Gastrointestinal side effects associated with high doses of acetaminophen

2000 ◽  
Vol 95 (9) ◽  
pp. 2639-2639
Author(s):  
Elham Rahme ◽  
Dan Pettitt ◽  
Jacques LaLorier
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Gastrointestinal Side Effects ◽  
High Doses

scholarly journals Portal 5-hydroxytryptophan infusion enhances glucose disposal in conscious dogs

2005 ◽  
Vol 289 (2) ◽  
pp. E225-E231 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary Courtney Moore ◽  
Kazuhiro Kimura ◽  
Haruki Shibata ◽  
Tsutomu Honjoh ◽  
Masayuki Saito ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Glucose Uptake ◽  
Glucose Infusion ◽  
Glucose Disposal ◽  
Gastrointestinal Discomfort ◽  
Hepatic Glucose ◽  
Gastrointestinal Side Effects ◽  
High Doses ◽  
Related Agent ◽  
Hepatic Glucose Uptake

Intraportal serotonin infusion enhances net hepatic glucose uptake (NHGU) during glucose infusion but blunts nonhepatic glucose uptake and can cause gastrointestinal discomfort and diarrhea at high doses. Whether the serotonin precursor 5-hydroxytryptophan (5-HTP) could enhance NHGU without gastrointestinal side effects during glucose infusion was examined in conscious 42-h-fasted dogs, using arteriovenous difference and tracer ([3-3H]glucose) techniques. Experiments consisted of equilibration (−120 to −30 min), basal (−30 to 0 min), and experimental (EXP; 0–270 min) periods. During EXP, somatostatin, fourfold basal intraportal insulin, basal intraportal glucagon, and peripheral glucose (to double the hepatic glucose load) were infused. In one group of dogs (HTP, n = 6), saline was infused intraportally from 0 to 90 min (P1), and 5-HTP was infused intraportally at 10, 20, and 40 μg·kg−1·min−1from 90 to 150 (P2), 150 to 210 (P3), and 210 to 270 (P4) min, respectively. In the other group (SAL, n = 7), saline was infused intraportally from 0 to 270 min. NHGU in SAL was 14.8 ± 1.9, 18.5 ± 2.3, 16.3 ± 1.4, and 19.7 ± 1.6 μmol·kg−1·min−1in P1–P4, whereas NHGU in 5-HTP averaged 16.4 ± 2.6, 18.5 ± 1.4, 20.8 ± 2.0, and 27.6 ± 2.6 μmol·kg−1·min−1( P < 0.05 vs. SAL). Nonhepatic glucose uptake (μmol·kg−1·min−1) in SAL was 30.2 ± 4.3, 36.8 ± 5.8, 44.3 ± 5.8, and 54.6 ± 11.8 during P1–P4, respectively, whereas in HTP the corresponding values were 26.3 ± 6.8, 44.9 ± 10.1, 47.5 ± 11.7, and 51.4 ± 13.2 (not significant between groups). Intraportal 5-HTP enhances NHGU without significantly altering nonhepatic glucose uptake or causing gastrointestinal side effects, raising the possibility that a related agent might have a role in reducing postprandial hyperglycemia.

Sulfinpyrazone or Acetylsalicylic Acid to Prevent Postoperative Thrombus Formation in Arteriovenous Fistulas of Haemodialysis Patients

1979 ◽  
Author(s):  
F Albert ◽  
U Schmidt
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Acetylsalicylic Acid ◽  
Thrombus Formation ◽  
Significant Inhibition ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Controlled Clinical Trial ◽  
Arteriovenous Fistulas ◽  
Arteriovenous Shunts ◽  
Gastrointestinal Side Effects ◽  
Antithrombotic Efficacy

The effect of sulfinpyrazone (200 mg three times a day) and acetylsalicylic acid (500 mg three times a day) on the incidence of thrombosis of arteriovenous shunts was investigated in a controlled clinical trial. In 36 patients with chronic renal failure scheduled to begin haemodialysis the same operating team constructed a subcutaneous fistula in the distal forearm. During the first six weeks after the operation the antithrombotic efficacy proved to be good for both substances. No differences of thrombotic events between the two treatment groups were statistically significant. But in contrast to acetylsalicylic acid sulfinpyrazone made no significant inhibition of platelet - aggregation; sulfinpyrazone probably will prevent the clot formation by prolonging the shortened platelet survival in uraemic patients. In a high rate of patients given acetylsalicylic acid (10 out of 17) there were local bleeding and gastrointestinal side effects. In consequence we should prefer sulfinpyrazone, because in the sulfinpyrazone group side effects were minimal and in none patient withdrawal from the study was necessitated.

