Wave Impact Experiment of a GBS Model in Large Waves

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhenjia (Jerry) Huang ◽  
Don Spencer ◽  
Robert Oberlies ◽  
Gracie Watts ◽  
Wenting Xiao
Keyword(s):  
Structural Model ◽  
Probability Distributions ◽  
Offshore Structures ◽  
Model Tests ◽  
Wave Crest ◽  
Maximum Pressure ◽  
Impact Loads ◽  
Wave Impact ◽  
Wave Basin ◽  
The Impact

For the design of offshore structures in harsh wave environments, model testing continues to be the recommended industry practice for determining wave impact forces on offshore structures. Accurate measurements of wave impacts in model tests have been a challenge for several decades. Transducers are required to accurately capture the short duration, high magnitude, and dynamic nature of impact loads. The structural model, transducers, and the transducer mountings need to be designed such that mechanical vibrations in the integrated transducer-mounting-structural model system do not contaminate the wave impact measurements. In this work, the dynamic oscillations in the measurements were controlled through the design and fabrication of transducers, their mounting and the GBS model. Wave crest probability distributions were developed that included fully nonlinear effects. These distributions were used as a benchmark to qualify the waves in the wave calibration tests. The highly stochastic nature of impact loads makes it challenging to obtain converged probability distributions of the maximum impact loads (i.e. forces or pressures) from model tests. To increase the confidence in the statistical values of wave impact loads, a large number of realizations were used for a given sea state. Variability of the maximum pressure due to wave basin effects (such as wait-time between tests) was examined with fifteen repeat tests using the same wave maker control signal. These tests provided insights into the random behavior of the impact loads.

Wave Impact Loads on the Bottom of Flat Decks

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel de Oliveira Costa ◽  
Julia Araújo Perim ◽  
Bruno Guedes Camargo ◽  
Joel Sena Sales Junior ◽  
Antonio Carlos Fernandes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Scale Effects ◽  
Offshore Structures ◽  
Model Tests ◽  
Analytical Models ◽  
Navier Stokes ◽  
Impact Loads ◽  
Wave Impact ◽  
Wave Channel ◽  
Waves And Currents ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Slamming events due to wave impact on the underside of decks might lead to severe and potentially harmful local and/or global loads in offshore structures. The strong nonlinearities during the impact require a robust method for accessing the loads and hinder the use of analytical models. The use of computation fluid dynamics (CFD) is an interesting alternative to estimate the impact loads, but validation through experimental data is still essential. The present work focuses on a flat-bottomed model fixed over the mean free surface level submitted to regular incoming waves. The proposal is to reproduce previous studies through CFD and model tests in a different reduced scale to provide extra validation and to identify possible non-potential scale effects such as air compressibility. Numerical simulations are performed in both experiments’ scales. The numerical analysis is performed with a marine dedicated flow solver, FINE™/Marine from NUMECA, which features an unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (URANS) solver and a finite volume method to build spatial discretization. The multiphase flow is represented through the Volume of Fluid (VOF) method for incompressible and nonmiscible fluids. The new model tests were performed at the wave channel of the Laboratory of Waves and Currents (LOC/COPPE – UFRJ), at the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro.

Numerical Study of Phase Change Influence on Wave Impact Loads in LNG Tanks on Floating Structures

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthieu Ancellin ◽  
Laurent Brosset ◽  
Jean-Michel Ghidaglia
Keyword(s):  
Natural Gas ◽  
Phase Change ◽  
Numerical Study ◽  
Model Tests ◽  
Impact Loads ◽  
Wave Impact ◽  
Floating Structures ◽  
Physical Phenomena ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Phase Phase

Understanding the physics of sloshing wave impacts is necessary for the improvement of sloshing assessment methodology based on sloshing model tests, for LNG membrane tanks on floating structures. The phase change between natural gas and liquefied natural gas is one of the physical phenomena involved during a LNG wave impact but is not taken into account during sloshing model tests. In this paper, some recent numerical and analytical works on the influence of phase change are summarized and discussed. For the impact of an ideally shaped wave, phase change influences two different steps of the impact in different ways: during the gas escape phase, phase change leads to a higher impact velocity; for entrapped gas pockets, phase change causes a reduction of the pressure in the gas pocket. However, this influence is quantitatively small. The generalization to more realistic wave shapes (including e.g. liquid aeration) should be the focus of future works.

