scholarly journals Thermodynamic modeling reveals widespread multivalent binding by RNA-binding proteins

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Salma Sohrabi-Jahromi ◽  
Johannes Söding
Keyword(s):  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Sequence Specificity ◽  
Rna Sequences ◽  
Link Type ◽  
Binding Domains ◽  
Regulatory Processes ◽  
Multivalent Binding

AbstractMotivationUnderstanding how proteins recognize their RNA targets is essential to elucidate regulatory processes in the cell. Many RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) form complexes or have multiple domains that allow them to bind to RNA in a multivalent, cooperative manner. They can thereby achieve higher specificity and affinity than proteins with a single RNA-binding domain. However, current approaches to de-novo discovery of RNA binding motifs do not take multivalent binding into account.ResultsWe present Bipartite Motif Finder (BMF), which is based on a thermodynamic model of RBPs with two cooperatively binding RNA-binding domains. We show that bivalent binding is a common strategy among RBPs, yielding higher affinity and sequence specificity. We furthermore illustrate that the spatial geometry between the binding sites can be learned from bound RNA sequences. These discovered bipartite motifs are consistent with previously known motifs and binding behaviors. Our results demonstrate the importance of multivalent binding for RNA-binding proteins and highlight the value of bipartite motif models in representing the multivalency of protein-RNA interactions.AvailabilityBMF source code is available at https://github.com/soedinglab/bipartite_motif_finder under a GPL license. The BMF web server is accessible at https://bmf.soedinglab.org.

scholarly journals Searching for a Match: Structure, Function and Application of Sequence-Specific RNA-Binding Proteins

2019 ◽  
Vol 60 (9) ◽  
pp. 1927-1938 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lauren K Dedow ◽  
Julia Bailey-Serres
Keyword(s):  
Gene Regulation ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Sequence Specificity ◽  
Pentatricopeptide Repeat ◽  
Rna Sequences ◽  
Regulatory Processes ◽  
Ppr Proteins ◽  
Modular Structures

Abstract Plants encode over 1800 RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) that modulate a myriad of steps in gene regulation from chromatin organization to translation, yet only a small number of these proteins and their target transcripts have been functionally characterized. Two classes of eukaryotic RBPs, pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) and pumilio/fem-3 binding factors (PUF), recognize and bind to specific sequential RNA sequences through protein–RNA interactions. These modular proteins possess helical structural units containing key residues with high affinity for specific nucleotides, whose sequential order determines binding to a specific target RNA sequence. PPR proteins are nucleus-encoded, but largely regulate post-transcriptional gene regulation within plastids and mitochondria, including splicing, translation and RNA editing. Plant PUFs are involved in gene regulatory processes within the cell nucleus and cytoplasm. The modular structures of PPRs and PUFs that determine sequence specificity has facilitated identification of their RNA targets and biological functions. The protein-based RNA-targeting of PPRs and PUFs contrasts to the prokaryotic cluster regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-associated proteins (Cas) that target RNAs in prokaryotes. Together the PPR, PUF and CRISPR-Cas systems provide varied opportunities for RNA-targeted engineering applications.

scholarly journals Binding specificities of human RNA binding proteins towards structured and linear RNA sequences

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arttu Jolma ◽  
Jilin Zhang ◽  
Estefania Mondragón ◽  
Ekaterina Morgunova ◽  
Teemu Kivioja ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Active Sites ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Metabolism ◽  
Rna Sequences ◽  
Binding Domains ◽  
A Genome ◽  
Rna Binding Domains ◽  
Rna Motif