CLINICAL INVESTIGATIONS OF A LONG-ACTING OESTRIOL (POLYOESTRIOL PHOSPHATE)

1961 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-87 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Lauritzen ◽  
Semih Velibese
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Phosphoric Acid ◽  
Quantitative Data ◽  
Water Soluble ◽  
Cholesterol Concentration ◽  
Experimental Investigations ◽  
Clinical Investigations ◽  
Prolonged Duration ◽  
High Doses ◽  
Long Acting

ABSTRACT A description is given of experimental investigations and preliminary clinical experience with the long-acting oestriol compound polyoestriol phosphate – a water-soluble polymere of oestriol and phosphoric acid. The compound seems to exert all the physiologically important effects of oestriol. Even with high doses the hormone causes no proliferation of the endometrium and no withdrawal bleeding. It has no untoward effect on metabolism. It decreases slightly the cholesterol concentration (to the extent of ⅓–⅕ of the effect produced by long-acting oestradiol esters). The compound has a wide therapeutic range. No side-effects have been observed. Doses of 10 mg or more have a prolonged duration. Additional prolongation of the effect is largely dependent on dosage. To ensure an effect lasting for 4 weeks 40 mg polyoestriol phosphate (corresponding with 30 mg oestriol) is required – an amount which roughly corresponds with physiological quantitative data. The compound, which involves an interesting new principle of prolongation, was most effectively used in the treatment of menopausal symptoms and genital organic disorders. For these indications it can be recommended without reservation.

scholarly journals Oral Iron Supplementation—Gastrointestinal Side Effects and the Impact on the Gut Microbiota

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 491-502
Author(s):  
Sarah R. Bloor ◽  
Rudolph Schutte ◽  
Anthony R. Hobson
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Gut Microbiota ◽  
Iron Supplementation ◽  
Methanogenic Archaea ◽  
Intravenous Iron ◽  
Oral Iron ◽  
Intestinal Lumen ◽  
Gastrointestinal Side Effects ◽  
Potential Link ◽  
The Impact

Iron deficiency anaemia (IDA) is a worldwide healthcare problem affecting approximately 25% of the global population. The most common IDA treatment is oral iron supplementation, which has been associated with gastrointestinal (GI) side effects such as constipation and bloating. These can result in treatment non-adherence and the persistence of IDA. Intravenous iron does not cause GI side effects, which may be due to the lack of exposure to the intestinal lumen. Luminal iron can cause changes to the gut microbiota, aiding the promotion of pathogenic species and decreasing beneficial protective species. Iron is vital for methanogenic archaea, which rely on iron for growth and metabolism. Increased intestinal methane has been associated with slowing of intestinal transit, constipation, and bloating. Here we explore the literature to understand a potential link between iron and methanogenesis as a novel way to understand the mechanism of oral iron supplementation induced GI side effects.

scholarly journals Impact of metformin treatment during pregnancy on maternal outcomes: a systematic review/meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jane L. Tarry-Adkins ◽  
Susan E. Ozanne ◽  
Catherine E. Aiken
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Pregnancy Outcomes ◽  
Gestational Hypertension ◽  
Risk Of Bias ◽  
Maternal Outcomes ◽  
Metformin Treatment ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
Gastrointestinal Side Effects ◽  
The Impact