Transducer Qualification for Wave Impact Load Measurements Using Wedge Drop Tests

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhenjia (Jerry) Huang ◽  
Robert Oberlies ◽  
Don Spencer ◽  
Jang Kim
Keyword(s):  
Impact Load ◽  
Research Work ◽  
Offshore Structures ◽  
Model Tests ◽  
Impact Loads ◽  
Dynamic Impact ◽  
Wave Impact ◽  
Impact Forces ◽  
Industry Practice ◽  
Drop Tests

For the design of offshore structures in harsh wave environments, it is essential to accurately determine the wave impact loads on the structure. To date, robust numerical prediction methods / algorithms for determining wave impact forces on offshore structures do not exist. Model testing continues to be the industry practice for determining wave impact forces on offshore structures. Accurate measurements of wave impact loads in model tests have been challenging for several decades. Transducers require the ability to capture the short duration, dynamic nature and high magnitude of impact loads. In order to qualify transducers for these types of measurements, we need to develop a way to physically impose dynamic impact loads on the transducers and to establish benchmark values that can be used to check the effectiveness of their measurements. In this paper, we present our recent research work on transducer qualification for wave impact load measurements, including their development, numerical analysis and wedge drop model tests. Our findings show that wedge drop tests can be used to impose dynamic impact loads for transducer qualification, and that the Wagner solution and / or validated computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations that include the effects of viscosity, compressibility and hydroelasticity can provide the appropriate benchmarking values. Numerical simulation results, model test measurements and findings on transducer qualification are presented and discussed in the paper.

Experimental Study of Air Gap Response and Wave Impact Forces of a Semi-Submersible Drilling Unit

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saeid Kazemi ◽  
Atilla Incecik
Keyword(s):  
Experimental Study ◽  
Offshore Structures ◽  
Model Tests ◽  
Air Gap ◽  
Scale Model ◽  
Offshore Structure ◽  
The Caspian Sea ◽  
Wave Impact ◽  
Impact Forces ◽  
The Impact

An experimental study for predicting the air gap and potential deck impact of a floating offshore structure is the main topic of this research. Numerical modeling for air gap prediction is particularly complicated in the case of floating offshore structures because of their large volume, and the resulting effects of wave diffraction and radiation. Therefore, for new floating platforms, the model tests are often performed as part of their design process. This paper summarizes physical model tests conducted on a semi-submersible model, representing a 1-to-100 scale model of a GVA4000 class, “IRAN-ALBORZ”, the largest semi-submersible platform in the Caspian Sea, under construction in North of Iran, to evaluate the platform’s air gap at different locations of its deck and also measure the impact forces in case of having negative air gap. The model was tested in regular waves in the wave tank of Newcastle University. The paper discusses the experimental setup, test conditions, and the resulting measurements of the air gap and the wave impact forces by using eight wave probes and three load cells located at different points of the lower deck of the platform.

On the Distribution of Wave Impact Loads on Offshore Structures

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas B. Johannessen ◽  
Øystein Lande ◽  
Øistein Hagen
Keyword(s):  
Model Test ◽  
Load Distribution ◽  
Impact Load ◽  
Peak Load ◽  
Offshore Structures ◽  
Impact Loads ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Wave Impact ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Crest Height

For offshore structures in harsh environments, horizontal wave impact loads should be taken into account in design. Shafts on GBS structures, and columns on semisubmersibles and TLPs are exposed to impact loads. Furthermore, if the crest height exceeds the available freeboard, the deck may also be exposed to wave impact loads. Horizontal loads due to waves impacting on the structure are difficult to quantify. The loads are highly intermittent, difficult to reproduce in model tests, have a very short duration and can be very large. It is difficult to calculate these loads accurately and the statistical challenges associated with estimating a value with a prescribed annual probability of occurrence are formidable. Although the accurate calculation of crest elevation in front of the structure is a significant challenge, industry has considerable experience in handling this problem and the analysis results are usually in good agreement with model test results. The present paper presents a statistical model for the distribution of horizontal slamming pressures conditional on the incident crest height upwave of the structure. The impact load distribution is found empirically from a large database of model test results where the wave impact load was measured simultaneously at a large number of panels together with the incident crest elevation. The model test was carried out on a circular surface piercing column using long simulations of longcrested, irregular waves with a variety of seastate parameters. By analyzing the physics of the process and using the measured crest elevation and the seastate parameters, the impact load distribution model is made seastate independent. The impact model separates the wave impact problem in three parts: – Given an incident crest in a specified seastate, calculate the probability of the crest giving a wave impact load above a threshold. – Given a wave impact event above a threshold, calculate the distribution of the resulting peak load. – Given a peak load, calculate the distribution of slamming pressures at one spatial location. The development of the statistical model is described and it is shown that the model is appropriate for fixed and floating structures and for wave impact with both columns and the deck box.