ABSTRACTSequence specific RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) control many important processes affecting gene expression. They regulate RNA metabolism at multiple levels, by affecting splicing of nascent transcripts, RNA folding, base modification, transport, localization, translation and stability. Despite their central role in most aspects of RNA metabolism and function, most RBP binding specificities remain unknown or incompletely defined. To address this, we have assembled a genome-scale collection of RBPs and their RNA binding domains (RBDs), and assessed their specificities using high throughput RNA-SELEX (HTR-SELEX). Approximately 70% of RBPs for which we obtained a motif bound to short linear sequences, whereas ~30% preferred structured motifs folding into stem-loops. We also found that many RBPs can bind to multiple distinctly different motifs. Analysis of the matches of the motifs in human genomic sequences suggested novel roles for many RBPs. We found that three cytoplasmic proteins, ZC3H12A, ZC3H12B and ZC3H12C bound to motifs resembling the splice donor sequence, suggesting that these proteins are involved in degradation of cytoplasmic viral and/or unspliced transcripts. Surprisingly, structural analysis revealed that the RNA motif was not bound by the conventional C3H1 RNA-binding domain of ZC3H12B. Instead, the RNA motif was bound by the ZC3H12B’s PilT N-terminus (PIN) RNase domain, revealing a potential mechanism by which unconventional RNA binding domains containing active sites or molecule-binding pockets could interact with short, structured RNA molecules. Our collection containing 145 high resolution binding specificity models for 86 RBPs is the largest systematic resource for the analysis of human RBPs, and will greatly facilitate future analysis of the various biological roles of this important class of proteins.

scholarly journals De-novo protein function prediction using DNA binding and RNA binding proteins as a test case

2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sapir Peled ◽  
Olga Leiderman ◽  
Rotem Charar ◽  
Gilat Efroni ◽  
Yaron Shav-Tal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Protein Function ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Protein Function Prediction ◽  
Function Prediction ◽  
Test Case

scholarly journals De novo design of RNA-binding proteins with a prion-like domain related to ALS/FTD proteinopathies

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kana Mitsuhashi ◽  
Daisuke Ito ◽  
Kyoko Mashima ◽  
Munenori Oyama ◽  
Shinichi Takahashi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
De Novo Design

scholarly journals The Role of RNA-Binding Proteins in Vertebrate Neural Crest and Craniofacial Development

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 34
Author(s):  
Thomas E. Forman ◽  
Brenna J. C. Dennison ◽  
Katherine A. Fantauzzo
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Neural Crest ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Gene Expression Regulation ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Craniofacial Development ◽  
Specific Sequence ◽  
Altered Expression ◽  
Binding Domains

Cranial neural crest (NC) cells delaminate from the neural folds in the forebrain to the hindbrain during mammalian embryogenesis and migrate into the frontonasal prominence and pharyngeal arches. These cells generate the bone and cartilage of the frontonasal skeleton, among other diverse derivatives. RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) have emerged as critical regulators of NC and craniofacial development in mammals. Conventional RBPs bind to specific sequence and/or structural motifs in a target RNA via one or more RNA-binding domains to regulate multiple aspects of RNA metabolism and ultimately affect gene expression. In this review, we discuss the roles of RBPs other than core spliceosome components during human and mouse NC and craniofacial development. Where applicable, we review data on these same RBPs from additional vertebrate species, including chicken, Xenopus and zebrafish models. Knockdown or ablation of several RBPs discussed here results in altered expression of transcripts encoding components of developmental signaling pathways, as well as reduced cell proliferation and/or increased cell death, indicating that these are common mechanisms contributing to the observed phenotypes. The study of these proteins offers a relatively untapped opportunity to provide significant insight into the mechanisms underlying gene expression regulation during craniofacial morphogenesis.

PUB1: a major yeast poly(A)+ RNA-binding protein

1993 ◽  
Vol 13 (10) ◽  
pp. 6114-6123
Author(s):  
M J Matunis ◽  
E L Matunis ◽  
G Dreyfuss
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Uv Light ◽  
Binding Protein ◽  
Gene Replacement ◽  
Yeast Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Binding Domains ◽  
Development And Differentiation

