AbstractBrucellosis, caused by Brucella bacteria species, remains the most prevalent zoonotic disease worldwide. Brucella establish chronic infections within host macrophages despite triggering cytosolic innate immune sensors, including Stimulator of Interferon Genes (STING), which potentially limit infection. In this study, STING was required for control of chronic Brucella infection in vivo. However, early during infection, Brucella down-regulated STING mRNA and protein. Down-regulation occurred post-transcriptionally, required live bacteria, the Brucella type IV secretion system, and was independent of host IRE1-RNase activity. Rather, Brucella induced a STING-targeting microRNA, miR-24-2. Furthermore, STING downregulation was inhibited by miR-24 anti-miRs and in mirn23a locus-deficient macrophages. Failure to suppress STING expression in mirn23a−/− macrophages correlated with diminished Brucella replication, and was rescued by exogenous miR-24. Anti-miR-24 potently suppressed replication in wild type, but much less in STING−/− macrophages, suggesting most of the impact of miR-24 induction on replication occurred via STING suppression. In summary, Brucella sabotages innate immunity by miR-24-dependent suppression of STING expression; post-STING activation “damage control” via targeted STING destruction may enable establishment of chronic infection.Author summaryCytosolic pattern recognition receptors, such as the nucleotide-activated STING molecule, play a critical role in the innate immune system by detecting the presence of intracellular invaders. Brucella bacterial species establish chronic infections in macrophages despite initially activating STING. STING does participate in the control of Brucella infection, as mice or cells lacking STING show a higher burden of Brucella infection. However, we have found that early following infection, Brucella upregulates a microRNA, miR-24, that targets the STING messenger RNA, resulting in lower STING levels. Dead bacteria or bacteria lacking a functional type IV secretion system were defective at upregulating miR-24 and STING suppression, suggesting an active bacteria-driven process. Failure to upregulate miR-24 and suppress STING greatly compromised the capacity for Brucella to replicate inside macrophages. Thus, although Brucella initially activate STING during infection, the ensuing STING downregulation serves as a “damage control” mechanism, enabling intracellular infection. Viruses have long been known to target immune sensors such as STING. Our results indicate that intracellular bacterial pathogens also directly target innate immune receptors to enhance their infectious success.
Vaccine responses in ageing and chronic viral infection