scholarly journals Multiversal SpaceTime (MSpaceTime) Not Neural Network as Source of Intelligence in Generalized Quantum Mechanics, Extended General Relativity, Darwin Dynamics for Artificial Super Intelligence Synthesis

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yang Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Neural Network ◽  
Hilbert Space ◽  
General Relativity ◽  
Quantum Mechanics ◽  
Riemannian Manifold ◽  
Conformal Geometry ◽  
Logic Synthesis ◽  
Einstein Equations ◽  
Biological Synthesis ◽  
Agent Intelligence

AbstractFrom Synthesis perspective, whether Logic Synthesis, Physical Synthesis, Chemical Synthesis, or Biological Synthesis, Physical Geometry such as Universal Geometry and Quantum Geometry, and Biological Geometry like Conformal Geometry supported by Tensors and Manifolds, are the outcome of physical laws and biological laws in modeling non-linear physical and biological dynamics as opposed to traditional partial differential/difference equation way. We discover that Multiversal SpaceTime instead of Neural Network, governing physical and biological world at macroscopic and microscopic level, is the ultimate source of intelligence. With that we propose Multiversal Synthesis-based Artificial Design Automation (ADA), a bio-physical inspired model based on Multiverse in Darwin Dynamics, Generalized Quantum Mechanics, and Extended General Relativity, for Artificial Super Intelligence (ASI) implementation. Based on Schrodinger Equation of Quantum Mechanics, we generalize the 4-Dimensional Hilbert Space based Discrete Quantum SpaceTime to N-Dimensional (1 ≪ N < M, with M is limited by Planck Length) Hilbert Space based Discrete MSpaceTime as part of MSpaceTime, in modeling both Micro-Environment Intelligence and Micro-Agent Intelligence of ASI; likewise based on Einstein Equations of General Relativity, we make a T-Symmetry extension first, and then extend the 4-Dimensional Pseudo-Riemannian Manifold based Continuous Curved SpaceTime as part of MSpaceTime to N-Dimensional (1 ≪ N < ∞) Pseudo-Riemannian Manifold based Continuous MSpaceTime extension, in modeling both Macro-Environment Intelligence and Macro-Agent Intelligence of ASI. Our discovery only solves the black box puzzle of AI, but also paves the way in achieving ASI through ADA. Of course, our Multiverse Endeavor will never stop from there.

scholarly journals Ontology in Quantum Mechanics

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerard ’t Hooft
Keyword(s):  
Hilbert Space ◽  
General Relativity ◽  
Black Hole ◽  
Quantum Mechanics ◽  
Evolution Equations ◽  
Black Hole Physics ◽  
Special Kind ◽  
Quantum Evolution ◽  
The Standard Model ◽  
Low Energies

It is suspected that the quantum evolution equations describing the micro-world as we know it are of a special kind that allows transformations to a special set of basis states in Hilbert space, such that, in this basis, the evolution is given by elements of the permutation group. This would restore an ontological interpretation. It is shown how, at low energies per particle degree of freedom, almost any quantum system allows for such a transformation. This contradicts Bell’s theorem, and we emphasise why some of the assumptions made by Bell to prove his theorem cannot hold for the models studied here. We speculate how an approach of this kind may become helpful in isolating the most likely version of the Standard Model, combined with General Relativity. A link is suggested with black hole physics.

GEOMETRIC STRUCTURES IN PHYSICS

2012 ◽  
Vol 09 (02) ◽  
pp. 1260026 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. J. BOYA
Keyword(s):  
Hilbert Space ◽  
General Relativity ◽  
Quantum Mechanics ◽  
Path Integral ◽  
Riemannian Manifolds ◽  
Symplectic Geometry ◽  
Gauge Theories ◽  
Classical Mechanics ◽  
The Past ◽  
Modern Physics

Geometry and Physics developed independently, until the past twentieth century, where physicists realized geometry is rather flexible and can adapt itself to the needs and characteristics of modern physics. Besides the use of Riemannian manifolds to describe General Relativity, classical mechanics encounters symplectic geometry, not to speak of the bundle connection ingredient of modern gauge theories; even Quantum Mechanics, after the initial Hilbert space period, is seeking nowadays to adapt itself better to a geometrical interpretation, by imperatives of the path integral description and also to incorporate more clearly the symplectic aspects of its classical antecedent.

scholarly journals Geometry and general relativity in the groupoid model with a finite structure group

2015 ◽  
Vol 93 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-54 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Heller ◽  
Tomasz Miller ◽  
Leszek Pysiak ◽  
Wiesław Sasin
Keyword(s):  
General Relativity ◽  
Quantum Mechanics ◽  
Lorentz Group ◽  
Space Time ◽  
Einstein Equations ◽  
Diagonal Form ◽  
Frame Bundle ◽  
Relativistic Limit ◽  
Theor Phys ◽  
A Finite Group