The expression of RNA polymerase II transcripts can be regulated at the posttranscriptional level by RNA-binding proteins. Although extensively characterized in metazoans, relatively few RNA-binding proteins have been characterized in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Three major proteins are cross-linked by UV light to poly(A)+ RNA in living S. cerevisiae cells. These are the 72-kDa poly(A)-binding protein and proteins of 60 and 50 kDa (S.A. Adam, T.Y. Nakagawa, M.S. Swanson, T. Woodruff, and G. Dreyfuss, Mol. Cell. Biol. 6:2932-2943, 1986). Here, we describe the 60-kDa protein, one of the major poly(A)+ RNA-binding proteins in S. cerevisiae. This protein, PUB1 [for poly(U)-binding protein 1], was purified by affinity chromatography on immobilized poly(rU), and specific monoclonal antibodies to it were produced. UV cross-linking demonstrated that PUB1 is bound to poly(A)+ RNA (mRNA or pre-mRNA) in living cells, and it was detected primarily in the cytoplasm by indirect immunofluorescence. The gene for PUB1 was cloned and sequenced, and the sequence was found to predict a 51-kDa protein with three ribonucleoprotein consensus RNA-binding domains and three glutamine- and asparagine-rich auxiliary domains. This overall structure is remarkably similar to the structures of the Drosophila melanogaster elav gene product, the human neuronal antigen HuD, and the cytolytic lymphocyte protein TIA-1. Each of these proteins has an important role in development and differentiation, potentially by affecting RNA processing. PUB1 was found to be nonessential in S. cerevisiae by gene replacement; however, further genetic analysis should reveal important features of this class of RNA-binding proteins.

scholarly journals The structural basis for RNA selectivity by the IMP family of RNA-binding proteins

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeetayu Biswas ◽  
Vivek L. Patel ◽  
Varun Bhaskar ◽  
Jeffrey A. Chao ◽  
Robert H. Singer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neural Development ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Stability ◽  
Underlying Mechanism ◽  
Structural Basis ◽  
General Mechanism ◽  
Binding Domains ◽  
Variable Loops

Abstract The IGF2 mRNA-binding proteins (ZBP1/IMP1, IMP2, IMP3) are highly conserved post-transcriptional regulators of RNA stability, localization and translation. They play important roles in cell migration, neural development, metabolism and cancer cell survival. The knockout phenotypes of individual IMP proteins suggest that each family member regulates a unique pool of RNAs, yet evidence and an underlying mechanism for this is lacking. Here, we combine systematic evolution of ligands by exponential enrichment (SELEX) and NMR spectroscopy to demonstrate that the major RNA-binding domains of the two most distantly related IMPs (ZBP1 and IMP2) bind to different consensus sequences and regulate targets consistent with their knockout phenotypes and roles in disease. We find that the targeting specificity of each IMP is determined by few amino acids in their variable loops. As variable loops often differ amongst KH domain paralogs, we hypothesize that this is a general mechanism for evolving specificity and regulation of the transcriptome.

scholarly journals KH domain containing RNA-binding proteins coordinate with microRNAs to regulate Caenorhabditis elegans development

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dustin Haskell ◽  
Anna Zinovyeva
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Caenorhabditis Elegans ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Regulate Gene Expression ◽  
C Elegans ◽  
Binding Domains ◽  
Kh Domain ◽  
Regulate Gene

Abstract MicroRNAs (miRNAs) and RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) regulate gene expression at the post-transcriptional level, but the extent to which these key regulators of gene expression coordinate their activities and the precise mechanisms of this coordination are not well understood. RBPs often have recognizable RNA binding domains that correlate with specific protein function. Recently, several RBPs containing K homology (KH) RNA binding domains were shown to work with miRNAs to regulate gene expression, raising the possibility that KH domains may be important for coordinating with miRNA pathways in gene expression regulation. To ascertain whether additional KH domain proteins functionally interact with miRNAs during Caenorhabditis elegans development, we knocked down twenty-four genes encoding KH-domain proteins in several miRNA sensitized genetic backgrounds. Here, we report that a majority of the KH domain-containing genes genetically interact with multiple miRNAs and Argonaute alg-1. Interestingly, two KH domain genes, predicted splicing factors sfa-1 and asd-2, genetically interacted with all of the miRNA mutants tested, whereas other KH domain genes showed genetic interactions only with specific miRNAs. Our domain architecture and phylogenetic relationship analyses of the C. elegans KH domain-containing proteins revealed potential groups that may share both structure and function. Collectively, we show that many C. elegans KH domain RBPs functionally interact with miRNAs, suggesting direct or indirect coordination between these two classes of post-transcriptional gene expression regulators.