AbstractWe systematically assessed the impact of metformin treatment on maternal pregnancy outcomes. PubMed, Ovid Embase, Medline, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov and Cochrane databases were systematically searched (inception-1st February 2021). Randomised controlled trials reporting pregnancy outcomes in women randomised to metformin versus any other treatment for any indication were included. Outcomes included gestational weight gain (GWG), pre-eclampsia, gestational hypertension, preterm birth, gestational age at delivery, caesarean section, gestational diabetes, glycaemic control, and gastrointestinal side-effects. Two independent reviewers conducted screening, with a third available to evaluate disagreements. Risk-of-bias and GRADE assessments were conducted using Cochrane Risk-of-Bias and GRADE-pro software. Thirty-five studies (n = 8033 pregnancies) met eligibility criteria. GWG was lower in pregnancies randomised to metformin versus other treatments (1.57 kg ± 0.60 kg; I2 = 86%, p < 0.0001), as was likelihood of pre-eclampsia (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.50–0.95; I2 = 55%, p = 0.02). The risk of gastrointestinal side-effects was greater in metformin-exposed versus other treatment groups (OR 2.43, 95% CI 1.53–3.84; I2 = 76%, p = 0.0002). The risk of other maternal outcomes assessed was not significantly different between metformin-exposed versus other treatment groups. Metformin for any indication during pregnancy is associated with lower GWG and a modest reduced risk of pre-eclampsia, but increased gastrointestinal side-effects compared to other treatments.

Risks of Cardiovascular Disease and Beyond in Prescription of Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs

2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manas A. Rane ◽  
Alexander Gitin ◽  
Benjamin Fiedler ◽  
Lawrence Fiedler ◽  
Charles H. Hennekens
Keyword(s):  
Cardiovascular Disease ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Relieve Pain ◽  
Gastrointestinal Side Effects ◽  
Inflammatory Drugs ◽  
Anti Inflammatory

Introduction: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) include aspirin, naproxen, diclofenac, and ibuprofen, as well as selective cyclooxygenase 2 inhibitors such as celecoxib. Their use is common, as well as their side effects which cause 100 000 hospitalizations and 17 000 deaths annually. Recently, the US Food and Drug Administration strengthened its warning about the risks of cardiovascular disease (CVD) attributed to nonaspirin NSAIDs. Methods: When the sample size is large, randomization provides control of confounding not possible to achieve with any observational study. Further, observational studies and, especially, claims data have inherent confounding by indication larger than the small to moderate effects being sought. Results: While trials are necessary, they must be of sufficient size and duration and achieve high compliance and follow-up. Until then, clinicians should remain uncertain about benefits and risks of these drugs. Conclusions: Since the totality of evidence remains incomplete, health-care providers should consider all these aforementioned benefits and risks, both CVD and beyond, in deciding whether and, if so, which, NSAID to prescribe. The factors in the decision of whether and, if so, which NSAID to prescribe for relief of pain from inflammatory arthritis should not be limited to risks of CVD or gastrointestinal side effects but should also include potential benefits including improvements in overall quality of life resulting from decreases in pain or impairment from musculoskeletal pain syndromes. The judicious individual clinical decision-making about the prescription of NSAIDs to relieve pain based on all these considerations has the potential to do much more good than harm.

Ampicillin-Associated Diarrhea: Effect of Dosage and Route of Administration

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1976 ◽  
Vol 58 (6) ◽  
pp. 869-872
Author(s):  
John A. Phillips ◽  
Frederick H. Lovejoy ◽  
Yoichi Matsumiya
Keyword(s):  
Urinary Tract ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Total Dosage ◽  
Pediatric Practice ◽  
Severe Diarrhea ◽  
Bowel Movements ◽  
Gastrointestinal Side Effects ◽  
Tract Infections ◽  
Mild Diarrhea

Ampicillin is one of the most frequently used antibiotics in pediatric practice.1 Its clinical efficacy has been widely studied, but its gastrointestinal side effects are poorly documented. In adults with urinary tract infections, 11% taking 1 gm/day of ampicillin orally had bowel movements which were at least twice as frequent as normal.2 Another series in adults receiving ampicillin reported an increase in stools with 16% having ≤5 and 5% having ≥5 stools per day. The change in stools increased with total dosage and was equal after oral or intravenous administration.3 In children, ampicillin ranging from 50 to the unusually high dose of 200 mg/kg/day resulted in mild diarrhea (≤5 stools per day) in 18% to 30%, moderate diarrhea (5 to 10 stools per day) in 2% to 11%, and severe diarrhea (≥10 stools per day) in 1% or less of cases.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document