Significance The combined in vitro and in vivo preclinical outcome showed that antivenoms manufactured in Colombia and Costa Rica effectively neutralize the major toxic activities of SW Colombian B. asper lineage venoms. The antivenomics profiles of the heterologous antivenoms manufactured in Argentina, Venezuela, and Perú strongly suggests their (pre)clinical adequacy for the treatment of B. asper lineage envenomings in SW Colombia. However, their recommendation in the clinical setting is pending on in vivo neutralization testing and clinical testing in humans. Bothrops asper is a highly adaptable snake species complex, which is considered the most dangerous snake throughout much of its distribution range from the Atlantic lowland of eastern México to northwestern Perú. Antivenoms are the only scientifically validated treatment of snakebite envenomings. Venom variation is particularly common in wide ranging species, such as B. asper, and may result in variable clinical presentations of envenomings, as is the case for the B. asper species complex, potentially undermining the efficacy of snakebite treatments depending on the immunization mixture used in the generation of the antivenom. Conversely, phylogenetic conservation of antigenic determinants confers an unpredictable degree of paraspecificity to homologous antivenoms produced for a geographic area, but also to heterologous congeneric antivenoms, towards the venom components of allopatric conspecific populations. This work aimed at comparing the preclinical profile of a panel of Latin American homologous and heterologous antivenoms against the venoms of B. asper lineages distributed in SW Colombia. The outcome of this study strongly suggests the suitability of considering the heterologous antivenoms BIOL (Argentina), UCV (Venezuela) and INS-PERU (Perú) as alternatives to homologous Colombian INS-COL and PROBIOL and Costa Rican ICP antivenoms for the treatment of envenomings by B. asper (sensu stricto) in W Colombia and Ecuador, B. ayerbei in Cauca and Nariño (Colombia), and B. rhombeatus in Cauca river valley, SW Colombia.


2015 ◽  
Vol 59 (12) ◽  
pp. 7873-7877 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas J. Biedenbach ◽  
Daryl J. Hoban ◽  
Edina Reiszner ◽  
Sushmita D. Lahiri ◽  
Richard A. Alm ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTThein vitroactivities of ceftaroline and comparators, using broth microdilution, were determined against 1,066Staphylococcus aureusisolates from hospitalized patients. Seventeen medical centers from Latin American countries contributed isolates. Methicillin-resistantS. aureus(MRSA) percentages ranged from 46% (Brazil) to 62% (Argentina). All methicillin-susceptibleS. aureus(MSSA) isolates were susceptible to ceftaroline. Ceftaroline activity against MRSA varied with MIC90s of 0.5 (Venezuela) to 2 (Brazil, Chile, and Colombia) μg/ml, which was the highest MIC value. ST-5 was the most common sequence type.


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S788-S788
Author(s):  
Krystyna Kazmierczak ◽  
Maria Lavinea Valente ◽  
Elkin Lemos ◽  
Monique Baudrit ◽  
Alvaro Quintana ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) is a β-lactam/non-β-lactam β-lactamase inhibitor combination with in vitro activity against Enterobacterales (Ent) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Psa) carrying Class A, C and some Class D β-lactamases. We examined the in vitro activity of CAZ-AVI and comparators against isolates collected in Latin America (LA) as part of the ATLAS surveillance program. Methods Non-duplicate isolates of Ent (n=8416) and Psa (n=2521) were collected in 10 countries in Central America (CAC; Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, Guatemala, Panama [2018-2019 only]) and South America (SA; Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Mexico, Venezuela [2017-2019]). Susceptibility testing was performed by CLSI broth microdilution and values were interpreted using CLSI 2020 breakpoints. CAZ-AVI was tested at a fixed concentration of 4 µg/mL AVI. Isolates with meropenem (MEM) MICs ≥2 µg/mL (Ent) or ≥4 µg/mL (Psa) were screened for β-lactamase genes. Results CAZ-AVI demonstrated potent in vitro activity against Ent collected in LA overall and in the CAC and SA subregions (95-99% susceptible (S)) that was comparable to or exceeded the activity of comparators including MEM, amikacin (AMK) and tigecycline (TGC) (Table). CAZ-AVI retained good activity against MEM non-susceptible (NS) Ent collected in SA (82% S; 6.9% of collected isolates) but activity was reduced against MEM-NS Ent from CAC (10% S; 5.7% of collected isolates), which included a high proportion of isolates carrying NDM-type metallo-β-lactamases (MBL). Among Psa, CAZ-AVI showed greater activity than the tested comparators against both all (86-92% S) and MEM-NS (61-66% S) isolates collected in LA overall and in the two subregions. Table Conclusion CAZ-AVI showed potent in vitro activity against Ent and Psa collected from patients in the CAC and SA subregions of LA. Activity was also good against MEM-NS isolates from SA but was reduced against MEM-NS Ent from CAC that included a high proportion of MBL-positive isolates. The regional and country prevalence of different carbapenem-resistance mechanisms must be considered when evaluating treatment options; however, CAZ-AVI could provide a valuable therapeutic option for treatment of infections caused by Ent and Psa in LA. Disclosures Krystyna Kazmierczak, PhD, IHMA (Employee)Pfizer, Inc. (Consultant) Maria Lavinea Valente, MD, Pfizer Brazil (Employee) Elkin Lemos, MD, PhD, Pfizer Columbia (Employee) Monique Baudrit, MD, MSc, Pfizer Costa Rica (Employee) Alvaro Quintana, MD MSc, Pfizer, Inc. (Employee) Paurus Irani, MD, Pfizer United Kingdom (Employee) Greg Stone, PhD, AztraZeneca (Shareholder, Former Employee)Pfizer, Inc. (Employee) Daniel F. Sahm, PhD, IHMA (Employee)Pfizer, Inc. (Consultant)Shionogi & Co., Ltd. (Independent Contractor)


2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (SPL1) ◽  
pp. 1278-1285
Author(s):  
Mohamed Yafout ◽  
Amine Ousaid ◽  
Ibrahim Sbai El Otmani ◽  
Youssef Khayati ◽  
Amal Ait Haj Said

The new SARS-CoV-2 belonging to the coronaviruses family has caused a pandemic affecting millions of people around the world. This pandemic has been declared by the World Health Organization as an international public health emergency. Although several clinical trials involving a large number of drugs are currently underway, no treatment protocol for COVID-19 has been officially approved so far. Here we demonstrate through a search in the scientific literature that the traditional Moroccan pharmacopoeia, which includes more than 500 medicinal plants, is a fascinating and promising source for the research of natural molecules active against SARS-CoV-2. Multiple in-silico and in-vitro studies showed that some of the medicinal plants used by Moroccans for centuries possess inhibitory activity against SARS-CoV or SARS-CoV-2. These inhibitory activities are achieved through the different molecular mechanisms of virus penetration and replication, or indirectly through stimulation of immunity. Thus, the potential of plants, plant extracts and molecules derived from plants that are traditionally used in Morocco and have activity against SARS-CoV-2, could be explored in the search for a preventive or curative treatment against COVID-19. Furthermore, safe plants or plant extracts that are proven to stimulate immunity could be officially recommended by governments as nutritional supplements.


Author(s):  
Lara Bittmann

On December 31, 2019, WHO was informed of cases of pneumonia of unknown cause in Wuhan City, China. A novel coronavirus was identified as the cause by Chinese authorities on January 7, 2020 and was provisionally named "2019-nCoV". This new Coronavirus causes a clinical picture which has received now the name COVID-19. The virus has spread subsequently worldwide and was explained on the 11th of March, 2020 by the World Health Organization to the pandemic.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document