scholarly journals A Meta-Analysis of Influenza Vaccination Following Correspondence: Considerations for COVID-19

Author(s):  
Robert P Murphy ◽  
Carol Taaffe ◽  
Elayne Ahern ◽  
Grace McMahon ◽  
Orla Muldoon

Background: High vaccination rates are needed to protect against influenza and to end the COVID-19 pandemic. Health authorities need to know if supplementing mass communications with direct correspondence to the community would increase uptake. Objectives: The primary objective is to determine if sending a single written message directly to individuals increases influenza vaccine uptake, and a secondary objective is to identify any identified content shown to increase influenza vaccine uptake. Methods: PubMed, PsycInfo and Web of Science were searched for English language RCTs testing a single correspondence for members of the community in OECD countries to obtain influenza vaccination. A meta-analysis with inverse-variance, random-effects modelling was used to estimate a mean, weighted risk ratio effect size measure of vaccine uptake. Studies were quality assessed and analysis was undertaken to account for potential publication bias. Results: Twenty-two randomized controlled trials were included covering 37 interventions. Of the 37 interventions, 32 (86%) report an increase in influenza vaccination rates. A formal meta-analysis shows that sending a single written message increases influenza vaccine uptake by 18% (RR = 1.18, 95%CI [1.13-1.22], Z = 8.56, p < .001) relative to the no contact comparator group. Analysis shows that the intervention is effective across correspondence type, age group, time, and location, and after allowing for risk of publication bias. Limitations: The review was restricted to English language publications, and the generalizability of results across the OECD may be questioned. Conclusions and implications: The implication for public health authorities organizing vaccination programs for influenza, and arguably also for COVID-19, is that sending written vaccination correspondence to members of the community is likely to increase uptake. Keywords: vaccine uptake, COVID-19, influenza, direct correspondence, meta-analysis.

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nirma Khatri Vadlamudi ◽  
Fawziah Marra

Background: Many studies report vaccine uptake among young adults aged 18 to 49 years is low. In Canada, the National Advisory Committee on Immunization (NACI) recommends influenza vaccination for adults in contact with young children, however vaccination rates for this specific population are missing. An estimate is required to identify appropriate public health interventions. The objective of this study was to describe recent trends in influenza vaccination uptake among Canadian adults aged 18 to 49 years old living with or without young children.Methods: The Canadian Community Health Survey (2013-2014) dataset, available for public use was used after grouping individuals by influenza vaccination uptake within the past year in adults aged 18 to 49 years.  The relationship between living in a household with young children and influenza vaccination uptake was examined using a multivariable logistic regression model.Results: Among Canadian adults aged 18 to 49 years, the influenza vaccination uptake was 24.1% in adult household contacts with young children compared to 18.2% in those without young children (p<.0001). After adjusting for socio-demographic characteristics and self-perceived health, we determined that vaccine uptake was associated with living in a household with young children (adjusted OR: 1.30 [95%CI: 1.17-1.44]). While socio-demographic characteristics and self-perceived health greatly influenced influenza vaccination uptake, we also found marital status was a strong influencer of influenza vaccine uptake (adjusted OR:  1.31 [95%CI: 1.16-1.48]). Conclusion: Overall, influenza vaccination uptake among caregiving adults is low. Increased vaccine uptake was associated with living in a household with one or more young children. Targeted education and vaccination programs are required to improve uptake of the influenza vaccine in this age group.


2016 ◽  
Vol 33 (11) ◽  
pp. 1104-1114 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marta Nunes ◽  
Anushka Aqil ◽  
Saad Omer ◽  
Shabir Madhi