In a series of papers (M. Heller et al. J. Math. Phys. 38, 5840 (1997). doi:10.1063/1.532186 ; M. Heller and W. Sasin. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 38, 1619 (1999). doi:10.1023/A:1026617913754 ; M. Heller et al. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 44, 619 (2005). doi:10.1007/s10773-005-3992-7 ) we proposed a model unifying general relativity and quantum mechanics. The idea was to deduce both general relativity and quantum mechanics from a noncommutative algebra, [Formula: see text], defined on a transformation groupoid Γ determined by the action of the Lorentz group on the frame bundle (E, πM, M) over space–time M. In the present work, we construct a simplified version of the gravitational sector of this model in which the Lorentz group is replaced by a finite group, G, and the frame bundle is trivial E = M × G. The model is fully computable. We define the Einstein–Hilbert action, with the help of which we derive the generalized vacuum Einstein equations. When the equations are projected to space–time (giving the “general relativistic limit”), the extra terms that appear due to our generalization can be interpreted as “matter terms”, as in Kaluza–Klein-type models. To illustrate this effect we further simplify the metric matrix to a block diagonal form, compute for it the generalized Einstein equations and find two of their “Friedman-like” solutions for the special case when G = [Formula: see text]. One of them gives the flat Minkowski space–time (which, however, is not static), another, a hyperbolic, linearly expanding universe.

scholarly journals Quantum-information conservation. The problem about “hidden variables”, or the “conservation of energy conservation” in quantum mechanics: A historical lesson for future discoveries

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vasil Dinev Penchev
Keyword(s):  
Hilbert Space ◽  
General Relativity ◽  
Quantum Mechanics ◽  
Energy Conservation ◽  
Ordinal Number ◽  
Hidden Variables ◽  
Mathematical Structure ◽  
Complex Hilbert Space ◽  
Conservation Of Energy ◽  
The Universe

The explicit history of the “hidden variables” problem is well-known and established. The main events of its chronology are traced. An implicit context of that history is suggested. It links the problem with the “conservation of energy conservation” in quantum mechanics. Bohr, Kramers, and Slaters (1924) admitted its violation being due to the “fourth Heisenberg uncertainty”, that of energy in relation to time. Wolfgang Pauli rejected the conjecture and even forecast the existence of a new and unknown then elementary particle, neutrino, on the ground of energy conservation in quantum mechanics, afterwards confirmed experimentally. Bohr recognized his defeat and Pauli’s truth: the paradigm of elementary particles (furthermore underlying the Standard model) dominates nowadays. However, the reason of energy conservation in quantum mechanics is quite different from that in classical mechanics (the Lie group of all translations in time). Even more, if the reason was the latter, Bohr, Cramers, and Slatters’s argument would be valid. The link between the “conservation of energy conservation” and the problem of hidden variables is the following: the former is equivalent to their absence. The same can be verified historically by the unification of Heisenberg’s matrix mechanics and Schrödinger’s wave mechanics in the contemporary quantum mechanics by means of the separable complex Hilbert space. The Heisenberg version relies on the vector interpretation of Hilbert space, and the Schrödinger one, on the wave-function interpretation. However the both are equivalent to each other only under the additional condition that a certain well-ordering is equivalent to the corresponding ordinal number (as in Neumann’s definition of “ordinal number”). The same condition interpreted in the proper terms of quantum mechanics means its “unitarity”, therefore the “conservation of energy conservation”. In other words, the “conservation of energy conservation” is postulated in the foundations of quantum mechanics by means of the concept of the separable complex Hilbert space, which furthermore is equivalent to postulating the absence of hidden variables in quantum mechanics (directly deducible from the properties of that Hilbert space). Further, the lesson of that unification (of Heisenberg’s approach and Schrödinger’s version) can be directly interpreted in terms of the unification of general relativity and quantum mechanics in the cherished “quantum gravity” as well as a “manual” of how one can do this considering them as isomorphic to each other in a new mathematical structure corresponding to quantum information. Even more, the condition of the unification is analogical to that in the historical precedent of the unifying mathematical structure (namely the separable complex Hilbert space of quantum mechanics) and consists in the class of equivalence of any smooth deformations of the pseudo-Riemannian space of general relativity: each element of that class is a wave function and vice versa as well. Thus, quantum mechanics can be considered as a “thermodynamic version” of general relativity, after which the universe is observed as if “outside” (similarly to a phenomenological thermodynamic system observable only “outside” as a whole). The statistical approach to that “phenomenological thermodynamics” of quantum mechanics implies Gibbs classes of equivalence of all states of the universe, furthermore representable in Boltzmann’s manner implying general relativity properly … The meta-lesson is that the historical lesson can serve for future discoveries.