scholarly journals EXTREME WAVE PRESSURES AND LOADS ON A PILE-SUPPORTED WHARF DECK - INFLUENCES OF AIR GAP AND WAVE DIRECTION

2018 ◽  
pp. 5
Author(s):  
Andrew Cornett
Keyword(s):  
Offshore Structures ◽  
Model Tests ◽  
Scale Model ◽  
Extreme Waves ◽  
Wave Direction ◽  
Coastal Structures ◽  
Extreme Wave ◽  
Wave Impact ◽  
The Past ◽  
Water Depths

Many deck-on-pile structures are located in shallow water depths at elevations low enough to be inundated by large waves during intense storms or tsunami. Many researchers have studied wave-in-deck loads over the past decade using a variety of theoretical, experimental, and numerical methods. Wave-in-deck loads on various pile supported coastal structures such as jetties, piers, wharves and bridges have been studied by Tirindelli et al. (2003), Cuomo et al. (2007, 2009), Murali et al. (2009), and Meng et al. (2010). All these authors analyzed data from scale model tests to investigate the pressures and loads on beam and deck elements subject to wave impact under various conditions. Wavein- deck loads on fixed offshore structures have been studied by Murray et al. (1997), Finnigan et al. (1997), Bea et al. (1999, 2001), Baarholm et al. (2004, 2009), and Raaij et al. (2007). These authors have studied both simplified and realistic deck structures using a mixture of theoretical analysis and model tests. Other researchers, including Kendon et al. (2010), Schellin et al. (2009), Lande et al. (2011) and Wemmenhove et al. (2011) have demonstrated that various CFD methods can be used to simulate the interaction of extreme waves with both simple and more realistic deck structures, and predict wave-in-deck pressures and loads.

Practical Structural Assessment of Offshore Structures for Wave Slap

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joong Soo Moon ◽  
Tae Hyun Park ◽  
Woo Seung Sim ◽  
Hyun Soo Shin
Keyword(s):  
Static Pressure ◽  
Impact Load ◽  
Offshore Structures ◽  
Model Tests ◽  
Design Stage ◽  
Load Prediction ◽  
Structural Assessment ◽  
Pressure Impulse ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Design Pressure

By the combination of theoretical and empirical approach, the methodology for practical structural assessment of offshore structures for wave slap is proposed. It is developed for engineers in the sense that the precise design pressure is easily obtainable and quickly applicable in early and detail design stage. For impact load prediction, the Pressure-Impulse theory that was well developed and validated in coastal engineering field is applied. The impact pressures are classified into three types (traditional, sharp, and immersed slap) according to model tests and BP Schiehallion FPSO’s bow monitoring. The time histories of impact pressures for the classified impact types are generated with the pressure impulse predicted by the Pressure-Impulse theory. Nonlinear transient structural analyses are performed using the time series of impact pressures to obtain equivalent static pressure factors. Finally, the design pressure is determined by multiplying the maximum peak pressure by the equivalent static pressure factor. The results are validated through the comparison with model tests and dedicated reports.

scholarly journals DETERMINATION OF THE WAVE ATTACK ANTICIPATED UPON A STRUCTURE FROM LABORATORY AND FIELD OBSERVATIONS

2011 ◽  
Vol 1 (7) ◽  
pp. 37
Author(s):  
W.A. Venis
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Model Tests ◽  
Water Levels ◽  
Field Observations ◽  
Wave Impact ◽  
Spring System ◽  
Mass Spring ◽  
The Comparative Study ◽  
The Impact

Model tests have been carried out to obtain an insight into the magnitude of the wave-pressures in various situations. These tests showed, that sharp high pressure peaks occur in addition to the pressures caused by the reflecting of the waves, which pressures are quasi-static. As the structure can be compared with a multiple mass-spring system these pressure-peaks may cause the whole construction to vibrate. Wave-attack therefore can be expressed in terms of impact. Moreover, calculations revealed that the impact pressures were critical factors in determining the strength of the structure. So many model tests were carried out to determine the design and location of the sluices. These tests involved numerous water-levels discharges and waves. Regarding the pressure-peaks a comparative study was made in the model, which led to the structure being designed in such a way that the occurrence of critical impacts was reduced to an acceptable minimum. As it was impossible to avoid the occurrence of impact pressures entirely it remained necessary to determine a basic load for the structure that takes care of the impact pressures. As it has not yet appeared possible physically to determine a theoretical maximum for the impact pressures, it has to be borne in mind that there is a probability that each pressure measured will be exceeded. So this paper describes, how the cumulative frequency curve of the impacts for the case mentioned in 1.1 sub a, which served as a basis for determining the basic load was arrived at by a certain combination of laboratory and field observations. The data used for this purpose were a. Results of wave-impact measurements on a model of the sluices. This model, built in accordance with the results of the comparative study, was situated in the wind-flume of the "de Voorst" hydraulic laboratory. b. Wave height measurements in the Haringvliet during 1957 and 1958. c. Wind-speed measurements on board the lightship Qoeree, likewise during 1957 and 1958. d. Tidal registrations at Hellevoetsluis from 1920 to 1960. e. Wind-force data from the Hook of Holland, likewise from 1920 to 1960.