Objective Numerous observational studies have evaluated the relationship between influenza vaccination during pregnancy and birth outcomes. The number of studies on this subject has increased, especially after the 2009 A/H1N1 pandemic (A/H1N1pdm09). This meta-analysis aims to determine the impact of maternal vaccination with either seasonal trivalent inactivated influenza vaccines (IIV) or A/H1N1pdm09 monovalent vaccines on the rates of preterm (PTB), small for gestational age (SGA), and low birth weight (LBW) births. Methods English language randomized controlled trials and observational studies assessing the proposed outcomes after administration of influenza vaccine during pregnancy were screened. Observational studies were included if they presented adjusted measures and if the total number of women evaluated reached predefined thresholds. Sensitivity analyses were performed, including all published observational studies irrespectively of the sample size. Results A total of 5 and 13 publications that assessed the impact of IIV and monovalent A/H1N1pdm09 vaccines, respectively, fulfilled the inclusion criteria for the main analyses. The rate of PTB and LBW was lower in women who received IIV during pregnancy compared with nonvaccinated women (odds ratio [OR]: 0.87; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.77, 0.98 for PTB and OR: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.61, 0.88 for LBW); and in women vaccinated with monovalent A/H1N1pdm09 versus nonvaccinated women (OR: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.85, 0.99 for PTB and OR: 0.88; 95% CI: 0.79, 0.98 for LBW). No significant impact of vaccination on SGA birth rates was detected in the main analyses independently of the vaccine group. Conclusion Receipt of influenza vaccine during pregnancy was associated with a decreased risk of PTB and LBW.


2017 ◽  
Vol 38 (8) ◽  
pp. 970-975 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Lipkowitz Eaton ◽  
David C. Mohr ◽  
Kathleen M. McPhaul ◽  
Richard A. Kaslow ◽  
Richard A. Martinello

OBJECTIVETo identify predictors of influenza vaccine acceptance among VHA healthcare workers (HCWs), with emphasis on modifiable factors related to promotion campaigns.DESIGNSurvey.SETTINGNational single-payer healthcare system with 140 hospitals and 321,000 HCWs.PARTICIPANTSNational voluntary sample of HCWs in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) system.METHODSWe invited a random sample of 5% of all VHA HCWs to participate. An 18-item intranet-based survey inquired about occupation, vaccination status, employer policy, and local campaign efforts.RESULTSThe response rate was 17.4%. Of 2,502 initial respondents, 2,406 (96.2%) provided usable data. This sample includes respondents from all 140 VA hospitals. Self-reported influenza vaccination rates were highest among physicians (95.6%) and licensed independent providers (88.3%). Nonclinical staff (80.7%) reported vaccine uptake similar to other certified but nonlicensed providers (81.2%). The strongest predictor of vaccine acceptance among VHA HCWs was individual awareness of organizational policy. Vaccine acceptance was also higher among HCWs who reported more options for access to vaccination and among those in facilities with more education activities.CONCLUSIONSInfluenza vaccine acceptance varied significantly by employee awareness of employer policy and on-site access to vaccine. Employer-sponsored activities to increase access continue to show positive returns across occupations. Local influenza campaign efforts to educate HCWs may have reached saturation in this target group. These results suggest that focused communications to increase HCW awareness and understanding of employer policy can drive further increase in influenza vaccination acceptance.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2017;38:970–975


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
G Gray ◽  
J Cooper

Abstract Background The annual influenza vaccination is recommended for all front-line healthcare workers in the UK and is a crucial way of reducing mortality for vulnerable patient groups. However, to date the UK government has never explicitly monitored influenza vaccine uptake in medical students. This is important to ascertain, as students regularly move between clinical areas and are both a perfect vector for the spread of influenza and at an increased risk of contracting influenza themselves. Aims This service evaluation was designed to evaluate the effectiveness of an influenza vaccination programme in one UK medical school and make recommendations to increase vaccination rates in the future. Methods This service evaluation collected data about medical student uptake of influenza vaccination in one UK medical school. Two hundred and fifty-one students at different course stages completed questionnaires, answering questions on vaccination status and Likert-scale ‘belief’ questions to assess the subjective reasons behind vaccine refusal. Results There was a substantial difference between year group cohorts (~20%), with significantly higher vaccination rates in the preclinical year group. Two significant negative predictors of vaccination were found (P &lt; 0.001), related to scepticism over the effectiveness of the vaccine and lack of convenient access to the vaccination. Results indicated that integrating information about the influenza vaccine into the curriculum would reduce lack of knowledge over the efficacy of the vaccine. The centralization of vaccination programmes at mandatory university-based learning events would mitigate against the problem of diversity of vaccination locations and lack of central accountability. Conclusions The results of this service evaluation provide significant predictors of vaccination status for medical students and potential occupational health interventions to improve vaccine uptake in this group.


