Hydro Francis Runner Stability and Forced Response Calculations
Abstract Hydroelectric power generation accounts for 7% of the total world electric energy production. Francis turbines are often employed in large-scale hydro projects and represent 60% of the total installed base. Outputs up to 800 MW are available and efficiencies of 95% are common. Cost, performance, and design cycle time are factors that continue to drive new designs as well as retrofits. This motivates the development of more sophisticated analysis tools to better assess runner performance earlier in the design phase. The focus of this paper is to demonstrate high fidelity and time-efficient runner damping and forced response calculations based on one-way fluid-structure interaction (FSI) using loosely coupled commercial finite element analysis (FEA) and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) codes. The runner damping is evaluated based on the work done by the fluid on the runner. The calculation of the work first involves determining the runner mode shapes and natural frequencies using a cyclic symmetric FEA model with structural elements to represent the runner hardware, and acoustic fluid elements to represent the mass loading effect of the fluid. The mode shapes are then used in a transient CFD calculation to determine the damping which represents the work done by the fluid on the runner. Positive damping represents stability from flutter perspective while negative damping represents unstable operating conditions. A transient CFD calculation was performed on a runner to obtain engine order forcing function from upstream stationary vanes. This unsteady forcing function was mapped to the FEA model. Care is taken to account for the proper inter-blade phase angle on the cyclic symmetric model. The hydraulic damping from flutter calculations was also provided as input to the forced response. The forced response is then determined using this equivalent proportional damping and modal superposition of the FEA model that includes both the structural and acoustic elements. Results of the developed analysis procedure are presented based on the Tokke runner, that has been the basis of several studies through the Norwegian HydroPower Center. Unique features of the workflow and modeling approaches are discussed in detail. Benefits and challenges for both the FEA model and the CFD model are discussed. The importance of the hydraulic damping, that is traditionally ignored in previous analysis is discussed as well. No validation data is available for the forced response, so this paper is focused on the methodology for the calculations.