An Evaluation of Wave Impact Indicators

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhigang Tian
Keyword(s):  
Wave Breaking ◽  
Offshore Structures ◽  
Phase Method ◽  
Impact Loads ◽  
Wave Steepness ◽  
Wave Load ◽  
Wave Impact ◽  
Large Wave ◽  
Impact Indicators ◽  
Local Wave

Wave impact on offshore structures has been the focus of several studies, due to its significant effect on offshore operations. We evaluate several parameters (wave impact indicators) which can be adopted to indicate the possibility of wave impact on offshore structures due to extreme waves. The indicators can be estimated quickly with given sea states, and thus may provide useful information to offshore structure designers at early design phases. Definitions of three wave impact indicators are presented and discussed. The first indicator, Ψ, is proposed by Stansberg (2008). The second one considered is a wave breaking parameter, μ, originally presented by Song and Banner (2002) in their construction of a wave breaking criterion. Finally, we propose a more generalized impact indicator, βn. The subscript n indicates its dependence on local wave steepness. Our study demonstrates that the three indicators are analytically related. To evaluate these indicators numerically, 2nd order random surface waves are generated with random phase method and Two-Dimensional Fast Fourier Transform (2D FFT). Hilbert analysis of the wave signal reveals that all indicators are able to identify steep and energetic waves that may potentially cause large wave impact loads. Further numerical study demonstrates that the quantitative correlation of wave impact loads to μ is less promising than that to Ψ and βn; while βn provides the best relationship to both local wave impact load and global wave load with its dependence on local wave steepness adjusted (i.e. adjusting n). The correlation is independent of sea states. Estimations and recommendations for thresholds of the two impact indicators (i.e. Ψ and βn with n = 1) are made based on model test results. With proper estimation of the thresholds, both indicators can be applied to predict wave impact and wave impact probability in given sea states.

scholarly journals Hydroelasticity effects on water-structure impacts

2020 ◽  
Vol 61 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Mai ◽  
C. Mai ◽  
A. Raby ◽  
D. M. Greaves
Keyword(s):  
Vertical Wall ◽  
Water Structure ◽  
Rigid Wall ◽  
Total Force ◽  
Impact Loads ◽  
Wave Impact ◽  
Impact Forces ◽  
Elastic Wall ◽  
Vertical Walls ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Local and global loadings, which may cause the local damage and/or global failure and collapse of offshore structures and ships, are experimentally investigated in this study. The research question is how the elasticity of the structural section affects loading during severe environmental conditions. Two different experiments were undertaken in this study to try to answer this question: (i) vertical slamming impacts of a square flat plate, which represents a plate section of the bottom or bow of a ship structure, onto water surface with zero degree deadrise angle; (ii) wave impacts on a truncated vertical wall in water, where the wall represents a plate section of a hull. The plate and wall are constructed such that they can be either rigid or elastic by virtue of a specially designed spring system. The experiments were carried out in the University of Plymouth’s COAST Laboratory. For the cases considered here, elasticity of the impact plate and/or wall has an effect on the slamming and wave impact loads. Here the slamming impact loads (both pressure and force) were considerably reduced for the elastic plate compared to the rigid one, though only at high impact velocities. The total impact force on the elastic wall was found to reduce for the high aeration, flip-through and slightly breaking wave impacts. However, the impact pressure decreased on the elastic wall only under flip-through wave impact. Due to the elasticity of the plates, the impulse of the first positive phase of pressure and force decreases significantly for the vertical slamming impact tests. This significant effect of hydroelasticity is also found for the total force impulse on the vertical wall under wave impacts. Graphic abstract Hydroelasticity effects on water-structure impacts: a impact pressures on dropped plates; b impact forces on dropped plates; c, d, e, f wave impact pressures on the vertical walls; g wave impact forces on the vertical walls; h wave force impulses on the vertical walls: elastic wall 1 vs. rigid wall (filled markers); elastic wall 2 vs. rigid wall (empty markers)

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document