Author(s):  
Xiaoju ZHOU ◽  
Xuequn ZHAO ◽  
Jun LIU ◽  
Wenjie YANG

Background: This study aimed to explore effective education method to improve influenza vaccine uptake rate. Methods: Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials was conducted in this study including subgroup analysis and publication bias test. Electronic databases comprised PubMed, EBSCO, Elsevier, Springer, Wiley, and Cochrane were searched for studies published up to Oct 8, 2019. Results: Influenza vaccination was significantly different in massages or letters intervention group (OR=1.30, 95%CI: 1.05-1.61). No heterogeneity and publication bias existed in this meta-analysis (I 2=43.60%, P=0.131, Pbegg =0.754, Pegger=0.051). Conclusion: Education by messages and letters was effective according to this study. Education messages could be more efficacy combined with easer vaccine access.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dan Wu ◽  
Chenqi Jin ◽  
Khaoula Bessame ◽  
Fanny Tang ◽  
Jason Ong ◽  
...  

Abstract China has low seasonal influenza vaccination rates among children and older adults. This quasi-experimental pragmatic trial examined the effectiveness of a pay-it-forward intervention on influenza vaccination compared to standard of care (user-paid vaccination) and free vaccination strategies among children and older people in China (ChiCTR2000040048). In pay-it-forward, people receive a free influenza vaccine from a local group and are offered an opportunity to donate financially to support vaccination among future individuals. The primary outcome was pre-specified as influenza vaccine uptake. Secondary outcomes included vaccine confidence and associated costs. Among 450 participants enrolled, 55/150 (36.7%) in the standard of care arm, 111/150 (74.0%) in the pay-it-forward arm, and 114/150 (76.0%) in the free vaccination arm received an influenza vaccine. The pay-it-forward arm had significantly higher vaccine confidence when compared to the standard of care arm. In the pay-it-forward arm, 107/111 (96.4%) of participants donated money for subsequent vaccinations and 19 of 60 invited (31.7%) created postcard messages.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (10) ◽  
pp. e0258258
Author(s):  
Ramia Zakhour ◽  
Hani Tamim ◽  
Farah Faytrouni ◽  
Joanne Khoury ◽  
Maha Makki ◽  
...  

Background A growing number of parents refuse vaccination due to concerns about side effects. Influenza vaccine is no exception and remains one of the most controversial vaccines. Data regarding influenza vaccine uptake and parental knowledge, attitude and practice towards vaccination in the Lebanese population is lacking. The aim of this study was to assess the rate of vaccination refusal and potential associated factors among Lebanese parents of school-aged children, in general and with a focus on influenza vaccine. Methods A parent questionnaire was distributed in randomly selected 2 public and 2 private schools from the greater Beirut area during the school year 2017–2018. Questionnaires covered knowledge, attitude (including themes of efficacy, hesitancy and trust), and practice of vaccination in general and influenza vaccine in particular. Results The response rate was 76.5% (306/400). Overall, 29.4% parents reported vaccinating their children against influenza (62.2% in private and 37.7% in public schools). Younger age, paternal employment and higher household income were associated with higher vaccination rates (p = 0.01, 0.02 and <0.0001 respectively). Lack of vaccine recommendation by the physician was the most common reason for not taking it (47%). Parents who accepted influenza vaccination had higher scores in efficacy, hesitancy and trust and were more compliant with other vaccinations. Conclusion One third of parents of school aged children in the greater Beirut area vaccinate their children against influenza. This rate is likely lower in rural remote areas. Physician’s recommendation is the single most important predictor of such vaccination. Future studies tackling physicians’ attitude and practice are needed to help improve influenza vaccination rates in the Lebanese population.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony Elia ◽  
Nedal Taha ◽  
Sima Tokajian

AbstractInfluenza is a common respiratory tract disease that has been around for years. Vaccination remains the most cost-effective measure to avoid infection. Influenza vaccination rates in Lebanon, like elsewhere in the world, are known to be suboptimal. The emergence and spread of SARS-CoV-2 led to a global health crisis. This study aimed at assessing the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the tendency of the general adult population residing in Lebanon to vaccinate against influenza. A quantitative cross-sectional study was conducted between November and December 2020 using a structured questionnaire passed on 1055 individuals to determine factors influencing vaccination habits prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic. The factors were analyzed using univariate, bivariate, and multivariate analyses. The majority (69.7%) of the study participants never received the influenza vaccine within the last 5 years, 20% vaccinated occasionally, and only 10.3% were yearly vaccinated. Among individuals who never got the influenza vaccine within the last 5 years, 20.7% reported their willingness to vaccinate this winter significantly increasing the vaccination percentage. Participants concerned about the COVID-19 pandemic showed an enhanced willingness to vaccinate against both. Influenza and COVID-19 vaccination rates, nevertheless, are still considerably lower than the recommended coverage. The COVID-19 pandemic caused a significant increase in the tendency to vaccinate against influenza. Yet, urgent vaccination strategies should be implemented to boost vaccine uptake across all demographics to consequently diminish the burden conflicted by influenza, COVID-19, and ultimately other infectious diseases.


