Diagnostic impact of safety protocols for processing peritoneal washing specimens during global pandemic of Coronavirus disease 2019 : a comparative study from 195 cytological samples

The onset of the Covid-19 global pandemic in early 2020 forced many governments to quarantine their citizens within their own homes over the course of the year - namely from the early to middle months of the year. This was then followed by a surge of domestic violence cases against women, most often by their own spouses. This problem seemed to be a global problem as it affected any countries regardless of how high or low they score in the Gender Development Index. This paper attempts to discuss the factors behind such a phenomenon and scrutinise what it represents through the lenses of gender theories. The paper will also analyse the studied countries’ governments’ approach to this issue. To that end, three countries from three different levels of GDI rankings are studied: Australia (ranked high), Indonesia (ranked medium) and India (ranked low). A brief explanation regarding this non-endemic issue will also be drawn from each countries’ individual variables.

Download Full-text

Social Media Rumors in Time of Corona Pandemic, Why & How is Criminalized? (Comparative Study)

Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics ◽

10.14505/jarle.v11.3(49).03 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 9 (3) ◽

pp. 719

Author(s):

Mohamad ALSHIBLE

Keyword(s):

Social Media ◽

Comparative Study ◽

Secretary General ◽

International Treaties ◽

The Real ◽

Methods Of Analysis ◽

Global Pandemic ◽

The World ◽

False News ◽

Analytical Approaches

No one in the world does not know what Corona is as a global pandemic, which the Secretary-General of the WHO has declared as ‘the enemy of humanity’. Yes, it is the enemy of humanity; the whole humans rose up to prevent it through several aspects. We are – as lawmen – responsible for the legal sides. All of us have become so miserable that many sciences are terrified of rumors and false news. The real news leaves pain in the souls, so what about that are false, whether it was broadcast or transmitted with intent or unintentionally The main objective of this article is to examine the Jordanian legislator attitude in regard of social media rumors during Corona pandemic (COVID19), in comparative to the Chinese legislator. The study shows that the opportunity to punish rumors at the time of the pandemic may be unavailable or weak and not coherent in Jordanian laws in comparison with other legislations, especially in Chinese laws. The study will also show if rumors were included in relative International treaties. The In respect to the methodology of this article, the author followed the descriptive and analytical approaches of the related Jordanian Penal laws in comparative with the Chinese Regulations in cybercrimes, by explaining the extent to which rumor crimes is punished in Jordan according to legal methods of analysis in comparative to the Chinese legal attitude.

Download Full-text

Comparative Study of Government Response Measures and Epidemic Trends for COVID‐19 Global Pandemic

Risk Analysis ◽

10.1111/risa.13817 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Chenyang Wang ◽

Hui Zhang ◽

Yang Gao ◽

Qing Deng

Keyword(s):

Comparative Study ◽

Government Response ◽

Global Pandemic ◽

Response Measures

Download Full-text

COVID-19 and H1N1 - The two pandemics and their consequences on human life: A Mini-Review

Pakistan Journal of Surgery and Medicine ◽

10.37978/pjsm.v1i3.186 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 1 (3) ◽

pp. e186

Author(s):

Muhammad Ali Fayyaz Ali ◽

Iqra Amjad ◽

Amrat Ayaz Ali

Keyword(s):

Data Collection ◽

Comparative Study ◽

Mental State ◽

Human Population ◽

Human Life ◽

Narrative Review ◽

H1n1 Pandemic ◽

Psychological Issues ◽

Global Pandemic ◽

After Effect

Background: A global pandemic has always been the after-effect of lessened immunity in the human population. This is a brief narrative review comparing some points of both pandemics. Methods: A comparative study was conducted by data collection through published articles and official websites. Conclusion: The current pandemic has affected all aspects of life. Psychological issues are dominating in this COVID-19 pandemic especially in six different groups of people. Emergency responses process was slower in COVID-19 pandemic than that of H1N1. H1N1 pandemic of 2009 proved to have a lesser impact on education, traveling, even the mental state of people. COVID-19 and H1N1 infections have most of the similar things but distinctions are very subordinating.

Download Full-text

A comparative study of the efficacy and outcome of methylprednisolone and dexamethasone in moderate to severe COVID-19 disease

Asian Journal of Medical Sciences ◽

10.3126/ajms.v12i12.39294 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 12 (12) ◽

pp. 17-22

Author(s):

Praveen B Gautam ◽

Arunesh Kumar ◽

Babu Lal Kannojia ◽

Rajendra Chaudhary

Keyword(s):

Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome ◽

Clinical Outcome ◽

Comparative Study ◽

Prospective Study ◽

Divided Dose ◽

Treatment Options ◽

Ventilatory Support ◽

Global Pandemic ◽

The World ◽

The Mean

Background: COVID-19 disease is caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome corona virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). In the first half of 2020 COVID-19 disease has already converted into a global pandemic. Many treatment options were explored through the world. Aims and Objectives: To compare the efficacy and outcome of methylprednisolone (MTP) and dexamethasone (DEXA) in moderate-to-severe COVID-19 disease. Materials and Methods: In this prospective study, a total of 140 moderate to severe COVID-19 patients were enrolled from 15 April to June 15, 2021. These patients were randomly allocated into two groups, 70 patients were received MTP 2 mg/kg/day for 3 days followed by 1.0 mg/kg/day for 3 days in divided doses while 70 patients received DEXA 8 mg/day in divided dose up to 10 days. Results: The mean age was 45.5 years in MTP group whereas 45.34 years in DEXA group. The clinical outcome in MTP group and DEXA group was assessed in terms of clinical improvement (92.85% vs. 81.42%), radiological improvement (82.85% vs. 68.57%), transfer to ICU (5.71 vs. 14.57%), needs of ventilatory support (2.85% vs. 8.57%) and mortality (7.14% vs. 18.57%) respectively. Conclusion: In this study, MTP demonstrated better outcome as compared to DEXA in COVID-19 patients.

Download Full-text