Nonlinear quantum mechanics in a q-deformed Hilbert space

2019 ◽  
Vol 383 (23) ◽  
pp. 2729-2738 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruno G. da Costa ◽  
Ernesto P. Borges
Keyword(s):  
Hilbert Space ◽  
Quantum Mechanics ◽  
Nonlinear Quantum ◽  
Nonlinear Quantum Mechanics

scholarly journals On Russell’s 1927 Book The Analysis of Matter

Philosophies ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 40
Author(s):  
Said Mikki
Keyword(s):  
General Relativity ◽  
Quantum Mechanics ◽  
Building Blocks ◽  
Bertrand Russell ◽  
Important Work ◽  
Philosophy Of Nature ◽  
Foundations Of Physics ◽  
The World ◽  
Ordinal Space ◽  
Historical Fact

The goal of this article is to bring into wider attention the often neglected important work by Bertrand Russell on the philosophy of nature and the foundations of physics, published in the year 1927. It is suggested that the idea of what could be named Russell space, introduced in Part III of that book, may be viewed as more fundamental than many other types of spaces since the highly abstract nature of the topological ordinal space proposed by Russell there would incorporate into its very fabric the emergent nature of spacetime by deploying event assemblages, but not spacetime or particles, as the fundamental building blocks of the world. We also point out the curious historical fact that the book The Analysis of Matter can be chronologically considered the earliest book-length generic attempt to reflect on the relation between quantum mechanics, just emerging by that time, and general relativity.

scholarly journals Clock-dependent spacetime

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sung-Sik Lee
Keyword(s):  
Hilbert Space ◽  
General Relativity ◽  
Quantum Gravity ◽  
Hilbert Spaces ◽  
Coordinate Systems ◽  
Physical Laws

Abstract Einstein’s theory of general relativity is based on the premise that the physical laws take the same form in all coordinate systems. However, it still presumes a preferred decomposition of the total kinematic Hilbert space into local kinematic Hilbert spaces. In this paper, we consider a theory of quantum gravity that does not come with a preferred partitioning of the kinematic Hilbert space. It is pointed out that, in such a theory, dimension, signature, topology and geometry of spacetime depend on how a collection of local clocks is chosen within the kinematic Hilbert space.

THE UNREASONABLE EFFECTIVENESS OF EXPONENTIALLY SUPPRESSED CORRECTIONS IN PRESERVING INFORMATION

2013 ◽  
Vol 22 (12) ◽  
pp. 1342030 ◽  
Author(s):  
KYRIAKOS PAPADODIMAS ◽  
SUVRAT RAJU
Keyword(s):  
Hilbert Space ◽  
Black Hole ◽  
Quantum Mechanics ◽  
Nonperturbative Effects ◽  
Von Neumann Entropy ◽  
Von Neumann ◽  
Information Theoretic ◽  
Black Hole Evaporation ◽  
Strong Subadditivity ◽  
Unreasonable Effectiveness

We point out that nonperturbative effects in quantum gravity are sufficient to reconcile the process of black hole evaporation with quantum mechanics. In ordinary processes, these corrections are unimportant because they are suppressed by e-S. However, they gain relevance in information-theoretic considerations because their small size is offset by the corresponding largeness of the Hilbert space. In particular, we show how such corrections can cause the von Neumann entropy of the emitted Hawking quanta to decrease after the Page time, without modifying the thermal nature of each emitted quantum. Second, we show that exponentially suppressed commutators between operators inside and outside the black hole are sufficient to resolve paradoxes associated with the strong subadditivity of entropy without any dramatic modifications of the geometry near the horizon.

scholarly journals CAN f(R) GRAVITY MIMIC GENERAL RELATIVITY?

2012 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 63-68 ◽  
Author(s):  
JE-AN GU
Keyword(s):  
General Relativity ◽  
Differential Equations ◽  
Early Time ◽  
Einstein Equations ◽  
Modified Theories Of Gravity ◽  
Cosmological Perturbations ◽  
Long Run ◽  
Theories Of Gravity ◽  
The Stability ◽  
Higher Order Differential Equations

We discuss the stability of the general-relativity (GR) limit in modified theories of gravity, particularly the f(R) theory. The problem of approximating the higher-order differential equations in modified gravity with the Einstein equations (2nd-order differential equations) in GR is elaborated. We demonstrate this problem with a heuristic example involving a simple ordinary differential equation. With this example we further present the iteration method that may serve as a better approximation for solving the equation, meanwhile providing a criterion for assessing the validity of the approximation. We then discuss our previous numerical analyses of the early-time evolution of the cosmological perturbations in f(R) gravity, following the similar ideas demonstrated by the heuristic example. The results of the analyses indicated the possible instability of the GR limit that might make the GR approximation inaccurate in describing the evolution of the cosmological perturbations in the long run.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document