2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S973-S974
Author(s):  
Daniel Norman ◽  
Rosanne Barnes ◽  
Margie Danchin ◽  
Holly Seale ◽  
Hannah C Moore ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Influenza vaccination is the most effective influenza prevention tool for children with medical comorbidities. Despite this, coverage remains inadequate. Numerous interventions to improve vaccination coverage have been assessed, yet there remains a paucity of data comparing the relative efficacy and effectiveness of different interventions. Methods We searched MEDLINE, PubMed, Scopus, Embase, CINAHL, CENTRAL, and Web of Science (1980 to March 2019) for studies evaluating interventions which sought to improve influenza vaccine coverage in children with medical comorbidities. Interventions were divided into those targeting parents, targeting vaccination providers, and targeting the hospital, clinic or ward. Screening and data extraction from publications meeting inclusion criteria was performed by two reviewers. Results were pooled and meta-analyses were performed using Mantel–Haenszel random-effects models in Review Manager 5. Results 35 articles met inclusion criteria; 14 cross-sectional, 12 randomized trials, and 9 cohort studies, 25 articles had sufficient data for pooled analysis. Of the included interventions, 17 were based within primary care or community-based settings, 17 were based in hospitals or tertiary clinics, and 1 intervention was conducted across both primary and tertiary settings. Interventions overall increased influenza vaccination likelihood by 33% (RR = 1.33: 95% CI 1.31, 1.35). Interventions targeting providers’ influenza vaccine knowledge increased vaccine coverage (RR = 1.42: 95% CI 1.36, 1.49) greater than those targeting parental knowledge (RR = 1.23: 95% CI 1.21, 1.26). Conversely, vaccination reminders targeting parents increased vaccine coverage (RR = 1.53: 95% CI 1.49, 1.58) greater than reminders targeting providers (RR = 1.23: 95% CI 1.20, 1.27). Interventions targeting hospitals, clinics or ward processes had the weakest impact on coverage (RR = 1.15: 95% CI 1.13, 1.17). Conclusion Interventions targeting parents, providers, and places individually have all shown to improve influenza vaccination in children with medical comorbidities. However, specifically targeting providers’ vaccine knowledge and parental reminders appear to have the greatest impact on vaccine uptake. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.


Author(s):  
Gokcen Orgul ◽  
Ayse Istek Keles ◽  
Aykan Yucel ◽  
Dilek Sahin

Abstract Purpose Most societies recommend routine influenza vaccine to all pregnant women. In Turkey, the Ministry of Health provides the influenza vaccine free of charge to pregnant women during the second and third trimesters. Pregnant women may not be willing to accept vaccination despite their knowledge and attitudes. We aimed to investigate the rate and determining factors of influenza vaccine acceptance after receipt of face-to-face information. Methods Pregnant women were informed about the benefits of the influenza vaccine and asked if they would get the vaccine. Results A total of 353 Turkish women were involved, and 191 (54.1%) accepted influenza vaccination. There was no statistically significant difference in terms of maternal age, body mass index, gravida, number of children, socioeconomic status, smoking and occupation between groups. Women in the third trimester had lower vaccination rates compared to first- and second-trimester pregnancies (35.7% vs. 67.7–64.2%). Women with at least a university degree also had lower vaccine uptake rates (58.1% vs. 59.5–36.8%). While 82.2% of women who accepted vaccination believed the benefit of the vaccine to the baby, the rate was 54.9% in the non-vaccinated group. The most common reason for refusal was the belief that influenza was not a serious disease. Vaccination uptake was higher especially for women who understood the benefits of the influenza vaccine for the baby (OR=3.79, 95%Cl=2.34–6.14). Conclusion Women who had enough information, who had a lower education level, who had a previous history of influenza infection, and who had decided to have their babies vaccinated were more likely to accept influenza vaccine.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document