scholarly journals Molecular dynamics of FMRP and other RNA-binding proteins in MEG-01 differentiation: the role of mRNP complexes in non-neuronal development

2016 ◽  
Vol 94 (6) ◽  
pp. 597-608 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. McCoy ◽  
D. Poliquin-Duchesneau ◽  
F. Corbin
Keyword(s):  
Protein Content ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Morphological Changes ◽  
Fragile X ◽  
Cellular Protein ◽  
The Body ◽  
Total Protein Content

Asymmetrically differentiating cells are formed with the aid of RNA-binding proteins (RBPs), which can bind, stabilize, regulate, and transport target mRNAs. The loss of RBPs in neurons may lead to severe neurodevelopmental diseases such as the Fragile X Syndrome with the absence of the Fragile X Mental Retardation Protein (FMRP). Because the latter is ubiquitous and shares many similarities with other RBPs involved in the development of peripheral cells, we suggest that FMRP would have a role in the differentiation of all tissues where it is expressed. A MEG-01 differentiation model was, therefore, established to study the global developmental functions of FMRP. PMA induction of MEG-01 cells causes important morphological changes driven by cytoskeletal dynamics. Cytoskeleton change and colocalization analyses were performed by confocal microscopy and sucrose gradient fractionation. Total cellular protein content and de novo synthesis were also analyzed. Microtubular transport mediates the displacement of FMRP and other RBP-containing mRNP complexes towards regions of the cell in development. De novo protein synthesis decreases significantly upon differentiation and total protein content composition is altered. Because those results are comparable with those obtained in neurons, the absence of FMRP would have significant consequences in cells everywhere in the body. The latter should be further investigated to give a better understanding of the systemic implications of imbalances of FMRP and other functionally similar RBPs.

scholarly journals A nuclear localization domain in the hnRNP A1 protein.

1995 ◽  
Vol 129 (3) ◽  
pp. 551-560 ◽  
Author(s):  
H Siomi ◽  
G Dreyfuss
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Localization ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Binding Motif ◽  
Hnrnp A1 ◽  
Binding Domains ◽  
Rich Domain ◽  
Localization Domain ◽  
Hnrnp Proteins

The heterogeneous nuclear RNP (hnRNP) A1 protein is one of the major pre-mRNA/mRNA binding proteins in eukaryotic cells and one of the most abundant proteins in the nucleus. It is localized to the nucleoplasm and it also shuttles between the nucleus and the cytoplasm. The amino acid sequence of A1 contains two RNP motif RNA-binding domains (RBDs) at the amino terminus and a glycine-rich domain at the carboxyl terminus. This configuration, designated 2x RBD-Gly, is representative of perhaps the largest family of hnRNP proteins. Unlike most nuclear proteins characterized so far, A1 (and most 2x RBD-Gly proteins) does not contain a recognizable nuclear localization signal (NLS). We have found that a segment of ca. 40 amino acids near the carboxyl end of the protein (designated M9) is necessary and sufficient for nuclear localization; attaching this segment to the bacterial protein beta-galactosidase or to pyruvate kinase completely localized these otherwise cytoplasmic proteins to the nucleus. The RBDs and another RNA binding motif found in the glycine-rich domain, the RGG box, are not required for A1 nuclear localization. M9 is a novel type of nuclear localization domain as it does not contain sequences similar to classical basic-type NLS. Interestingly, sequences similar to M9 are found in other nuclear RNA-binding proteins including hnRNP A2.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document